Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
Thu May 19, 2016, 11:14 AM May 2016

Sanders’ Sole Senate Backer Says He's ‘Absolutely’ Against Convention Battle

The only senator to endorse Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is “absolutely” opposed to a convention-floor battle to flip superdelegates who support Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) told the Washington Post on Wednesday that Sanders should bow out if Clinton wins a higher number of pledged delegates as well as the popular vote.

“When a nominee wins a majority of both those categories, it is time for us to come together, link arms and go forward,” Merkley said. “It would be inconsistent, given the commentary on super-delegates, to depend on super-delegates to turn over those first two categories of evaluating party members’ support.”

While the Sanders campaign and its supporters initially criticized superdelegates—party insiders who can change their allegiance to a particular candidate—as undemocratic, top aides are now betting the future of the campaign on convincing those delegates to join their side.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeff-merkley-opposes-sanders-convention-floor-fight

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders’ Sole Senate Backer Says He's ‘Absolutely’ Against Convention Battle (Original Post) leftynyc May 2016 OP
Progressive Leaders Are Almost all Uniting Behind Clinton for General Election Stallion May 2016 #1
Why are people afraid of Democracy in action? Skink May 2016 #2
I'm not sure. NCTraveler May 2016 #9
I thought the reason the Superdelegates were invented... Optimism May 2016 #3
You Do Realize that Most Super Delegates are Actual Elected Democratic Officeholders Stallion May 2016 #4
With constituencies who are represented, just like The Second Stone May 2016 #8
Yawn. Whomever have the MOST pledged delegates. Iliyah May 2016 #6
You were wrong leftynyc May 2016 #7
I must agree due to the use of the word: Battle. Literally. Hiraeth May 2016 #5
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
9. I'm not sure.
Thu May 19, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016

I don't get why a group of people are going with the thought that Sanders should win while being behind millions of votes and hundreds of delegates. They think working to subvert the will of the people is a righteous cause. Really ignorant is what it is.

Optimism

(142 posts)
3. I thought the reason the Superdelegates were invented...
Thu May 19, 2016, 11:25 AM
May 2016

... was to make sure the most electable candidate got the nod?

If they're refusing to do that this time, why the hell do we even need them?

I guess to purge the party of progressives and ensure a President Trump. Scary times.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
8. With constituencies who are represented, just like
Thu May 19, 2016, 12:07 PM
May 2016

representative democracy and delegates at a convention! Huh, figure that!

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
7. You were wrong
Thu May 19, 2016, 12:01 PM
May 2016

They've NEVER turned the nomination over to the losing candidate and they never will.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders’ Sole Senate Back...