HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Dan Savage Has Had Enough...

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:42 AM

Dan Savage Has Had Enough Of ‘Pasty White’ Jill Stein Supporters

Dan Savage is not buying what Stein or her supporters are selling. He says what so many Democrats are thinking about Jill Stein's Presidential bid and the liberal fools who will vote for her: "Only privileged groups can afford to risk a Trump presidency", the podcast host argued in an epic rant.

Go Dan!









Dan Savage, sex-advice columnist and host of popular podcast “Savage Lovecast,” has some strong arguments against fed-up progressives voting for Jill Stein, the Green Party presidential candidate...Rather than merely run candidates in presidential elections when the stakes are highest and the spotlight greatest, Savage said marginal political parties should make a better effort to develop their presence at the state and local level before making a run for the White House.

“I have a problem with these fake, attention-seeking, grandstanding Green/Libertarian party candidates who pop up every four years, like mushrooms in sh*t, saying that they’re building a third party,” Savage opined..

.



Savage also rejected some of the circular logic of progressives backing third-party candidates. On the one hand, these voters argue that there is no difference between Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, and on the other hand, they suggest that allowing the more conservative of the two to be elected would lead to such extreme conditions that it would spark a “revolution,” Savage said....Savage noted that the Republican and Democratic candidates can either be indistinguishable, or one can be so extreme that it would prompt a revolution, but not both.

“They’re exactly the same, exactly as awful, but one would bring the revolution and one wouldn’t,” he said. “Which means they weren’t exactly the same and they weren’t equally awful.”





“Disaster will come” if Trump is president, Savage stated. “And the people who’ll suffer are not going to be the pasty white Green Party supporters — pasty white Jill Stein and her pasty white supporters. The people who’ll suffer are going to be people of color. People of minority faiths. Queer people. Women.”


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dan-savage-jill-stein_us_578fa239e4b04ca54ebfbc1c

144 replies, 9815 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 144 replies Author Time Post
Reply Dan Savage Has Had Enough Of ‘Pasty White’ Jill Stein Supporters (Original post)
Haveadream Jul 2016 OP
tonyt53 Jul 2016 #1
Haveadream Jul 2016 #2
Loki Liesmith Jul 2016 #8
Haveadream Jul 2016 #12
GoCubsGo Jul 2016 #122
Hortensis Jul 2016 #129
GoCubsGo Jul 2016 #137
Hortensis Jul 2016 #138
CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #3
LynneSin Jul 2016 #37
seaglass Jul 2016 #48
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #80
LynneSin Jul 2016 #83
Agschmid Jul 2016 #128
RockaFowler Jul 2016 #109
GoneOffShore Jul 2016 #142
SylviaD Jul 2016 #45
CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #58
SylviaD Jul 2016 #100
CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #101
Her Sister Jul 2016 #4
Paladin Jul 2016 #5
JustAnotherGen Jul 2016 #6
freshwest Jul 2016 #46
In_The_Wind Jul 2016 #120
sufrommich Jul 2016 #7
Haveadream Jul 2016 #9
NWCorona Jul 2016 #11
LynneSin Jul 2016 #39
Hortensis Jul 2016 #130
calimary Jul 2016 #65
uponit7771 Jul 2016 #115
bigwillq Jul 2016 #10
hrmjustin Jul 2016 #13
bigwillq Jul 2016 #16
okasha Jul 2016 #114
NCTraveler Jul 2016 #14
bigwillq Jul 2016 #17
Haveadream Jul 2016 #19
Ellen Forradalom Jul 2016 #33
NCTraveler Jul 2016 #40
Hortensis Jul 2016 #131
frazzled Jul 2016 #18
BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #23
bigwillq Jul 2016 #31
Ellen Forradalom Jul 2016 #34
bigwillq Jul 2016 #43
avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #70
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #88
kerry-is-my-prez Jul 2016 #125
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #87
Old and In the Way Jul 2016 #126
one_voice Jul 2016 #27
LanternWaste Jul 2016 #35
frazzled Jul 2016 #41
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #84
Silent3 Jul 2016 #136
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2016 #44
bigwillq Jul 2016 #49
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #82
TexasBushwhacker Jul 2016 #144
RandySF Jul 2016 #15
BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #20
Haveadream Jul 2016 #28
redwitch Jul 2016 #36
Ellen Forradalom Jul 2016 #38
uponit7771 Jul 2016 #116
sarae Jul 2016 #21
liberalnarb Jul 2016 #22
Haveadream Jul 2016 #25
BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2016 #47
CobaltBlue Jul 2016 #24
grossproffit Jul 2016 #127
Maru Kitteh Jul 2016 #139
GoneOffShore Jul 2016 #143
JaneyVee Jul 2016 #26
Eric J in MN Jul 2016 #79
JaneyVee Jul 2016 #95
Eric J in MN Jul 2016 #98
XemaSab Jul 2016 #123
Tarc Jul 2016 #29
Fast Walker 52 Jul 2016 #55
Eric J in MN Jul 2016 #89
Tarc Jul 2016 #119
obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #133
obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #132
Tarc Jul 2016 #134
mountain grammy Jul 2016 #30
spanzini Jul 2016 #32
stevenleser Jul 2016 #51
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #91
TheSarcastinator Jul 2016 #42
stevenleser Jul 2016 #52
TheSarcastinator Jul 2016 #57
stevenleser Jul 2016 #66
BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #107
anoNY42 Jul 2016 #50
stevenleser Jul 2016 #53
tonyt53 Jul 2016 #60
TheSarcastinator Jul 2016 #61
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #96
Post removed Jul 2016 #73
uponit7771 Jul 2016 #117
whatthehey Jul 2016 #62
TheSarcastinator Jul 2016 #63
whatthehey Jul 2016 #68
anoNY42 Jul 2016 #74
anoNY42 Jul 2016 #85
anoNY42 Jul 2016 #72
whatthehey Jul 2016 #77
anoNY42 Jul 2016 #78
whatthehey Jul 2016 #81
Haveadream Jul 2016 #105
arcane1 Jul 2016 #54
stevenleser Jul 2016 #56
bettyellen Jul 2016 #110
stevenleser Jul 2016 #121
Haveadream Jul 2016 #102
arcane1 Jul 2016 #103
HuckleB Jul 2016 #59
Starry Messenger Jul 2016 #64
MrScorpio Jul 2016 #67
Haveadream Jul 2016 #71
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #69
DemonGoddess Jul 2016 #94
Demsrule86 Jul 2016 #141
zappaman Jul 2016 #75
Eric J in MN Jul 2016 #76
KMOD Jul 2016 #90
Eric J in MN Jul 2016 #93
Downtown Hound Jul 2016 #97
uponit7771 Jul 2016 #118
kwolf68 Jul 2016 #86
Cali_Democrat Jul 2016 #92
thucythucy Jul 2016 #99
obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #135
ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2016 #104
DonCoquixote Jul 2016 #106
mwrguy Jul 2016 #108
DemocraticWing Jul 2016 #111
Haveadream Jul 2016 #113
greiner3 Jul 2016 #112
Butterflies Jul 2016 #124
Ellen Forradalom Jul 2016 #140

Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:44 AM

1. Don't really care for the guy, but on this matter i agree 100%. He nailed it.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tonyt53 (Reply #1)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:49 AM

2. He really did!

He has sometimes been slow to get with the issues outside his own and it is good to see him expanding his SJ perspective!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Reply #2)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:08 AM

8. What issues does he not pass muster on?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #8)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:16 AM

12. In the past he has been tone deaf on some LBTQ issues

and the community has taken him to task on that. He seems to have come around a lot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tonyt53 (Reply #1)

Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:15 PM

122. Actually, he got it 99% right.

The only thing he had wrong is that Stein and her ilk won't suffer under a Trump presidency. Unless they're part of the uber-wealthy circles in which Trump and his hellspawn run, they'll likely get screwed along with the rest of us, one way or another. They aren't privileged enough to be spared.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #122)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 07:36 AM

129. Not that good. He called Greens "liberals,"

which is kind of like referring to Malheur occupiers as "conservatives," as if that's what a conservative is. Works if what you're trying to do is insult disapproving conservatives, but otherwise no.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #129)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:38 PM

137. So, if Greens aren't liberal, what are they?

They sure as hell aren't conservatives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoCubsGo (Reply #137)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:45 PM

138. My main point is Green does not mean liberal.

I didn't say some Greens can't be liberal.

But liberal is a personality type before it is a political orientation, and some on the farther left are not strongly liberal in personality, or liberal at all. Some may be a mix of liberal plus more radical, extremist traits. Others are just plain extremist.

My guess is some Greens are probably pretty solidly liberal, some a mix of liberal and extremist traits, and some generally extremist.

One good clue is presence of antagonism/hostility toward Democrats. Liberals are relatively lower than both conservatives and the farther left in hostility toward anyone. A liberal may disapprove of Democrats, but repeated definite hostility toward Democrats? THAT you see among people with at least radical/extremist traits.

And of course you see a full range of those behaviors among the Greens, as well as other behaviors not widely characteristic of liberals, such as strong intolerance of anyone who disagrees with them and profound dishonesty about Democrats.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:51 AM

3. Plus, Jill Stein is about as detestable a person as a progressive can be.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CrowCityDem (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:09 AM

37. "But I want that President to reflect the values of being a mother" - Stein

I agree w/ Hillary, it's time to elect a woman for President. But I want that President to reflect the values of being a mother.

This is what Jill Stein said about Hillary Clinton ON MOTHER'S DAY.

