2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCan someone draw me a pic of a heavily gerrymandered, deep red district?
I want to know what this looks like, socially, from the inside.
Are there NO Democrats in the neighborhood? Are there some that are deeply demoralized and dejected and have given up? Are there Democrats who are just scared of losing their jobs, or being ostracized?
Are there a lot of non-engaged citizens who "don't DO politics" ?
Is the local Chamber of Commerce the only group with money?
I need to know why these districts are seriously considered "lost causes" when Democratic policies are so much better for so many people. Could good policies get trojan-horsed into the dialogues?
former9thward
(31,941 posts)They numbers are just not there. If a district is 70% registered Democratic no Republican is going to win. There are only about 80 competitive districts out of 435 and that is stretching it.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Is anyone here FROM such a district? In such a district right now? I'm trying to imagine what it's like on a daily basis....
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Go here, http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/congress.html#pa
click District 12
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Aside from the convoluted contours, do you know what it's "like" there?
Can you tell, on the ground, when you cross and re-cross those boundaries?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)being in Pa, it's northern Appalachians that run from the lower left to the upper right. The district was designed to isolate Dems and runs across valley, criss-crossing highways, etc.
Go to googlemaps.com, put it in hybrid, and search for latrobe PA. Back it out a hair, and you'll get the idea.
On edit, added this link: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Pennsylvania's_12th_congressional_district_elections,_2012
blue neen
(12,319 posts)There are townships and municipalities split in half and thirds in that district. One side of the street is Republican voters, the other side Democrats or Independents.
Trust me, the Republican party did a whole lot of homework when they gerrymandered PA last year. NOTHING was left to chance. Nothing.
No Vested Interest
(5,164 posts)these maps are based on the 2000 census.
New districts were drawn based on 2010 census.
Ohio CD-01 (2012) is horribly gerrymandered.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Those are up-to-date.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)I think maybe this is the map of District 12 as it stands now:
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=picture+of+pennsylvania+district+12+in&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&biw=1472&bih=683&tbm=isch&tbnid=RP1XnxfJU39W1M:&imgrefurl=http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Elections/2012/House/Pennsylvania/12/&docid=atUY7AQKDaB6kM&imgurl=&w=650&h=650&ei=Pzn2UPvPCqex0QG02oHQCg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=4&vpy=108&dur=1046&hovh=225&hovw=225&tx=96&ty=93&sig=102138175121666047650&page=1&tbnh=132&tbnw=132&start=0&ndsp=31&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:84
Keith Rothfus (R-Teabagger) actually moved his wife and 6 children into the district to run after it was gerrymandered by the Pennsylvania Teabagger Republicans to favor Rothfus.
jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)Who can draw and post a drawing of a crowd with face palms?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)fun to look at, but not much use.
Redfairen
(1,276 posts)This is an image of Alabama's 6th congressional district which is 89% white. That finger of land which the 6th district nearly surrounds is inner city Birmingham which is 62% black and was gerrymandered into a different district a long time ago.
2012 House election results for the 6th district:
Spencer Bachus (R) - 71.4%
Penny Bailey (D) - 28.6
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Is the WHOLE white population of #6 republican?
Would a white Democrat be afraid to admit it?
former9thward
(31,941 posts)That "finger of land" which the 6th district surrounds is the 7th district which goes from Birmingham to Tuscaloosa. It also contains nine counties of Alabama's 'Black Belt'. I used to live in it. The highly irregular shape is because this is a majority-minority district, formed under provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as amended in 1982 to include greater representation for minorities in Congress. The VRA requires majority-minority districts to be at least 65% minority. If the 6th district did not have the shape it does then whites would be put into the 7th district and it is likely minorities would not have a representative.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)(I'm afraid I assumed that the district had been drawn to prevent minority representation)
I hope the SC doesn't think that this kind of protection isn't necessary anymore.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The section along Hwy 20 from Mountain Brook down through the bottom of Tuscaloosa County must have a really low population.
The Constitution needs to be amended to stop this shit.
Lars39
(26,107 posts)Got the moneyed conservatives in Brentwood (Williamson Country, 17th richest county in the USA), going to the moneyed conservatives in Germantown, with very conservative farming counties in between. Takes about 3-4 hours to get from Brentwood to Germantown, btw. Not sure why Montgomery County was thrown in.
tnlurker
(1,020 posts)As in Marsha, Marsha, Marsha.
