Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

awake

(3,226 posts)
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:01 AM Jul 2016

WTF another of Hillary's "friends"kneecaps her

Terry McAuliffe's TPP comments do Clinton no favors
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-democratic-convention-2016-live-mcauliffe-does-clinton-no-favors-with-1469581798-htmlstory.html

"Hillary Clinton’s longtime friend Terry McAuliffe, the governor of Virginia and a prolific fundraiser for Democrats, just made her difficult job of pulling the Democratic Party together even tougher.

As Clinton assures restive Bernie Sanders voters that they can trust her to fight against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the massive trade deal that Sanders helped galvanize a large share of the electorate against, McAuliffe just gave them good reason to doubt her.

Asked by Politico whether Clinton will ultimately work to approve the trade deal once in office, McAuliffe said, “Yes. Listen, she was in support of it. There were specific things in it she wants fixed.”

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTF another of Hillary's "friends"kneecaps her (Original Post) awake Jul 2016 OP
Are you praising the current trade deal and do not think there needs to be any changes? Thinkingabout Jul 2016 #1
Are you for the TPP? Dawgs Jul 2016 #2
Why are you for the current trade deals? Recursion Jul 2016 #8
That is not the answer to my question, are you happy Thinkingabout Jul 2016 #39
No. You dodged my question. Dawgs Jul 2016 #40
Then if you are not happy with the current trade agreement then a new one needs to be Thinkingabout Jul 2016 #41
Fine. Throw out the TPP and start over from scratch. nt Dawgs Jul 2016 #42
How the F did you come up with that conclusion awake Jul 2016 #5
Because we need to renegotiate the current deals Recursion Jul 2016 #18
If it can be fixed, and we implement good fixes... Orsino Jul 2016 #3
"Less shitty" is the kind of "progress" we've been getting for decades. Scuba Jul 2016 #7
Centuries Recursion Jul 2016 #9
"Thank you sir, may I have another?" Scuba Jul 2016 #10
How many times does this have to be said? leftofcool Jul 2016 #4
A Couple Of Questions Here.... global1 Jul 2016 #6
#3 will unfortunately never get answered Recursion Jul 2016 #11
It Will Get Answered If Bernie Is Vocal And The Leader Of The... global1 Jul 2016 #13
Criticism is not the same thing Recursion Jul 2016 #17
The TPP can't be revised or altered now Arazi Jul 2016 #20
That is a lie. Lord Magus Jul 2016 #23
No its not. Obama has TPA authority and fast track is approved Arazi Jul 2016 #25
Which has nothing to do with your claim that TPP can't be altered. -nt- Lord Magus Jul 2016 #28
Exactly. If we don't ratify it as it stands, it will be renegotiated or we are out. Hoyt Jul 2016 #29
So Hillary Has Cover Here And Could Say She Doesn't Support TPP But... global1 Jul 2016 #26
That's exactly what it is, but I wouldn't call it smart. Exilednight Jul 2016 #38
McCauliffe is an idiot.... vi5 Jul 2016 #12
Well said I would have said something like that in my OP awake Jul 2016 #14
How many other of Hillary's stances are 'purely for sake of the campaign'?... StraightRazor Jul 2016 #22
I don't disagree..... vi5 Jul 2016 #24
That's how it will come down hollowdweller Jul 2016 #15
I see nothing wrong with this. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2016 #16
Do you support the TPP? n/t Avalux Jul 2016 #33
Not entirely in its current form, but I support the idea that trade is not bad. Why do you ask? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2016 #34
Just trying to understand why you're ok with what Terry said. Avalux Jul 2016 #35
I still don't see what's wrong with what he said. Sorry. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2016 #36
I see it as him putting words in her mouth. Avalux Jul 2016 #37
She said she is for it, just wants it tweaked. JaneyVee Jul 2016 #19
Either in it, or more likely another agreement like the Paris Accord. Hoyt Jul 2016 #30
McAuliffe has always been a clown Renew Deal Jul 2016 #21
Why is anyone surprised FreakinDJ Jul 2016 #27
Terry has his opinion. Cali_Democrat Jul 2016 #31
McAuliffe shouldn't be trotted out like he is; he sticks foot in mouth a lot. Avalux Jul 2016 #32
Why would anyone be surprised by this? JRLeft Jul 2016 #43

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. Why are you for the current trade deals?
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jul 2016

That's what I find shocking

A slight majority of Democratic voters favor the TPP so it shouldn't be surprising to run into some here.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
40. No. You dodged my question.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jul 2016

And, the current trade agreement and the TPP both suck.

Now, are you for the TPP or not?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
41. Then if you are not happy with the current trade agreement then a new one needs to be
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 04:06 PM
Jul 2016

Negotiated, correct some of the problems.

awake

(3,226 posts)
5. How the F did you come up with that conclusion
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:15 AM
Jul 2016

Terry just opened a big can of worms that need not have been even touched.

All too offen it is Hillary's "friends" are the ones who have created issues for her that were unnessary. Hillary has said that she is not for the TTP so why the F*ck is Terry bringing it up?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. Because we need to renegotiate the current deals
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jul 2016

Right now Vietnam and Malaysia don't have to have a minimum wage or let unions elect their own officers. That's not acceptable.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
3. If it can be fixed, and we implement good fixes...
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jul 2016

...there's no reason it couldn't be a good deal. Or at least much less shitty.