Jill Stein can go *#% herself. There are many things one can say negatively about Hillary Clinton but for one woman to smear another woman about her ability to be a mother ON MOTHER'S DAY. I have no respect whatsoever for Dr. Stein. She is nothing more than a publicity whore who thinks somehow she is doing something to make a difference in this country. Even Bernie Sanders endorsed Hillary over her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #37)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:22 AM

48. Between that and her celebration of Juneteenth with a room full of white people - lost all respect

for her. She is from my home state, I agree with her on a lot of issues, but she is actually an asshole.

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/jill-stein-juneteenth-tweet-backlash/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seaglass (Reply #48)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:29 PM

80. I can't stand any of them.

They accomplish nothing and only slow and in some case (2000) stop progressive policy from making gains.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seaglass (Reply #48)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:32 PM

83. Omg! She did that?

That would be something I expect from Trump and his supporters!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seaglass (Reply #48)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 07:22 AM

128. I end up grocery shopping with her quite often...

Not impressed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #37)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 04:43 PM

109. That made me turn against her, too

Plus all she does is bash Hillary (along with Susan Sarandon) on Twitter. Tell me what you are for Ms. Stein. I have no idea!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #37)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 09:07 PM

142. Are we sure Jill Stein isn't a Ralph Nader clone?

I was more than willing to support the Greens in local races, until I encountered Stein's anti-science views on homeopathy and vaccinations.

She's moved over to the loon side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CrowCityDem (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:19 AM

45. How so? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SylviaD (Reply #45)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:41 AM

58. Those comments about motherhood the other reply mentioned, for one.

 

For another, seeing the existential threat Trump is to the America we know, she's still bashing Bernie for not abandoning his word and propping up the rotten carcass of the Greens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CrowCityDem (Reply #58)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 01:18 PM

100. You may be right but...

...my husband's cousin knows her and has worked with her. He says she is a good person.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SylviaD (Reply #100)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 01:52 PM

101. That could be. As a politician, she shows the worst traits of a Trump, with a cleaner mouth.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:52 AM

4. Yep, well said!

 

So clear!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:55 AM

5. Dan Savage hits another home run. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 09:59 AM

6. Well said Mr. Savage




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #6)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:21 AM

46. Brought me out of out of hibernation, this OP!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freshwest (Reply #46)

Fri Jul 22, 2016, 03:47 PM

120. Missed you!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:01 AM

7. He could have summed it up with one sentence:

"some people just want to watch the world burn".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sufrommich (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:11 AM

9. Great point, sufrommich!

That is something the far left and right have in common. They revel in the idea as long as they are the ones carrying the torches. They somehow think they will be spared when the fire gets out of control.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sufrommich (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:15 AM

11. Alfred said it best

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sufrommich (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:11 AM

39. How easy is it to watch the world burn from within our 'fire-safe house'

People who have good jobs, decent homes and salaries who let's face it, tend to also be white (I am) - they are not thinking about the entire country when they support someone like Jill Stein. A vote for Stein is a vote for selfishness and no better than people who vote for Trump because of their greediness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #39)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:07 AM

130. Well, to be fair, large numbers of POC do

also have good jobs, decent homes, etc., just not in the percentages they could now thanks to the takeover of conservative income ideology and the disappearance of so many good jobs. In any case it was never entirely true that to be black was to be poor, or helpless, and certainly not now.

Thanks to the fact that blacks are only 13% of the population, there are also a whole lot more poor whites to be hurt by electing those dysfunctional regressives on the right. And others, of course.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sufrommich (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:52 AM

65. TOTALLY true, sufrommich.

I watched a video clip of her interview with Maria Bartiromo and friends - where she went on and on with her pie-in-the-sky crap about how all we have to do is cancel the debt, and we'll have the economy of our DREAMS! Her babblings were so dithering and addled and incomprehensible that I literally started feeling dizzy. My eyes started crossing. I thought I was listening to "Word Salad Time" with sarah palin. I kept wondering - "THIS is a Harvard MD???????" I actually had to bail out of the video clip about halfway through. I just couldn't take any more of it.

I kept shaking my head and thinking - people actually want to vote for this ding-dong? To make WHAT point? To send WHAT message? (Other than "Hi! My name is Idiot!"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sufrommich (Reply #7)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:46 PM

115. Amen, mostly cause "their" world wont be burn the hottest

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:14 AM

10. Vote your conscience, Dan.

 

As I hope everyone will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:17 AM

13. I will be and that is why I am voting for Hillary.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #13)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:25 AM

16. Awesome!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #13)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:36 PM

114. Likewise.

Now, I wish we did have a strong Green Party with viable candidates. But we don't, and we won't as long as it remains nothing but a vehicle for Jill Stein's ego. Only Hillary has a plan to address climate change. If we don't deal with that problem, the other issues don't matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:18 AM

14. Ted Cruz sure is. lol.

 

I agree, people should vote their conscience.

