HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Bernie Sanders: Top 10 Co...

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 03:50 PM

 

Bernie Sanders: Top 10 Corporate Tax Cheats

General Electric
From 2008 to 2013, while GE made over $33.9 billion in United States profits, it received a total tax refund of more than $2.9 billion from the Internal Revenue Service.

Boeing
From 2008 to 2013, while Boeing made over $26.4 billion in U.S. profits, it received a total tax refund of $401 million from the IRS. Boeing’s effective U.S. corporate income tax rate over this six-year period was -2 percent.

Verizon
From 2008 to 2013, while Verizon made over $42.4 billion in U.S. profits, it received a total tax refund of $732 million from the IRS.

Bank of America
Bank of America received a $1.9 billion tax refund from the IRS in 2010, even though it made $4.4 billion in profits and received a bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department of more than $1.3 trillion

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/top-10-corporate-tax-avoiders


These Corps are raiding the wealth of America's Working Class just to stash profits made in America in offshore bank accounts. What is even worse most of the $MultiMillion dollar CEOs want to see the eligibility age for social security and Medicare raised to 70.

Got to admit "Bernie gets it"

84 replies, 9234 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 84 replies Author Time Post
Reply Bernie Sanders: Top 10 Corporate Tax Cheats (Original post)
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 OP
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #1
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #2
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #5
sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #10
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #12
udbcrzy2 Jul 2015 #20
restorefreedom Jul 2015 #3
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #6
restorefreedom Jul 2015 #9
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #11
restorefreedom Jul 2015 #35
7962 Jul 2015 #66
JaneyVee Jul 2015 #4
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #7
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #8
JaneyVee Jul 2015 #25
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #30
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #34
jwirr Jul 2015 #39
RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #14
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #16
malokvale77 Jul 2015 #23
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #24
beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #36
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #44
beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #45
RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #47
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #48
malokvale77 Jul 2015 #79
7962 Jul 2015 #68
RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #69
7962 Jul 2015 #70
malokvale77 Jul 2015 #22
rhett o rick Jul 2015 #51
LeftOfWest Jul 2015 #54
malokvale77 Jul 2015 #78
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #28
rhett o rick Jul 2015 #50
Cleita Jul 2015 #13
SoapBox Jul 2015 #15
MerryBlooms Jul 2015 #17
udbcrzy2 Jul 2015 #18
99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #21
azmom Jul 2015 #19
beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #26
WillyT Jul 2015 #27
KT2000 Jul 2015 #29
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #31
KT2000 Jul 2015 #33
DebJ Jul 2015 #74
appalachiablue Jul 2015 #32
cantbeserious Jul 2015 #37
bananas Jul 2015 #38
Enthusiast Jul 2015 #40
Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #41
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #42
beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #43
frazzled Jul 2015 #46
Sheepshank Jul 2015 #52
JDPriestly Jul 2015 #72
Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #49
Scuba Jul 2015 #53
Tommymac Jul 2015 #55
PatrickforO Jul 2015 #56
raouldukelives Jul 2015 #57
lonestarnot Jul 2015 #58
Diremoon Jul 2015 #59
stevenleser Jul 2015 #75
Chico Man Jul 2015 #60
Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #61
Chico Man Jul 2015 #62
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #64
LineLineLineLineLineReply ?
Chico Man Jul 2015 #65
L0oniX Jul 2015 #63
MADem Jul 2015 #67
StarzGuy Jul 2015 #71
EndElectoral Jul 2015 #73
WDIM Jul 2015 #76
stuffmatters Jul 2015 #77
FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #80
beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #81
stuffmatters Aug 2015 #83
beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #84
azmom Jul 2015 #82

Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 03:56 PM

1. Holy Crap!

 

Last edited Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Imagine what we could do with all those "refunds", just from these four
corporations ... roughly $4 BILLION .. I'm thinking jobs to rebuild
infrastructure, paying back to SS what Bush2 plundered it for, single-payer
health care 4 all <-- it would probably cover about all of these.

Obviously I'm making very rough estimates here, but still .. $4 BILLION.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 03:58 PM

2. Total take is estimated at $225 Billion per year

 

Lost to "Tax Loop Hole Legislation" bought and paid for by these coprs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #2)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:08 PM

5. and "paid for" to whom, exactly?

