Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBishop (R-UT) amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion
Source: Salt Lake Tribune
Bishop amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion
By Thomas Burr | The Salt Lake Tribune |
First Published 25 minutes ago Updated 1 minute ago
Washington Rep. Rob Bishop pushed through language in an emergency spending bill for Hurricane Sandy relief that precludes the government from buying any more property, a move environmentalists say could undermine access to national park sites.
Bishops amendment, which passed the House late Tuesday on a near party-line vote of 223-198, is aimed at ensuring the National Park Service doesnt try to add land to its inventory instead of using funds to repair Sandy-damaged parks.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Bishop said he understands that the Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island and several other parks were hard hit by the storm last October but that the original bill was vague enough to allow the Interior Department to do more than repair storm-ravaged facilities.
Craig Obey, a senior vice president of the National Parks Conservation Association, says Bishops change in the legislation could hamper the governments ability to add new trailheads or parking lots where previous access points were destroyed.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By Thomas Burr | The Salt Lake Tribune |
First Published 25 minutes ago Updated 1 minute ago
Washington Rep. Rob Bishop pushed through language in an emergency spending bill for Hurricane Sandy relief that precludes the government from buying any more property, a move environmentalists say could undermine access to national park sites.
Bishops amendment, which passed the House late Tuesday on a near party-line vote of 223-198, is aimed at ensuring the National Park Service doesnt try to add land to its inventory instead of using funds to repair Sandy-damaged parks.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Bishop said he understands that the Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island and several other parks were hard hit by the storm last October but that the original bill was vague enough to allow the Interior Department to do more than repair storm-ravaged facilities.
Craig Obey, a senior vice president of the National Parks Conservation Association, says Bishops change in the legislation could hamper the governments ability to add new trailheads or parking lots where previous access points were destroyed.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55641556-78/access-add-bill-bishop.html.csp
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1401 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bishop (R-UT) amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion (Original Post)
Eugene
Jan 2013
OP
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)1. Shithead
It's too bad he comes from a state that likely won't ever need disaster relief. It would be nice to throw it back in his face later down the road.
LiberalFighter
(50,825 posts)2. Remove interstate access to the state?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)3. The problem with that is there are 3 or 4 major interstate roads that run through the state
Including one that runs east to west. Instead let's just revoke all their federal funding.
LiberalFighter
(50,825 posts)4. If we don't want to remove access to interstate roads for them
won't the federal funding do the same thing? They are unlikely or able to continue maintain those roads.
Most of any ideas we might have likely would have serious flaws anyhow and are just hopes that won't fly.
politicat
(9,808 posts)5. Fires. Every summer, which endanger the neighbors (Colorado)
Let's just remember come summer, okay?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)6. Ah, good point
Touche!