Edit to add: K&R for the op. Stein is the embodiment of entitlement and her base is a mirror image.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCTraveler (Reply #14)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:25 AM

17. Best thing Cruz ever said.

 

Lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCTraveler (Reply #14)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:27 AM

19. Ted Cruz is with her!

Thanks, Ted!





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCTraveler (Reply #14)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:07 AM

33. Tell me about it

I have a shining example of that leftist male entitlement in my own damn family who told me that unlike Hillary, Jill Stein was a "REAL WOMAN." I had nothing against her up to that point but if that's what her supporters say I do now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ellen Forradalom (Reply #33)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:13 AM

40. That is truly sad. nt.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ellen Forradalom (Reply #33)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:13 AM

131. Lot of extremist intellect scrambling in that sphere.

Honesty takes a permanent holiday so rationalization can move in.

I had something generally like that said to me once, so I asked what a real woman was and how I needed to change to become one. He literally couldn't come up with even an incoherent half response, much less a whole sentence to explain. Apparently Limbaugh hadn't fed him a catchphrase and his comment on womanhood was him trying to fly free.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:27 AM

18. And if your conscience doesn't give a damn about

the other 323,729,999 Americans whose welfare will suffer under a Trump presidency, vote for Stein. If your conscience doesn't tremble at the economic, diplomatic, and social depredations that would most certainly befall the country under a Trump presidency, then vote your conscience.

I won't think your conscience has much of a moral or ethical core.

To be a political animal of a liberal or progressive stripe means considering the common good, not your own damned conscience.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #18)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:36 AM

23. +1! Isn't it odd seeing "vote your conscience" being used as cover for not doing the right thing?

 

This whole white progressive entitlement nonsense is moving into "beyond ridiculous" territory. Susan Sarandon really exposed this idiocy with her "Trump will bring the revolution" brain-fart.

We should absolutely criticize Green enablers for gambling the rights and safety of women and minorities all over America in some bass-ackwards plot to make America worse enough for the Greens to take over. Do they really think that the American people who saw the Greens do nothing to stop Trump now are going to trust them to do something to stop Trump later? Talk about hubris.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BobbyDrake (Reply #23)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:02 AM

31. The Greens or Libertarians or any other third party

 

Will have little impact on the 2016 race.

A large majority will vote for either the R or D.

Clinton and Trump will win or lose on their own merit, and because a small portion decided to vote for someone else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #31)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:08 AM

34. I've been jumpy

ever since 2000.

But yeah, Stein is no Nader.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ellen Forradalom (Reply #34)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:17 AM

43. I don't believe Nader was the reason Gore "lost"

 

Sure, Nader was the scapegoat because it came down to Florida but Gore was not a good candidate, imo; he couldn't even win his home state. He didn't motivate enough people in the swing states to vote for him. No one's fault but his own.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #43)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:05 PM

70. You are correct.

 

Gore did win. People who scapegoat Nader are ignorant of the facts.
http://fair.org/extra/who-won-the-election-who-cares/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to avaistheone1 (Reply #70)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:39 PM

88. Nader lowered Gores vote by taking votes

which allowed The GOP to steal the election...it was their fault after they ran Gore down for over a year.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to avaistheone1 (Reply #70)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 01:03 AM

125. Gore did win but Nader made it possible for Bush to steal the election.He was a part of allowing

a Bush presidency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #43)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:37 PM

87. The Greens and Nader are the reason for Gore's loss.

They spent all year much like this year whining about how the parties are both the same...or a Bush win would not be so...bad...well it was terrible. Had Nader not run Gore would have been presidient...many would still be alive today who died under the Bush presidency...9-11, wars, Katrina and eight years with many people having no chance at health care...And Trump would be way worse.I dislike Stein particularly. The Greens are traitors to all progressives and are dead to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #43)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 01:38 AM

126. Corget Florida. Look at New Hampshire.

Had Nader kept his word and stayed out of close contezts.
,Gore wins in NH and Florida doesn"t matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #18)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:47 AM

27. Some people must think this is a movie...

and when the shit storm hits a hero is gonna rush in and save the day. WRONG!

I'm pretty sure some just wanna complain about EVERYTHING & you know what they say: 'Misery loves company'.

Two things:

1) Either they can survive a Trump presidency & possibly a repuke controlled house/senate. In which case they're no better than the 'I've got mine so fuck you' repukes.

2) They're by nature miserable fucks who think everyone should be as miserable as them. In which case-fuck them. I hope they suffer A LOT under a repuke government. I hope they have to watch people they love suffer--though that probably won't matter because it will just give them more to bitch about.

After watching the RNC thus far, I'm not even trying to give those selfish fuckwads a break. They didn't get who they wanted and now they want to watch the country burn. FOH.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #18)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:08 AM

35. Except that for so many, the common good is part and parcel of that inconvenient "damned conscience"

Except that for so many, the common good is part and parcel of that inconvenient "damned conscience" you so righteously rail against.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LanternWaste (Reply #35)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:15 AM

41. No ...

We can all accept that Jill Stein (who has never been elected to any office, though she's tried for dozens of them) will not become President of the United States. That's an incontrovertible fact. A given. So what happens when you vote for Jill Stein? You take away a vote from Hillary Clinton. And every vote taken away from Hillary Clinton strengthens Donald Trump's chances.

