Campaign cash of Sanders growing, despite elimination

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

Despite Hillary Clinton winning the outright nomination on June 7, Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) refuses to back down. According to CNN, Sanders pledges to fight on to the convention. Sander’s supporters have also made it clear that they will continue to give money to his campaign.

In fact, according to recent Federal Election Commission data, the Sanders campaign raised an additional $17 million throughout June, despite being mathematically eliminated. Of the over $229 million Sanders has now raised in total, 99.98 percent has come from donations, which is greater than what presidential candidates Donald Trump, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Ohio Governor John Kasich raised.

Sanders has no debt that he needs to settle, and has spent approximately $219.9 million with a surplus of $9 million remaining, which he will most likely spend before he drops out of the campaign.

[NCTraveler]

1. Do you have a link to his May financials? nt.

[lapucelle]

40. Here's a link

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00577130/1079424/

He had to return contributions to 2464 donors.

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00577130/1079424/sb/28A/1

[Her Sister]

84. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Her Sister]

95. “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.”

Mark Twain

[Her Sister]

66. I think there is no corroboration for what this article is saying and the source is suspect!

FEC does not show that he got whatever amount of money in June! All we know is the end of May! 9 million end of May. There is also no corroboration that he has no debt.

Strange website and very recent. Started in April of 2016!! Something's off

and their twitter is bare minimum also started in April. Most articles are from month of June! HMMmmmm!

Am looking at the FEC website and not finding this info!
Here is the real FEC website and the last numbers for Bernie is Filed in June for month of May

http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommitteeDetail.do

That was the May 31, 2016 data.

There is no date for June yet. It has yet to be filed.

Look here what the heck is this:


CAMPAIGN CASH OF SANDERS GROWING DESPITE CLINTON’S OUTRIGHT NOMINATION

http://usapoliticsnow.com/?p=2870


Same article!!!!!

Exact & same article in 2 websites

1st one is a new website and most but two articles are from June! has author.

2nd website is dripping with hate for HRC! shows no author


https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

http://usapoliticsnow.com/?p=2870

Where the heck did Sandhya Taneja get this info!

Trying everywhere in the internets and keep coming back to this article. Can anyone help??

[Her Sister]

85. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Her Sister]

113. Problems now with the title of the Article/OP

Especially after they corrected erroneous information that was the reason for the title.

[liberal N proud]

2. If there is another lost cause you want to donate, I could use some

[pangaia]

42. It is not a lost cause. He is winning the cause he ran for.

[Her Sister]

86. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Her Sister]

79. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Politicalboi]

3. Great News

It's better to have him on stand by just in case..........

[brooklynite]

19. Just in case WHAT...?

[Go Vols]

60. Bobby Kennedy?

?t=1m53s

[Her Sister]

80. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[TheKentuckian]

92. Having SPAM for lunch today?

[Her Sister]

93. “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.”

by Mark Twain!

Felt the truth was important! Having truth for breakfast in the East Coast.

Are you in Kentucky at the moment?

[DanTex]

4. Good news, he should be able to pay for his delegates to attend the convention now.

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

5. He just sent out a new fundraising email...

Tonight is an important fundraising deadline for our campaign, XXX, and I want to take a moment to tell you why.

In less than one month, we are going to take our political revolution into the halls of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia where we will fight to place a $15 minimum wage, opposition to the TPP, and a ban on fracking directly into the Democratic Party platform.

Our campaign has earned the right to send almost 1,900 delegates to vote on these important issues, but many of them are working folks and the costs of attending the convention are too high. So I want to help them get there, because this campaign isn’t about Bernie Sanders, it’s about all of us.

We have another FEC fundraising deadline tonight, the last one before the convention. And when we report our numbers, we can send a powerful message to the political establishment that we intend to get every last one of our delegates to Philadelphia to fight for the values we share.

Can I count on you to make another contribution to our campaign today? This one will go directly towards ensuring we can get all of our delegates to Philadelphia for the convention next month.

Our power comes from a simple, timeless truth: that when people stand together, there is nothing we cannot accomplish. And I know that if we continue to fight to get all of our sisters and brothers to Philadelphia next month, we are going to transform the Democratic Party.

