NY Times: Voters unlikely to care much about the Hillary Clinton email furor

[LiberalElite]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/upshot/voters-unlikely-to-care-much-about-the-hillary-clinton-email-furor.html?abt=0002&abg=0&_r=0

"The report Monday that Hillary Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state raises a number of important questions about government transparency and access to public records.

Unsurprisingly, however, the conversation quickly veered from matters of policy into ominous speculation about the political consequences for Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic Party presidential front-runner, including hyperbolic suggestions that the emails could “shake up the 2016 race,” cause irreparable damage to her, cause her to lose the general election, or even help force her out of the race."

[Erich Bloodaxe BSN]

1. Exactly.

While there are troubling issues to raise, most voters aren't going to care.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

2. If the people can ignore the likes of what Chris Christie does on an average day, or

other GOP pricks, they will surely disregard this story.

I hear the last thing Christie did was a backroom deal worth billions for an oil company


I mean do you need to see the money change hands

[Dawson Leery]

3. Christie and his thugs shut down a federally operated traffic bridge

and got away with it. Using a private account for one's emails in nothing in compared to that.

[oldandhappy]

4. If it is true that the current secretary of state is the first to use a gov. email

then this is the usual MSM hyped to death time filler story. Dear media, I click to mute when the story comes up.

[UCmeNdc]

5. The NY Times article was an inaccurate hit job

There are so many inaccurate facts written in the piece on purpose to mislead the reader.





http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/03/03/1368297/-The-New-York-Times-Blows-It-With-Misleading-Hit-Job-on-Clinton-Emails?detail=email