Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 08:46 PM Jan 2013

Can someone draw me a pic of a heavily gerrymandered, deep red district?

I want to know what this looks like, socially, from the inside.

Are there NO Democrats in the neighborhood? Are there some that are deeply demoralized and dejected and have given up? Are there Democrats who are just scared of losing their jobs, or being ostracized?

Are there a lot of non-engaged citizens who "don't DO politics" ?

Is the local Chamber of Commerce the only group with money?

I need to know why these districts are seriously considered "lost causes" when Democratic policies are so much better for so many people. Could good policies get trojan-horsed into the dialogues?

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone draw me a pic of a heavily gerrymandered, deep red district? (Original Post) annabanana Jan 2013 OP
If a district is 70% registered Republican no Democrat is going to win. former9thward Jan 2013 #1
And what % is unregistered altogether? annabanana Jan 2013 #2
here Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #3
Pretty damn weird map for sure. annabanana Jan 2013 #4
Not quite sure what you're after, Anna, but... Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #6
You cannot tell when you cross the boundaries. blue neen Jan 2013 #16
Unfortunately No Vested Interest Jan 2013 #13
The map at the Wikipedia link is old, but not the atlas map. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #14
Hi Buzz, blue neen Jan 2013 #15
Help poor Anna out. jerseyjack Jan 2013 #5
Oh I got GREAT face palms... annabanana Jan 2013 #7
Here's racial gerrymandering for you. Redfairen Jan 2013 #8
An ugly piece of business to be sure. annabanana Jan 2013 #9
The 6th district is a direct result of the Voting Rights Act. former9thward Jan 2013 #10
Thank you. annabanana Jan 2013 #11
That is screwed up davidpdx Jan 2013 #18
Michelle Blackburn's district: Lars39 Jan 2013 #12
It's Marsha Blackburn tnlurker Jan 2013 #28
Argh! I know better...musta been tired. Lars39 Jan 2013 #29
It is still bad tnlurker Jan 2013 #32
It actually works the opposite from what you are thinking dsc Jan 2013 #17
Yes, +1. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #19
This makes it seem not so hopeless.. annabanana Jan 2013 #21
It is pretty bad dsc Jan 2013 #23
The point is not a "deeply red" district Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #20
So the red is actually annabanana Jan 2013 #22
No - here in NC some of the red districts are very gerrymandered. blm Jan 2013 #26
I applaud all of you. You know this stuff -- an education for sure. This funky drawing up of Filibuster Harry Jan 2013 #24
Here is a place to see demographics on a district csziggy Jan 2013 #25
Actually, Gerrymandering results in less deep-red districts. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #27
Thank you Jackpine annabanana Jan 2013 #31
That's certainly correct. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #33
Here's Michele "batshit crazy" Bachmann's district: Zoeisright Jan 2013 #30

former9thward

(31,941 posts)
1. If a district is 70% registered Republican no Democrat is going to win.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 08:59 PM
Jan 2013

They numbers are just not there. If a district is 70% registered Democratic no Republican is going to win. There are only about 80 competitive districts out of 435 and that is stretching it.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
2. And what % is unregistered altogether?
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jan 2013

Is anyone here FROM such a district? In such a district right now? I'm trying to imagine what it's like on a daily basis....

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
4. Pretty damn weird map for sure.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 09:31 PM
Jan 2013

Aside from the convoluted contours, do you know what it's "like" there?

Can you tell, on the ground, when you cross and re-cross those boundaries?

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
6. Not quite sure what you're after, Anna, but...
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jan 2013

being in Pa, it's northern Appalachians that run from the lower left to the upper right. The district was designed to isolate Dems and runs across valley, criss-crossing highways, etc.

Go to googlemaps.com, put it in hybrid, and search for latrobe PA. Back it out a hair, and you'll get the idea.

On edit, added this link: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Pennsylvania's_12th_congressional_district_elections,_2012

blue neen

(12,319 posts)
16. You cannot tell when you cross the boundaries.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:36 AM
Jan 2013

There are townships and municipalities split in half and thirds in that district. One side of the street is Republican voters, the other side Democrats or Independents.