A vote for Stein is, in practice, a vote for Trump. That's a fact, too.

If you are only concerned with the self-interest of your conscience, you will allow this to happen. Which makes you not a progressive, and not a liberal, and probably not even a moral person. It just makes you selfish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #18)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:32 PM

84. +1 nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to frazzled (Reply #18)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 09:11 AM

136. +1 n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:19 AM

44. I will. I'll be voting for Hilary and a straight dem ticket.....

The problems with "just vote your conscience"?

1). The information people are using is so twisted, some people think they're conscience is telling them the right thing; but it's based on disinformation.

2) In an unfortunately high number of people, the conscience is a vestigial organ.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Reply #44)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:23 AM

49. That's awesome.

 

Happy you are voting for Hillary and DEMs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #10)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:31 PM

82. If you have a conscience, you will vote for Hillary.

The horror that a Trump presidency would unleash would be terrible for everyone really but in particular LGBT, people of color, immigrants and women.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigwillq (Reply #10)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 09:17 PM

144. If you don't live in a swing state

As I don't (Texas obviously) feel free to vote for Stein or Bernie or Elmo for all I care. But please please vote for Hillary if your vote counts in the GE.

While I like some of the principles of the Greens, Stein bugs me because of her unwillingness to start at the bottom. Run for congress and serve FIRST. You know, like BERNIE. Hell, like Rand Paul.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:19 AM

15. Why won't the Greens put effort into local government?

They can won more elections for less money, do more to positively impact people's everyday lives and build a bench.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #15)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:28 AM

20. They want to complain, not be in charge. If they're in charge, they'd have to

 

complain about themselves.

Your question strikes at the very heart of why mainstream Americans don't take Greens seriously: because the Greens themselves are unserious about politics.

Seeing someone advocate for Greens as they are now is a good way to identify someone who knows less-than-nothing about politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BobbyDrake (Reply #20)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:48 AM

28. Stein certainly fits that description

So much of her message is about what is wrong rather than how she will make things right. It is easy to complain but very difficult to effect change and we have yet to see how she has any of the means necessary to do that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #15)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:09 AM

36. They actually do that.

I am married to a Green.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #15)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:09 AM

38. They were doing that for a while

I recall some positive press coverage in the 90s of Greens winning some local offices.
Not since the Nader campaign, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #15)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:48 PM

116. +1, It takes way less effort to complain than to actually be "progress"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:31 AM

21. K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:32 AM

22. He's 100% correct about the Stein supporters

 

Though I wish I didn't have to see the phrase "Liberal fools" on a Liberal discussion board.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberalnarb (Reply #22)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:43 AM

25. I agree

Unfortunately, there have sometimes been enough of them to throw the reins of power right into Republican hands causing decades of damage and loss of rights. Although they have many liberal sensibilities, some are recklessly foolish for not being able to anticipate the dangerous results of their caprice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Reply #25)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:21 AM

47. ^. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:38 AM

24. Dan Savage should be confident

 

When your party nominated the best candidate, you don’t feel a need to issue lectures to anyone who usually self-identifies with, and votes for, the party.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CobaltBlue (Reply #24)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 05:57 AM

127. Uh huh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CobaltBlue (Reply #24)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 02:12 PM

139. Foaming bull excrement. The Green party doesn't exist to vote for Democrats.

Trump, Johnson and Stein are all opposition candidates from opposition parties. Democrats nominated our best candidate, and we have seen before what happens when we just ignore opposition parties, candidates, and the special snowflakes that shill for them. Unambiguous illumination is precisely what is called for, and it was delivered.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CobaltBlue (Reply #24)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 09:11 PM

143. At this point: Cool story, bro.

I supported Bernie and his ideas. He lost. I'm not taking my vote anywhere but to HRC because, although I'm not fond of her (nor WJC, who is only mildly less objectionable than a good many people out there), the Drumpfer and his supporters frighten the bejesus out of me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:43 AM

26. Jill Stein has even less minority support than Bernie and Trump.

 

Do Jill fans not care about solidarity with marginalized groups?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #26)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:29 PM

79. In the 2008 primary, did you vote for Obama for solidarity? NT

NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #79)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:43 PM

95. Both O and HRC had huge minority support.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #95)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:50 PM

98. In Pennsylvania

...HRC got 10% of the black vote in 2008. Sanders got 30% of the black vote there this year.

In some states, she got a bigger percentage of the black vote in 2008 than Sanders this year, but overall the black vote was a landslide for Obama in the 2008 primaries and a landslide for HRC in this year's primaries.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #26)

Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:50 PM

123. I hate this "X group knows better than you do!" nonsense

It's nothing more than liberal racism.

