Read the 1998 Affidavit of Juanita Broaddrick denying non-consensual sex with President Clinton.

[factfinder_77]

http://www.anusha.com/janedoe5.htm

Released on Monday, March 30, 1998
Following is the full text of a Jan. 2 affidavit from the woman named in documents filed by the Jones legal team on March 28, 1998. Those documents reported an unsubstantiated hearsay claim that the woman, here called "Jane Doe #5," was raped by Bill Clinton 20 years ago.

1. My name is Jane Doe #5. I am 55 years old and have been married since 1981. I have one child, age 28. I currently reside in Arkansas.

2. In November of 1997, two private investigators retained by Paula Corbin Jones approached me at my residence. I declined to speak with them, but provided the name of my family attorney. I subsequently was served with a subpoena seeking the production of documents and purporting to require my testimony at a deposition in the civil action between Paula Corbin Jones and President William Jefferson Clinton (Civil Action No. LR-C-94-290). I have never met Ms. Jones, nor do I have any information regarding the allegations that she has advanced against President Clinton. In this regard, I have no knowledge or information regarding the events she has alleged occurred on May 8, 1991 at the Excelsior Hotel or, for that matter, any knowledge or information regarding any interaction between herself and Mr. Clinton.

3. I met President Clinton more than twenty years ago through family friends. Our introduction was not arranged or facilitated, in any way, by the Arkansas State Police. I have never been an Arkansas state employee or a federal employee. I have never discussed with Mr. Clinton the possibility of state or federal employment nor has he offered me any such position. I have had no further relations with him for the past (15) years.

4. During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.

5. I do not possess any information that could possibly be relevant to the allegations advanced by Paula Corbin Jones or which could lead to admissible evidence in her case. Specifically, I do not have any information to offer regarding a nonconsensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton, any discussion offer or provision of state or federal employment or advancement in exchange for sexual conduct, or any use of state troopers to procure women for sex. Requiring my testimony at a deposition in this matter would cause unwarranted attorney's fees and costs, disruption to my life and constitute an invasion of my right to privacy. For these reasons, I have asked my attorney to advise Ms. Jones's counsel that there is no truth to the rumors they are pursuing and to provide her counsel with this sworn affidavit.

Further affiant sayeth not.

Jane Doe #5

[bigdarryl]

1. I didn't know.Bill was on the ballot

So why post this bullshit

[factfinder_77]

2. Bacause of this DU post

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512484241

[Madam45for2923]

3. Thanks for posting!

[wishstar]

4. Thanks for posting- ABC News this morning was talking about her so DU'ers need to know background

A close friend who is a big Facebooker called me this morning upset about the Trump/Broaddrick allegations going viral, and she was not familiar with any of the details so I was glad I had read about the story on DU to explain the history.

ABC News did not mention this affidavit but did say that she had never pressed charges and that Clintons had denied allegations

[factfinder_77]

5. Hope you share the link - easy to debunk the lies.

[factfinder_77]

6. Fucking CNN just discussed the "rape" without refering to the Affidavit

crazy.

[DeltaLitProf]

7. Why would she have signed this affidavit if BC really raped her?

She said she didn't report the alleged rape to police because Bill was Attorney General and could shut down the nursing home she ran. Was she still running any kind of business as of 1998 that Clinton or his friends could bring down?

[factfinder_77]

8. She has said a lot of things - to wp 1999 - "I just don't think anyone would have believed me."

Juanita Broaddrick told her story to a national television audience last night, saying she did not tell authorities 21 years ago of her contention that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her because "I just don't think anyone would have believed me."

...

Broaddrick later recanted that affidavit when questioned by FBI agents working for independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr, who found her account inconclusive. Two of the House impeachment "managers" spoke to Broaddrick but did not pursue her allegation.

Broaddrick told NBC she considered coming forward last year, after Kathleen E. Willey accused the president of groping her in the Oval Office. But, she said, "I just wasn't brave enough to do it."

Dabbing at her eye with a tissue, Broaddrick said she agreed to go on camera because "I just couldn't hold it in any longer." She said she did not want her grandchildren to ask: "Why didn't you tell what this man did to you?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick022599.htm