Fri May 13, 2016, 02:03 PM
Actor (626 posts)
Do you have a medical diagnosis of any illness or problem? Heart disease? Diabetes?
If Trump is elected say goodbye to your health insurance, when he does away with ACA the first thing that will happen is all people with pre existing conditions will be without health insurance unless they have a real good job where they have insurance, and THEN if you leave that job, well dont, not ever.
Because you will NEVER get it again.
|
101 replies, 6377 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Actor | May 2016 | OP |
NuclearDem | May 2016 | #1 | |
Redwoods Red | May 2016 | #3 | |
MoonRiver | May 2016 | #8 | |
GreatGazoo | May 2016 | #13 | |
Baobab | May 2016 | #31 | |
Thinkingabout | May 2016 | #36 | |
Baobab | May 2016 | #39 | |
bettyellen | May 2016 | #95 | |
Autumn | May 2016 | #4 | |
NuclearDem | May 2016 | #10 | |
Autumn | May 2016 | #12 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #23 | |
NuclearDem | May 2016 | #24 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #29 | |
CoffeeCat | May 2016 | #68 | |
840high | May 2016 | #96 | |
DeadLetterOffice | May 2016 | #26 | |
QC | May 2016 | #30 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #40 | |
arcane1 | May 2016 | #2 | |
Lizzie Poppet | May 2016 | #7 | |
KingFlorez | May 2016 | #5 | |
Armstead | May 2016 | #20 | |
Live and Learn | May 2016 | #6 | |
JaneyVee | May 2016 | #9 | |
Live and Learn | May 2016 | #14 | |
Fawke Em | May 2016 | #16 | |
NuclearDem | May 2016 | #11 | |
Live and Learn | May 2016 | #15 | |
NuclearDem | May 2016 | #18 | |
Live and Learn | May 2016 | #19 | |
NuclearDem | May 2016 | #22 | |
Live and Learn | May 2016 | #25 | |
Armstead | May 2016 | #32 | |
Live and Learn | May 2016 | #33 | |
Armstead | May 2016 | #34 | |
hobbit709 | May 2016 | #17 | |
riversedge | May 2016 | #28 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #21 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #38 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #41 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #42 | |
riderinthestorm | May 2016 | #49 | |
riversedge | May 2016 | #27 | |
me b zola | May 2016 | #35 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #37 | |
me b zola | May 2016 | #43 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #47 | |
me b zola | May 2016 | #72 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #97 | |
frylock | May 2016 | #44 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #48 | |
frylock | May 2016 | #45 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #54 | |
closeupready | May 2016 | #46 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #50 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #66 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #67 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #69 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #71 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #73 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #74 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #75 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #76 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #77 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #79 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #86 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #87 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #99 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #84 | |
Lizzie Poppet | May 2016 | #70 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #51 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #53 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #57 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #58 | |
frylock | May 2016 | #61 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #63 | |
treestar | May 2016 | #52 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #55 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #56 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #59 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #64 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #65 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #81 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #83 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #85 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #88 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #89 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #90 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #91 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #92 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #93 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #94 | |
tularetom | May 2016 | #78 | |
Actor | May 2016 | #80 | |
Ed Suspicious | May 2016 | #101 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #60 | |
nadinbrzezinski | May 2016 | #62 | |
Mnpaul | May 2016 | #98 | |
Aerows | May 2016 | #100 | |
Lindsixo | May 2016 | #82 |
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:06 PM
NuclearDem (16,184 posts)
1. These people have the disposable income to send in $27 just out of spite.
I don't think seeing the ACA destroyed would phase them one bit.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:08 PM
Redwoods Red (137 posts)
3. This could be one of the stupidest things I've ever read here.
Yeah, those 1%er Bernie supporters, with their huge $27 donations.
|
Response to Redwoods Red (Reply #3)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:15 PM
MoonRiver (35,045 posts)
8. Congratulations, you missed the entire point of that post.
It is called S.A.R.C.A.S.M.
![]() |
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #8)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:24 PM
GreatGazoo (3,937 posts)
13. no you missed the point
sarcasm is saying the opposite of what you mean in order bully, demean and generally be an asshole on purpose -- that isn't what the other poster did.
It is called SINCERITY (which is not an acronym btw). It was ragingly partisan but sincere nonetheless. |
Response to GreatGazoo (Reply #13)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:54 PM
Baobab (4,667 posts)
31. Hillary plans to globalize health care which will lead to all the good things in ACA being rolled ba
rolled back? WTF?
Yes, in 1994 we signed on to the WTO GATS which committed our health insurance industry to GATS disciplines. And in 1998 an annex to the GATS that contained a standstill clause was added to it. What that means is that the minute it becomes world trade the WTO has the final say on anything and everything related to anything covered by GATS which is basically everything of economic importance that might effect profitability. The WTO views regulation as bad and pushes for deregulation of everything. Which would mean the rolling back of restrictions on what insurance companies have to do, allowing them to dump sicker people, since they are less profitable. Also, limits on their profitability would likely be rolled back. Also, once it becomes world trade, single payer becomes forever impossible, unless we pay a compensation in free money that would literally be a kings ransom, in lost expected future profits, we become locked in to the private for profit system forever, barring some huge multi trillion dollar bailout for foreign firms effected. (as currently no foreign firms are involved yet we need to withdraw from this deal or insert broad carve outs preventing this now!) The paper in my .sig explains the rest. Its not a good situation. So we need to vote for Bernie because Hillary is already committed to this globalization agenda because of her husband's signature and US trade policy of pushing it, over the last 20 years of negotiations.Those negotiations are over economic integration, basically allowing developing countries to participate in our service markets as if they were American companies but without the higher costs. Health insurance and medical care are both services, even if delivered across international borders, insurance is committed unambiguously as a service, so is nursing, medicine, teaching, IT, construction, staffing, etc. the new TiSA agreement is almost finished in Geneva after 10 years of negotiations. |
Response to Baobab (Reply #31)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:06 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
36. Are you using your normal opinion page as a source?
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #36)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:21 PM
Baobab (4,667 posts)
39. I don't follow exactly what you mean?
But things are not at all what they seem on health care. We're being fed a bill of goods to keep us from speaking up on this all important issue which is literally going to make or break American families - to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars a person over our lives. At least $500k- thats probably low. (the total distribution of healthcare cost in today's money (adjusted for inflation) over a single person's entire lifetime)
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #36)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:48 PM
bettyellen (47,209 posts)
95. They are known for their impeccable sourcing.
This is the DU member formerly known as bettyellen.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:11 PM
Autumn (40,113 posts)
4. $27 just out of spite???
![]() ![]() |
Response to Autumn (Reply #4)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:17 PM
NuclearDem (16,184 posts)
10. Found this in 30 seconds...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1955795
Funny thing is, you guys actually think this irritates or bothers us in any way. |
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #10)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:24 PM
Autumn (40,113 posts)
12. That's not spite, That's a good reason to donate to Bernie/ We know it takes money for
our man to fight the smears thrown at him. Hill has unlimited funding by her brockshit pac to do that stuff.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #10)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:35 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
23. That's not spite. Its my firmly held belief
and every time someone says they want Bernie to drop out, I send him more $$ so he can continue to fight.
![]() |
Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #23)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:38 PM
NuclearDem (16,184 posts)
24. Otherwise known as...
spite.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #24)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:49 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
29. Ah, I see. You have 9 hides and attack everyone thinking we're all nasty.
I'm sorry about that. Miserable way to live...
![]() Have a great day! |
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #24)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:45 PM
CoffeeCat (24,411 posts)
68. You must have your own dictionary
in which spite is defined incorrectly--and in a way that makes sense to you, and no one else.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #24)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:54 PM
840high (17,196 posts)
96. Spite - you are full of it.
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:45 PM
DeadLetterOffice (1,352 posts)
26. "These people?"
Who might these people be, pray tell? I'm a Sanders supporter through the primaries and I damn well do care about the ACA, thank you very much -- I have a genetic, progressively disabling disorder and no job.
So please don't presume to speak for people who are not you. |
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:52 PM
QC (26,371 posts)
30. Poster with 9 hides calling other people spiteful.
![]() |
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:23 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
40. You know this how? Access to bank accounts how
This is mind boggling but not surprising anymore
|
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:07 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
2. Admit it: you typed that with one hand n/t
Response to arcane1 (Reply #2)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:14 PM
Lizzie Poppet (10,164 posts)
7. ^ thread winner
![]() |
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:12 PM
KingFlorez (12,689 posts)
5. I have epilepsy, so that would be disaster for me
My medication would cost over $400 a month without the ACA and my doctor's visits would be even more. I was able to be diagnosed because of a four day stay in Cedars-Sinai for monitoring and I would not have been able to afford that without ACA. My medical debt from before I had insurance is over $4000 from general practitioner visits.
|
Response to KingFlorez (Reply #5)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:32 PM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
20. I'm sincerely glad you were helped
people who support Sanders and Universal healthcare want EVERYONE e to be able to receive adequate healthcare without a question, and have available on an affordable basis.
As it is too many people still have insufficient coverage at excessively high prices, or fall through the cracks completely because of the loopholes. |
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:14 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
6. Yet, with Berniereallydoescare, we wouldn't even need insurance. nt
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #6)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:16 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
9. What if I want insurance?
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #9)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:26 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
14. What a silly question. If you want it go ahead and get it. nt
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #9)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:27 PM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
16. Then you can buy it extra.
Every country with single-payer (or something similar) has companies that offer additional insurance. It's just that you don't need it for survival.
|
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #6)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:19 PM
NuclearDem (16,184 posts)
11. Well, if he oversees it as well as he oversaw the VA
then "no insurance" is going to be the least of everyone's concerns.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #11)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:27 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
15. Really? Bernie himself was in charge of overseeing the VA?
Actually, most veterans love their health care and Bernie.
|
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #15)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:29 PM
NuclearDem (16,184 posts)
18. That's typically what the chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee does.
Maybe you need to read up on the VA health care crisis and how Bernie didn't address it.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #18)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:31 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
19. No, maybe you need to start making some sense. Is Obama now responsible
for every problem that occurs under Obamacare? Enough with the nonsense!
|
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #19)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:34 PM
NuclearDem (16,184 posts)
22. President Obama doesn't hold a chairmanship on an ACA oversight committee.
Bernie Sanders was the chair of such a committee responsible for overseeing the VA health care system.
|
Response to NuclearDem (Reply #22)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:38 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
25. By your standards then, he also deserves great praise for the system the Veterans love, correct?
Why do you think Bernie has such fantastic support from Veterans?
|
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #25)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:56 PM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
32. Some beg to differ
http://vetsforbernie.org/honors/
Sen. Bernie Sanders has been honored by some of America’s oldest and largest veterans organizations for his tireless advocacy on behalf of Veterans and military families. VFW Congressional Award 2015 American Legion Patriot Award 2014 MOAA Col. Arthur T. Marix Congressional Leadership Award 2014 DAV Congressional Leadership Award 2012 VFW Congressional Award After 8 years on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, 2 of them as chairman, it is no understatement to say that Sen. Sanders has truly taken care of wounded, ill and injured veterans and their surviving family members. He has been a commanding voice against changing the COLA calculations for disabled veterans, for the proper care and treatment of women veterans, for homeless veterans, for better employment opportunities and improved access to mental health programs, plus increased Congressional oversight of the VA claims processing transformation. When the VA imploded last year, he was the lead negotiator for the Veterans Access, CHOICE and Accountability Act, which the President signed into law last summer. The VA still has an uphill climb to fix what’s broken, to hold employees appropriately accountable, and to restore the faith of veterans in their VA. But veterans everywhere should be proud and comforted to know that this member of Congress has their back. The VFW Congressional Award has been presented annually since 1964 to one sitting member of the House or Senate for significant legislative contributions on behalf of those who have worn the uniform. This award is extremely important to us, because it recognizes that our military, our veterans, and our families, past and present, have a champion in our corner on Capitol Hill. |
Response to Armstead (Reply #32)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:59 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
33. I think you meant to respond upstream a bit but great post. nt
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #33)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:02 PM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
34. Oppos...Well hopefully the intended recipient will see it
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:28 PM
hobbit709 (41,694 posts)
17. I have diabetes, sleep apnea and a host of other problems.
I get my medical care through the VA and now Medicare(since last year)
|
Response to hobbit709 (Reply #17)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:47 PM
riversedge (60,111 posts)
28. You are fortunate. The ACA is for 'common good" of America.
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:33 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
21. Wait, Hillary’s going to slam dunk win this I've been told
So never fear - it won't go away.
We'll just have to pay ever larger premiums and deductibles so those of us with chronic conditions won't get care anyway. |
Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #21)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:12 PM
Actor (626 posts)
38. Yes, higher costs until single payer. Did you also want to do away with pre existing exclusion
provision no longer existing?
This is your choice. That alone is enough reason for some to vote, i know it is for me. |
Response to Actor (Reply #38)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:30 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
41. Many Americans can't afford to use it now
Next year will see millions more who can't afford to use their health insurance.
Medical bankruptcies are very much a problem. I have PECs that weren't covered in the bad old days. Now I don't go get proper care because its too expensive. It's all lose lose. ![]() |
Response to riderinthestorm (Reply #41)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:56 PM
Actor (626 posts)
42. an answer for everything...Latinos deported?
Response to Actor (Reply #42)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:26 PM
riderinthestorm (23,272 posts)
49. At least 5 children deported back to war stricken Honduras have been murdered.
Hillary said those parents needed to be taught a lesson.
Of course this was Hillary's coup fomented in Honduras as SOS - a foreign policy resume builder! http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/minors-honduras-killed_n_5694986.html ![]() |
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:46 PM
riversedge (60,111 posts)
27. I really do not think most folks know that. It will be one of the first things to go (ACA)
Response to me b zola (Reply #35)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:10 PM
Actor (626 posts)
37. You all have an answer for everything, because you simply dont care. Disgusting
Response to Actor (Reply #37)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:14 PM
me b zola (19,053 posts)
43. You haven't the slightest idea of who I am or my struggles
...but I guess you felt as though you had the right to tell me what I care and don't care about. That takes some kind of balls to make shit up about me and then tell me that your made up shit makes me disgusting.
I don't need insurance~~I can't afford it. I am, however, in need of real medical attention. |
Response to me b zola (Reply #43)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:24 PM
Actor (626 posts)
47. OH NO YOU DONT, you linked a post to me that meant I was selling fear. period
Response to Actor (Reply #47)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:53 PM
me b zola (19,053 posts)
72. GTFOOH
You clearly have no intention of an honest discussion.
|
Response to Actor (Reply #47)
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:10 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
97. This and previous post you made in this thread
are both unnecessary and ugly. Disagreeing with anybody on their choice of candidates does not warrant a personal attack.
|
Response to Actor (Reply #37)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:16 PM
frylock (34,825 posts)
44. You all have an answer for everything.
![]() |
Response to me b zola (Reply #35)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:25 PM
Actor (626 posts)
48. You did it again, amazing
Response to frylock (Reply #45)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:29 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
54. It shocks me that Republican bullshit talking points
get accepted here at DU.
Well, actually, I guess they didn't get completely accepted, they pissed me off and here I am saying so. |
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:20 PM
closeupready (29,503 posts)
46. Nope. Don't take my word for it, here's Trump on what he plans:
Let's be honest here - if you want to defeat him, you can do it, but you WON'T do it by lying about what he's said and or what plans to do. |
Response to closeupready (Reply #46)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:27 PM
Actor (626 posts)
50. Why are you defending Trump and promoting his ATTACK on ACA?
Why is this SHIT allowed here?
Why are pro Trump people allowed to promote him here? Trump has NO Plan and is repealing ACA, so everything i said is true and this poster is both lying and promoting Trump HELLO |
Response to Actor (Reply #50)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:42 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
66. *WHY* are people pushing back on you posting bullshit?
Oh, right. Because you are posting bullshit.
That's why. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #66)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:43 PM
Actor (626 posts)
67. You mean the bernie or bust folks, clearly they have an agenda, you all do.
It is obvious.
Mine is to stop Trump, dont know why you are here if it isnt yours. |
Response to Actor (Reply #67)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:47 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
69. Interesting
So you are wondering why people are here.
Why do you think you are here? Use as many or few words as you like. Say what comes to your mind immediately. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #69)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:49 PM
Actor (626 posts)
71. Liberals belong here, not cons. That is what I was told, guess rules changed
Response to Actor (Reply #71)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:06 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
73. Well, 4/15/16
It probably isn't a good idea to start this early opining who does and does not belong here.
That's rather frowned upon anyway, and I don't particularly appreciate it hurled in my direction. You are off to an interesting start, I can tell you that much. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #73)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:14 PM
Actor (626 posts)
74. I will vote for the democrat, vote blue no matter who, you?
Response to Actor (Reply #74)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:23 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
75. Not even here a month
and demanding loyalty oaths, questioning why long term members are here, and generally tossing snide commentary at the whole board like smug confetti.
It isn't me that is in the wrong place, it is *you* who is in the wrong place unless you check your attitude. Charging into any forum, insulting the shit out of everybody right off the bat while being audacious enough to accuse long term members of "not belonging on the forum" isn't exactly going to lead to productive conversation. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #75)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:27 PM
Actor (626 posts)
76. I am voting for the Democrat no matter who it is because of Trump. I belong here.
And why does it make you angry to be asked to vote Blue??????
A lot of that around here, really angry to be asked to vote Blue. Weird, that. |
Response to Actor (Reply #76)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:37 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
77. It annoys me
that you are so arrogant that you can pass judgment on the whole message board you haven't even been a member of for a month yet.
So yeah, I'm sure you got a shitload of indignant people asking who exactly you thought you are. Count me as another one. Had you been here longer than a couple of weeks, you wouldn't even have to ask, that's the rub. Most of us have already stated such information, but you seem to think it's a hip and trendy question around here. It's like strolling onto an environmental forum and demanding to know who recycles their glass products while firmly asserting that anyone who won't answer you must not live green enough. It's a pretty good guess that they aren't recreationally clubbing seals regardless of how arrogantly and self-importantly you imply it, being as they are there in the first place, most many more years than your couple of days self has been. So, yeah. Don't you have some other place in which to lord your self-righteousness? We're pretty laid back here at DU. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #77)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:42 PM
Actor (626 posts)
79. Bullshit, I can read. I cant count the number of people here who say they wont vote
for Hillary in November.
Who do you think you are fooling? Doesnt help to hear caller after caller on liberal radio shows saying the same fucking stupid bullshit. |
Response to Actor (Reply #79)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:49 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
86. Take it up with the people
on the radio show you are angry at.
Nobody here on DU is accountable for what some dumbass radio caller had to say. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #86)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:50 PM
Actor (626 posts)
87. Dozens or hundreds here do nothing but attack Hillary and say they wont vote for her.
And for every poster here who admits they wont vote for her in Nov, ten defend them.
The rub is I only want to talk to liberals. |
Response to Actor (Reply #87)
Sat May 14, 2016, 01:00 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
99. Maybe if you learn to actually talk
*to* people instead of *at* them, you might just have a decent conversation with the multitude of liberals on this board.
Like I said, strutting into a message board and casting aspersions at people who have been members and have solid friendships here is NOT the path to productive, meaningful conversation. If you have that many problems with that many people on DU, maybe the problem isn't the people on DU - maybe the problem lies with you. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #77)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:47 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
84. At this point I am laughing
because he is assuming that some of us are pro trump, and do not know liberals fight fascists.
IT is actually quite adorable. Mom, can I keep it. Please? |
Response to Actor (Reply #67)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:48 PM
Lizzie Poppet (10,164 posts)
70. Of course we have an agenda: a president for the people.
That ain't Trump...and it ain't Hillary.
|
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:28 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
51. Fear mongering
and telling people their health care treatments are automatically going away is an extremely dubious and shitty tactic.
I suggest you delete this post and quit acting like the side you claim you are against. It is just sad to bring this here to DU. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #51)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:28 PM
Actor (626 posts)
53. So you are FOR Trump repealing ACA?
Response to Actor (Reply #53)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:31 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
57. Take a step back, binary thinking Bob.
This is the same shit I would expect at a Republican website "Vote for Mitt .. or Trump or who the hell else they are propping up" or your health care will be gone forever!!!!!
Settle the fuck down. DU hasn't ever needed this brand of hyperbole, and I'm sorry that you got the impression that we did. Damn. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #57)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:32 PM
Actor (626 posts)
58. So you wont answer, big surprise.
Response to Actor (Reply #58)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:38 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
63. You should be surprised that I even answered at all
I don't usually respond to fodder like this, but yours is so over the top, I figured others would be tickled by seeing such so I kicked it
![]() It wasn't a "kicked it, I agree", lest you receive the wrong message. ![]() |
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:28 PM
treestar (78,357 posts)
52. I have ACA insurance
It is very stressful to think I may be back to the situation I was in before the ACA.
|
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:30 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
55. Hold it, you told us that this was in the bag
and you did not need the rest of us.
So there is a bed you made. Or you are realizing you do need the pesky voters you keep insulting and now you are employing FEAR. Give people are reason to vote FOR, not against, it is more effective. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #55)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:31 PM
Actor (626 posts)
56. Privilege is ugly.
Response to Actor (Reply #56)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:35 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
59. Insults are even better
![]() So it is not in the bag and you have no idea how to get people to vote for a candidate. All you got is this fear ˈfir/ noun 1. an unpleasant emotion caused by the belief that someone or something is dangerous, likely to cause pain, or a threat. "drivers are threatening to quit their jobs in fear after a cabby's murder" synonyms: terror, fright, fearfulness, horror, alarm, panic, agitation, trepidation, dread, consternation, dismay, distress; More verb 1. be afraid of (someone or something) as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening. "he said he didn't care about life so why should he fear death?" Pro tip, that depresses the vote |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #59)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:40 PM
Actor (626 posts)
64. Your laughing emoticon tells me you are hoping the democratic party loses in November.
I get that, I do.
I see it all the time on right wing boards, but this is supposed to be left. |
Response to Actor (Reply #64)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:42 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
65. This now to the level of high commedy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #65)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:44 PM
Actor (626 posts)
81. I know you think it is funny for liberals to work to defeat fascists, but that is what we do
and normally I have a good sense of humor, but you folks are making this very depressing.
I just hope you are a tiny minority, otherwise there will be hell to pay. Maybe you wont be clapping and laughing then |
Response to Actor (Reply #81)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:45 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
83. Ah the assumptions being made
are even more hysterical
Please keep this up, I need the laugh ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #83)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:48 PM
Actor (626 posts)
85. Glad you can laugh. Muslims and latinos and pregnant women are not.
You see to seasoned political people, liberals, there is great concern that people like some here who are not seasoned, dont understand what they are doing, can cause harm.
|
Response to Actor (Reply #85)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:52 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
88. There more assumptions on your part
adorable. This has to be some form of brock inspired high comedy.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Are you going to be here all week? This is really good comedy on your part. <------Immigrant, woman, Latina, Jewish, Oh and kid I cover city hall regularly. You really are doing some great comedy here, I also cover social justice and poverty issues, and speak wth all those groups regularly. Mom can I keep it? really... And now I need to probably finish that candidate questionnaire instead of having a good laugh at YOUR EXPENSE. We actually have a race for city attorney this year. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #88)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:01 PM
Actor (626 posts)
89. And yet you pretend it is funny that you can be all those things and still act like you dont care
about Trump.
Weird. |
Response to Actor (Reply #89)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:04 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
90. Even MORE ASSUMPTIONS
kid I started taking him seriously before you did, I can bet on that. But hey, the assumptions are just hysterical Please continue.
![]() ![]() ![]() I probably should tip you after making me laugh so damn hard. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #90)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:08 PM
Actor (626 posts)
91. You are not laughing now, you are pretending to because I have hit a nerve.
You know damn well if you sit home and Trump is elected, you will be partially to blame.
I dont think you want that, stop the pretending and get serious, this is serious business |
Response to Actor (Reply #91)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:16 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
92. YOu have hit no nerve
In fact, just about to write yet another story on TRUMP. You hit zero nerves, but if Trump is elected I will blame YOUR PARTY and partisans like YOU, for selecting the weakest candidate in decades to run against this clown.
You sir are hysterically funny,. Please keep the comedy going. You assumed all those things and then got some egg on your face. You SIR are a keyboard commando, So what is the going rate from David Brock and Correct the Record? You are attempting a guilt trip, the kind of guilt trip that ACTUALLY FUCKING TURNS PEOPLE OFF AND DEPRESSES THE FUCKING VOTE YOU NEED with the weakest candidate since at least Mondale. You are using fear not positive messaging. So keep it up. You will do well in depressing the vote. And yes I will continue to laugh AT YOU. |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #92)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:21 PM
Actor (626 posts)
93. My party? So you are not a Deemocrat and you are not planning on voting against him
but in your warped world I am the one that is helping him.
W O W And an adult liberal would not have to be asked to vote against Trump |
Response to Actor (Reply #93)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:46 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
94. No I am a Decline to state voter
and proud of it.
And you are still telling to vote against, not for. That is a classic low turnout messaging. Look it up. This is very basic, like first semester political science. I am enjoying your pretzel logic at this point. |
Response to Actor (Reply #64)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:42 PM
tularetom (23,664 posts)
78. Mr. Brock called he says you better step up your game or you ain't gonna get paid
Response to tularetom (Reply #78)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:43 PM
Actor (626 posts)
80. You cant fathom what a liberal does in politics, can you.
I am not surprised.
|
Response to Actor (Reply #80)
Sat May 14, 2016, 01:24 PM
Ed Suspicious (8,879 posts)
101. Who are you?
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #55)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:35 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
60. I like the OPs response.
"Privilege".
Good lord. We are in for a fun ride with condescending, ill-informed folks, it appears. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #60)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:38 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
62. Yup, like he knows the first thing of my life
or my medical or health insurance status. The funniest part is he tried to insult a PoC, who happens to be an immigrant, as far from that privilege he imagines as you can get. Pity the snotty one, he does not know better. I guess they are starting to realize this, ooopsie, we might need those votes after all.
|
Response to Aerows (Reply #60)
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:44 PM
Mnpaul (3,655 posts)
98. I'm so privileged
I can't even afford a diagnosis. No coverage. I'm guessing this is a person with healthcare coverage provided free or at low cost by their employer.
|
Response to Mnpaul (Reply #98)
Sat May 14, 2016, 01:08 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
100. Most likely
The gall is just breathtaking.
|
Response to Actor (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:45 PM
Lindsixo (18 posts)
82. I have epilepsy and ACA
I hate to say it but I actually am worse off now because before I used to get my medicine for free from the pharmaceutical company that makes it and now I dont get that anymore because I have insurance. And the premiums are too expensive for me. I have a very low income but not low enough to qualify for medicare in my state so I often lapse on insurance payments and then have no insurance till I pay again. Its the worst of both worlds.
|