Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow the NYT described another racist demagogue in 1922
The Nov. 21, 1922 article -- headlined "New Popular Idol Rises in Bavaria" - offers a profile of the 33-year-old leader of the so-called Bavarian Fascisti.
While the paper accurately characterizes Hitler's hatred toward Jews and the popularity of his vitriolic public speeches, the Times also quotes sources who were just a bit off the mark.
The Times wrote: "Several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes."
The Times also quoted an unnamed politician who said Hitler was being politically deft for exaggerating his anti-Semitism.
"You can't expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims," the newspaper quoted the politician as saying. "You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them."
While the paper accurately characterizes Hitler's hatred toward Jews and the popularity of his vitriolic public speeches, the Times also quotes sources who were just a bit off the mark.
The Times wrote: "Several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler's anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes."
The Times also quoted an unnamed politician who said Hitler was being politically deft for exaggerating his anti-Semitism.
"You can't expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims," the newspaper quoted the politician as saying. "You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them."
Sound familiar? More at link.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-york-times-in-1922-hitlers-anti-semitism-was-not-so-genuine/
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

How the NYT described another racist demagogue in 1922 (Original Post)
synergie
Sep 2016
OP
If Trump was doing the same, it would likely generate the same type of article.
Behind the Aegis
Sep 2016
#2
Behind the Aegis
(55,176 posts)2. If Trump was doing the same, it would likely generate the same type of article.
However, reading right-wing media, and some "conservative" sites/news outlets, we are seeing the exact same type of sentiment in regards to his bigoted rants against immigrants and other ethnic groups. They go out of their way to "justify" or "explain" how we, the super-sensitive liberals, just don't understand and how he is speaking a truth too many are afraid to say, but he is brave for being the one to bring these issues to light.
Festivito
(13,671 posts)7. This was written in one country about another. Perhaps this article is being written elesewhere now.
Maybe even in Germany about us.
Cha
(308,477 posts)3. Ye gods!
Mahalo, synergie~
DemonGoddess
(5,126 posts)4. K&R!
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)5. It doesn't all happen elsewhere...worth knowing.
The long-forgotten racial attitudes and policies of Woodrow Wilson
March 4th, 2013
...
A hundred years ago today (March 4th, then the date of presidential inaugurations), Democrat Thomas Woodrow Wilson became the first Southerner elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848. Washington was flooded with revelers from the Old Confederacy, whose people had long dreamed of a return to the glory days of Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe, when southern gentlemen ran the country. Rebel yells and the strains of Dixie reverberated throughout the city. The new administration brought to power a generation of political leaders from the old South who would play influential roles in Washington for generations to come.
Wilson is widely and correctly remembered and represented in our history books as a progressive Democrat who introduced many liberal reforms at home and fought for the extension of democratic liberties and human rights abroad. But on the issue of race his legacy was, in fact, regressive and has been largely forgotten.
Born in Virginia and raised in Georgia and South Carolina, Wilson was a loyal son of the old South who regretted the outcome of the Civil War. He used his high office to reverse some of its consequences. When he entered the White House a hundred years ago today, Washington was a rigidly segregated town except for federal government agencies. They had been integrated during the post-war Reconstruction period, enabling African-Americans to obtain federal jobs and work side by side with whites in government agencies. Wilson promptly authorized members of his cabinet to reverse this long-standing policy of racial integration in the federal civil service.
...
The novel The Clansman by Thomas Dixon a longtime political supporter, friend and former classmate of Wilsons at Johns Hopkins University was published in 1905. A decade later, with Wilson in the White House, cinematographer D.W. Griffith produced a motion picture version of the book, titled Birth of a Nation. With quotations from Wilsons scholarly writings in its subtitles, the silent film denounced the Reconstruction period in the South when blacks briefly held elective office in several states. It hailed the rise of the Ku Klux Klan as a sign of southern white societys recovery from the humiliation and suffering to which the federal government and the northern carpetbaggers had subjected it after its defeat in the Civil War. The film depicted African-Americans (most played by white actors in blackface) as uncouth, uncivilized rabble.
...
http://www.bu.edu/professorvoices/2013/03/04/the-long-forgotten-racial-attitudes-and-policies-of-woodrow-wilson/
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)6. k and r..nt
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)8. good thing that Hitler fellow never went anywhere...
