Fri May 27, 2016, 03:09 PM
Raastan (242 posts)
Has Bernie Sanders responded to FEC requests about his campaign contributions yet?
I haven't seen whether or not he has accounted for some of his "mystery money" issues...
|
48 replies, 2598 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Raastan | May 2016 | OP |
floriduck | May 2016 | #1 | |
Raastan | May 2016 | #11 | |
floriduck | May 2016 | #13 | |
Raastan | May 2016 | #15 | |
floriduck | May 2016 | #16 | |
WhiteTara | May 2016 | #32 | |
floriduck | May 2016 | #34 | |
WhiteTara | May 2016 | #36 | |
floriduck | May 2016 | #37 | |
redwitch | May 2016 | #18 | |
demwing | May 2016 | #23 | |
Snotcicles | May 2016 | #42 | |
pangaia | May 2016 | #2 | |
Sheepshank | May 2016 | #5 | |
Bill USA | May 2016 | #7 | |
pangaia | May 2016 | #17 | |
livetohike | May 2016 | #3 | |
juxtaposed | May 2016 | #6 | |
livetohike | May 2016 | #8 | |
juxtaposed | May 2016 | #4 | |
Thinkingabout | May 2016 | #20 | |
juxtaposed | May 2016 | #25 | |
Thinkingabout | May 2016 | #28 | |
juxtaposed | May 2016 | #29 | |
Thinkingabout | May 2016 | #30 | |
floriduck | May 2016 | #35 | |
grasswire | May 2016 | #9 | |
Raastan | May 2016 | #14 | |
demwing | May 2016 | #24 | |
litlbilly | May 2016 | #26 | |
demwing | May 2016 | #38 | |
litlbilly | May 2016 | #39 | |
Raastan | May 2016 | #43 | |
litlbilly | May 2016 | #44 | |
Raastan | May 2016 | #46 | |
demwing | May 2016 | #47 | |
Bob-o the Clown | May 2016 | #48 | |
litlbilly | May 2016 | #27 | |
passiveporcupine | May 2016 | #45 | |
onecaliberal | May 2016 | #10 | |
litlbilly | May 2016 | #41 | |
LaurenG | May 2016 | #12 | |
RAFisher | May 2016 | #19 | |
Thinkingabout | May 2016 | #21 | |
asuhornets | May 2016 | #22 | |
Matt_in_STL | May 2016 | #31 | |
bobbobbins01 | May 2016 | #33 | |
TheSarcastinator | May 2016 | #40 |
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:12 PM
floriduck (2,262 posts)
1. Unless you're an FEC staff member, it really doesn't affect you. My guess is that if he hadn't,
every major media organization internationally would have written about it.
|
Response to floriduck (Reply #1)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:22 PM
Raastan (242 posts)
11. As a voter, I would like to feel that Bernie has not been bought
Or being influenced by non democratic donors
|
Response to Raastan (Reply #11)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:27 PM
floriduck (2,262 posts)
13. No, you're a Hillary supporter (per your profile) so you don't need to know that. Your voting for
her.
|
Response to floriduck (Reply #13)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:40 PM
Raastan (242 posts)
15. Are you suggesting that Bernie need not disclose his campaign donations
Because regardless of what you think I need to know, it does make a difference on what kind of candidate he is or President he might be.
|
Response to Raastan (Reply #15)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:42 PM
floriduck (2,262 posts)
16. Wow, look how far you've wandered from your original post. Focus, please. No answer needed.
Response to floriduck (Reply #13)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:07 PM
WhiteTara (27,018 posts)
32. That's an interesting assessment
Only BS supporters should know? I thought this was a nationwide campaign and that he was working for all the people.
![]() |
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #32)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:20 PM
floriduck (2,262 posts)
34. Sure. But to make the assumption that the "mystery money" has not been addressed is ludicrous.
With over 7 million donations, it's likely a bit more challenging than the 25-30 massive donations through superpacs. But the point remains, it may have been addressed already so why the pissing up the rope?
So unless you're an Independaent or an undecided voter, you don't need to know. Those that it matters to will find out when they need to. |
Response to floriduck (Reply #34)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:25 PM
WhiteTara (27,018 posts)
36. Wow that seems presumptious
that voters shouldn't know whether or not BS is acting in a legal fashion.
|
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #36)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:26 PM
floriduck (2,262 posts)
37. I can't help you. Bye.
![]() ![]() |
Response to Raastan (Reply #11)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:45 PM
redwitch (14,427 posts)
18. Oh FFS!
Stupid award for today, you haz earned it. ![]() |
Response to Raastan (Reply #11)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:04 PM
demwing (16,916 posts)
23. Because you'll never get that from Hillary, right?
don't bother answering
|
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:13 PM
pangaia (24,324 posts)
2. Has Hillary Clinton stopped lying yet?
Response to pangaia (Reply #2)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:15 PM
Sheepshank (12,504 posts)
5. are you saying Hillary should lie until Bernie releases the info? that's just weird. n/t
Response to pangaia (Reply #2)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:17 PM
Bill USA (6,436 posts)
7. you think your candidate the Donald will win this thing?
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:13 PM
livetohike (20,580 posts)
3. No of course not. Rules don't apply to Sanders. He's such a rebel you know.
Everyone loves him just like Palin. Going rogue.
|
Response to livetohike (Reply #3)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:16 PM
juxtaposed (2,778 posts)
6. pistol palin loves Bernie too!!!!
![]() ![]() |
Response to juxtaposed (Reply #6)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:18 PM
livetohike (20,580 posts)
8. Love that "pistol Palin". Maybe they can go to the next NRA convention
together 😊.
|
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:14 PM
juxtaposed (2,778 posts)
4. yes! He said once hrc releases transcripts to her overlords than he will release the mystery
rabbit hole money!
![]() |
Response to juxtaposed (Reply #4)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:58 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
20. Interesting take, does this mean Sanders is refusing to cooperate with the FEC?
There are penalties and or prison time for intentional campaign fund fraud.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #20)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:09 PM
juxtaposed (2,778 posts)
25. you think?
Response to juxtaposed (Reply #25)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:16 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
28. Yes, maybe this is intentional.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #28)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:24 PM
juxtaposed (2,778 posts)
29. No I think it would be fair. hrc release the transcripts and Bernie release his $350k total worth.
Seems fair. My home is worth over $250k bernie is worth 100k more than me? Question? Does hrc own any homes if so what are they worth? And were they bought in cash? Did hrc pay cash for her homes?
|
Response to juxtaposed (Reply #29)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:40 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
30. Yoi really keep up with Bernie, the $350,000 was in 2014, last year he reported
$800,000, not bad for a guy whose salary is $174,000 a year, he more than doubled his net worth in a year, follow the money. Maybe he is getting extra money.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #20)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:25 PM
floriduck (2,262 posts)
35. Nice leap. Don't hurt yourself. Unless any one of you can prove that he has violated and not
corrected any election contribution irregularities, you are the most ruthlessly ignorant group I have met this week. This is the ClintonNothingbuger. I prefer to call it the Whopper.
|
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:19 PM
grasswire (50,130 posts)
9. nobody cares
and you will never earn your bonus money this way.
|
Response to grasswire (Reply #9)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:27 PM
Raastan (242 posts)
14. If Bernie is hiding something, I would like to know about it sooner rather than later
Response to Raastan (Reply #14)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:06 PM
demwing (16,916 posts)
24. Why, as a Hillary supporter you should be used to being lied to.
So go peddle your bullshit elsewhere
|
Response to demwing (Reply #24)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:13 PM
litlbilly (2,227 posts)
26. All these brand new member posters kinda proves how much in total panic
mode they are in. I bet they watched M$NBC with Andrea Mitchell, Chucky Todd and MIka going full bore against Hillary. They have to not be to happy about that and know something is coming down soon.
|
Response to litlbilly (Reply #26)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:29 PM
demwing (16,916 posts)
38. Mika is one thing
Mtchell is another, I thought she was in the bag for Hillary?
|
Response to demwing (Reply #38)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:30 PM
litlbilly (2,227 posts)
39. I thought the same thing. When you lose Andrea, thats another ballgame.
Response to litlbilly (Reply #26)
Fri May 27, 2016, 10:05 PM
Raastan (242 posts)
43. FYI, I have been reading DU for over 10 years
And I have only chosen to start posting at this time due to the rude and ill informed comments like your own that have taken over this once great place to get news and interesting points of view.
There is nothing to be gained from belittling others. Just because you are a long time poster does not make you superior. |
Response to Raastan (Reply #43)
Fri May 27, 2016, 10:07 PM
litlbilly (2,227 posts)
44. that nonsense gets you an ignore. by by
Response to demwing (Reply #24)
Fri May 27, 2016, 10:15 PM
Raastan (242 posts)
46. I am selling nothing
I just expect Bernie to follow the law and be transparent about his campaign funds just like every other candidate has done.
|
Response to Raastan (Reply #46)
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:56 AM
demwing (16,916 posts)
47. Oh you're selling it alright, we're just not buying it
go peddle your bullshit somewhere else
|
Response to Raastan (Reply #46)
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:02 AM
Bob-o the Clown (35 posts)
48. You want transparency
Lets talk about Clintons SuperPACs and Correct the Record.
THey are all coordinating with each other. |
Response to Raastan (Reply #14)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:14 PM
litlbilly (2,227 posts)
27. Member since this morning. Yeah, credible:)
Response to grasswire (Reply #9)
Fri May 27, 2016, 10:12 PM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
45. Heh
![]() Thank dog for the ignore button. I've noticed that the more bad news comes out about Hillary and her e-mail, the more desperate threads to distract are posted. |
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:20 PM
onecaliberal (19,671 posts)
10. Has Hillary stopped lying about her email server yet?
Response to onecaliberal (Reply #10)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:31 PM
litlbilly (2,227 posts)
41. Not according to Andrea, Mika and even Chuckie
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:26 PM
LaurenG (24,841 posts)
12. Ahhahahaha really, the FEC is so busy with Bernie that they can't get busy with the Hill's $
![]() |
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 03:45 PM
RAFisher (466 posts)
19. I wish we knew where all the Pro-Clinton SuperPAC money came from.
There certainly seems to be an accounting problem that Sanders needs to address. But I don't think the Clinton and Republican approach of just circumventing the FEC rules is the way to go.
|
Response to RAFisher (Reply #19)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:01 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
21. PACs are different from candidate campaign funds, they are not limited to $2700,
Sanders has received two letters, money will have to be returned.
|
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:01 PM
asuhornets (2,405 posts)
22. Of course not....
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:02 PM
Matt_in_STL (1,446 posts)
31. Chock-a-Brock deflection tactic
Anything to keep people from talking about private servers.
|
Response to Raastan (Original post)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:15 PM
bobbobbins01 (1,681 posts)
33. FEC requests: Hillary: >60, Bernie: 4
And unlike Hillary he never triggered an audit for not replying.
|
Response to bobbobbins01 (Reply #33)
Fri May 27, 2016, 05:30 PM
TheSarcastinator (854 posts)
40. SHHH. Team Hindenburg is in deep denial
Along with the deep derp.
|