Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:07 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

L.A. County Board Hears Testimony on Vote Fraud

According to todays report by 'The Inquisitor" the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors heard testimony of vote system irregularities so irregular one vote supervisor said it reeked of fraud and he considered refusing to put his name to certify.

Testimonies given (as noted in the story - HERE ) include mulitple accounts of switching anomalies, family of 4 all being switched to a party they never heard of, and the lack of proper ballots being printed.

Furthermore, there was a million new regustered voters, and, accirding to CBS, the largest chunk were new voters 18 to 29 years of age.

Currently, Hillary leads Bernie, in L.A. County, by 170,000 votes with over 368, 000 provisional ballots remaining.

Unfortunately the article has a little bit of bad math, in reporting that Bernie needs to take 193 delegates away from Clinton, to take lead in July Convention.

Neither Hillary, nor Bernie will have anything " finalized" come the start of the Democratic Convention.

In the meantime, a wildcard GOP race is of serious concern, as the powers that be, in the GOP, are planning a whole new effort of the "Dump Trump" variety.

Can Hillary Clinton beat Mitt?

Bernie surely can!

Here's a video of the Board of Supervisors meeting.

[br][hr][br]

11 votes, 1 pass \| Time left: Unlimited
	Bernie still has a chance
	6 (55%)
	Hillary is going to be President, No Matter What
	5 (45%)
	Who cares
	0 (0%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

14 replies, 1379 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

14 replies	Author	Time	Post
L.A. County Board Hears Testimony on Vote Fraud (Original post)	laserhaas	Jun 2016	OP
Its Friday afternoon...	laserhaas	Jun 2016	#1
Do you realize that the results in CA wouldn't have changed anything?	Beacool	Jun 2016	#2
Do YOU realize the pledge delegates declare no winner	laserhaas	Jun 2016	#3
Do you realize that since the inception of the super delegate system they have never gone against	Beacool	Jun 2016	#4
Your own words condemn 40 percent of Supers	laserhaas	Jun 2016	#5
What do you expect the supers to do differently this year than they have done since 1984?	Beacool	Jun 2016	#6
One would expect the deocratic process, to be democratic	laserhaas	Jun 2016	#8
I believe the reason we're still here is because of a IT problem the admins had...	tritsofme	Jun 2016	#10
This is the only time we've ever had a vote poll dead even	laserhaas	Jun 2016	#7
Which way does water churn when you flush a toilet?	XRubicon	Jun 2016	#9
The Inquisitr, hotbed for pro-Sanders freelance writers	Tarc	Jun 2016	#11
"family of 4 all being switched to a party they never heard of"	Retrograde	Jun 2016	#12
Berniacs are now suing the San Diego Registrar of Voters	Zorro	Jun 2016	#13
Hillary is still going to be the nominee (nt)	bigwillq	Jun 2016	#14

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:14 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

1. Its Friday afternoon...

Hopefully...come Monday morning....this issue will have updates

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:42 PM

Beacool (30,187 posts)

2. Do you realize that the results in CA wouldn't have changed anything?

Hillary's pledged delegate advantage was large enough to have sustained a loss in CA.

Reply to this post

Response to Beacool (Reply #2)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:48 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

3. Do YOU realize the pledge delegates declare no winner

Until the end of the convention?

We're Still Here for a reason.

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Reply #3)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:57 PM

Beacool (30,187 posts)

4. Do you realize that since the inception of the super delegate system they have never gone against

the will of the people? Obama was ahead by a very narrow pledged delegate advantage. Notwithstanding, a large number of super delegates switched to him because he was ahead in pledged delegates.

This meme on DU that has been perpetuated thanks to Sanders, is utter nonsense. No, he will NOT be the nominee. Hillary has won by a large margin.

By now, this argument has gone from funny to pathetic. Do some of you really think that super delegates are going to have an epiphany and nominate the person who lost the primaries??????

Reply to this post

Response to Beacool (Reply #4)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:00 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

5. Your own words condemn 40 percent of Supers

For doing that very thing.

Fickle?

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Reply #5)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:04 PM

Beacool (30,187 posts)

6. What do you expect the supers to do differently this year than they have done since 1984?

Reply to this post

Response to Beacool (Reply #6)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:34 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

8. One would expect the deocratic process, to be democratic

And it has been anything but.

Just sayin....

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Reply #3)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:51 PM

tritsofme (15,791 posts)

10. I believe the reason we're still here is because of a IT problem the admins had...

Primaries are long over.

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:23 PM

laserhaas (7,805 posts)

7. This is the only time we've ever had a vote poll dead even

Wow

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 06:38 PM

XRubicon (2,170 posts)

9. Which way does water churn when you flush a toilet?

I think it is opposite in Australia.

Your post got me thinking about flushing toilets. Thanks for getting me thinking about physics.

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:20 PM

Tarc (10,345 posts)

11. The Inquisitr, hotbed for pro-Sanders freelance writers

Let's not pretend this is an objective news you're citing here, it is just a glorified blog that republishes outsider's screeds.

Today, Dawn Papple is up; https://twitter.com/dawnpapple

Have a gander at that twitter feed, it reads like the last 6 months of Sander's DU contingent.

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 07:58 PM

Retrograde (9,226 posts)

12. "family of 4 all being switched to a party they never heard of"

Wanna bet this "party they never heard of" is American Independent? And that they ignored the sample ballots they were sent?

1 million new voters in LA county? Either this is poorly written and the author means 1M new voters in the state, or 10% of the entire county - including minors and non-citizens - decided to register to vote in the last few months.

All voting problems should be investigated, because the process involves people and people do make mistakes. However, I'm somewhat suspicious that these problems always seem to affect Sanders voters and not Clinton ones: how do They know?

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 08:29 PM

Zorro (14,955 posts)

13. Berniacs are now suing the San Diego Registrar of Voters

One thing I think is certain to come out of this is that in the future the California Democratic Party will not open its primaries to non-registered Democrats.

Reply to this post

Response to laserhaas (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 08:33 PM

bigwillq (72,790 posts)

14. Hillary is still going to be the nominee (nt)

Reply to this post

2016 Postmortem (Forum)