HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » How you know it aint abou...

Mon May 9, 2016, 06:45 PM

How you know it aint about emails or security of the nation.

It just isnt, none of the folks who have all this "concern" about emails, it aint about that.

Sorry, it just aint.

We know what it is about, and what has been about since day one of the Benghazi hearings.

aint, nada, no, nope, zilch, nada.


Hello

38 replies, 2024 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 38 replies Author Time Post
Reply How you know it aint about emails or security of the nation. (Original post)
Actor May 2016 OP
Skink May 2016 #1
GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #3
scscholar May 2016 #2
TimPlo May 2016 #4
Actor May 2016 #5
TimPlo May 2016 #6
Actor May 2016 #7
TimPlo May 2016 #8
DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #9
Actor May 2016 #10
DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #15
Actor May 2016 #16
Fawke Em May 2016 #19
DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #22
Fawke Em May 2016 #23
DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #24
tonedevil May 2016 #36
DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #38
jeff47 May 2016 #35
AzDar May 2016 #11
Actor May 2016 #12
AzDar May 2016 #13
Actor May 2016 #14
Skink May 2016 #17
Fawke Em May 2016 #20
TM99 May 2016 #21
Fawke Em May 2016 #18
frylock May 2016 #25
annavictorious May 2016 #32
frylock May 2016 #34
Trust Buster May 2016 #26
BootinUp May 2016 #30
Dem2 May 2016 #27
Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #28
SheilaT May 2016 #29
Vote2016 May 2016 #31
AgingAmerican May 2016 #33
cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #37

Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 06:56 PM

1. It's way worse

Money laundering. Pay to play. It's a cesspool.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #1)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:23 PM

3. It is indeed!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:13 PM

2. The new attack on overclassification is a good thing though

 

There could still be some positive come out of the FBI's politically-based witchhunt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:26 PM

4. Why do you imply Obama is doing something wrong?

 

Obama was one who instructed the AG to have FBI start a security review. And FBI found other things that None of us know about that lead to more deeper investigation. Anything claiming guilt or innocent is speculation at this point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TimPlo (Reply #4)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:27 PM

5. Nice try...really. But I see who is who here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #5)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:29 PM

6. So you are replying to me

 

And doubling down on saying Obama started a security review over some other reason? Please expand on this it not like you get paid for posting less words or something. Use some to explain your point better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TimPlo (Reply #6)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:31 PM

7. I get it, I do...Some folks are dedicated to destroying Hillary clinton

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #7)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:34 PM

8. That a bit too over top saying that about POTUS.

 

I just think Obama does not like her. But destroy her I don't think he wants to go that far. All he did was call for a security review, they found something what we don't even know yet. But Obama has not really done anything trying to destroy her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #7)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:35 PM

9. I don't feel like talking to that guy but would you please tell him the investigation...

I don't feel like talking to that guy but would you please tell him the investigation began with a referral from the Benghazi Committee and not President Obama.

Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #9)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:36 PM

10. Oh that, wont matter

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #10)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:42 PM

15. You do know this is a trap to get us into an endless argument ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #15)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:43 PM

16. IDK, could be. I do know that if Trump is the next president, I wont blame

the republican party.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #9)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:52 PM

19. Wrong.

The referral came from the Inspector General's office after State drug it's feet. The existence of the private server came from the Benghazi hearings.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fawke Em (Reply #19)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:55 PM

22. Thank you.

The investigation emanated from a request by the Republican led Benghazi Committee just as DemocratSinceBirth has stated.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #22)

Mon May 9, 2016, 08:08 PM

23. But that committee did not refer the case to the FBI.

The FBI got involved after the U.S. Intelligence community and the IG's office referred them the case.

The only thing Benghazi has to do with it is that it was through those hearings that the private server came to light. The Benghazi committee had months and months of hearings before the IG's office and Intelligence got involved. Both the IG's office and Intelligence are under Obama.

On edit: Regardless of how it came to light, does it not bother you that she ignored security protocols - legal or not? I don't believe it was illegal to have the server, FWIW, but I do believe she mishandled national defense data. However, I do believe it was stupid to have the server and ignore protocol because I also believe that act caused a the criminal act of mishandling data.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #22)

Mon May 9, 2016, 08:15 PM

24. Please see Post #22

Thank you in advance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #22)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:33 PM

36. I would think you of all people...

would know that isn't what DemocratSinceBirth said. Here's a quote:
would you please tell him the investigation began with a referral from the Benghazi Committee.
It is obvious that DemocratSinceBirth realizes referral is straight up horsehocky so DemocratSinceBirth wants to pretend emanate is the same as refer. DemocratSinceBirth is not very clever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tonedevil (Reply #36)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:36 PM

38. I have another fan. I am flattered...Actually another detractor...

My fan clubs swells like...


Better not go there

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #9)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:26 PM

35. Wrong.

The investigation started due to a run-of-the-mill FOIA review when responding to Judicial Watch's FOIA request.

During that review, the DNI's office found classified. The DNI IG referred the matter to the FBI.

Remember back when we were the party that was concerned about accuracy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #7)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:37 PM

11. Primarily Hillary Clinton... Most of her 'wounds' are stupidly self-inflicted.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AzDar (Reply #11)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:37 PM

12. That is a right wing talking point, I am surprised it is used here as often as it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #12)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:40 PM

13. It's the truth. Sorry if that hurts your feelings...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AzDar (Reply #13)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:40 PM

14. Repeating a known right wing talking point shouldn't work in a room full of liberals

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #14)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:44 PM

17. Liberals ain't lining up to vote HRC

Nope

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #14)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:54 PM

20. So which right-winger put a gun to her head and made her buck

protocol by setting up a private and unsecure server?

Because that would be the only way a right-winger had anything to do with it's set up.

She brought this on herself by going that route. She's even admitted it wasn't "one of her best decisions."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Reply #14)


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 07:46 PM

18. I thought Benghazi was stupid.

You can Google my comments on this board if you like (there aren't many. I thought the whole thing was dumb).

But what I DO care about is an unsecure email server housing our nation's secrets. You see, I've worked in the cyber security industry for nearly 10 years. I know the score.

Feel free to also Google my transformation into realizing this is a real issue as I learned about the total lack of security measures placed upon her server on this very board.

Maybe if you'd get your head out of the sand and read this timeline, you'll finally understand why this is a very big deal: http://thompsontimeline.com/The_Clinton_Email_Scandal_Timeline

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink





Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 08:59 PM

26. Like we see with Republicans, if they can't win on the merits, then a smear campaign is the answer.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trust Buster (Reply #26)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:03 PM

30. So true. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:01 PM

27. Yep

It is very sad that the left has picked up where the right-wing fake made up scandal - as the leader said - made up simply to destroy Hillary Clinton.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:02 PM

28. The perception of wrongdoing is often as damaging is the reality of wrongdoing.

 

The voters will decide what it's about, rightly or wrongly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:03 PM

29. Your fact filled post is truly enlightening.

 

Thank you for all the diligent research, links, and eloquent summation of the entire email thing. What a lot of time you must have taken for this.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:10 PM

31. No, it's about the intentional premeditated violation of the FOIA, the key law ensuring transparency

 

in our government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:18 PM

33. Please tell that to the FBI

 

Because they are the ones investigating it, not the GOP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Actor (Original post)

Mon May 9, 2016, 09:34 PM

37. Three weeks, less than 250 posts... no star. Excuse me but you won't be fucking lecturing me.

 

Ain't no fucking way you lecture me today, fella.

I would add that I don't think you have a single fucking clue about national security.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread