Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 02:02 AM Jul 2013

Harry Reid Tees Up Potential Filibuster Rule Fight



Harry Reid Tees Up Potential Filibuster Rule Fight

WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) signaled Tuesday that his Democratic caucus members are becoming so frustrated with Republicans blocking President Barack Obama's nominees that they will again consider whether to invoke the so-called nuclear option to change Senate rules.

"I'm going to have a full meeting with my caucus on Thursday. We're going to talk about nominations," Reid said. He did not hint what he would do, but suggested his deliberations were far enough along that the sessions with his members would be decisive.

"I think Thursday, by the time the day's out, you'll have a better idea of what we're going to try to do on this," Reid told reporters on Capitol Hill.

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/09/harry-reid-filibuster_n_3568948.html


28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harry Reid Tees Up Potential Filibuster Rule Fight (Original Post) Tx4obama Jul 2013 OP
Finally! Just Saying Jul 2013 #1
"will again consider whether to invoke " - Oh wow, they're going to 'consider' (again)!! n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #2
Somebody owes me a new keyboard MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #3
Fool me once, shame on you. Kablooie Jul 2013 #4
No kidding davidpdx Jul 2013 #7
Yes, but maybe THIS time MurrayDelph Jul 2013 #10
I'll beleive reid AFTER he does it NT sigmasix Jul 2013 #5
At this point such announcements are fingernails scraped down a blackboard. delrem Jul 2013 #6
Place Your Bets... KharmaTrain Jul 2013 #8
Blah blah blah .... Myrina Jul 2013 #9
Oh, boy! Miscreants beware, huh? malthaussen Jul 2013 #11
The boy who cried "wolf." Blue Idaho Jul 2013 #12
Or Lucy holding a football. nt awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #14
Put up or shut up, Harry. polichick Jul 2013 #13
Reid is a joke Harmony Blue Jul 2013 #15
BOHICA Pab Sungenis Jul 2013 #16
I'm not holding my breath sakabatou Jul 2013 #17
Yeah, yeah, sure. Iggo Jul 2013 #18
for those of you complaining about Reid dsc Jul 2013 #19
We've all seen this play before EvolveOrConvolve Jul 2013 #20
Is Reid going to use appointments to the President's administration or for judges first?? Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #21
Judicial nominations will be excluded - change will be only for admin/agency nominees Tx4obama Jul 2013 #22
Here's an excerpt and link regarding the 7 clotures Reid filed for the admin nominees Tx4obama Jul 2013 #23
Excellent, do you know what the votes were for these crucial positions? Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #26
To see who voted for what ... Tx4obama Jul 2013 #27
Thanks, Tex. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #28
thanks Tx Cha Jul 2013 #24
They, Harry and the pukes are in negotiations now... Stuart G Jul 2013 #25

Kablooie

(18,603 posts)
4. Fool me once, shame on you.
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 02:32 AM
Jul 2013

Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me three times, shame on me..
Fool me four times, shame on me.
Fool me five times, shame on me.
Fool me six times, shame on me.
Ad Infinitim..

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
7. No kidding
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 07:30 AM
Jul 2013

Reid has had his chance, screw him. He is an idiot for trusting McConnell. The last 7 months have been a waste of time.

Merkley had a plan to change the rules and his own party screwed him.

The feckless 7 along with Ding dong Reid continue to work for the other side.

MurrayDelph

(5,291 posts)
10. Yes, but maybe THIS time
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jul 2013

he really Really REALLY double-dog-REALLY means it.

Last January, Harry Reid helped stab my Senator Merkley in the back, and punished him when he said ouch.

But this time he means it.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
6. At this point such announcements are fingernails scraped down a blackboard.
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 03:25 AM
Jul 2013

{for those of you aged and decrepit enough to catch the reference}

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
8. Place Your Bets...
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 08:03 AM
Jul 2013

...which Democrat will cave and prevent a majority vote? Manchin? Landreu? Heitkamp? DiFi??? Color my cynical anything will happen...

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
9. Blah blah blah ....
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:33 AM
Jul 2013

:yawn: It's like the only 2 things DC knows how to do anymore: threaten to overturn ACA and threaten to rewrite filibuster rules.