People of color don't have any special knowledge or understanding. They get into stupid wars and kill each other just like white people do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:53 AM

29. Jill Stein is a white-privileged ass

That is all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #29)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:37 AM

55. does seem that way, plus just a weaselly opportunist

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #29)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:39 PM

89. Dan Savage is an affluent white man. NT

NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #89)

Fri Jul 22, 2016, 12:13 PM

119. Dan Savage is gay, the type of person that the GOP base wants to either

"rehabilitate" or murder.

Jill Stein is an asshole. Period.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #89)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:47 AM

133. Dan Savage is gay, and would roar with laughter at being called "wealthy"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #29)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:47 AM

132. And an anti vaxxer

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #132)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:50 AM

134. Ew, really?

I did not know that. Makes her even worse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 10:58 AM

30. Dan Savage moves on.. we all must.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:06 AM

32. Cornel West isn't pasty white

 

Who does Dan Savage think he is anyway?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spanzini (Reply #32)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:28 AM

51. There was an African American speaker at the RNC too. Using outliers to try to prove your point

 

doesnt prove your point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spanzini (Reply #32)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:42 PM

91. One guy

And Cornell is well off enough to survive. Of course, he apparently does not care if others no so fortunate survive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:16 AM

42. is this the same D. Savage who claimed those who opposed the illegal invasion of Iraq

hated homosexuals?

He's a sex advice columnist who teaches people how to pee on each other. I don't give a damn what he "thinks", any more than I care what Ted Nugent "thinks".

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/say-yes-to-war-on-iraq/Content?oid=12237

"You see, lefties, there are times when saying "no" to war means saying "yes" to oppression. Don't believe me? Go ask a Czech or a European Jew about the British and French saying "no" to war with Germany in 1938. War may be bad for children and other living things, but there are times when peace is worse for children and other living things, and this is one of those times. Saying no to war in Iraq means saying yes to the continued oppression of the Iraqi people. It amazes me when I hear lefties argue that we should assassinate Saddam in order to avoid war. If Saddam is assassinated, he will be replaced by another Baathist dictator--and what then for the people of Iraq? More "peace"--i.e., more oppression, more executions, more gassings, more terror, more fear."

On edit: it is of interest to me that many here use the same tactics against Stein that Trumpians are using against Hillary. It's very telling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheSarcastinator (Reply #42)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:32 AM

52. So your argument is he was wrong about one thing once so he can never be right even when its obvious

 

that he is?

That's not much of an argument.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #52)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:40 AM

57. Keep up those Trumpian tactics, you savvy strategists!

To Keep calling Stein supporters (and yes, I will be voting for Hillary, so you can put away your purity test and pitchfork) "pasty white" and then insult them is both racist and incredibly stupid. Even when Dan Savage is right, he is wrong. And if you think this is the most effective way to speak for a campaign, you're wrong too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheSarcastinator (Reply #57)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:54 AM

66. Calling what I said "Trumpian" doesn't mean anything. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #52)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 02:56 PM

107. He wasn't even wrong. His point was that inaction can be worse than action under

 

certain conditions. Too many fake progressives around here have illogical love for dictators.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:24 AM

50. Hooray

 

Screw voting for the best candidate, screw voting your conscience, screw voting for the person who agrees with you most. According to Savage you have to vote Blue because....Red!

Also, voting for someone you actually want to see as President is now racist (see "pasty white" comments).

This rant makes me think less of Dan Savage...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to anoNY42 (Reply #50)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:34 AM

53. And you just articulated the privileged argument perfectly.

 

If you know your actions will screw Latinos, Women and various other minorities but you do it anyway because it wont hurt you at all or nearly as much, then yes, you are voting out of a privileged, "who cares about those other people", mindset.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #53)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:41 AM

60. Bingo

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #53)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:42 AM

61. which Dan Savage is absolutely reinforcing with his angry screed

Do you really believe anyone will be persuaded to vote for (soon to be) Pres. Clinton based on this type of hyperbolic insult and smear?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheSarcastinator (Reply #61)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:47 PM

96. He is correct and yes he might make some stop

and think about others instead of their own selfish motives...mostly bitterness that their guy did not win.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #53)


Response to stevenleser (Reply #53)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:49 PM

117. Amen and Amen!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to anoNY42 (Reply #50)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:43 AM

62. And in the real world...

One of two people will be President next year. Stein is not one of the two. You can stamp your feet in futile tantrums all you want about "conscience", the meaning of which apparently has now morphed into "fuck the rest of you; I want to bathe myself in a purist patina so as to seem enlightened at the next vegan Indigo Children potluck", but you like everyone else only get to pick between alternate futures with either Trump or Clinton in possession of appointment, veto and CIC powers for the next few years. There is no option C in reality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whatthehey (Reply #62)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:47 AM

63. another brilliant bit of persuasion!

