Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Aide DECLINES To Answer Questions About Email Server Setup
-snip-
Mrs. Clinton has maintained that she thought she was following the precedent of other secretaries of state, including Colin Powell, who used personal email.
It was still a mistake, and if I could go back I would do it differently, Mrs. Clinton said on CNN Tuesday. I understand people may have concerns about this, but I hope voters look at the full picture of everything Ive done in my career and the full threat posed by a Donald Trump presidency.
Mrs. Clintons email setup is also being probed for the possible loss or mishandling of classified information. As part of the public release of her emails, the government ultimately deemed that more than 2,000 emails in Mrs. Clintons inbox contained information that is now considered classified, including emails from aides and other State Department staffers.
Mrs. Clintons campaign notes that those emails contain no marking showing they were classified and has argued that the government often over-classifies information.
As part of another Freedom of Information Act request, the Republican National Committee obtained copies of nondisclosure agreements signed by Mrs. Clintons top aides, including Mr. Pagliano and top policy staffer Jake Sullivan. Those documents, provided to The Wall Street Journal this week, show that all State Department employees were warned against unauthorized disclosure of information and cautioned that such information can be marked or unmarked.
Mr. Sullivan was the author of more than 200 of the now-classified emails found in Mrs. Clintons inbox, while Mrs. Clinton herself wrote about 100. The rest came from dozens of others inside and outside government.
cont'
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-aide-declines-to-answer-questions-about-email-server-setup-1464734286
Mrs. Clinton has maintained that she thought she was following the precedent of other secretaries of state, including Colin Powell, who used personal email.
It was still a mistake, and if I could go back I would do it differently, Mrs. Clinton said on CNN Tuesday. I understand people may have concerns about this, but I hope voters look at the full picture of everything Ive done in my career and the full threat posed by a Donald Trump presidency.
Mrs. Clintons email setup is also being probed for the possible loss or mishandling of classified information. As part of the public release of her emails, the government ultimately deemed that more than 2,000 emails in Mrs. Clintons inbox contained information that is now considered classified, including emails from aides and other State Department staffers.
Mrs. Clintons campaign notes that those emails contain no marking showing they were classified and has argued that the government often over-classifies information.
As part of another Freedom of Information Act request, the Republican National Committee obtained copies of nondisclosure agreements signed by Mrs. Clintons top aides, including Mr. Pagliano and top policy staffer Jake Sullivan. Those documents, provided to The Wall Street Journal this week, show that all State Department employees were warned against unauthorized disclosure of information and cautioned that such information can be marked or unmarked.
Mr. Sullivan was the author of more than 200 of the now-classified emails found in Mrs. Clintons inbox, while Mrs. Clinton herself wrote about 100. The rest came from dozens of others inside and outside government.
cont'
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-aide-declines-to-answer-questions-about-email-server-setup-1464734286
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Aide DECLINES To Answer Questions About Email Server Setup (Original Post)
Segami
May 2016
OP
Good for her, racist/sexist/bastard supporting wingers care about the email server
uponit7771
May 2016
#4
Not when they're doing something important, when they're collecting DNA to confirm
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#15
Sounds like that's nothing. Sounds like Hillary plans to avoid talking to the FBI...
Bob41213
May 2016
#11
Segami
(14,923 posts)1. And the Clinton drip keeps dripping....
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)13. "I am not a crook!"
AzDar
(14,023 posts)2. Shameful and duplicitous... proclaiming full cooperation.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)3. Mills has no ground to claim Atty-Client Privilege
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)5. And when did the court rule on that?
It would be gross malpractice for an attorney to testify unless and until ordered to do so, and likely on appeal of that order.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)6. Don't worry, they will.
uponit7771
(92,138 posts)4. Good for her, racist/sexist/bastard supporting wingers care about the email server
840high
(17,196 posts)7. So this is how you describe
the FBI?
Segami
(14,923 posts)9. Heh heh....
uponit7771
(92,138 posts)15. Not when they're doing something important, when they're collecting DNA to confirm
... sperm on a dress... hell yes
Blue_Adept
(6,439 posts)12. Jury Results
On Tue May 31, 2016, 04:32 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Good for her, racist/sexist/bastard supporting wingers care about the email server
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2097174
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
"racist/sexist/bastard supporting wingers"
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue May 31, 2016, 04:37 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: What's the problem, you're alerting so much you can't even bother to come up with a reason?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)8. Keep hearing the unbeknownst defense
While it lost its charm it remains humorous, from a certain perspective.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)10. IGNORE IT AND IT WILL GO AWAY
It's like, quantum physics or some shit.
Bob41213
(491 posts)11. Sounds like that's nothing. Sounds like Hillary plans to avoid talking to the FBI...
You know what that means? She's in a bit of trouble.
GreenPartyVoter
(73,106 posts)14. Can you actually even do that?