Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's up with Alaska? (Original Post) Reter Nov 2014 OP
Remote areas TroyD Nov 2014 #1
This. Travelman Nov 2014 #4
In this day and age of electronics I was shocked to still see at 1 am that all Connecticut votes Filibuster Harry Nov 2014 #2
I just checked, it say 100.00% reporting Reter Nov 2014 #3
Yes, see my post below. Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #8
Juneau doesn't have any roads coming into it, as an example Recursion Nov 2014 #5
OK, I get that why it takes so much longer in Alaska now Reter Nov 2014 #6
Two weeks, and, yes, we can win, Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #9
Big state, lots of remote precincts, Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #7

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
1. Remote areas
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:14 PM
Nov 2014

Harder to count the remote areas, apparently.

But the vote is coming in slowly in lots of states actually.

The counting has been going slowly in Virginia, Colorado & New Hampshire, as well as Connecticut, which is why it has taken so long for Warner, Hickenlooper and Malloy to be elected, and for Brown to finally realize that Shaheen won.

And California seems to only be at 60% in, although Brown won by a 60-40 margin, so the result was known a long time ago (although there are some House races in question).

Travelman

(708 posts)
4. This.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 01:31 AM
Nov 2014

The distance from the Aleutians to Barrow is farther than the distance from New York to L.A., and there are a whole lot of people out there who live a practically nomadic life: no internet access to speak of, and often no electricity from any sort of established source other than a Honda generator.

Voting in Alaska is not at all like voting at the 22nd precinct in Cleveland or wherever. Ballots are often literally flown by bush plane from some tiny village of twelve people into Juneau for manual tabulation. You don't just hit "enter" to send the votes out there.

Filibuster Harry

(666 posts)
2. In this day and age of electronics I was shocked to still see at 1 am that all Connecticut votes
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:24 PM
Nov 2014

had not been tallied. Stayed up to 1:30 and up this morning at 6 and still no winner for Governor. Very, very happy Malloy was re-elected.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
3. I just checked, it say 100.00% reporting
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:47 PM
Nov 2014

So apparently they are waiting on absentees to come it. Right now it's:

Dan Sullivan 48.96%
Republican 110,203

Mark Begich 45.34%
Democrat 102,054

Realistically, is there any way this can be made up?

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
8. Yes, see my post below.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:01 PM
Nov 2014

If the absentee votes are coming from rural Alaska they will strongly favor Begich.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
5. Juneau doesn't have any roads coming into it, as an example
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:27 AM
Nov 2014

It's only accessible to the rest of the state by boat or plane, and it's the state capital.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
6. OK, I get that why it takes so much longer in Alaska now
Fri Nov 7, 2014, 02:07 AM
Nov 2014

My next questions are when will we find out, and is there any way we realistically win this?

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
9. Two weeks, and, yes, we can win,
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:03 PM
Nov 2014

although it's an uphill climb. Sullivan's lead should shrink considerably or be entirely eliminated if past elections are any indication.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
7. Big state, lots of remote precincts,
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 04:57 PM
Nov 2014

Many, many absentee and early voters. Mark Begich has vowed not to concede until all votes are counted. Here's the latest from Alaska Dispatch:


http://www.adn.com/article/20141107/number-uncounted-votes-grows-alaska-us-senate-race



The number of uncounted votes in Alaska’s tightly fought U.S. Senate race grew by 21,000 between Wednesday and Friday -- and more than 5,000 of those were votes that hadn’t been predicted in early accounts of the number of ballots outstanding.

After election night on Tuesday, incumbent Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Begich trailed Republican challenger Dan Sullivan by 8,000 votes, or 3.6 percent, and both campaigns have been closely watching as state elections officials collect additional ballots cast by mail, or at more than 200 so-called “absentee in-person voting locations” around the state, where people could vote early.

More than 40,000 ballots will likely be counted starting Tuesday, though the number will probably climb even more before then. To win, Begich would have to reverse election night trends and win a substantial majority -- though his allies have pointed out that in the count following Election Day in 2008, Begich overcame a 3,000 vote deficit to Republican Ted Stevens and ultimately won by 4,000 votes.

The spike between Wednesday and Friday was a reflection of state elections officials’ new accounting for more than 13,000 provisional ballots, 2,200 absentee ballots submitted by fax, mail or email, and some 5,200 ballots cast early at the in-person absentee voting locations across the state.

<snip>

The reason that many of the absentee votes aren't counted immediately is because state elections officials need to check them against registers used at individual precincts on Election Day, to ensure that people didn't try to vote twice.



Shannyn Moore also has good analysis of our election here:

http://www.adn.com/article/20141109/bottom-line-election-results-alaskans-want-less-ideology-more-work
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What's up with Alaska?