This thread is a perfect illustration of why the poll numbers are as close as they are. Campaign Clinton should be taking the high road at every opportunity -- that excellent ad that features kids watching Trump on TV is a fine example -- not engaging in this type of hyperbolic personal attack on anyone who dares disagree.

Do you really believe that the language you used in your post is going to persuade anyone to vote for Hillary? I don't. You're just throwing a nasty little vicious temper tantrum because everyone hasn't automatically defaulted to your perspective. It's ugly, and incredibly stupid from a tactical perspective.

You're treating Stein supporters -- very much potential allies in the coming election -- the same way Trumpians treat Hillary and her supporters. Low ethos, and terrible strategy. Democrats need to take the high road every time, especially in this election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheSarcastinator (Reply #63)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:02 PM

68. "Potential allies" will vote for the better future. Idiots will throw away that privilege.

I am not so arrogant as to imagine whatever I say as an obscure poster on an obscure partisan forum will make the slightest whit of difference. Anyone so mentally and morally stunted as to change their voting intention on those grounds is a waste of skin whose concerns are not worth considering for a second.

I mean fuck it, imagine what vapid nonentity would seriously think "well, I know Trump will plunge us into a depression, multiple wars, a fascist uprising and an unending race riot whereas Clinton is a bit chummy with high finance folks but will more or less stay the course. That said an anonymous internet poster who wants everyone to pick Clinton hurt my poor widdle fee-fees so I'll throw away my vote on an irrelevant protest candidate to spite them. Fuck the country, I'll show that guy who I don't know and doesn't know me!"

If that's a potential ally I'm Ming the Merciless. That's nothing but a moron.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whatthehey (Reply #68)


Response to whatthehey (Reply #68)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:34 PM

85. Not convincing me

 

sorry, but that tone is what I would have expected from my Trump-supporting neighbor...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whatthehey (Reply #62)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:11 PM

72. Yawn

 

You are wedded to a two-party system.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to anoNY42 (Reply #72)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:22 PM

77. I'm wedded to the reality in which the US *has* a two party system, not dreaming of what-ifs

When we change the Constitution to have proportional representation or IRV or another system which allows third parties to become relevant, feel free to wake up from that nap that has you both yawning and dreaming so much and we can talk third parties as serious political options until the cows come home. Absent those changes though they have as much chance of legislating or executing executive authority as Vermin Supreme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to whatthehey (Reply #77)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:26 PM

78. You talk of changing the system

 

but how would you do that if the current two parties are always comfortably in power?

Anyway, we should not be insulting those who are currently supporting third-party candidates, as Dan Savage did. Those are votes we need to convince to come over to us. In that sense, you yourself are supporting Trump by being insulting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to anoNY42 (Reply #78)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:29 PM

81. See post 68

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to anoNY42 (Reply #72)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 02:49 PM

105. DUers are generally wedded to the Democratic Party

and discuss that here on a forum created to support Democrats. The number of parties in the system doesn't have much to do with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:36 AM

54. How fucking embarrassing, that Trump has even a fraction of a chance of winning

 

I hope the Dems take a long look in the mirror after 2016, and ask themselves why it's so hard for them to beat a moron who doesn't even want the job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arcane1 (Reply #54)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:39 AM

56. That's easy to answer. The Republicans spend years beating up the most prominent Democrats

 

to make it difficult for them to win.

Anytime a Democrat emerges who looks like they could be a potential national candidate, the swarming attacks start.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #56)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 04:54 PM

110. I also have friends blaming Dems for what the Republicans do! Delusional.

 

Thanks for the pithy reply. Are you meeting me and Pri at Rudy's later?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bettyellen (Reply #110)

Fri Jul 22, 2016, 10:44 PM

121. Just saw your response. Hard for me to attend anything these days.

 

I sign up and then work or baby duties become overwhelming. Hope you guys had a great time!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arcane1 (Reply #54)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 02:19 PM

102. Even more embarrassing and dangerous are the number of Americans who actively support Trump

He is a homegrown monster, and, whether we like it or not, he is our monster. People of good conscience will take responsibility for preventing him and his cohorts anywhere near the White House and the Supreme Court.

If Trump wins, anyone who did not vote for Hillary is personally responsible for their part in getting him elected and the consequences of that. They are responsible when people lose their healthcare, when costs for insurance and prescription drugs go up, when ever more minorities are imprisoned, when an emboldened, better armed police force is unaccountable for their actions, when torture is green lighted, even for the families of the accused, when women are denied or criminalized for seeking healthcare and reproductive rights, when conservatives control the Supreme Court for the next 30 years, when Citizens United remains the path to elections, when more protective voting rights laws are eliminated, when carbon emissions from a heavily promoted gas and coal industry accelerate causing irrevocable climate change, when college costs more, not less and student debt gets worse, when a stagnant minimum wage keeps more people in poverty, when the 1% gets even more tax breaks, when tent cities and mass deportations become routine, when hate crimes increase, when guns and mass shootings proliferate, when social security is privatized and our response to every foreign policy conflict is to go rogue from NATO allies and simply carpet bomb our enemies.

