Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,845 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:45 PM Jan 2013

Bishop (R-UT) amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion

Source: Salt Lake Tribune

Bishop amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion

By Thomas Burr | The Salt Lake Tribune |
First Published 25 minutes ago • Updated 1 minute ago

Washington • Rep. Rob Bishop pushed through language in an emergency spending bill for Hurricane Sandy relief that precludes the government from buying any more property, a move environmentalists say could undermine access to national park sites.

Bishop’s amendment, which passed the House late Tuesday on a near party-line vote of 223-198, is aimed at ensuring the National Park Service doesn’t try to add land to its inventory instead of using funds to repair Sandy-damaged parks.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Bishop said he understands that the Statue of Liberty, Ellis Island and several other parks were hard hit by the storm last October but that the original bill was vague enough to allow the Interior Department to do more than repair storm-ravaged facilities.

Craig Obey, a senior vice president of the National Parks Conservation Association, says Bishop’s change in the legislation could hamper the government’s ability to add new trailheads or parking lots where previous access points were destroyed.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55641556-78/access-add-bill-bishop.html.csp
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bishop (R-UT) amends Sandy relief bill to prohibit park expansion (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2013 OP
Shithead davidpdx Jan 2013 #1
Remove interstate access to the state? LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #2
The problem with that is there are 3 or 4 major interstate roads that run through the state davidpdx Jan 2013 #3
If we don't want to remove access to interstate roads for them LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #4
Fires. Every summer, which endanger the neighbors (Colorado) politicat Jan 2013 #5
Ah, good point davidpdx Jan 2013 #6

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
1. Shithead
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 01:19 AM
Jan 2013

It's too bad he comes from a state that likely won't ever need disaster relief. It would be nice to throw it back in his face later down the road.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. The problem with that is there are 3 or 4 major interstate roads that run through the state
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:35 AM
Jan 2013

Including one that runs east to west. Instead let's just revoke all their federal funding.

LiberalFighter

(50,825 posts)
4. If we don't want to remove access to interstate roads for them
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 10:18 AM
Jan 2013

won't the federal funding do the same thing? They are unlikely or able to continue maintain those roads.

Most of any ideas we might have likely would have serious flaws anyhow and are just hopes that won't fly.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bishop (R-UT) amends Sand...