Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zoonart

(11,850 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:08 AM Jan 2014

Christie Bridge disaster within days of 9/11

This is the angle of the Christie Bridge story that no one is discussing, I have to ask myself why?

For me, the fact that this bridge closing was orchestrated to take place on the George Washington Bridge, the biggest terror target in NYC, arguably in the nation, on 9/09 and 9/10; in the run up to the commemoration of the 9/11 terror attacks adds an entirely different layer of OMG to this scandal.

Question: Did The Department of Homeland Security know about this "Traffic Study"?
Who informed them? How was that information received and how was it acted upon? Does the DHS not add increased security to the GWB in the event of terror attack around 9/11 each year when we are supposedly enjoying increased security? Would it not make sense that smooth traffic conditions should be maintained especially around 9/11?

What level of chaos is acceptable without the direct sign-off of higher authorities- Christie- DHS? ANYONE?

Forget getting ambulances around in Fort Lee on an average day. Suppose there had been a bomb on the bridge on this particular day?

After years of screaming about the need for the DHS and TERROR! TERROR! TERROR!,
can anyone believe that DHS was not alerted to this situation? How did DHS allow this to happen? What are we paying for? Or is this the proof of what we suspected all along... that DHS is nothing but a slush fund, and that cries of terrorism are political theater? WHICH IS IT?

There are a million questions here that go to the heart of the efficacy of the Department of Homeland Security and the war on terror, not just political payback from the thuggish Governor of New Jersey.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Christie Bridge disaster within days of 9/11 (Original Post) Zoonart Jan 2014 OP
Someone should just call the PA Police their station is a block or two west of the bridge.. Historic NY Jan 2014 #1
I have a real shot JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #2
I have to agree with your statement! LynneSin Jan 2014 #3
I can't find it in our constitution JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #5
That's fair enough for 2009 LynneSin Jan 2014 #18
Completely understand... but Zoonart Jan 2014 #4
There wasn't any traffic study. Schema Thing Jan 2014 #6
Thanks JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #8
I don't believe DHS knew anything JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #7
1) christie is not that complex 2) christie and his cronies didn't think this through Javaman Jan 2014 #9
Someone else gets this Zoonart Jan 2014 #10
Why are you trying to shift the blame to the DHS? It was Christie & his thugs doing! 66 dmhlt Jan 2014 #14
BNot trying to blame it on the DHS Zoonart Jan 2014 #17
I'll tell you why Christie and his people did it rocktivity May 2014 #19
You have a point randr Jan 2014 #11
I get it too, Zoonart. Aldo Leopold Jan 2014 #12
More will be revealed later. Zoonart Jan 2014 #13
thanks injecting this angle. 911 is important because it suggests either a total lack certainot Jan 2014 #15
BOOM Zoonart Jan 2014 #16
Alcoa stock just took a upward bump! whistler162 May 2014 #20

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
1. Someone should just call the PA Police their station is a block or two west of the bridge..
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:13 AM
Jan 2014

they would have had to been informed. FOIL thier logs.

JustAnotherGen

(31,811 posts)
2. I have a real shot
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:35 AM
Jan 2014

Of getting that asshole booted from Trenton with this . . . I'm not placing an iota of blame on DHS.

He and his people did it - why? We'll never know.

But I won't allow anything that deflects this to the Federal Government and by virtue of that President Obama.

Obama/DHS did not do it and that's the not hot button.

The hot button is everyone in American helping us liberal/progressive New Jerseyans GET RID OF HIM.

This is our shot - please help us.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
3. I have to agree with your statement!
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:44 AM
Jan 2014

If I'm correct New Jersey has the ability to recall a governor - something that should have been done ages ago.

Personally the fact that Christie wasted $24 million in NJ Tax Dollars just to not have Cory Booker's senate race on the same ballot was a criminal waste of money. Christie knew that Booker would bring out a high voter turnout that would not favor Christie in his election.

In the end, if New Jersey held their Governor elections on an even year I highly doubt Christie would have ever won the governor seat in New Jersey.

JustAnotherGen

(31,811 posts)
5. I can't find it in our constitution
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:50 AM
Jan 2014

Only language that speaks to it - is Federal level reps and after they have served a year.

BUT - with enough pressure - maybe he can step down.

He won in 2009 because of disenchanted Democratic voters staying home and not just holding their nose and voting for Corzine. If you look at the numbers of voters and those who went Obama in 2008 - the sheer volume of IndieTeaPublicans vs. Liberals/Progressives is how he got into office.

And bang on in terms of the Special Election. In 1924 the NJ Legislature made a law that would have allowed Christie to legally hold the election for Lautenbergs seat at the same time as the Governors race. But he was very afraid of Booker's star power. Had Bouno and Booker been able to run on the same day - I'm convinced she would have won. She was a near perfect Democratic Liberal/Progressive candidate. Just flawless.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
18. That's fair enough for 2009
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jan 2014

And I agree - Bouno may have been very competitive against Christie had Booker been on the ticket.

Zoonart

(11,850 posts)
4. Completely understand... but
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:49 AM
Jan 2014

Don't you want to know if DHS knew about this and who contacted them? IF they did not know within a day of 9/11,why not? You seriously do not want to know the answer to this question?

I understand that The Obama admin. did not do this and DHS did not do this. My angle is this- Someone had to sign off on this with the DHS and if not... why not?

THIS IS how we get Christie. Would not someone in high authority, say the Governor, have to sign off on something like this within days of 9/11?

JustAnotherGen

(31,811 posts)
7. I don't believe DHS knew anything
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:53 AM
Jan 2014

I think the fact that they NY Port Authority folks didn't know anything and it was as much a surprise to them as the folks trying to get over to Manhattan that day and to/from work/school is the answer to the question. And Governor Cuomo can really whack the Christie Administration on this.

A few cocky arrogant jerks in Trenton - from a place of sheer spite - at a time when Christie was leading in the polls by close to 30% - they did this. They thought they would get away with it - and damn near did . . .

Javaman

(62,521 posts)
9. 1) christie is not that complex 2) christie and his cronies didn't think this through
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:04 AM
Jan 2014

3) stop stirring the pot.

Zoonart

(11,850 posts)
17. BNot trying to blame it on the DHS
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:31 AM
Jan 2014

My point is that DHS should have known and if they DID know... who told them and who signed off on it, meaning Christie. This is where Christie may not be able to disguise his fingerprints.

If DHS did not know within a day of 9/11... the country needs to know why not. Period.

randr

(12,411 posts)
11. You have a point
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:13 AM
Jan 2014

However, it is important to keep the thumbs on Christie's involvment and follow the buck to the top.
I hope someone somewhere brings up your question to the DHS. They should have known there was a situation.

Aldo Leopold

(685 posts)
12. I get it too, Zoonart.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:34 AM
Jan 2014

Thanks for posting this and the kos link. Hadn't thought of it this way until reading your post. I agree, this raises some interesting new wrinkles.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
15. thanks injecting this angle. 911 is important because it suggests either a total lack
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jan 2014

of awareness of the implications of the timing or the thinking that the timing has political positives for whoever instigated this.

if the gov suggested this or accepted this to a staff member as a payback but didn't specify when and told them he didn't want to know anymore, just make it so, the staffmember could have just fucked it up or somewhere someone thought it was a good way to play politics according to whoever signs off/allows it at the necessary DHS level. the GOP is always trying to get dems.

but as far as the DHS, at the local level aren't those are long term appointments/jobs? the buck doesn't stop at the pres but maybe the NJ DHS head was the target.

or maybe some in the christie staff are working for GOP rivals.

and maybe there was a fake terror thing going on.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Christie Bridge disaster ...