 

It's high time to start naming names. Who voted for these loopholes?
Who was POTUS when they were signed into law, rather than vetoed, etc.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #5)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:16 PM

10. Yes, name names. Who is voting for this stuff? Corporate funded candidates.

Not Bernie Sanders. And this is what all the distractions we are seeing are intended to prevent, discussion of this most important issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #10)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:28 PM

12. Like we always like to say on the Left

 

follow the money, and the votes & vetoes --or lack there of.

There is some serious research here to be done, and I trust that
Team Bernie is already on-it.

There's gold in them thar' hills.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:45 PM

20. This ^^^^ n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:01 PM

3. would love to see which d candidates

they are giving $ to

well we know it is not bernie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to restorefreedom (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:09 PM

6. Damn Straight. Can we start naming names here?

 

This is going to be a very interesting Primary season.

Go Bernie Go!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #6)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:15 PM

9. i would ,love to see the research

i am sure those numbers are somewhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to restorefreedom (Reply #9)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:21 PM

11. MEMO to Team Bernie

 

If no one's already on this, please let us know, so we can
take it on at DU for Bernie Group.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #11)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:12 PM

35. good idea

maybe an xpost to the group?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to restorefreedom (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:31 PM

66. Beat me to it!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:07 PM

4. It's not really cheating because unfortunately it's all legal...

 

And companies like GE pay huge amounts in taxes, although it could be argued that they pay more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #4)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:10 PM

7. I'm sure they pay taxes in China which they deduct from their US Tax burden

 

which is why they receive a "Tax Return" even when they pay No US Taxes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #4)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:12 PM

8. Of course "it's all legal". But that totally begs some pressing questions ...

 

It's high time to start naming names. Who voted for these loopholes?
Who was POTUS when they were signed into law, rather than vetoed,
What's Hillary's and O'Malley's positions on these loopholes?

what did I miss?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #8)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:16 PM

25. That was exactly my point...

 

Everything they do is legal, they can afford to hire armies of accountants.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #25)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:29 PM

30. I should have known better

 

yes, accountants, lawyers, lobbyists ,,, the same folks who sit around
behind closed doors to write crap into law, like the TPP, et. al.

Sorry JaneyVee if I offended in any way. I need to check handles more
closely before posting sometimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #30)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:48 PM

34. Yes they can afford to "Out Lobbyist the 99%" but is Representative Governance

 

only afforded to those that can hire the most lobbyist

Our Representatives - Congress-critters Senators, even the President, have a fiduciary duty to those they represent - "ALL of us" and that includes 99% of Americans

So while YES the corporations have lobbied for and received the most lucrative tax loop holes imaginable - do we continue and condone this policy to the point it renders SSI merely a hidden tax platform raising the eligibility age to a point beyond the life span of 99% of those paying into the fund


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #25)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:30 PM

39. They have spent 30+ years making it legal for them to do this type of things. Reagan started

deregulating things and every president since then as contributed to this process. Some also lowered taxes in addition. We have been going down hill for a long time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #4)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:33 PM

14. GE pays huge amounts in taxes?!?!?!?

 

I don't know where you got this information from, but it is out and out WRONG!
They paid a billion in taxes, but got a rebate of over THREE BILLION!
Look it up for yourself, if you don't believe me,
Unless you are living in Bizzaroland.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #14)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:38 PM

16. So you're defending GE's tax loop-holes

 

or so it would seem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #16)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:04 PM

23. I could be wrong...

but I don't believe RoccoR5955 was defending GE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malokvale77 (Reply #23)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:09 PM

24. I could be wrong too

 

but I'd like to hear exactly how I'm wrong from RoccoR5955 .

Either GE benefited hugely from a tax loophole or they didn't.
I'm all ears.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #24)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:19 PM

36. Looks like they were responding to JaneyVee's post #4

Saying she was wrong, not you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #36)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 07:23 PM

44. That's a refreshing change

 

Everyone looking for common ground, not division & vitriol

I must be in the Bernie Sanders group.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #44)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 07:25 PM

45. Yes it is.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #16)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 08:58 PM

47. No I am not

 

I was merely citing the falsity that someone posted that GE pays taxes.
I wish to hell they paid all of their taxes, and had their loopholes plugged with cement!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #47)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 09:08 PM

48. +100 nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #48)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:33 PM

79. +100

In this case we seem to all be on the same side of the issue.