That was the old district up until the new congress in Jan of this year. Her district basically looks the same now except it dropped the eastern parts of Shelby County (Germantown and heavy white suburbs of Memphis). East Shelby county now belongs to the 8th congressional district that had been a Democratic district for decades but went Republican in 2010. The Republican controlled state legislature moved the east Memphis suburbs to the 8th to make sure it stays Republican now.
I live in east Shelby county and my State Senators and Representative run unopposed every election because no Democrat can get more that 30% of the vote in those elections no matter how much money is spent.
Lars39
(26,107 posts)tnlurker
(1,020 posts)In the 1990's a well off Democrat spent about $600,000 of mainly his own money to win that seat when it came open (the republican in that seat was running for governor that year). He pulled in 40% of the vote. In years when a no-name Democrat runs and has very little money to spend they get about 34%.
The Tennessee Democratic party writes off that election every time as un-winnable. They never attempt to put any funds into the race no matter who is running.
dsc
(52,152 posts)It is the Democratic districts which are hugely Democratic while the GOP ones are more like 55/45 districts. NC was a perfect example of this. In NC we have 13 Congressional districts.
Democratic districts District 1 (majority minority) Dem incumbent 75% GOP challenger 23%. District 4 Dem incumbent 74% GOP challenger 25%. District 12 (majority minority) Dem incumbent 80% GOP challenger 20%
GOP districts District 2 GOP incumbent 56% Dem Challenger 41%, District 3 GOP incumbent 63% Dem challenger 37%, District 5 GOP incumbent 58 % Dem challenger 42%, District 6 GOP incumbent 61% Dem challenger 39%, District 8 GOP challenger 53% Dem incumbent 45%, District 9 open seat GOP 52% Dem 46%, District 10 GOP incumbent 57% Dem challenger 43%, District 11 open seat GOP 57% Dem 43%, District 13 open seat GOP 57% Dem 43%
Tie district (won by Democrat) District 7
District 50.1% to 49.9% this seat was drawn to be a GOP district (Romney won 57 to 43) but our very conservative Democratic candidate won by 654 votes out of 336,736 votes cast.
In the state as a whole, Democrats got more votes for Congress than did the GOP did but nearly lost 10 seats out of 13.
The Dem districts with the exception of district 7 are overwhelmingly Democratic (D 52, D 49, D 60)while the GOP districts range from a 6 point GOP edge to a 22 point GOP edge. So it is kind of the opposite of what your OP suggests.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)If the GOP edges are not as "steep", then recruitment and new voters could still be a factor.
dsc
(52,152 posts)The GOP incumbent margins are R 15, R 26, R 16, R 22, and R 14. The non incumbent margins are R 8, R 6, R 14, and R 14. The latter group will likely increase by 3% or maybe a bit more. These aren't trivial margins. Our hope is if the districts change due to immigration from other states.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)The point is to have a (single) deeply blue district, corral all your Democrats into a single district, so that the surrounding districts have Republican majorities.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)The fact that these boundaries are now set for the next decade, and demographics being what they are.. The whole gerrymandering thing seems like a fools errand.
blm
(113,013 posts)NC Dem Party has a lawsuit going on right now because the gerrymandering is so extreme in some areas.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/hotline/redistricting/modern-gerrymanders-10-most-contorted-congressional-districts-maps-20120330
Filibuster Harry
(666 posts)districts has to end.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)I've linked to Florida Congressional District 6:
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida%27s_6th_congressional_district_elections,_2012
Compare that district to the solidly Democratic District 5 right next to it:
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida%27s_5th_congressional_district_elections,_2012
Here is the map of all Florida congressional districts:
http://www.flsenate.gov/PublishedContent/SESSION/HOME/REDISTRICTING2012/PUBLICCOMMENTS/h000c9047_35x42L.pdf
If those two districts (5 & 6) were mixed up more, we'd probably get representatives that would better serve everyone. But the Florida legislature have effectively divided Republican from Democratic voters and we get more extreme representatives of each party.
(I do like Corrine Brown, but she is not who many people in that area may like.)
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)What you do is try draw the lines to confine all the opponents' votes in single districts. You want their districts to be 95% solid against you, and your districts to be 55-45 (safely but not overwhelmingly weighted in your favor) so as to get the most "purhasing power" out of each vote while reducing the impact of each vote for your opponent.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)"safely but not overwhelmingly weighted"
So demographic changes could be a big factor here...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Demographic changes could easily destabilize a gerrymandered map.