In solidarity,

Bernie Sanders

Spoiler alert: I donated

[DanTex]

13. I support that. Getting his delegates to the convention is a legitimate use of funds.

Also I'm glad that he left single payer out of his list of demands. We might have unity after all.

[Eric J in MN]

37. I don't think he meant the items

...mentioned in that email as a complete list of issues he may ask delegates to vote on. But I also don't think he needs to win all such votes to be satisfied.

[eridani]

75. I guess you oppose the 81% of Democrats who favor single payer?

II guess they just aren't' "real" Democrqts.

[Her Sister]

77. Nah! Democrats voted for the nominee~ The one building on- on Obamacare

So no thank you!

eridani
I guess you oppose the 81% of Democrats who favor single payer?
View profile
II guess they just aren't' "real" Democrqts.

This is false ~

[eridani]

110. If you don't favor single payer, you are out of step with 81% of Democrats

[Her Sister]

111. Stop repeating that. Right now we voted & chose the nominee that will build on Obamacare

so stop repeating that 81% blah blah blah. (oooopps your're not going to like the blahhh blahh blah am sure!) The candidate for that was not chosen. We want Obamacare to be built on.. You are acting like you don't get this point, which was hashed during the whole primaries and was an important part. Obamacare was hard fought and a great accomplishment. Needs to be tweaked and built on. Stop the nagging about single payer. It did a showing in the primaries and did not win!! Many of us did not think it'd be a great idea with the congress we have. Plus there are different ways to have Universal Health care.

Ah rehashing the whole she-bang! You probably already know all the arguments but you're really enamored of your one little tidbit and think that ought to be the winning argument.

eridani
110. If you don't favor single payer, you are out of step with 81% of Democrats

I consider you fighting over this being stubborn when millions more chose and voted for the candidate that would build on Obamacare. How many and varied ways ought I or we say this. The nominee was voted and chosen because of her platform and that includes building on Obamacare.

Again HRC won, her platform includes building on Obama Care. SHE won for many reasons and building on Obamacare was one of them.!!

If we favor building on Obamacare we are in step with the Majority that chose the winning nominee HRC!

eridani
110. If you don't favor single payer, you are out of step with 81% of Democrats

If you don't favor building on Obamacare you're out of step with the majority of Democratic Primary voters!

and you're choosing to rehash the losing nominee's losing idea, which lost in part because of it!

[eridani]

114. Right. The 85% who account for 15% of health care expenses just told the sick 15%--

--to fuck off and die. Right back atcha. People are dying right now because paying for insurance is preventing them from getting actual health care.

[Her Sister]

116. Wow! if this was such an emergency and BS really had the winning solution he would've

garnered more votes. As it is the nominee's platform builds and perfects on the hard-fought-for Obamacare!

eridani
114. Right. The 85% who account for 15% of health care expenses just told the sick 15%--
View profile
--to fuck off and die. Right back atcha. People are dying right now because paying for insurance is preventing them from getting actual health care

The primaries was a lot to do with this topic. Part of that was also recognizing that Congress obstructed Obamacare the whole way. It seems like people want to forget about that and about CONGRESS!

[eridani]

117. Bullshit. Voters vote more on name recognition than on policy

Yes, Congress would fight single payer. So let's just stop advocating for policies we want? (Though I think that state by state is the best approach.) Let's just keep executing 22,000 people a year in the name of insurance companies. Yes, Obamacare cut that number in half, but mass murder is still mass murder.

[Her Sister]

119. I voted on brilliance and qualifications and yes Knowledge of this candidate

which meant she was vetted and vetted throughout the years and even through smears. I voted for the candidate who cares about the many things I care about. I voted for the candidate that can be a team player and a team leader. I voted for the candidate that could explain her goals and platform and all the details and heck she probably could explain all the other candidates platforms better than them if she wanted to. I voted for the candidate who showed she was aware of and understood what it took to get Obamacare passed! I voted for the candidate who will help down the ballot candidate get elected because that's what's really needed as per out constitution. I made an informed decision and voted for HRC and she is the nominee.


