This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest | Jill Abramson - The Guardian
Based on what I know about the emails, the idea of her being indicted or going to prison is nonsensical. Nonetheless, the belief that Clinton is dishonest and untrustworthy is pervasive. A recent New York Times-CBS poll found that 40% of Democrats say she cannot be trusted.
For decades she’s been portrayed as a Lady Macbeth involved in nefarious plots, branded as “a congenital liar” and accused of covering up her husband’s misconduct, from Arkansas to Monica Lewinsky. Some of this is sexist caricature. Some is stoked by the “Hillary is a liar” videos that flood Facebook feeds. Some of it she brings on herself by insisting on a perimeter or “zone of privacy” that she protects too fiercely. It’s a natural impulse, given the level of scrutiny she’s attracted, more than any male politician I can think of.
I would be “dead rich”, to adapt an infamous Clinton phrase, if I could bill for all the hours I’ve spent covering just about every “scandal” that has enveloped the Clintons. As an editor I’ve launched investigations into her business dealings, her fundraising, her foundation and her marriage. As a reporter my stories stretch back to Whitewater. I’m not a favorite in Hillaryland. That makes what I want to say next surprising.
Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy. (continued at the link below)
...Link to the fulll article at The Guardian
= new reply since forum marked as read
explains Bosnian sniper fire, the Rose law firm documents suddenly reappearing, Chelsea jogging around the Trade Center on 9/11, and on and on and on. 
This article is just more tired tripe that spans the gambit from poor victim Hillary to it is a sexist double standard to call her a liar to well Politifacts says she honest to the 'purity' bullshit.
Sorry no sale, I am not buying hers or your bullshit. I have seen the Clintons in action since the late 1980's in Arkansas. I don't need some bullshit media person to tell me what I have seen for myself to be true.
He never lied. When he said "I did not have sex with that woman" what he was
actually saying was that woman had sex with him.
If we're too stupid to understand what he really meant, that's not his fault. How clear
does he have to make it before we all get it? Sheesh. Same thing with sniper fire in
Bosnia.
I speak fluent Clintonese. 
If she says A... she reserves the right to later clarify that she meant Z. Our failure to understand that distinction is a result of taking her misstatements out of context.
And the VOTERS don't think so either
.