But it would be a very different "it."

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
4. How many times does this have to be said?
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jul 2016

I will repeat this one more time. Hillary has stated that she is against the TPP in its current form. If she gets the changes she wants, ones that protect the American workers among other things, she would consider supporting it.

global1

(25,241 posts)
6. A Couple Of Questions Here....
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:18 AM
Jul 2016

1. Other countries have to sign this deal as well - are all of them aboard or are these other countries against it too?

2. Bernie goes back to the Senate as an Independant - he says we can't let TPP pass in the lame duck session - so as a Senator can he filibuster it - like the Repugs have done with so many of Obama's bills and let it die until after the election?

3. Does Bernie have any recommended fixes that can modify TPP to make it more acceptable or does he think we should proceed without any further trade deals? Essentially - what would Bernie do (WWBD) if he was the President?

I think I just coined a new abbreviation here that we can use over the next 4 years of Hiilary's presidency - WWBD - What Would Bernie Do.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. #3 will unfortunately never get answered
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:23 AM
Jul 2016

And it's the only important question. What better achievable deal do people think is out there?

global1

(25,241 posts)
13. It Will Get Answered If Bernie Is Vocal And The Leader Of The...
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:29 AM
Jul 2016

"Political Revolution". I don't think he will hold back warranted criticism of Madam President if he feels she's not living up to the Dems Progressive Platform.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
17. Criticism is not the same thing
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:59 AM
Jul 2016

I was asking for a better trade deal framework, not what's wrong with this one. I know what's wrong with this one. I want to know what people think would be a better idea.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
23. That is a lie.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 11:48 AM
Jul 2016

Agreements can always be renegotiated, especially ones that haven't even been ratified by Congress.

global1

(25,241 posts)
26. So Hillary Has Cover Here And Could Say She Doesn't Support TPP But...
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jul 2016

if it's fast tracked through Congress and can't be filibustered then she can get by saying that she doesn't support TPP but because she was not the President yet - she couldn't do anything to stop it.

This is a way of being on both sides of the issue. Now that's a smart political maneuver.

Or am I missing something here?

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
38. That's exactly what it is, but I wouldn't call it smart.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jul 2016

Saying you're against the TPP in its current form is great, but she needs to take the next step or it has the optics of fence sitting.

She has to be vocal about the changes needed and publicly urge the president to consider those changes and to actively push for them.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
12. McCauliffe is an idiot....
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:28 AM
Jul 2016

Sorry if that breaks the rules but he really is. How can you be so balls deep in the political system for as long as he has and not know that you just don't say shit like that in the middle of a campaign.

Look, I know Hillary's anti-TPP stance is purely for the sake of the campaign, and probably largely because of running against Bernie in the primary. I don't like it, but I know it and I'm going to vote for her anyway for obvious reasons.

But McCaullife is someone who likes to be the most insider guy in the room, and shooting his mouth off without thinking is the way he does this.

awake

(3,226 posts)
14. Well said I would have said something like that in my OP
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jul 2016

But I did not want to get it locked. I do hope people wake up and remember that what they say can hurt our candidate.

 

StraightRazor

(260 posts)
22. How many other of Hillary's stances are 'purely for sake of the campaign'?...
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 11:30 AM
Jul 2016

good thing she's running against Trump or she'd have to be honest about where she stands on issues and further lessen her chances of getting elected.

This way she's essentially lucked into the 'anyone but Trump' candidate and just needs stay one degree above that cretin.

McCaullife told the truth - one that HRC supports don't want getting out, but you can't blame him for her positions.

So many Democrats under the bus at this point just to get her elected it's amazing that the wheels still touch the ground - this is 'Stronger Together'?



 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
24. I don't disagree.....
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jul 2016

My McCaullife is an idiot statement was as much that I hate his position and his style of Democrat as it was anything else.

And to answer your question I'm sure there are many other stances 'purely for the sake of the campaign". Which is what pains me about this election more than any other in my lifetime.

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
15. That's how it will come down
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:41 AM
Jul 2016

They will make some minor changes and claim it protects the working people and ram it thru.

I think our side underestimates how much that the average person is against free trade and thinks they can pull the same bs they did in the 90's again by assuring us with these modifications that it will be better.

I think if we win the way Hillary settles the trust deficit for her next run is to spend the first 2 years only doing things that are going to help average people.

I thought NAFTA was a bad idea but in the 90's I was willing to give Clinton the benefit of the doubt because he was overall a good pres.

However now we have experience and it's not a good thing. I don't think they can use the same playbook, or they can but they won't win re election if people keep losing good jobs.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
35. Just trying to understand why you're ok with what Terry said.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jul 2016

Clinton herself has not stated she supports the TPP. I support fair trade as well but the TPP is not fair.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
37. I see it as him putting words in her mouth.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jul 2016

But maybe that was the idea, so she will have to address it.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
19. She said she is for it, just wants it tweaked.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jul 2016

There was supposed to be a currency manipulation clause that never made it in and she wants it in there.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
32. McAuliffe shouldn't be trotted out like he is; he sticks foot in mouth a lot.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jul 2016

I've never liked the guy. I certainly hope he comes out and says he 'misspoke' or yes, this will cause problems for Hillary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WTF another of Hillary's ...