It's not always easy to know here on the DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #47)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:35 PM

68. MAke the corporate tax a flat rate 0 deductions and there wouldnt be any of this.

 

And there wouldnt be any armies of lawyers working to get out of paying either

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 7962 (Reply #68)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:37 PM

69. A flat rate wouldn't do it.

 

Even though it would be an equal percentage, corporations with less money would feel it more than those with lots of money.
Same for the damn flat income tax.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #69)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:42 PM

70. Well the current higher rate certainly isnt doing it either.

 

We've got the highest corp rate in the world, but nobody pays it.
Maybe start the tax above a certain level, just like what would have to be done for an income tax. Smaller corps may not even have to pay ANY tax and they wouldnt have to spend a ton of money on lawyers to do it for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #14)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:03 PM

22. Some here don't even bother to pretend anymore.

It is sad to see so called Democrats defend corporate greed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malokvale77 (Reply #22)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:45 AM

51. It's authoritarianism. They think that big money is goodness and will take care of them. Afraid to

 

fight for freedoms and liberties.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malokvale77 (Reply #22)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:09 AM

54. Why is that still happening?!!?

 

Why did it ever happen?!!?

I do not get that at all. Disgusting money for me and not you sell out crap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LeftOfWest (Reply #54)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:19 PM

78. "Why is that still happening?!!?"

Follow the money.

It is especially painful to see on DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #4)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:27 PM

28. This is why $Romnie didn't want to release his Taxes during his campaign

 

Not that he cheated on his taxes - he probably didn't. But that 99% of Americans don't realize the massive tax loop holes they use to game the system

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:42 AM

50. They get tax subsidies, they don't pay any taxes. Why are you defending these tax cheats? nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:33 PM

13. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:36 PM

15. Arghhhhh...Grrrrrrrr....

Well this drives up my blood pressure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:39 PM

17. rec & kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:42 PM

18. This is why Bernie matters and they will #FeelTheBern n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to udbcrzy2 (Reply #18)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:48 PM

21. +100 nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:42 PM

19. k&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:17 PM

26. KnR

Everyone needs to get it.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:22 PM

27. K & R !!!

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:28 PM

29. question about tax refunds

what does it mean when the corporation gets a tax refund? Does this mean the government is giving them money or is this a refund from what they have already paid?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KT2000 (Reply #29)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:30 PM

31. They can deduct Foriegn Taxes Paid even if they paid no US taxes

 

and receive a refund

- kinda like Free Money

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #31)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:33 PM

33. Thanks for quick reply!

Boeing makes me sick. They get state tax breaks too or they threaten to leave. Middle class picks up the tab.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KT2000 (Reply #29)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:09 PM

74. I think this was poorly stated, for the reason you gave. The effective tax rates in the negatives

are a much better statement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:31 PM

32. K & R Unbelievable, corporate tax cheats. Go USA-

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:22 PM

37. Why Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go

eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:29 PM

38. k&r nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:35 PM

40. Kicked and recommended!

Of course your GOP would insist these players are your job creators and as such are worthy of special consideration.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:48 PM

41. And each and every one of these would be just fine

with Hillary or the Clown Car as president. Bernie? Not so much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Reply #41)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:56 PM

42. ^^^ THIS ^^^

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 07:07 PM

43. Big Rec sent me here to kick this.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 07:37 PM

46. I think he forgot to mention the captive insurance industry

of which tiny Vermont is the national leader--second only to the Cayman Islands in offshore tax shelters.

At conferences of the offshore insurance industry, next to the booth for Bermuda, can often be found one promoting Vermont.

While that may seem strange for a chilly, landlocked state, Vermont is an offshore haven in one very real sense: It offers American companies lucrative tax breaks through unusual insurance arrangements.

...

More than 560 United States companies, including Wal-Mart Stores, Starbucks and McGraw-Hill, have set up Vermont-based entities to insure their biggest risks and liabilities, giving them a tax benefit in the process. Vermont now rivals the Cayman Islands and Bermuda as the insurance destination of choice for American companies.