Trust me, the Republican party did a whole lot of homework when they gerrymandered PA last year. NOTHING was left to chance. Nothing.

No Vested Interest

(5,164 posts)
13. Unfortunately
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jan 2013

these maps are based on the 2000 census.
New districts were drawn based on 2010 census.

Ohio CD-01 (2012) is horribly gerrymandered.

blue neen

(12,319 posts)
15. Hi Buzz,
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:29 AM
Jan 2013

I think maybe this is the map of District 12 as it stands now:

http://www.google.com/imgres?q=picture+of+pennsylvania+district+12+in&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&biw=1472&bih=683&tbm=isch&tbnid=RP1XnxfJU39W1M:&imgrefurl=http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Elections/2012/House/Pennsylvania/12/&docid=atUY7AQKDaB6kM&imgurl=&w=650&h=650&ei=Pzn2UPvPCqex0QG02oHQCg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=4&vpy=108&dur=1046&hovh=225&hovw=225&tx=96&ty=93&sig=102138175121666047650&page=1&tbnh=132&tbnw=132&start=0&ndsp=31&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:84

Keith Rothfus (R-Teabagger) actually moved his wife and 6 children into the district to run after it was gerrymandered by the Pennsylvania Teabagger Republicans to favor Rothfus.

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
8. Here's racial gerrymandering for you.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:01 PM
Jan 2013

This is an image of Alabama's 6th congressional district which is 89% white. That finger of land which the 6th district nearly surrounds is inner city Birmingham which is 62% black and was gerrymandered into a different district a long time ago.

2012 House election results for the 6th district:
Spencer Bachus (R) - 71.4%
Penny Bailey (D) - 28.6

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
9. An ugly piece of business to be sure.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:04 PM
Jan 2013

Is the WHOLE white population of #6 republican?

Would a white Democrat be afraid to admit it?

former9thward

(31,941 posts)
10. The 6th district is a direct result of the Voting Rights Act.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jan 2013

That "finger of land" which the 6th district surrounds is the 7th district which goes from Birmingham to Tuscaloosa. It also contains nine counties of Alabama's 'Black Belt'. I used to live in it. The highly irregular shape is because this is a majority-minority district, formed under provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as amended in 1982 to include greater representation for minorities in Congress. The VRA requires majority-minority districts to be at least 65% minority. If the 6th district did not have the shape it does then whites would be put into the 7th district and it is likely minorities would not have a representative.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
11. Thank you.
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:59 PM
Jan 2013

(I'm afraid I assumed that the district had been drawn to prevent minority representation)
I hope the SC doesn't think that this kind of protection isn't necessary anymore.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
18. That is screwed up
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 09:06 AM
Jan 2013

The section along Hwy 20 from Mountain Brook down through the bottom of Tuscaloosa County must have a really low population.

The Constitution needs to be amended to stop this shit.

Lars39

(26,107 posts)
12. Michelle Blackburn's district:
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 11:38 PM
Jan 2013
http://blackburn.house.gov/district/

Got the moneyed conservatives in Brentwood (Williamson Country, 17th richest county in the USA), going to the moneyed conservatives in Germantown, with very conservative farming counties in between. Takes about 3-4 hours to get from Brentwood to Germantown, btw. Not sure why Montgomery County was thrown in.

tnlurker

(1,020 posts)
28. It's Marsha Blackburn
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:58 PM
Jan 2013

As in Marsha, Marsha, Marsha.

That was the old district up until the new congress in Jan of this year. Her district basically looks the same now except it dropped the eastern parts of Shelby County (Germantown and heavy white suburbs of Memphis). East Shelby county now belongs to the 8th congressional district that had been a Democratic district for decades but went Republican in 2010. The Republican controlled state legislature moved the east Memphis suburbs to the 8th to make sure it stays Republican now.

I live in east Shelby county and my State Senators and Representative run unopposed every election because no Democrat can get more that 30% of the vote in those elections no matter how much money is spent.

tnlurker

(1,020 posts)
32. It is still bad
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jan 2013

In the 1990's a well off Democrat spent about $600,000 of mainly his own money to win that seat when it came open (the republican in that seat was running for governor that year). He pulled in 40% of the vote. In years when a no-name Democrat runs and has very little money to spend they get about 34%.