The game's getting really old, guys.

FIX SOME SHIT, ALREADY!!

malthaussen

(17,174 posts)
11. Oh, boy! Miscreants beware, huh?
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jul 2013

We need to invent a new dance: the debt-ceiling/filibuster reform two-step. Kind of like the White Boy Shuffle: you look stupid, and always end up just where you started.

-- Mal

Blue Idaho

(5,035 posts)
12. The boy who cried "wolf."
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 11:54 AM
Jul 2013

Does anyone really believe milk toast Harry will do anything about the abuse of filibuster rules in the senate anytime soon? Not me.

dsc

(52,147 posts)
19. for those of you complaining about Reid
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:37 PM
Jul 2013

if you live in any of the following, and you haven't written your Senator about it, you are the problem. MI (Levin), VT (Leahy), CA (Boxer and Feinstein), Ark (Pryor), MT (Baucus) they are why this hasn't happened.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
21. Is Reid going to use appointments to the President's administration or for judges first??
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:02 AM
Jul 2013

There was some talk of 7 important votes coming up this week.
But, I can't remember if it was about judges or appointments to President Obama's administration first.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
22. Judicial nominations will be excluded - change will be only for admin/agency nominees
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:27 AM
Jul 2013

-snip-

The fight over the filibuster in December and January was waged in public, with outside groups and progressive senators such as Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon trying to pressure Reid into action. This time, Reid and Merkley are working together and the outside advocacy has been much quieter, indicating that Reid himself is invested in the outcome.

One key difference this time is that the rules change would not apply to judicial nominees. Senate insiders say that Democrats lack the votes to change the rules for judges, but agency nominees are an easier sell. The president was elected, goes the argument, and has earned the right to choose his own staff, free of a filibuster. If Republicans want to pick the White House staff, then they should win the election and occupy the White House, the argument concludes. Judges, on the other hand, are a separate branch of government and are appointed for life. To underscore their reasoning, Democrats on Thursday released a compilation of video clips of Republicans such as McConnell (below). "I've been a proud guardian of gridlock myself," said McConnell in 2005, "but it never made sense for executive branch appointments." ...

-snip-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/11/harry-reid-nuclear-option_n_3579427.html

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
23. Here's an excerpt and link regarding the 7 clotures Reid filed for the admin nominees
Mon Jul 15, 2013, 02:40 AM
Jul 2013

-snip-

Senator Reid filed cloture on the following nominations:

- Exec. Cal. #51, Richard Cordray, of Ohio, to be Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection;

- Exec. Cal #100, Richard Griffin, of the District of Columbia, to be Member of the National Labor Relations Board;

- Exec. Cal #101, Sharon Block, of the District of Columbia, to be Member of the National Labor Relations Board;

- Exec. Cal #104, Mark Pearce, of New York, to be Member of the National Labor Relations Board;

- Exec. Cal #178, Fred Hochberg, of New York, to be President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States;

- Exec. Cal #99, Thomas Perez, of Maryland, to be Secretary of Labor; and

- Exec. Cal #98, Gina McCarthy, of Massachusetts, to be Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

-snip-
http://democrats.senate.gov/2013/07/11/cloture-filed-on-7-nominationsnext-vote-530pm-monday/



And here's a link to the Senate's Monday schedule: http://democrats.senate.gov/2013/07/15/senate-floor-schedule-for-monday-july-15-2013/



Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
26. Excellent, do you know what the votes were for these crucial positions?
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 11:25 PM
Jul 2013

I wonder who voted against President Obama's choices to be the heads of these agencies.

I want to find out how my two redneck Senators voted.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
27. To see who voted for what ...
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 05:36 PM
Jul 2013

Here's a link to the page that lists 'all' senate votes that have so far been taken: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_113_1.htm

Click on the little red link in the first column for which ever vote you want to see.



Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
28. Thanks, Tex.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 07:59 PM
Jul 2013

Man, you sure have kept me up on what was going on this last week.

Haha.

I would have been lost without ya.
The local news isn't reporting any of this shiiiiitte.

I bookmarked that site so I won't forget again.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Harry Reid Tees Up Potent...