Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 02:41 PM Jul 2015

The Troubling Implications of Hillary's Anti-BDS Letter

The Troubling Implications of Hillary's Anti-BDS Letter
Friday, 17 July 2015 * By Stephen Zunes * TruthOut

On July 2, former secretary of state and frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination Hillary Clinton wrote a letter to Israeli-American billionaire Haim Saban, a strong supporter of the right-wing Netanyahu government, denouncing human rights activists who support boycott/divestment/sanctions (BDS) against the Israeli occupation.

In the letter, made public a few days later, Clinton made a number of statements which are not only demonstrably false but raise serious concerns regarding what kind of policies she would pursue as president.

She claimed that the BDS movement was working to "malign and undermine Israel and the Jewish people." Though some BDS activists target Israel as a whole, most efforts on college campuses and elsewhere focus solely on the Israeli occupation, particularly companies that profit from that occupation and support illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank. In any case, the BDS campaign does not "malign and undermine" Jews. This cynical effort to depict the movement as anti-Semitic could be an indication of the kind of rhetoric she would use as president to discredit human rights activists who challenge her policies elsewhere.

Clinton claims in the letter that initiatives through the United Nations critical of Israeli violations of international humanitarian law are inherently "anti-Israel," thereby implying that those who raise concerns about a given country's human rights record do so not because of a desire to uphold universally recognized ethical and legal principles, but because of an ideological bias against a particular country. Although some UN agencies have disproportionately targeted Israel for criticism, the vast majority of such reports and resolutions have been consistent with findings and concerns raised by reputable international human rights organizations (such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch) and Israeli groups (such as the B'tselem human rights group and the veterans' organization Breaking the Silence.)

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/31930-the-troubling-implications-of-hillary-s-anti-bds-letter
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Troubling Implications of Hillary's Anti-BDS Letter (Original Post) 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 OP
Clinton's letter was disgusting. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #1
can anyone explain to me why she did it? HFRN Jul 2015 #2
You know, it would be REALLY helpful... Spider Jerusalem Jul 2015 #3
Agreed, but it is hard to do while Netanyahu continues the practice. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #4
she calculates this will help her get elected 6chars Jul 2015 #5
I was proud of principles laid out in Clinton's letter. tritsofme Jul 2015 #6

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
1. Clinton's letter was disgusting.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jul 2015

Pandering to the Israeli lobby is as bad as pandering to the banksters.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. You know, it would be REALLY helpful...
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 03:04 PM
Jul 2015

if people who claim to support Israel could just fucking stop conflating Israel and "the Jewish people".

6chars

(3,967 posts)
5. she calculates this will help her get elected
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 04:58 PM
Jul 2015

that it will not significantly hurt her in the primaries, and will help in the general election

tritsofme

(17,375 posts)
6. I was proud of principles laid out in Clinton's letter.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 07:37 PM
Jul 2015

As president, she will be a good friend to the Jewish state.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Troubling Implication...