Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tgards79

(1,415 posts)
Tue Oct 4, 2016, 09:55 PM Oct 2016

Why You Should Completely Ignore LA TImes/USC Tracking Polls

CBS News 9/28 - 10/2 Clinton +6
CNN/ORC 9/28 - 10/2 Clinton +6
Economist/YouGov 10/1 - 10/3 Clinton +5
LA Times/USC Tracking 9/27 - 10/3 Trump +4
NBC News/SM 9/26 - 10/2 Clinton +6
FOX News 9/27 - 9/29 Clinton +5
PPP (D) 9/27 - 9/28 Clinton +4
Reuters/Ipsos 9/22 - 9/26 Clinton +6

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why You Should Completely Ignore LA TImes/USC Tracking Polls (Original Post) tgards79 Oct 2016 OP
I always do MFM008 Oct 2016 #1
It has been that way since they started. They are using a flawed sampling, and instead of fine still_one Oct 2016 #2

still_one

(92,061 posts)
2. It has been that way since they started. They are using a flawed sampling, and instead of fine
Tue Oct 4, 2016, 09:59 PM
Oct 2016

tuning it they keep the same flawed sampling

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why You Should Completely...