WTG, Greens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Reply #102)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 02:37 PM

103. What a pathetic country we are.

 

oh well, my vote doesn't matter anyway. My state will elect Hillary no matter where my vote goes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:41 AM

59. Dan Savage is spot on!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:52 AM

64. Something tells me "Pheasant" isn't suffering from much in life.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 11:55 AM

67. DAN Skippy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MrScorpio (Reply #67)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:07 PM

71. lol!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:02 PM

69. Savage nailed it.

Green are the most selfish blind voters on the planet...and many either have nothing to lose or are no smart enough to understand what Trump presidency would bring to this country. Trump is dangerous. He is the kind of guy who runs for election once and remains for life...the best case scenario is he turns the presidency into his personal enrichment vehicle...but that would mean Pence running the country ...look at Indiana if you want to see how that will go.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #69)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:43 PM

94. We really do NOT want either of 'em anywhere NEAR

the White House. Pence is my governor. He's an utter asshole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemonGoddess (Reply #94)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:21 PM

141. He sure is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:17 PM

75. Kick and rec!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:19 PM

76. Race baiting by a white man. NT

NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #76)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:41 PM

90. Truth telling, not race baiting.

 

What the heck is a Berniecrat?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KMOD (Reply #90)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:42 PM

93. Berniecrat = Democrat who supports Sanders. NT

NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #76)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:47 PM

97. Bullshit X 1000. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #76)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:50 PM

118. Facts say different

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:34 PM

86. Part right, part wrong


I agree the Greens should put resources into local races. I agree it's a dog and pony show. But when the main candidates leave people wanting what do you expect? The Greens have no faith in the Democratic establishment anymore and Hillary sure does nothing to curb those fears. WHOSE fault is that? Yes, Trump is dangerous and I believe a practical vote is to vote for Clinton, but others don't feel that way. Many will NOT vote this year and many will vote third party. I blame that on who the two parties have nominated. Not some sort of selfish delusion by people who can no longer stomach voting for the "less of the worse".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 12:42 PM

92. K&R....Excellent article

 

Dan Savage is spot on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 01:12 PM

99. Stein and the Greens today are as deluded

as the far left in Germany in 1932. They urged their followers to do what they could to fuck up the workings of the Weimar Republic, and withdraw support from the Social Democrats, calling them "Social Fascists" -- in other words. just as bad or worse than the Nazis. The reasoning was much the same: Hitler coming to power would be a "temporary aberration" and his failed regime would quickly clear the way for a true socialist victory.

This was dangerous bullshit then (as history so tragically proved) and it's dangerous bullshit now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thucythucy (Reply #99)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 09:03 AM

135. This This This

Starry Messenger and I have discussed this IRL many times.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 02:41 PM

104. I was a YUGE Bernie fan, but

There really is no choice. Jill does little or nothing to earn my vote. Same for that crazy libertarian whose name was so memorable that I forgot it.

If Hillary does not win, our country is in deep deep dew dew.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 02:55 PM

106. I am so ready

to make this quote a signature

"“Disaster will come” if Trump is president, Savage stated. “And the people who’ll suffer are not going to be the pasty white Green Party supporters — pasty white Jill Stein and her pasty white supporters. The people who’ll suffer are going to be people of color. People of minority faiths. Queer people. Women.”

To which I add, the affluent pasty white know they will never pick up the bill for their parties, we do. We are also the maids and butlers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 04:40 PM

108. Dan should go lick her doorknobs and coffee cups

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 06:55 PM

111. Jill Stein's a moron, but I don't like what Savage said.

She does have supporters who are people of color or from other non-privileged groups, and I think pretending that minority leftists don't exist is something that we've had enough of this year.

I think if I was voting along on who best supported social justice, then maybe Stein's position gets there...but she mixes in too much nonsense and comes across as an idiot when talking. Throw in the fact that she has no chance and it's not a hard choice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocraticWing (Reply #111)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 07:11 PM

113. I think pretending we don't live in the real world

with a realistic choice of only two candidates is either dangerously delusional, not terribly bright or privileged enough to willfully ignore that. Stein can not legitimately be invested in social justice and still be willing to take the risk of Donald Trump being elected. Bernie knows that, conceded, endorsed Hillary and is not supporting Stein. Robert Reich knows that, endorsed Hillary and is not supporting Stein. Thom Hartmann knows that and is not supporting Stein. He also agrees with Dan Savage on this specific issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Thu Jul 21, 2016, 06:59 PM

112. But but

 

Ralph lost it for us in 2000.

NOT!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:36 AM

124. He's right

More people need to read this . . .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Haveadream (Original post)

Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:13 PM

140. Thank you Dan

I'm with him on this

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread