Mon May 30, 2016, 10:22 PM
Gothmog (92,354 posts)
What does it mean to 'clinch the nomination' when superdelegates are involved?
Great article on how in every primary contest since the creation of super delegates, the winner was declared the presumptive nominee based on the inclusion of super delegates. http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/5/29/1532358/-What-Does-It-Mean-to-Clinch-the-Nomination-When-Superdelegates-Are-Involved
![]() After reading a number of impassioned defenses of why the Democratic presidential nomination should not be called next week on June 7th, I got curious. What’s the history here, since the superdelegates were added to the process? When a Democratic candidate hits the magic number of pledged delegates plus superdelegates, are they the nominee?
The answer: history says the first person to get to the magic number is the presumptive nominee, and says it unambiguously, even if the losers often disagree. Here’s how it has gone since the superdelegates were added to the process..... Summary Anyway, I started this research 12 hours ago to answer a question for myself, so that as everyone on TV is spinning things this way and that on June 7th I have some context. What, if anything, have I learned? First, most non-incumbent candidates have needed superdelegates to win, and the history of superdelegates has been that once a Democrat hits the magic number and becomes the nominee, superdelegates are more likely to flow to the nominee than from them. Also, in the history of the superdelegates, they have always ended up supporting the decision of the pledged delegates, and their most important contribution has been to amplify leads of the pledged delegate winner so that they can be assured success on a first ballot, and avoid the sort of messy convention that harms a general campaign. The major thing I’ve learned is that the press declares, and has always declared, the winner after they hit the magic number, and has done so in far more nebulous circumstances than this. Even in 1984, in which Hart won by a number of other metrics, in which the delegate count was the arbiter, and Mondale announced himself as the nominee, even with 38 percent of the popular vote to Hart’s 36 percent—even then, Hart may have claimed he still had a cunning plan, but no one begrudged Mondale the fact he was, for all intents and purposes, the nominee. When you think about it, that simply has to happen. Things need to get done, and they need the nominee to do them. Except for Reagan in 1976, who chose a running mate after Gerald Ford was made the nominee, there aren’t a whole lot of non-nominee candidates going to the convention with their own vice president picked out. You get to do that because the numbers say you’re the nominee. Meeting this number also allows the nominee to do the work of campaigning before the convention, establishing a message, building capacity on the ground, etc. The press, for its part, has always understood this, from 1984 onward, and has named the nominee (or the “presumptive nominee”) the minute the candidate crosses the line with their combination of pledged and supers, and usually said something to the effect that they had “clinched” the nomination. They did that when Mondale had won far fewer states than Hart. They did that when Dukakis did not have 50 percent of the pledged delegates. They did that when Obama had not won the popular vote (yes, I know, Michigan—I hope we’re still not fighting this?). This is a well researched article and confirms that the nomination process will be over on Tuesday June 7, 2016 when the results of the New Jersey primary are announced. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
This is the DU member formerly known as Gothmog.
|
19 replies, 1711 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Gothmog | May 2016 | OP |
Gothmog | May 2016 | #1 | |
MohRokTah | May 2016 | #2 | |
anotherproletariat | May 2016 | #4 | |
Thinkingabout | May 2016 | #3 | |
Iliyah | May 2016 | #5 | |
DesertRat | May 2016 | #6 | |
NastyRiffraff | May 2016 | #7 | |
ProudProgressiveNow | May 2016 | #8 | |
Lucinda | May 2016 | #9 | |
tandem5 | May 2016 | #10 | |
Gothmog | May 2016 | #14 | |
beachbum bob | May 2016 | #15 | |
tandem5 | May 2016 | #19 | |
still_one | May 2016 | #11 | |
auntpurl | May 2016 | #12 | |
all american girl | May 2016 | #13 | |
beachbum bob | May 2016 | #16 | |
George II | May 2016 | #17 | |
Garrett78 | May 2016 | #18 |
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Mon May 30, 2016, 10:25 PM
Gothmog (92,354 posts)
1. Some nice clips from the article cited in the OP
![]() ![]() ![]() This is the DU member formerly known as Gothmog.
|
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Mon May 30, 2016, 10:39 PM
MohRokTah (15,429 posts)
2. Yet Sanders appears to want to go down the road of petulant child.
It's his career he'll be destroying.
![]() |
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #2)
Mon May 30, 2016, 10:51 PM
anotherproletariat (1,446 posts)
4. Very, very true. nt
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Mon May 30, 2016, 10:50 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
3. Soon and very soon, the truth will be saying what many here have been saying,
Hillary will soon be the DNC presumptive nominee, she will get the needed delegates on June 7, she will have more than the required number of delegates thereby removing all opportunity of Sanders being the nominee.
|
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:36 AM
NastyRiffraff (12,448 posts)
7. Here's a big ol' K&R
No matter what Sanders says, math counts. Numbers mean something.
|
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 12:41 AM
ProudProgressiveNow (5,984 posts)
8. K&R nt
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:01 AM
tandem5 (2,059 posts)
10. This doesn't belong in GD-P
Reality is off topic.
|
Response to tandem5 (Reply #10)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:17 AM
Gothmog (92,354 posts)
14. Facts do make it into this group from time to time
This is the DU member formerly known as Gothmog.
|
Response to tandem5 (Reply #10)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:21 AM
beachbum bob (10,437 posts)
15. lol....so information about the primary process that leads to the nominee being selected
doesn't belong in GD-P
gotta say when I heard this....I thought I have heard everything but wow |
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:34 AM
still_one (77,026 posts)
11. Kick and Rec!!!
This is the DU member formerly known as still_one.
|
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:44 AM
auntpurl (4,311 posts)
12. Yes, and the other way around of looking at this is
if you use SDs in the "magic number" a candidate has to reach, then you have to COUNT SDs that have declared toward a candidate's total.
OR you can choose to NOT use SDs in the magic number and just count pledged delegates. Those are your two options. Any other way of doing it is dishonest. And either of the two ways above that you choose to count, Hillary (barring disaster) is going to clinch on June 7. |
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:10 AM
all american girl (1,788 posts)
13. K&R
I read this earlier today...a very good read. Thanks for bringing it over here.
|
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:23 AM
beachbum bob (10,437 posts)
16. thanks you for this, I forget to cross post this morning
a very indepth analyst of all our primary winners and how it played out.. The writer should be applauded
|
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:37 AM
George II (60,838 posts)
17. Excellent work, thank you.
Response to Gothmog (Original post)
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:53 AM
Garrett78 (10,721 posts)
18. Yep, that's pretty much how it works every time.
I don't know why people expect this year to be any different. Oh, right, because Clinton's about to be hauled off to prison.
![]() |