In any case we gotta stop meeting like this because we are close to rehashing the primaries and we got a nominee and she's got her platform and so forth and so on.

And you are starting to use words like Bullshit and that's not a convincing argument. Bye. Have a good Holiday weekend!

eridani
117. Bullshit. Voters vote more on name recognition than on policy

Yes, Congress would fight single payer. So let's just stop advocating for policies we want? (Though I think that state by state is the best approach.) Let's just keep executing 22,000 people a year in the name of insurance companies. Yes, Obamacare cut that number in half, but mass murder is still mass murder.

[eridani]

120. I'll vote for her because Trump's much worse

Nice to hear that 22,000 dead people a year is fine by you. Not to mention the ones in US imperial wars (not that Sanders could do much about that.) She has zero coattails--unless you think that Repub women disgusted by Trump are going to vote for downticket Democrats. I'm not holding out too much hope for that.

[pangaia]

43. Spoiler alert: Me, too.

[politicaljunkie41910]

55. When you have to say, "this campaign is not about Me". Trust me. It's about Me."

[Her Sister]

6. Wouldn't that be considered paying/bribing a delegate's vote?

[blackspade]

12. Um, No

[randome]

14. No, it's only when you shake their hand and get to know them that it's considered bribery.

[Surya Gayatri]

17. Plenty in the kitty, apparently.

[Her Sister]

87. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Surya Gayatri]

103. The figure IS suspect...nevertheless, I'd bet even money that there's still

enough in the piggy bank to pay for some Sanders delegates to travel to Philly, without hitting up his mailing list again.

Whatever...

[Her Sister]

105. If you go to the article now, they wrote a correction and changed it!

I posted below:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512229927#post54

[Surya Gayatri]

106. You were right to question its veracity...lots of misinformation being

intentionally bandied about .

[JRLeft]

50. He's also fundraising for downtickets.

[tonyt53]

52. Who? List of all please.

[Her Sister]

81. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[libdem4life]

121. Are you really, really sure? Good lord. Take a rest already.

[riderinthestorm]

7. Excellent! $$ equals power.

He can help down ticket candidates and keep getting his message out.

Good.

[Her Sister]

9. Has he done this with Campaign money donated to his campaign?

He can help down ticket candidates...

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

11. Yes, by virtue of using split donations in Actblue when he has sent fundraising emails for thee nt

[Eric J in MN]

39. He asks people to donate directly to downballot candidates

...instead of asking them to donate to him to pass on.

[Her Sister]

88. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[libdem4life]

122. Have you got a closed loop tape going...one track posting?

I've never seen this obsession on DU before.

[Uncle Joe]

8. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, GeorgiaPeanuts.

[Her Sister]

78. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[blackspade]

10. Awesome, and he is using that money to help elect progressives....

The revolution continues!

[Her Sister]

15. Strange website and very recent. Started in April of 2016!! Something's off

and their twitter is bare minimum also started in April. Most articles are from month of June! HMMmmmm!

https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

https://whipboard.co/what-is-a-whipboard/

https://twitter.com/whipboard/

Here their staff with Total Posts/articles.

Whipboard Staff:

Hanna Talley
15 POSTS
Erin Hickok
6 POSTS
Sandhya Taneja
5 POSTS
Eric Vistnes
3 POSTS
Adam Nekola
1 POSTS
Elisabeth Ericson
1 POSTS
Evan Bell
0 POSTS

That's it!

[Lord Magus]

18. Why is he soliticing donations for a zombie campaign instead of for downticket Dems?

Or for the party as a whole?

[shenmue]

27. Dingdingding

[Her Sister]

90. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Her Sister]

89. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[Her Sister]

20. Am looking at the FEC website and not finding this info!

[Her Sister]

21. Am telling you your source is suspect!

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

22. What?

https://beta.fec.gov/data/candidate/P60007168/?tab=summary

Clearly says he has ~$9 million cash on hand and no debts. I am happy about this because it means he won't have to beg Clinton and grovel at her feet so that she pays off his campaign debts like happened in 2008. So his leverage at getting the best platform possible won't be diminished.