The most recent arrival is Wells Fargo, which was granted a waiver by the federal Labor Department in February to provide life insurance and long-term disability insurance to its 153,000 employees through its own private unrated insurance company in Vermont.

With its wholly owned insurer, known as a captive, Wells Fargo will benefit from improved cash flow, new investment income and tax breaks totaling at least hundreds of millions of dollars over the next 30 to 40 years,

...

But Vermont’s success in attracting insurance captives also highlights the many ways that American corporations are allowed to minimize their tax bills by moving their profits, intellectual property or liabilities to places that provide substantial tax advantages, whether it is a Caribbean island, Ireland or Singapore. And while many states in the United States provide tax breaks and subsidies to companies that move or expand operations in state, the benefits offered by Vermont are much larger.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/business/04vermont.html?n=Top%2FReference%2FTimes%20Topics%2FSubjects%2FT%2FTaxes


The IRS recently put captives on its "Dirty Dozen" list of tax abuses:

http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/Abusive-Tax-Shelters-Again-on-the-IRS-Dirty-Dozen-List-of-Tax-Scams-for-the-2015-Filing-Season

And yes, Bernie has pictures up of him meeting with the association of captive insurers, and he apparently didn't support the IRS attempt to tax these entities (and the ruling got scotched).

I'm not saying he's responsible for all this. I am saying that things are complex, and no public figure is totally isolated from such issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #46)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 01:07 AM

52. It is complicated and all politicians have a hand, or statement, or votes

 

That have enabled such corporate practices in one way or another. Thanks for trying to point it out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #46)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 02:05 PM

72. Bernie is not in the Vermont state legislature.

He is a senator in the US Senate.

If someone in the Senate wants to present a bill to change insurance laws and that affects Vermont, they will. Then we can see how Bernie votes. But until that time, this is not his business. Delaware does similar things for corporate laws. When I think of insurance, I tend to think more of Connecticut, but I don't know why. I don't think of Vermont.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Sun Jul 26, 2015, 09:56 PM

49. K&R. These are the enemies!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:04 AM

53. K&R

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:46 AM

55. K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 08:54 AM

56. He's the ONLY candidate who is talking about this!

That's why I support him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:58 AM

57. K&R Some labor for the least, some for the most.

Every dollar in Wall St is a dollar against representative democracy for everyone but themselves.

If they can't recognize this by now, when thanks to them even corporations are more human than human, they never will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:08 AM

58. K & R!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:31 AM

59. Misleading figures.

Sorry, but I believe that the wording of the claims is misleading. In regard to GE, I believe that they paid Zero Federal Tax, and received an additional 2.9 billion. The wording could lead one to think that they overpaid their tax and received a refund on overpayment, like a person might do. Corporations are not people my friend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Diremoon (Reply #59)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:10 PM

75. I would like to see that info. It would make a stronger argument. I would also like to know what

 

loophole they used for taxes. Was it hiring disabled people or was it just accounting trickery? That answer matters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:37 AM

60. Should GE, Boeing, Verizon, BOA have lay offs?

GE employs > 130,000 in the US (not all have been moved to China :/)

I'm fairly certain the tax write-offs are helping to pay an American salary or two...

Does that matter? Or should they be punished? What if they extended a job offer to you? Would you be righteous and deny it because they apparently don't pay taxes in an un-american sort of way?

Maybe we should all work for non-profits.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Chico Man (Reply #60)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:11 AM

61. Do you realize that every single dollar paid out in salary is money that is not taxed?

The greatest disincentive to hiring is to not make companies earn their tax breaks through reinvestment in their businesses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ed Suspicious (Reply #61)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:18 AM

62. I'm certain much of GE's tax break is due to investment and reinvestment in their business

That's the nature of the accounting behind tax breaks (some of which may be investment in staff).Much of the accounting is accomplished via write offs and depreciation.

Take the $1 billion + investment GE made in the Software Center of Excellence in San Ramon. Over 1000 data scientists and engineers have been hired thus far.

