would Americans actually put a THIRD Bush in office?

[Liberal_in_LA]

President Bush
President Bush

Then President Jeb Bush?

18 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Hell no
	8 (44%)
	Maybe
	0 (0%)
	a real possibility
	10 (56%)
	Other
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[RKP5637]

1. Never underestimate the 'Idiocracy' of American voters. n/t

[GoCubsGo]

2. Yep.

I can't believe they gave his rotten, dumbass brother enough votes to let him steal it once, let alone twice. Now, I put nothing past them.

[bullimiami]

4. exactly.

[Paladin]

11. +1000 (nt)

[sakabatou]

14. +1

[avebury]

19. Agreed! nt

[Arctic Dave]

3. If the Democratic Party keeps going down the same road it is

then I will go on record right now as it being, all but a done deal.

Hello pResident Jeb.

And we have no one else to blame but our own party "leaders".

[RKP5637]

12. I know R's here that voted for Obama that now say WTF. They

voted for him because they did not like what R's were saying about SS and Medicare. Now, they don't like Obama's budget and are saying what's the difference. We may find that difficult, but to them it makes perfect sense, especially those that straddle the R/D fence. They would vote for Jeb, no question at all. The democrats are embarked on a very treacherous road. They are losing a grip on being a "we the people party" and are now on the road of being "we the money party."

[Mnemosyne]

5. No, but their machines could. Frightening thought. nt

[Lugnut]

10. +1,000 n/t

[Kath1]

6. Hell no!

As one of my favorite bumper stickers said, "The only Bush I trust is my own!" No more Bushes, please!

[curlyred]

7. WTF but

I don't have a lot of faith in us.

[defacto7]

8. Very unlikely

as the T party is diminishing. But if the T party or a successor gains the publics interest, all my bets are off.

[Jamaal510]

9. Jeb will never win fair and square, but

the GOP state legislatures can still continue to tweak the rules in individual states so that it will be more inconvenient for likely Dems to vote. We saw them pull that shit this past election, but luckily they got caught and it actually boosted Democratic enthusiasm. Now they're still at it, except their efforts this time are more under the radar, since other things in the news are getting more coverage.

[whistler162]

13. You'll have to ask South Carolina voters....

In this case it might be a good thing to put another Busch in office.

[bigwillq]

15. I think it's a real possibility.

Anything can happen from now until 2016.
Can't rule out another Bush just yet.
Or another Clinton for that matter.

Dynasties rule!

[BlueDemKev]

16. If liberals and progressives stay home, YES, IT COULD HAPPEN

[Liberal_in_LA]

17. ..

[Liberal_Stalwart71]

18. I put nothing past Americans. And meanwhile, there is a large number of Democrats blaming Obama,

enough to demoralize the base such that there is a low turnout in 2014. I'm much more concerned about 2014 than I am about 2016. If not enough Democrats turnout for the midterms, the larger discussion becomes moot.

[Daniel537]

20. If Bush was able to win in 2004

after WMD was exposed as a lie, and Iraqi ties to al-Qaeda, and we would be greeted as liberators and etc.... then anybody can win in this country.

[yortsed snacilbuper]

21. Keep an eye on george P bush,

he's being groomed to climb the political ladder!

[Zoeisright]

22. Sure.

There are enough stupid people in this country to do that. After all, Bush the Dumber's popularity has risen since he left office.