[Her Sister]

25. yep I already looked there and that "beta" FEC website under construction is also suspect

https://beta.fec.gov/

beta.FEC.gov
A work in progress

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

26. FEC(DOT)GOV.... It is the official FEC Beta site.

I assume the new site is being developed to replace the existing one. The new one is much easier to navigate and get important information quicker.

[Her Sister]

28. Here is the real FEC website and the last numbers for Bernie is Filed in June for month of May

http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommitteeDetail.do

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

29. Wrong...

Your link even shows in the top right a link to the FEC beta website I just linked you to.

[Her Sister]

35. Where is the info about June money besides the cash at hand at end of May

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

33. Also here specifically is his filing for June from the beta FEC site

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/213/201606209018597213/201606209018597213.pdf

Found here: https://beta.fec.gov/data/committee/C00577130/?cycle=2016&tab=filings

[MineralMan]

38. That was the May 31, 2016 data.

There is no date for June yet. It has yet to be filed.

[bettyellen]

74. LOL...... Oops.

[LiberalFighter]

69. Go to fec.gov and in the upper right hand corner it says Try out betaFEC

[Her Sister]

70. There's no filing of June numbers yet!

Maybe writer is looking at the numbers for the month of May which are filed in June (20th).

Maybe she's making it up, or she confused the month.

[LiberalFighter]

71. Likely doesn't understand that just because it is filed in June does not mean it is for June.

[Her Sister]

73. Yes, so makes the article wrong! wrong!

I still haven't seen anywhere else what this article is saying.

[lapucelle]

46. Plus $9,000,000 is enough money to pay for his delegates to go to Philly.

That is what he is going to use the money for, isn't it?
I'm sure that Weaver and the O'Meara clan will be happy to do a month of work pro bono.

As for Sanders's leverage...it was diminished after New York and at this point is nonexistent.

h/t E Warren

[Maru Kitteh]

64. There was no "pay-off" of Hillary's debt in 2008. Were you aware of this and repeating a lie

or did you honestly not know this?

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

65. If that is true I didn't know it....

CNN article here suggests you are not entirely accurate: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/25/obama.clinton.debt/index.html?iref=newssearch

[LiberalFighter]

72. No where in the CNN article does it say that Obama paid it off.

He ask others to help out.

[MohRokTah]

23. P. T. Barnum was right!

[Her Sister]

24. Look here what the heck is this:

CAMPAIGN CASH OF SANDERS GROWING DESPITE CLINTON’S OUTRIGHT NOMINATION

http://usapoliticsnow.com/?p=2870

Same article!!!!!

[MADem]

31. Does "USUNCUT" have it yet?

I love the smell of astroturf in the morning....

[DemonGoddess]

34. oh I see

another Bernie or Bust thing. Lovely.

[riversedge]

56. uga. Looks like a Hillary hate site IMHO

Had now clicked that one before. Hope to not again.

[Her Sister]

59. Yes! exactly!

These are the only two sites with the same info ---and they happen to be actually the same article!
In the meantime the writer is a University Student. Not sure what she's basing her info on. The FEC does not show/prove what she's saying!

[libdem4life]

30. I continue to support him and continue to expect that he will support

those down ticket who share his values. IMO, that's why many of us continue. It could very well be to put pressure on 2018 and 2020 for what we really want...no Neoliberal/Third Wayers running the New Democratic Party.

Interestingly enough, he is living his message...money from the people to whom he is beholden to. Not huge donations from Corporations (Oligarchy) to be beholden to. The social issues are rather minor, but this one Is Not Minor. We, The People want our equal say. That's why many quit in disgust or dispair or boredom over the past decades. Berne brought many of them out. He listens and marches with union members and other Blue Collar values. You'll not find him talking to Management or the Boardrooms.

[CajunBlazer]

62. Well, if this is what you want....

"...no Neoliberal/Third Wayers running the New Democratic Party" after 2018 and 2020, I think you are setting yourself for big disappointment.

I don't appreciate your use of the term, "Neoliberal/Third Wayers", it is obvious that you meant it in a derogatory manner, but no one could misunderstand to whom you are referring. Hillary Clinton and the Democrats who support her will indeed be running the the Democratic Party until at least 2020 and I am reasonably sure until 2024. Even if she is displaced in 2020 it will be by a Republican, not someone out of the Sanders mold.

[libdem4life]

67. Both she and Bill are Neoliberals...Bill kind of wrote the book on it.

Convenient pragmatism. If you can't beat them, join them.

And as for disappointments, nothing new about that.

There is a global push against top down government...Brexit, and other European countries are experiencing their issues, as well. Trump, sorry to say, is how the Republicans are experiencing their disdain.

So, "The Sander's Mold" as you put it, is bottom up democracy...and that's not anything radical. As to HRC...time will tell. And I'm real tired of "No, we Can't."

"This love leaps from the pages of SEC filings, which show Clinton raising a startling sum of cash from the financial sector.

While Trump represents an angry and largely incoherent rebuke of the establishment and Sanders embodies an inspiring alternative to stale corporate liberalism — which has, as Doug Henwood has written, shown itself to be the enemy of "even mild social democracy" — Clinton represents more politics and economics as usual.

And she is being rewarded for her commitment to the status quo.

Ultimately, though, as long as Sanders is defeated, business will, for the most part, be satisfied.

Whichever party wins office," concludes Corey Robin, "donors can expect that their material interests will be fulfilled. Not because of bribery, simple quid-pro-quos, or access, or influence, but simply because both parties are so ideologically amenable to meeting the needs and interests of wealthy donors."


http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/06/30/wary-trump-business-leaders-are-flocking-clinton-style-neoliberalism

Call it what you will...I call it Top Down Government...just short of Oligarchy. Neoliberalism.

[CajunBlazer]

68. Well Hillary is going to be the next President....

... with or without your help. And the moderate wing (my preferred term) of the Democratic Party is going to be running things for the next 8 years. I like that that way; to me it is those on the far left and far right who are most responsible for the extreme partisan divide which has paralyzed our government for years. It is time for the reasonable moderates in both parties to find ways to compromise on issues and get back to effective government. There are far more moderates in this country than those on the far right and the far left combined, though those on the extremes yell the loudest, so there is no reason why it can't happen

[Her Sister]

32. BTW that last post about "usa politics now" another crap website but has exactly the same article

but no author. I could not find that info anywhere else. Only these two suspect sources with that info.

[MineralMan]

36. Those numbers only go up to May 31, 2016.

June figures are not there, and won't be for a while. So, you're looking back to before the primaries were even done.

There is no reporting for June donations or expenditures. We have no idea how much money is in his till at this time.

[Her Sister]

41. exactly!

[uponit7771]

63. +1

[Her Sister]

44. Exact & same article in 2 websites

1st one is a new website and most but two articles are from June! has author.

2nd website is dripping with hate for HRC! shows no author

https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

http://usapoliticsnow.com/?p=2870

[skylucy]

58. Her Sister----Thank you for looking into this and finding that it is bogus. It didn't make sense

to me when I read it and your research gave me the information needed to discount it.

[Her Sister]

45. I think there is no corroboration for what this article is saying and the source is suspect!

FEC does not show that he got whatever amount of money in June! All we know is the end of May! 9 million end of May. There is also no corroboration that he has no debt.

[lapucelle]

47. Yes, but I heard a guy on a street corner with a megaphone say it!

[Her Sister]

48. Author of bogus article above: Sandhya Taneja. Twitter is brand new as of June

https://twitter.com/officialsandhya



Says she writes for whipboard (where article came from) and fiscal note

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FiscalNote

FiscalNote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FiscalNote
FN-color-large-01.png
Type
Technology
Industry Internet, Software as a service, Open data
Founded 2013
Founder Timothy Hwang: CEO
Gerald Yao: Co-Founder
Jonathan C. Chen: Co-Founder
Headquarters Washington, D.C.
Website www.fiscalnote.com
FiscalNote, Inc. is a technology company that helps businesses and organizations take control of their government strategy with the first dedicated government relationship management (GRM) system. The company is headquartered in Washington, D.C. with offices in New York City. Clients include Aetna, Lyft, Southwest Airlines, Enerplus, and the University of Virginia.