The Tennessee Democratic party writes off that election every time as un-winnable. They never attempt to put any funds into the race no matter who is running.

dsc

(52,152 posts)
17. It actually works the opposite from what you are thinking
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:15 AM
Jan 2013

It is the Democratic districts which are hugely Democratic while the GOP ones are more like 55/45 districts. NC was a perfect example of this. In NC we have 13 Congressional districts.

Democratic districts District 1 (majority minority) Dem incumbent 75% GOP challenger 23%. District 4 Dem incumbent 74% GOP challenger 25%. District 12 (majority minority) Dem incumbent 80% GOP challenger 20%

GOP districts District 2 GOP incumbent 56% Dem Challenger 41%, District 3 GOP incumbent 63% Dem challenger 37%, District 5 GOP incumbent 58 % Dem challenger 42%, District 6 GOP incumbent 61% Dem challenger 39%, District 8 GOP challenger 53% Dem incumbent 45%, District 9 open seat GOP 52% Dem 46%, District 10 GOP incumbent 57% Dem challenger 43%, District 11 open seat GOP 57% Dem 43%, District 13 open seat GOP 57% Dem 43%

Tie district (won by Democrat) District 7
District 50.1% to 49.9% this seat was drawn to be a GOP district (Romney won 57 to 43) but our very conservative Democratic candidate won by 654 votes out of 336,736 votes cast.

In the state as a whole, Democrats got more votes for Congress than did the GOP did but nearly lost 10 seats out of 13.

The Dem districts with the exception of district 7 are overwhelmingly Democratic (D 52, D 49, D 60)while the GOP districts range from a 6 point GOP edge to a 22 point GOP edge. So it is kind of the opposite of what your OP suggests.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
21. This makes it seem not so hopeless..
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:53 AM
Jan 2013

If the GOP edges are not as "steep", then recruitment and new voters could still be a factor.

dsc

(52,152 posts)
23. It is pretty bad
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jan 2013

The GOP incumbent margins are R 15, R 26, R 16, R 22, and R 14. The non incumbent margins are R 8, R 6, R 14, and R 14. The latter group will likely increase by 3% or maybe a bit more. These aren't trivial margins. Our hope is if the districts change due to immigration from other states.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
20. The point is not a "deeply red" district
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:13 AM
Jan 2013

The point is to have a (single) deeply blue district, corral all your Democrats into a single district, so that the surrounding districts have Republican majorities.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
22. So the red is actually
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:57 AM
Jan 2013
softer than I thought.

The fact that these boundaries are now set for the next decade, and demographics being what they are.. The whole gerrymandering thing seems like a fools errand.

Filibuster Harry

(666 posts)
24. I applaud all of you. You know this stuff -- an education for sure. This funky drawing up of
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:20 PM
Jan 2013

districts has to end.

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
25. Here is a place to see demographics on a district
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:38 PM
Jan 2013

I've linked to Florida Congressional District 6:
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida%27s_6th_congressional_district_elections,_2012

Compare that district to the solidly Democratic District 5 right next to it:
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida%27s_5th_congressional_district_elections,_2012

Here is the map of all Florida congressional districts:
http://www.flsenate.gov/PublishedContent/SESSION/HOME/REDISTRICTING2012/PUBLICCOMMENTS/h000c9047_35x42L.pdf

If those two districts (5 & 6) were mixed up more, we'd probably get representatives that would better serve everyone. But the Florida legislature have effectively divided Republican from Democratic voters and we get more extreme representatives of each party.

(I do like Corrine Brown, but she is not who many people in that area may like.)

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
27. Actually, Gerrymandering results in less deep-red districts.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:55 PM
Jan 2013

What you do is try draw the lines to confine all the opponents' votes in single districts. You want their districts to be 95% solid against you, and your districts to be 55-45 (safely but not overwhelmingly weighted in your favor) so as to get the most "purhasing power" out of each vote while reducing the impact of each vote for your opponent.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
31. Thank you Jackpine
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 05:08 PM
Jan 2013

"safely but not overwhelmingly weighted"

So demographic changes could be a big factor here...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can someone draw me a pic...