2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRomney bombs on 'Face the Nation' !!
Shades of Sarah Palin as Mitt Romney Bombs On Face The Nation
Jason Easley June 17, 2012
"Romney was fumbling, bumbling, and dodging through seventeen painful minutes..."
Even with Bob Schieffer being as gentle as only the corporate media can, there is no escaping the conclusion that Mitt Romney bombed his first non-Fox Sunday morning interview.
This interview went wrong in so many ways.
http://www.politicususa.com/shades-sarah-palin-mitt-romney-bombs-cbs-interview.html
Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)He's one of them. They don't like Presidents who are smarter than they are.
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)And I can't wait for "the gang" (Martin, Rachel, Ed, Lawrence, Al) to take him to task for his lousy interview tomorrow!!
Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)want representing the U.S.
Kablooie
(18,619 posts)But none of them watch Face The Nation anyway so it won't matter
monmouth
(21,078 posts)Siwsan
(26,255 posts)This is a guy with ZERO ideas of his own. I really think he believes he can buy the election.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Romney is simply not good at thinking while talking.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The first concern of a good president must be principles.
Presidents have to consider expediency, but voters will not trust a person for whom expediency is the first concern.
Romney is trying to keep his Party together. He will deny it, but he is walking on eggshells when it comes to the political bickering in his own party.
We Democrats have the same problem, but to a far lesser extent.
This is going to be a very interesting election. The comparison of Romney to Palin is accurate.
Romney and Palin are even worse people-pleasers than Obama.
Of course, a politician has to be good with people.
Bill Clinton charmed people with his warmth. That is how he managed to stay afloat in the political storm.
While Romney may be charming on a one-to-one basis, he projects anything but charm in public appearances. He is visibly insecure and won the nomination simply because he was the sanest person on the stage. That is not saying much.
Romney wouldn't make much of a president. If elected, he will split our country into even more pieces than it already is. He just doesn't have that warmth it takes to melt bitter differences. Obama is by nature way ahead of Romney on that. And Romney and Rove will not be able to manufacture that warmth no matter how much money they put into the campaign. That is because Romney has lived the Galtian life and nobody loves that kind of a person. He doesn't even love himself.
Besides, the mantra of lower taxes for the rich is no longer convincing.
Raising wages for working people to a level that injects purchasing power combined with a trade policy that balances imports with exports and stimulates clean manufacturing are what will has helped the economy in the past and would help it again. That is becoming more and more evident as we see that those economies that are doing relatively well, like Germany and China, are those in which either the workers are well compensated (Germany) or the government is protecting its local industry and fostering development (China).
fredamae
(4,458 posts)to say it---says it all.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)He isn't sure what NOT to say so it seems he tries to say very little of substance. In trying hard not to blow it, he blows it. Like in the donut thing -- he wants to say something clever then memories of the 7/11 cookies come into his head and then he just stumbles through the rest and smiles as if he DID say something clever.
We have seen the real Mitt Romney and we don't like it so now he is trying to be folksy and normal but can't pull it off.
I have had more experience than I wanted in dealing with relatives and friends' brain cancers, aphasia and Alzheimers and I think it may be possible that Mitt is some stage of decline. I say that with no malice and it is just a theory but the way he fumbles these things looks all too familiar to me.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Very much like Palin! lolz His team must be shitting themselves in anticipation of the debates. hahahaha
Julie
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)young_at_heart
(3,767 posts)Of course, Bush claimed he had a bad tailor and the media went with it!!
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 20, 2012, 08:20 PM - Edit history (1)
We never did find out what it was, did we?
Weird
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)since it we saw it. Nope, nary a peep about it.
yellowcanine
(35,698 posts)Of course it could have been his inner self interrupting him. Or maybe GAWD.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Thanks Supreme Court Of The United States
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)liberalnationalist
(170 posts)had to laugh when i heard him say that...what a mormon..ooops moron
jillan
(39,451 posts)to control his every move.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)I see him as an idiot. And I think he got through that pretty well. He's in a position where any statement of substance can only cost him votes.
But he can't hide forever.
Prediction: The tax breaks for his horse is the kind of thing that could resonate.
--imm
BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)Like the base was going to let him slide on that. It's basically all they care about.
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)That's disgusting. I can't believe how racist this country is.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,399 posts)can't he just say that he'll keep President Obama's new policy in effect AND push for something more if- Ra forbid- he gets elected POTUS? Is it THAT complicated? Also, to say that President Obama hasn't "done anything" on immigration is false too if anybody still remembers that the GOP blocked the WH-backed Dream Act from even getting a vote in 2010. Of course, I think that he fears the GOP base so much he can't really say anything without worrying about a backlash from them. If this keeps up- if he's so boxed in like this that he can't answer basic questions nor articulate much of anything about what he is likely to do as POTUS, then President Obama will be easily able to run circles around him in the debates and prove the point that Romney has no real core- or at least that he will pander to the extremist elements of the GOP as POTUS and not try to come up with any "common sense" solutions to anything, which is o.k. with the right as all they really want is an "autopen".
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)he can't say he'll overturn it because he'll lose the Hispanic vote.
He is on record as being to the right over *everybody* on immigration. He is on record supporting Arizona's disastrous laws.
Instead of standing on principals, he is trying to avoid taking a stand and hold onto two groups with diametrically opposed views.
It takes political genius to walk that sort of tightrope. He is a political moron.
PopYoColla
(59 posts)...that playing slow pitch softball with family (interviews on Fox Noise) is a lot different than hitting a 100 mph fastball in the Major Leagues.....
I can't wait for the debates.....
graywarrior
(59,440 posts)liberalnationalist
(170 posts)takes the cake though...he is worse than bush
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)installed by the Supreme Court in a bloodless coup, but I'm pretty sure he was not 'elected,' no matter how the ballots were counted.
graywarrior
(59,440 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)the 1%, the 2%, the .5% would still pay the same burden as they do today. Well isn't that just cheesy? They have had the lowest tax rates in a century for the past decade and where are the jobs? I don't see any.
This is the same sorry trickle-down crap we have seen before.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Romney told the truth, to those listening. He was very clear - the 1% will continue to pay the same, lowest rates they are blessed with now, the same rates that helped push the US to the economic brink.
demwing
(16,916 posts)he didn't fumble, no deer in the headlights looks, no horrible sound bites...
What he did do was show what a greedy, lying, oily snake charmer he can be, and that should be enough.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)A. With regard to immigration, my congressman, Xavier Becerra, (and others no doubt) has been working for reform for years. He has a good plan. The problem is that conservatives including the clowns and extremists in Arizona have created a paranoid, hate-filled climate that does not permit any progress in Congress on this. Romney's promise to get a long-term solution is empty considering his own party has thwarted the slightest leniency on this issue. And it is mostly Republicans who have balked at the idea of making employers who hire illegals responsible for their conduct. The fact that she had hired an illegal and then treated the illegal maid cruelly was part of the reason that Meg Whitman lost her bid for governor of California. How many Democrats do you know who employ illegal immigrants? There are some, but not as many as Republicans, I would bet.
B. With regard to California raising taxes and Romney's promise to lower taxes and cut spending. Guess what Arnold Schwarzenegger promised Californians? Right. He was going to cut spending by eliminating the fat in the state budget. He failed miserably. He hired someone to study the books and couldn't find enough fat to balance the budget. So, Schwarzenegger floated bonds -- which Californians now have to repay in a depressed economy. Schwarzenegger's solution was a recipe for disaster.
When I hear Romney threaten the same "solutions" that put Schwarzenegger in the governor's office in California, I really worry. It is a "solution" that leads to disaster. It sounds to easy and reassuring, but it didn't work for Schwarzenegger and it won't work for Romney.
Paka
(2,760 posts)No tv so I have to rely on DU to get my dose of the Sunday shows or wait until I get Rachel online Tuesday mid-day.
liberalnationalist
(170 posts)cbsnews.com
dennis4868
(9,774 posts)could have easily called him out to his face on all his fucking lies (i.e., Obama negotiated any trade agrement is one example)...he went VERY VERY VERY easy on Romney. He's lucky he was not interviewed by someone demanding he explain his lies.
Happydayz
(112 posts)Mittens has to spend a billion dollars just to compete with Obama. But Americans are going to see how incompetent and unqualified Mittens is during the debates.
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)Romney is not ready for real media and will stick to Fox News which is a safe place for him.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)sooner is better because it gives him the opportunity to practice while fewer people are watching.
Maybe he could start with somebody easier, like, say, Katie Couric?
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 19, 2012, 07:45 PM - Edit history (1)
But I don't see how he can get through the debates because they're not going to coddle him.
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)so as much as Rachel would love to have him on her show, never gonna happen because she will eat him alive on the national telly.
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Nothing but a lot of hot air
He can talk endlessly and say nothing
Wounded Bear
(58,618 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)It will be like watching a live execution on prime time TV.
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Now I know why Nitt put off doing a formal interview...he stinks!!!!!
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)nuff said
yellowcanine
(35,698 posts)ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Obama, by being calm, knowledgeable, and eloquent, will show America what a babbling idiot Nitt really is!!
FSogol
(45,464 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Meanwhile, everything Obama says or does is being looked at under an electron microscope and labeled as a floundering campaign.
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)I do know that it's certainly being discussed with the MSNBC gang. I guess I don't watch msm anymore, unless it's a non-political story. Learned that in the early 2000s. Helps keep me anchored.
Iceberg Louie
(190 posts)marlakay
(11,442 posts)I remember Bush got elected twice...
eppur_se_muova
(36,256 posts)Maybe it's because he's thinking that really hard ... *every* time he speaks in public.