FiscalNote leverages artificial intelligence and beautiful design to make government data more accessible and actionable across industries. FiscalNote is the first government strategy platform to offer a mobile application, allowing users to access and analyze every bill at every stage from all fifty states, D.C. and Congress on their phones. These offerings tie to the company’s objective – empowering organizations to take control of their government strategy.

https://twitter.com/FiscalNote

[Her Sister]

49. Where the heck did Sandhya Taneja get this info!

Trying everywhere in the internets and keep coming back to this article. Can anyone help??

[Her Sister]

51. Linked Resume of Sandhya Taneja. Junior in University of MCP

Summary
I am a junior at the University of Maryland College Park focused on Economics with a minor in General Business, planning to pursue my dreams of being a Corporate Lawyer and fostering a relationship between these two fields.

Scholarship, Leadership, and Service are three characteristics that I find very important to succeed.

Scholarship to me means academic excellence, which I take full advantage of by attending the 19th best public university in the United States and being both a student of the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences and of the Robert H. Smith School of Business.

Leadership entails confidence, integrity, and teamwork, which I demonstrate as I tutor students from K-12 at Kumon Math and Reading, is a wedding planner for Seven Ivory Brides, and is also involved on campus as Association of India’s Development’s Vice President. Having worked with a myriad of different people, I know first-hand that with success comes hard work and determination.

Lastly, there’s service. I am a recipient of the Congressman Chris Van Hollen Public Service Award for dedicating over 1000 hours of her time towards her community, and was invited to be a part of the Co-Ed Service Fraternity Alpha Phi Omega. I hope to open my own law firm in the future and create my own NGO.
Experience


Junior Political Writer
FiscalNote
May 2016 – Present (2 months)

[Her Sister]

54. Sandhya Taneja: I am a junior at the University of Maryland College Park focused on Economics

Sandhya Taneja

Junior Political Writer at FiscalNote
United States

Current Junior Political Writer at FiscalNote, President at Raising India Socially and Economically (RISE), Junior Event Planner and Pay it Forward...

Past Marketing Executive at Student Entertainment Events, Sales and Marketing Intern at Aflac, Administrative Assistant at Maryland State...

Education University of Maryland College Park

Summary I am a junior at the University of Maryland College Park focused on Economics with a minor in General Business, planning to pursue my...

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Sandhya/Taneja

[Her Sister]

61. Says she also works here: https://www.fiscalnote.com/ FISCAL NOTE

https://www.fiscalnote.com/ What the heck is this?

Fiscal Note Twitter: https://twitter.com/FiscalNote

Any answers?

[aikoaiko]

53. Thanks for the reminder. I just clicked on the express donate button again for another $27

Go, Bernie, go!

[IMG][/IMG]

[pkdu]

102. Dear Aikoaiko, Thankyou very much..

Best Regards,

Jeff Weaver.

[Her Sister]

57. I see this bogus article/info is spreading through reddit!

[MFM008]

76. .....

[Her Sister]

83. OP Source is suspect. New website and new writer. Facts don't corroborate statements

The writer of the piece is either making it up or confused. Must be thinking of month of May, not June.

[harris8]

91. Just donated again this morning. NT

[Her Sister]

94. “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.”

Mark Twain!

[ms liberty]

98. Have you emailed the author

Of the article, asking her the questions you've posted ad nauseum in this thread? You do have her contact info; you posted her profile three times in this thread, after all. But congrats on padding your post count, and Welcome to DU!

[Her Sister]

108. Ah thank you for your welcome! I joined DU because of misinformation and disinformation and lies

and smears and hate and stupidity and condescension and bullying !!!

Yeah it ticks me off!

ms liberty
98. Have you emailed the author

Of the article, asking her the questions you've posted ad nauseum in this thread? You do have her contact info; you posted her profile three times in this thread, after all. But congrats on padding your post count, and Welcome to DU!

Here you can see the trajectory of my research yesterday when it all started.... Its a love story... take a chair... long time ago.... There were some really clever gnomes that lived in some far far away land where birds could talk and Crocodiles could fly....

[Her Sister]

109. So I guess they edited & corrected since Yesterday!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512227794#post104

[Her Sister]

96. Disinformation

Disinformation is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately.[1] It is an act of deception and false statements to convince someone of untruth. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false.

Unlike traditional propaganda techniques designed to engage emotional support, disinformation is designed to manipulate the audience at the rational level by either discrediting conflicting information or supporting false conclusions. A common disinformation tactic is to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies, or to reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole (a limited hangout).

Another technique of concealing facts, or censorship, is also used if the group can affect such control. When channels of information cannot be completely closed, they can be rendered useless by filling them with disinformation, effectively lowering their signal-to-noise ratio and discrediting the opposition by association with many easily disproved false

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation

[Sheepshank]

99. Poor, unsubstatiated info that it likely completley false

and yet there are those that so badly want this to be the truth, they jump on the noble cause, donation bandwagon. Makes one wander why this untruth is being broadcast?

[Her Sister]

100. Editors correction:Editor’s Note: A previous version of this story incorrectly reported May fundrais

Editor’s Note: A previous version of this story incorrectly reported May fundraising as June

Finally!

Correction here: https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

The same exact article in in this HRC hating website but without author's name! and no correction?

Here identical article: http://usapoliticsnow.com/?p=2870

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

101. Okay, are you happy now?

Obviously the original author of the article did not have malicious intentions as you insinuated, even though I don't comprehend the purpose what anybody gains from the mistake.

And usapoliticsnow is just a spam site, that steals articles from other sites. (Rehosted content rule on reddit politics section)

[Her Sister]

107. Yes I think so! Thanks!

As for intentions am not sure, really who knows! It's a biggie mistake and the article's premise was the title which the body of the article now cannot corroborate. But Ah well!!

Going to choose to believe that all's well!



Thanks again!

[Her Sister]

104. So I guess they edited since Yesterday!

Here Yesterday's OP:

GeorgiaPeanuts (2,308 posts)

Campaign cash of Sanders growing, despite elimination [View all]

https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

Despite Hillary Clinton winning the outright nomination on June 7, Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) refuses to back down. According to CNN, Sanders pledges to fight on to the convention. Sander’s supporters have also made it clear that they will continue to give money to his campaign.

In fact, according to recent Federal Election Commission data, the Sanders campaign raised an additional $17 million throughout June, despite being mathematically eliminated. Of the over $229 million Sanders has now raised in total, 99.98 percent has come from donations, which is greater than what presidential candidates Donald Trump, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Ohio Governor John Kasich raised.

Sanders has no debt that he needs to settle, and has spent approximately $219.9 million with a surplus of $9 million remaining, which he will most likely spend before he drops out of the campaign.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2227794

NOW:

Campaign cash of Sanders growing, despite elimination

Editor’s Note: A previous version of this story incorrectly reported May fundraising as June.

Despite Hillary Clinton winning the nomination on June 7, Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) refuses to back down. According to CNN, Sanders pledges to fight on to the convention. Sander’s supporters have also made it clear that they will continue to give money to his campaign – and the campaign continues to ask for it.

The Sanders campaign raised nearly $46 million in March, but only $16.4 million in May.

Of the over $229 million Sanders has now raised in total, 99.98 percent has come from donations, which is greater than what presidential candidates Donald Trump, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Ohio Governor John Kasich raised.

As of May 31, Sanders had no debt that he needs to settle, and has spent approximately $219.9 million with a surplus of $9 million remaining, which he may spend before he drops out of the campaign.

https://whipboard.co/2016/06/campaign-cash-sanders-growing-despite-mathematical-elimination/

[Her Sister]

112. Problems now with the title of the Article/OP

Especially after they corrected erroneous information that was the reason for the title.

[Tarheel_Dem]

115. I think someone tried to pull a fast one, and you caught 'em. Thanks for that!

[Capt. Obvious]

118. Apparently there's 117 replies to this