2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum![](/du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)How do people who traffic in these theories conduct themselves in the real world? In that vein I knew a gentleman who wore a helmet when he was driving his car.
valerief
(53,235 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)He wan't traveling the roads of Central Florida.
valerief
(53,235 posts)PufPuf23
(9,283 posts)I did the comparison with google search and bing.
Its not a theory, the differing search results are fact.
I have no idea who or why but the google search avoids rather omits the top results from bing and avoid some potentially negative issues regards Hillary Clinton.
FSogol
(46,957 posts)[font size=196]ALCOA![/font]
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #1)
Post removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)![](http://www.eurojuris.net/sites/eurojuris.net/files/styles/extra_large__880x585_/public/filed/image/istock_000020065349small.jpg)
I wear your insults like a medal... I would literally cut off the tip of my index finger for you to see the look on my face as I type this.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)by posting pictures of a fairy to respond to me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)by posting pictures of a fairy to respond to me.
I posted a medal.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)As I said, I'm so glad you took time off your busy schedule (of defending Hillary by posting pictures of a fairy) to respond to me. I hope the parentheses help you out.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #24)
Post removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)Are you even aware that your leader is an unlikeable corrupt liar?
What's it like to disrespect someone from the anonymity of a computer connection?
I rather cut off my, errr, ear and eat it than be that guy.
![](/emoticons/loveya.gif)
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)and show you they hadn't quite reached it yet.
kadaholo
(304 posts)"What we've discovered about Google's potential actions is shocking and deeply disturbing. I no longer have the trust that I once did in the company at large and what they're meant to represent."
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)PufPuf23
(9,283 posts)Google search has different results than Bing that serve to move internet researchers away from some issues regards Hillary Clinton.
Creepy.
Probably not legally wrong but certainly morally wrong.
randome
(34,845 posts){Giant, humongous, wordless face-palm goes here.}
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
PufPuf23
(9,283 posts)One is steered away from issues discussed here at DU in the search results using Google Search when compared to Bing as I verified less than an hour ago.
Folks with relations to Google and the Clinton campaign are named.
The search engines supposedly reflect the amount of historic searches
Try Hillary Clinton Ind
Google Hillary Clinton India (and no indictment at all)
Bing Hillary Clinton Indictment
I do not support Clinton in the primary but have never thought nor stated that Hillary Clinton would be indicted over the emails not stated that Clinton should be indicted nor that Clinton's indictment was a path for Sanders to the nomination. The one thing I have typed is that if something should happen to Clinton that I thought the Democratic party (my party of 45 years of registration and votes) would replace Clinton with other than Sanders.
There are other examples in the video comparing google with bing and another search engine.
You are correct that the search algorithms are different but specifically so regards Hillary Clinton searches.
Creepy is all I can say.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)XRubicon
(2,241 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)Tarc
(10,581 posts)![](http://cdn.niketalk.com/2/2f/2f7585ce_reaching.gif)
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Smh
Response to DesMoinesDem (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,439 posts)![](/emoticons/sad.gif)