You say "The greatest disincentive to hiring is to not make companies"

So, it's the fault of the Government? I'm pretty sure Bernie called them cheats.. Is that really fair?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Chico Man (Reply #62)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:47 AM

64. Inaccurate research

 

R&D is a right off

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #64)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:55 AM

65. ?



Come again?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:47 AM

63. kick ...rec

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:33 PM

67. Where's Lockheed Martin? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 01:20 PM

71. These Large Corporations Are..

...hollowing out America from the inside out with these tax refund takings. We need to elect people who will repeal these tax loopholes. Why raise the retirement age to 70? What extra profits are involved here? Why would this billionaires care about the retirement age? I'd like to know what's behind this push by these creeps.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 02:41 PM

73. Republican Response below:

"Why is an avowed Socialist picking on some of the most successful United States corporations? These small businesses are the heart and soul of the country. They create jobs. Sanders is trying the old tax and spend approach. Increase Tax rates for successful small businesses like Boeing and watch the layoffs and outsourcing to other countries. If the United States wants to compete abroad a better strategy is to reward these successful small businesses like GE and provide them more government tax cut incentives so that they can increase hiring and do not ship their jobs abroad. Frankly, it is much better to let the private sector handle these issues rather the government. Sanders would only take the hard-earned profits of small businesses and distribute them to the free loaders in our society. Our founding fathers believed that if you work hard you get ahead. Only a socialist like Sanders would try and turn this founding principle on its head. God Bless America, and Ronald Reagan for standing up to Socialism."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:34 PM

76. Criminal actions of the wealthy ignored. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreakinDJ (Original post)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 04:10 PM

77. From Bernie: 6 Ex Actions could stop Corp Loopholes

I scribbled down this info from a Bernie Sanders campaign email a while ago.

He proposed that much of these tax cheating loopholes could be stopped by executive action, outlining "6 Executive Actions Obama could take to stop Corporate Loopholes." If executive actions are possible to close these loopholes, then Bernie certainly makes a compelling case for replacing a corporatist President with one who would restore fiscal sanity and justice to our corporate tax code. According to that Bernie email " in 1952 corporate taxes accounted for 32% of federal tax revenue. Today , despite record breaking profits & stagnant wages, only 11% of federal revenue is corporate taxes."

6 Executive Actions Obama (or a US President) Could Take to Stop Corporate Loopholes by ending:

1) Check the box loophole (offshoring profits to subsidiaries)
2) Hewlett-Packard loophole(using short term loans from foreign subsidiaries to avoid taxes)
3) Corporate inversion loophole (Merging with a foreign corp, reincorporating(TAXED) there while operating as usual in the US.
4) Carried interest loophole (the hedge fund et alios misnomer of "investment"
5) Valuation discounts (to keep business and property values artificially low for estate and gift tax transfers)
6) The REIT Loophole (where "rent income" loophole claimed by private prisons, casinos, even billboard owners.)


I hope Bernie send this email out again. It was the clearest and best summary of these loopholes that cost the American Treasury & taxpayers hundreds of billions per year. And guess who pays and what safety net trust funds are "borrowed against" to make up the difference?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stuffmatters (Reply #77)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:06 PM

80. That deserves a thread of its own

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stuffmatters (Reply #77)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:09 PM

81. I agree, that deserves its own thread.

Maybe you could find and repost the email?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #81)

Sun Aug 2, 2015, 07:34 PM

83. I received this on April 14 from [email protected]"Act now:close corporate loopholes"

It then asked to sign the petition where it explained those 6 corporate loopholes that could be done "by executive action without Congressional approval."

I'm not tech savvy, sorry, and not able to get this personal email & ensuing petition points to repost on DU. But I'm happy to forward the email to anyone who knows how to do it or can tell me steps to do it myself.

Many people must have received the same email from bernie.org Lots important coming those days about opposing fast track/TPP so maybe this got overlooked in the flurry?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stuffmatters (Reply #83)

Mon Aug 3, 2015, 06:26 AM

84. I did a search and found this petition from Tax Day:

Sign the petition: Tell corporations to pay their fair share

I signed it and sent emails to my brothers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stuffmatters (Reply #77)

Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:00 PM

82. Private prisons claim rent income

Those are some evil motherfuckers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread