Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:46 PM May 2016

At the risk of being alerted, banned, ....

I don't care anymore.

I AM a Hillary Clinton supporter. I was in 2008 and I am now.

I have been a member of DU back to the dino years. Put up with a LOT of crap. Seen a lot of crap.

Back in the day I thought that the 2004 primary was ugly ...... that was child's play to 2008 and NOW. Ironic that Howard Dean was the Bernie Sanders of that cycle and NOW he has been trashed by the Bernie supporters for having to DARE support that evil HILLARY!

In 2008 it was pure hell. But compared to 2016, 2008 was a bit of getting a bad case of gas.

We started this cycle when Hillary threw her paint suit into the ring with "oh ... look at her logo ... it's pointed to the RIGHT"!!! That was just the start of the bullshit.

Bernie throws his hat in and the sky parts, the angels sing .. anyone that DARES to question him is should be not trusted and put on "the list".

I'm glad that Bernie is running. I likeD him. No more.

I can't stand the shit that he is saying about a "contested" convention. I can't stand his wife spewing her bullshit and the Weaver asshole that is sucking up money.

If Hillary pulled half of the shit that Bernie and his people did in 2008 she would have been SOS with President Obama.

In 2008 I didn't take one second to pull up my jock strap and support MY President Obama. I love that man. I'm am PROUD to have voted for him in 2008 and 2012. And YES ..... I had his back in the midterms in 2010 and 2014 unlike these assholes that didn't get their glitter pony and sat on their asses.

I am PROUD DEMOCRAT! I support my party.

Got a problem? Then alert this. I'm over this bullshit.

296 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At the risk of being alerted, banned, .... (Original Post) ronnykmarshall May 2016 OP
Well said. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #1
I can't believe I'm reading these OPs. She did pull half that shit, and more! TheBlackAdder May 2016 #143
We must not forget the TRUTH about Hillary! Rockyj May 2016 #174
Truth: Part of Bernie's platform puffy socks May 2016 #176
Although I like your name for some reason rock May 2016 #238
Thank you for reminding people of this... the true Hillary revealed. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #177
She was much, much closer to Obama than Bernie is. Their popular vote totals in the last pnwmom May 2016 #225
That just seems to affirm that negativisms work. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #227
Not true. The states that she just carried recently were large, diverse states. pnwmom May 2016 #228
But the tone was set early on in the Southeast and gave an instant delegate lead. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #229
What you call the "tone" was really just the fact that she has extremely strong support pnwmom May 2016 #234
actually it is: gopiscrap May 2016 #254
Hillary is a gutter fighter farleftlib May 2016 #239
Is this a typo? hellofromreddit May 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #26
hahaha... so Hillary DID pull the shit her supporters are falsely accusing Bernie of. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #178
genius . . . . great editor! pdsimdars May 2016 #147
Good post. cwydro May 2016 #3
Goldman Sachs and Big Pharma thank you for your support. virtualobserver May 2016 #4
Thank you for proving my point. ronnykmarshall May 2016 #17
Your point is that you support the DNC and Hillary.....along with their pals virtualobserver May 2016 #22
You post is "look at me"! Logical May 2016 #30
As is yours since it adds nothing. synergie May 2016 #58
Baaaazing oasis May 2016 #86
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #29
Actually, 3 million MORE than Sanders. Clinton vote count well exceeds 3 million. seabeyond May 2016 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #41
"Big Pharma" is saving countless lives around the world every day. George II May 2016 #32
Big Pharma is making countless dollars around the world every day virtualobserver May 2016 #49
I'm taking two medications, total monthly cost $4.00, total cost to Obamacare $11.00 George II May 2016 #62
Thank Obamacare, not Big Pharma virtualobserver May 2016 #65
"Big Pharma" developed the medications, the ACA didn't. George II May 2016 #66
They also price gouge, and ignore evidence of deadly side effects.... virtualobserver May 2016 #71
Then by all means protest them by opting out of any and all drugs, that is your right. synergie May 2016 #90
It is your privilege to ignore the deaths caused by their greed virtualobserver May 2016 #95
Which deaths would those be that I'm supposedly ignoring? The ones that die due to synergie May 2016 #110
no one is denied medication and no one is gouged in the world of my candidate virtualobserver May 2016 #126
They would not do so as they know they will get sued treestar May 2016 #158
they have done so, and I have personally known someone who died because of it virtualobserver May 2016 #167
perfection does not exist treestar May 2016 #251
when corporations conceal evidence of deadly side effects it is not "imperfection" virtualobserver May 2016 #253
Lets shut all of them down!!!!! Logical May 2016 #263
Yeah, let's!!! Sparkly May 2016 #269
let's stop them from influencing politicians by carpet bombing them with money virtualobserver May 2016 #272
and Sanders is still taking money MFM008 May 2016 #120
Big pharma is also allowing people who cannot pay for their drugs to die. PatrickforO May 2016 #111
Exactly, we are expected to hate all companies treestar May 2016 #157
Let's see what I did this morning.... George II May 2016 #173
Well, here's what I did. RoccoR5955 May 2016 #207
I do all those things too, but the difference is that I recognize my privilege. yardwork May 2016 #222
Yeah I recognize that. RoccoR5955 May 2016 #223
I hope that you have many, many years before that happens. yardwork May 2016 #243
You know what. RoccoR5955 May 2016 #244
So what about everyone else? treestar May 2016 #250
And each of them employs many people treestar May 2016 #249
I was just going to ask which one is willing to Loki May 2016 #260
The NRA thanks Bernie. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #226
Bernie has a D- rating from the NRA, and they ran hard against Bernie when he ran for the Senate virtualobserver May 2016 #230
This year he does. They liked him more the year he voted for the PLCAA pnwmom May 2016 #233
+1 Buzz Clik May 2016 #5
I'm Right There With You Stallion May 2016 #6
Amen! nt puffy socks May 2016 #191
Fantastic post!! Bleacher Creature May 2016 #7
Amen! LisaM May 2016 #8
Well said... SidDithers May 2016 #9
Sometimes you just have to speak your mind. BootinUp May 2016 #10
You mean "Sometimes you just have to speak your rage" pdsimdars May 2016 #149
OK, you like Hillary Clinton. You don't like Jane Sanders. Got it. CentralCoaster May 2016 #11
Agreed! chwaliszewski May 2016 #130
That's very odd treestar May 2016 #160
+10 840high May 2016 #279
The HUGE multinational corps trying to take ALL power away from the people via "free trade"... Triana May 2016 #12
Thanks Ronny, I like hearing you voted in the presidential and mid term elections, a good citizen. Thinkingabout May 2016 #13
You I love, and we should all be 'allowed' to babylonsister May 2016 #14
and I love you too. ronnykmarshall May 2016 #18
Why would anyone alert on this? postatomic May 2016 #15
they wouldn't. It's another stupid "bwah...everyone hates me because I like Hillary" Doctor_J May 2016 #45
I didn't see it that way postatomic May 2016 #74
+1, desperate to play the martyr. Much like Hillary, oddly enough. /nt Marr May 2016 #98
I was hidden for posting Sanders own words... and about Sanders having West stump for him uponit7771 May 2016 #112
I was hidden for puffy socks May 2016 #179
I think we've all had bogus hides postatomic May 2016 #218
I don't like Sanders anymore either. hrmjustin May 2016 #16
No don't worry this stuff won't get reported, 13 min videos of hillsters lying insta8er May 2016 #19
It's going to be hilarious when the bus rolls over Bernie for supporting Hillary..... bettyellen May 2016 #20
That's a silly statement Armstead May 2016 #46
I'd guess 15-20% will throw him under the bus. that said- it is petulant and childish to do that. bettyellen May 2016 #54
I always say that in any campaign, movement etc with large numbers... Armstead May 2016 #79
I think a couple of "personalities" have emerged online - and it is not so pretty. bettyellen May 2016 #80
I don't get your pount... Armstead May 2016 #83
I meant to say that I think just a few personalities feel prominent- because of the net.... bettyellen May 2016 #89
Not so. The party rallies behind the nominee treestar May 2016 #159
One more thing she was wrong about. cui bono May 2016 #235
She was wrong to support Obama? treestar May 2016 #248
Like the passion Joob May 2016 #21
This is what it looks like when a liberal fights for an agenda instead of a job. aikoaiko May 2016 #23
No. When a loser throws his tantrum. seabeyond May 2016 #31
Oh please Armstead May 2016 #42
Sure looks like it to me. I don't expect this nastiness with Democrats. seabeyond May 2016 #43
Democrats have always been known as the "herding cats" party Armstead May 2016 #48
He's just campaigning until the end. How is that a trantrum? aikoaiko May 2016 #44
It isn't. something about Hiraeth May 2016 #107
In Bernieworld anyone with a good job is a corporate shill if they redstateblues May 2016 #39
I used to love him too. I'm really disappointed in him and the way he's been acting. kerry-is-my-prez May 2016 #24
Lol, sure you did! Nt Logical May 2016 #27
Was a huge fan. Have been following him for years. To be honest I actually agree with his ideas kerry-is-my-prez May 2016 #70
I too am rooting for a female president... Silver_Witch May 2016 #108
so in the meanwhile MFM008 May 2016 #121
Not the same sorry Silver_Witch May 2016 #171
A peace freak puffy socks May 2016 #186
Give us all a break. . . . tell us which issue, what principle did Hillary get right for you pdsimdars May 2016 #150
Everybody loves a progressive when they safely tucked away in the corner Armstead May 2016 #52
If Bernie had been denied running as a Democrat you would have a point BootinUp May 2016 #82
Bernie doesn't have the impending legal problems that Hillary has. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #122
Fair point. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #180
I think that picture is from Goblinmonger May 2016 #184
I've beenvery disappointed in Hillary Clinton going on 9 years now. So disappointed I want nothing nc4bo May 2016 #59
Thank God he's revealing his true character now uponit7771 May 2016 #113
Same here. Sparkly May 2016 #266
Banned? Dramatic much? LOL! Logical May 2016 #25
Drama Queens For Hillary! Doctor_J May 2016 #51
Cha loves her some Hillary now, though chwaliszewski May 2016 #131
Perhaps just some confusion over whose supporters have been getting banned since December? merrily May 2016 #246
Righteous rant and I am with you absolutely!!! Nt seabeyond May 2016 #28
Alert? Why oh pray why? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #33
Ironic that you constantly say your OPs will be alerted on. zappaman May 2016 #77
Except I do not waste my time alerting nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #87
Uh huh zappaman May 2016 #114
What you believe is your projection and fantasy nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #118
Best of luck to your candidate zappaman May 2016 #124
Thank you for putting in words how I also feel Progressive dog May 2016 #34
How have they been acting worse than Clinton? Armstead May 2016 #40
How are they worse than Clinton? This garbage. Totally made up insulting attacks like you just made. seabeyond May 2016 #57
Bernie fought in the primaries and he has lost. Progressive dog May 2016 #138
How is trying to influence the platform helping the Republicans? Armstead May 2016 #142
First, Bernie claims that he still has a path to the nomination Progressive dog May 2016 #148
Seriously! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #181
steal the super delegates? passiveporcupine May 2016 #84
OMG, Bernie can't succeed in making it a "contested contest" Progressive dog May 2016 #136
OMG OMG OMG passiveporcupine May 2016 #224
So you must be in the Hill camp Progressive dog May 2016 #237
No, my use of the OMG's were intentional...to sound like you guys. passiveporcupine May 2016 #245
OMG OMG OMG that is funny Progressive dog May 2016 #285
Now I would take your OP and just switch the characters around and call it a day. bkkyosemite May 2016 #36
+10,000 nt Live and Learn May 2016 #53
haha, yes! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #183
She pulled just as much shit in 2008...and has been pulling it this year Armstead May 2016 #37
more excuses for Bernie's failed gambit redstateblues May 2016 #72
Hillary used to be for "the notion of a primary being allowed to pursue its course." pdsimdars May 2016 #154
Excellent rant. sheshe2 May 2016 #38
Why would I alert it? Disagree with most of it, but would never alert it. EndElectoral May 2016 #47
+10,000 nt Live and Learn May 2016 #56
One of the reasons why the banned was revoked was because of the number of times AA and HRC ... uponit7771 May 2016 #116
Well said. I couldn't agree more. Is New Democrat a thing I missed? I like the silvershadow May 2016 #128
That's my RonnyK!!! NanceGreggs May 2016 #50
Back at ya! ronnykmarshall May 2016 #256
K&R betsuni May 2016 #55
Kicked and recommended! Firebrand Gary May 2016 #60
I know you only as someone who makes snide putdowns on Bernie. senz May 2016 #61
^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^ pdsimdars May 2016 #155
Thanks for stalking! ronnykmarshall May 2016 #295
Whatever floats your boat whatchamacallit May 2016 #63
Whatever trips your trigger. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #64
Whatever quids your pro quo. pdsimdars May 2016 #156
I see what you did there. Good one! nt cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #164
Why rage? She went to the end. Bernie's going to the end. Ok for her, not him? Silly. snowy owl May 2016 #67
There you go again snowy... using logic! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #185
Beyond silly. Hypocritical, vintx May 2016 #220
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #68
Damn! I see you haven't change your ways Ronny nini May 2016 #69
There is one constant Ronny, we are both stil here. William769 May 2016 #73
Well said! nolawarlock May 2016 #75
Right there with you RonnieK Maru Kitteh May 2016 #76
You know very well that you won't be banned sadoldgirl May 2016 #78
ronnyk! Bobbie Jo May 2016 #81
I am a PROUD Establishment Democrat fun n serious May 2016 #85
100 % agreement from this Hillary supporter. oasis May 2016 #88
K&R ismnotwasm May 2016 #91
"I'm over this bullshit." workinclasszero May 2016 #92
Hear, hear!!!! Beacool May 2016 #93
I don't think he's really going to Turin_C3PO May 2016 #213
But that's what he, Devine and Weaver keep saying. Beacool May 2016 #215
Oh the drama... artislife May 2016 #94
K&R a million times!!! lunamagica May 2016 #96
Skinner is not going to ban you Relax, He supports Mrs. Clinton! akbacchus_BC May 2016 #97
You're so very brave. Marr May 2016 #99
Why on earth will you be banned? You are a Clinton supporer akbacchus_BC May 2016 #100
WOW, ronny! So glad you got to tell it like it is! And, thank you for supporting President Obama Cha May 2016 #101
See post #51. nt 2cannan May 2016 #175
PROUD DEMOCRAT...says it all. New button, please!! Jitter65 May 2016 #102
The sad thing is that you have to be worried about being alerted on for posting your honest Trust Buster May 2016 #103
^^^^This. Lisa0825 May 2016 #273
This is the problem of painting people with a broad brush... Silver_Witch May 2016 #104
ARE YOU KIDDING???? northernsouthern May 2016 #105
You support a republican. basselope May 2016 #106
Top 15% most liberal in congress. seabeyond May 2016 #141
Who was number one? SwampG8r May 2016 #165
I imagine Sanders. See, hurts me not. Clinton only a couple percentage points behind Sanders. seabeyond May 2016 #188
Just asking SwampG8r May 2016 #193
The article I read had Sanders at number one sitting at 95% and Clinton at 15% sitting at 93%. seabeyond May 2016 #194
Sanders was number one ismnotwasm May 2016 #206
No. basselope May 2016 #195
Yada Yada Yada, you are still incorrect. Clinton is a strong liberal. seabeyond May 2016 #198
LOL. Yeo, a good ol War/frackin loving liberal. basselope May 2016 #200
Hey.... Backatcha being a Sanders supporter. Getting frackin' money along with the rest of 'em. seabeyond May 2016 #217
Nonsense. Bobbie Jo May 2016 #151
Democrats love their war and fracking! basselope May 2016 #196
! Hiraeth May 2016 #109
I could barely summon enough interest to reply ibegurpard May 2016 #115
thank you ronnyk! DemonGoddess May 2016 #117
agree MFM008 May 2016 #119
Most of the shit that the GOP believes about Obama started with Hillary's campaign. w4rma May 2016 #123
The pony accusation. Long time no see Betty Karlson May 2016 #125
Some OPs seem far more suitable for one's diary or journal. merrily May 2016 #127
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #129
Righteous "rant" leftynyc May 2016 #132
Thank you ronnie! murielm99 May 2016 #133
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #134
Sanders is trying to win the nomination ProfessorPlum May 2016 #135
Apparently he will still be trying to win during Hillary's inauguration. nt BootinUp May 2016 #192
HAHA workinclasszero May 2016 #214
I love you Ronny. As much of a shitshow this place can be, I'm glad it exists, I'm glad PeaceNikki May 2016 #137
Don't forget attacking civil rights icons, blatant sexism and blatant racism. nt LexVegas May 2016 #139
Every party's gotta have a Nixon. VulgarPoet May 2016 #140
I've got some bad news... disillusioned73 May 2016 #144
the definition of irony dlwickham May 2016 #277
"I am PROUD DEMOCRAT! I support my party." disillusioned73 May 2016 #280
Right there with you, Ronny, as always. Lyric May 2016 #145
Come on, you are so far "into a bubble" that you seem to have lost touch with reality. pdsimdars May 2016 #146
Bernie did vote against the auto bailout Progressive dog May 2016 #169
Thank you for that! n/t RoccoR5955 May 2016 #208
Good for you ... if it were a football game Doremus May 2016 #152
Logo Gate defined the intelligence of those we are up against. NCTraveler May 2016 #153
Support whatever you want, just don't pretend to be more than a corporate tool. PeteSelman May 2016 #161
and thank you again and rest for Hillary attackers for proving my point. ronnykmarshall May 2016 #163
That the point is corruption pays? Katashi_itto May 2016 #172
"don't pretend to be more than a corporate tool." Do not pretend you have a clue. seabeyond May 2016 #189
K&R Gothmog May 2016 #162
Okay. LWolf May 2016 #166
A clinton supporter banned? SwampG8r May 2016 #168
True dat. n/t RoccoR5955 May 2016 #209
"didn't get their glitter pony and sat on their asses" wildeyed May 2016 #170
Alert for what? Bombast? Lack of diplomatic skills? Pugnaciousness? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #182
I love your post CreekDog May 2016 #187
right on ruggerson May 2016 #190
You don't know what a democrat lastone May 2016 #197
You have seen only half of the singing angels, then. Orsino May 2016 #199
Considering the political meaning of the terms left & right, CrispyQ May 2016 #201
Good for you. Jester Messiah May 2016 #202
Thank you! tonyt53 May 2016 #203
Having a bad day? (eom) HassleCat May 2016 #204
Yes! Scurrilous May 2016 #205
Thank you Ronny! livetohike May 2016 #210
"Got a problem?" bvf May 2016 #211
Glad to be the 100th rec! R B Garr May 2016 #212
Kicked and recommended. hamsterjill May 2016 #216
well said. K&R!! n/t Sheepshank May 2016 #219
Righteous rant. Kicked and recommended. yardwork May 2016 #221
Saying that you are a Clinton supporter kiva May 2016 #231
Are you an actual member of the Democratic Party? imagine2015 May 2016 #232
lol Go Vols May 2016 #236
Since this is a fuck you to me can I say fuck you to you too? DFab420 May 2016 #240
Sure ronnykmarshall May 2016 #255
You know, there is a Hillary Group in DemocraticUnderground... Herman4747 May 2016 #241
Of course I know of the group. ronnykmarshall May 2016 #258
When you write: "best qualified candidate ever to run"... Herman4747 May 2016 #284
Bye hon ronnykmarshall May 2016 #289
Maybe you shouldn't leave the Bernie group if you are so afraid of what goes on here. JTFrog May 2016 #270
So presumptuous you are! Herman4747 May 2016 #281
Lol. You've been banned from both. JTFrog May 2016 #283
Do you have anything substantive to say? rbnyc May 2016 #242
Good for you! This needed to be said! anotherproletariat May 2016 #247
What a bold stand! Ed Suspicious May 2016 #252
Why thank you, hon! ronnykmarshall May 2016 #259
K&R baldguy May 2016 #257
Get well soon. CentralCoaster May 2016 #261
I agree. I supported Obama in 2008, but the ugliness was child's play compared to what I see now still_one May 2016 #262
Great thread Gothmog May 2016 #264
You speak for me, ronnykmarshall. SunSeeker May 2016 #265
BRAVO!!! STANDING OVATION!!! Lisa0825 May 2016 #267
Have a cocktail, dear. sister_rosa_refried May 2016 #268
Hillary makes me vomit PowerToThePeople May 2016 #271
How vivid. ronnykmarshall May 2016 #274
K&R. nt UtahLib May 2016 #275
Geez, you have the convenient amnesia of a conservative. BillZBubb May 2016 #276
oh she fed the birther bullshit? ronnykmarshall May 2016 #288
Amen! Stuckinthebush May 2016 #278
That's the difference RonnieK Loki May 2016 #282
Amen. n/t Stand and Fight May 2016 #286
Anyone who runs on the hatred of my party is a dangerous individual. Walk away May 2016 #287
kick for truth... Blue_Tires May 2016 #290
You Dont Care Anymore-About the Primary The Country The Future...What exactly does that mean?? Bern2WinUSA May 2016 #291
Yes I do care about future ronnykmarshall May 2016 #292
Do you know what she said to the Wall Street Banksters who had stolen our money and B Calm May 2016 #293
Do you know? ronnykmarshall May 2016 #294
Hell no! That's one reason why I don't trust her. B Calm May 2016 #296

TheBlackAdder

(28,167 posts)
143. I can't believe I'm reading these OPs. She did pull half that shit, and more!
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:36 AM
May 2016

.


Especially trashing MLK, Rev. Wright, or staying in until the end just in case someone gets assasinated, etc.

It really takes off after the 7 min. mark:





.

Rockyj

(538 posts)
174. We must not forget the TRUTH about Hillary!
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:38 AM
May 2016

The REAL Hillary is NOT a Progressive, she's a Neo-Liberal that's very scary!
I'd rather see Trump as President then her!

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
176. Truth: Part of Bernie's platform
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:58 AM
May 2016

is civility and not mud slinging, that's all his supporters have done.
He can't run on the issues like you all said.

rock

(13,218 posts)
238. Although I like your name for some reason
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:55 PM
May 2016

And I suppose it's my duty to welcome you to DU. So, welcome to DU, please stay a while. Finally, I do find your opinions rather poor, which you are completely entitled to. But please try not to spread garbage around on DU.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
177. Thank you for reminding people of this... the true Hillary revealed.
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:04 AM
May 2016

It ain't over til it's over.

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
225. She was much, much closer to Obama than Bernie is. Their popular vote totals in the last
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:45 PM
May 2016

month were just about even, with them trading tiny leads.

That situation was nothing like now, with Hillary almost 3 million votes and more than 300 delegates ahead.

TheBlackAdder

(28,167 posts)
227. That just seems to affirm that negativisms work.
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:47 PM
May 2016

.


You keep posting the numbers, when most of the drive occurred early on, setting the tone.


I'm just posting the fact that the 2008 race was in the gutter.


.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
228. Not true. The states that she just carried recently were large, diverse states.
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:49 PM
May 2016

Bernie carried a string of low population caucus states, with WA being the biggest. And WA is not a large state, population wise.

TheBlackAdder

(28,167 posts)
229. But the tone was set early on in the Southeast and gave an instant delegate lead.
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:00 PM
May 2016

.


While I am for closed primaries, I also believe that undeclareds, Indys, and disgruntled Reps should be able to switch to the Democratic Party right up to voting day--instead of alienating a lot of people, denying them the ability to participate and join the party.


.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
234. What you call the "tone" was really just the fact that she has extremely strong support
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:01 PM
May 2016

among African American voters, which was first demonstrated in the South. But her success among minority voters there has been repeated all over the country, including in the most recent races.

gopiscrap

(23,726 posts)
254. actually it is:
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:45 PM
May 2016

it has the 11th most electoral votes of the 50 states and DC with 12 Only CA, FL, TX, PA< IL , GA, MI, NC> OH, VA have more

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
239. Hillary is a gutter fighter
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:59 PM
May 2016

She is not a victim in this campaign nor was she in '08. Thanks for pointing out one of her finest moments.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
2. Is this a typo?
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:48 PM
May 2016
If Hillary pulled half of the shit that Bernie and his people did in 2008 she would have been SOS with President Obama.


Did you mean SOL?

Response to hellofromreddit (Reply #2)

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
178. hahaha... so Hillary DID pull the shit her supporters are falsely accusing Bernie of.
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:08 AM
May 2016

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

Response to virtualobserver (Reply #4)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
35. Actually, 3 million MORE than Sanders. Clinton vote count well exceeds 3 million.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:15 PM
May 2016

I know you know, just clarifying.

Response to seabeyond (Reply #35)

George II

(67,782 posts)
62. I'm taking two medications, total monthly cost $4.00, total cost to Obamacare $11.00
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:41 PM
May 2016

Without them I'd wind up with serious heart disease.

Thank you, "Big Pharma"!

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
71. They also price gouge, and ignore evidence of deadly side effects....
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:56 PM
May 2016

Some of the drugs that help relieve the negative effects of one ailment, damage other organs in order to achieve it,

it is a money machine. They also ignore anything that they cannot patent, even if they find serious health benefits.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
90. Then by all means protest them by opting out of any and all drugs, that is your right.
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:36 AM
May 2016

The rest of us will be happy to treat our illnesses and those of our loved ones. Many pray every day to have the access you disparage. Privilege to pout over politics while rejecting the work done by researchers and pharma companies everyday is nice, if you can swing it.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
95. It is your privilege to ignore the deaths caused by their greed
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:13 AM
May 2016

...just as you ignore the complete corruption of our political system because you believe that it favors your candidate.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
110. Which deaths would those be that I'm supposedly ignoring? The ones that die due to
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:53 AM
May 2016

a lack of access to medication? Or are those deaths the ones you're happy to ignore? Just as you ignore truth, reality and facts which have been proven to be rather inconvenient for your candidate?

Do you truly wish that everyone was deprived of pharmacology therapy, and do you truly have no clue just how many deaths are caused by such purist silliness?

When you don't have to look into the eyes of the people you sacrifice at the altar of your purity politics, it's very easy to repeating silly talking points that don't show much awareness of knowledge about anything medicine, drugs or how they actually work in this world.

Deaths caused by callous indifference to reality in favor of playing at politics, that's pretty cold, and rather corrupt. Your candidate offers vague references to policies that would indeed endanger many and cause immense suffering, but neither you nor he seem to be much educated about the realities of poorly thought out policies with little thought or understanding behind them.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
126. no one is denied medication and no one is gouged in the world of my candidate
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:21 AM
May 2016

the deaths are all on the greedy side of Big Pharma....as they conceal deathly side effects for profits

your straw man is laughable....no one is sacrificed at the :altar of my purity, and no one is endangered by coverage for all Americans.

Unnecessary deaths are prevented.

Unlike team “Trudge up the Hill”(Thanks, President Obama!) I believe in Healthcare for all.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
158. They would not do so as they know they will get sued
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

America is litigious - which is actually good, in that it encourages companies not to put out dangerous products.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
251. perfection does not exist
Wed May 4, 2016, 08:59 PM
May 2016

And that's why they always want "tort reform." But when they screw up they have to pay the damages.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
253. when corporations conceal evidence of deadly side effects it is not "imperfection"
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:06 PM
May 2016

it is not merely a "mistake".

Sparkly

(24,149 posts)
269. Yeah, let's!!!
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:29 PM
May 2016

How shall we go about it?

Considering Congress exists? And the other party is so obstructionist, they're still trying to vote down the ACA?

We could work for reform, but that's so third way..

I know! We could all yell "Let's shut all of them down!!!!!" REALLY loud! That should do it.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
120. and Sanders is still taking money
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:23 AM
May 2016

with out a chance of winning.
Maybe his supporters should just make his house payment or pay his next trip to the Vatican?




PatrickforO

(14,559 posts)
111. Big pharma is also allowing people who cannot pay for their drugs to die.
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:01 AM
May 2016

From a shareholder standpoint, it is good business to set the price of any given drug high enough so maximum revenue can be derived while an 'acceptable' number of people are allowed to die. From a moral standpoint, not so much. I guess I'm one of those unicorns, but we are simply going to have to reorganize our world around decisions and policies that benefit our entire species by promoting social, economic and environmental justice. It may already be too late here, because we're facing some existential threats that have been downplayed by the lie merchants, but nonetheless exist.

And, you know, one of the FIRST things that we're going to have to jettison is the 'profits over people' model. Profit IS a dirty word if people are dying for its sake.

WE'VE got to get moral here, ASAP.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
157. Exactly, we are expected to hate all companies
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:07 AM
May 2016

no matter what they do. Most Americans do not hate business. This is why Bernie can't win the general.

George II

(67,782 posts)
173. Let's see what I did this morning....
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:36 AM
May 2016

- I got up and made coffee - BIG food conglomerates import the coffee beans
- I took a shower - using soap and shampoo made by the same FOREIGN conglomerate that Sanders' best buddies Ben & Jerry sold their ice cream company - Uniliver (UK and Dutch owned)
- Got in my car (manufactured by BIG AUTO) and went to get gas, sold by BIG OIL.
- Went to the bank (BIG BANKING) and checked to see if my pension check had arrived - a pension that is almost 100% invested in WALL STREET!
- Finally I went to the local Walgreen's to pick up our three prescriptions, manufactured by BIG PHARMA. Cost to us for a month? $6.00 TOTAL

Let's see Sanders and all his followers put their lives where their mouths are - do without BIG Pharma, BIG oil, BIG auto, BIG banks, WALL STREET and BIG International food and household item providers.

I didn't see any loud hue and cry about Sanders' "carbon footprint" and abject waste when he flew 19 hours round trip to Rome for a 10-minute speech and chance encounter with the Pope. How much BIG oil was consumed for that?

I don't see anyone complaining about most of Sanders' net worth invested in mutual funds that rely on stocks and bonds traded on WALL Street.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
207. Well, here's what I did.
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:45 PM
May 2016

I made coffee that I got from a local roaster who gets their beans from a worker owned co-op in Mexico.

I took a shower using soap that is made in the US in by a smaller US company and is never tested on animals

I got on my US made bicycle that is very old and has been repaired by the local repair shop, and rode to

My local credit union, who makes sure to invest the money that I deposit where we, the members of the credit union tell it to.

I went to the food co-op and got the herbal remedies that were recommended by my osteopath.

Oh, I stopped along the way to the farmers' market to get some food for dinner from local farmers.


I guess that some of us don't need the big businesses, big pharma, or big anything.

yardwork

(61,539 posts)
222. I do all those things too, but the difference is that I recognize my privilege.
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:37 PM
May 2016

One day you or your loved ones will have a serious illness that requires more than herbal remedies, and when that day comes, you will either access Big Healthcare or you won't. I've lived long enough to know with 99% certainty what you will choose.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
223. Yeah I recognize that.
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

I also recognize that the fact of the matter is that life ultimately leads to death.
Personally, if I get a "serious illness," I would rather just die, than pay everything I own to Big Healthcare and Pharma.

yardwork

(61,539 posts)
243. I hope that you have many, many years before that happens.
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:28 PM
May 2016

Many people recover completely from serious illnesses - over and over in their lives - without paying everything they own. I wish you long life and happiness.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
244. You know what.
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:33 PM
May 2016

With this climate change that I, for one have been warning people about for more than 30 years, and the right wing corporatists that abound, I really hope you are wrong. I really do not want to be here.
I'll just go about my business and tread lightly on the planet, while I still tell others about the impending doom. Whether or not they listen, be certain that capitalism is killing the planet and killing the Human race.
No, I don't want long life, because as things are going at this point, I shall never be happy.
Too many people are too concerned with their materialistic gains. All about me, me, me, and not enough us and we.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
249. And each of them employs many people
Wed May 4, 2016, 08:57 PM
May 2016

Who make their living from their jobs. And thus have money to buy whatever we are selling for our livings.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
260. I was just going to ask which one is willing to
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:16 PM
May 2016

give up their Rx's and any that any family member takes, to stop supporting "big pharma". Betcha I would hear crickets, in fact, I know I would. It's all talk. But it doesn't stop us from wanting change and that's what we will get with a Democratic president, senate and house. Madam President.....sure love the sound of those words.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
230. Bernie has a D- rating from the NRA, and they ran hard against Bernie when he ran for the Senate
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:12 PM
May 2016

Big Pharma funds her current campaign and I could retire in luxury from just the cash that they gave her personally from short speeches.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
233. This year he does. They liked him more the year he voted for the PLCAA
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:42 PM
May 2016

and more the year he voted against Brady.

And the NRA website is full of articles attacking Hillary -- but not Bernie. For obvious reasons.

http://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2016/5/3/dear-hillary-well-keep-our-gun-culture-thank-you/

At a campaign stop in Hartford, Conn., late last month, Democratic presidential front-runner ratcheted up her hateful rhetoric toward law-abiding American gun owners. Yes, you read that right—once again she was ignoring violent criminals involved in murder and mayhem on our streets, while targeting those who own and regularly use firearms for a variety of legal reasons.

“I am here to tell you I will use every single minute of every day … looking for ways we can save lives, that we can change the gun culture,” she told the fawning crowd. (Emphasis added.)

Aside from the obvious question that arises concerning the myriad of extremely important challenges facing our nation that will evidently go ignored by such single-mindedness should Clinton be elected, the statement reveals another fault in her logic. The gangbangers shooting it out on the streets of Chicago aren’t the people Clinton is referring to as the “gun culture.” In truth, I’m the “gun culture.” And you’re the “gun culture.”

That’s right, her goal is to change us.

Stallion

(6,473 posts)
6. I'm Right There With You
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:52 PM
May 2016

Clinton supporter in 2008 but proudly cast my ballot for Obama in 2008 and 2012 and the Democrats in 2010 and 2014. Loyal Democrats versus Independents shooting from the rear many of whom have been driving Obama's unfavorables for years and sat on their ass during mid-terms

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
149. You mean "Sometimes you just have to speak your rage"
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

There wasn't much actual fact or thought in that post

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
11. OK, you like Hillary Clinton. You don't like Jane Sanders. Got it.
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:57 PM
May 2016

I hope you don't mind then that we like Sanders and his wife, Jane, and don't care for Hillary Clinton.

Good. I'm glad we had this talk.

PS: I don't think you'll be banned.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
12. The HUGE multinational corps trying to take ALL power away from the people via "free trade"...
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:57 PM
May 2016

..THANK YOU for your support of their efforts.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027797776

babylonsister

(171,035 posts)
14. You I love, and we should all be 'allowed' to
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

support who we want there. You go, my friend.

I support Bernie, but I understand your passion. Rock on!

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
15. Why would anyone alert on this?
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

Sorry. Stupid question. I should know better.

You know, early on I liked Jane. She seemed to keep The Sandman grounded.

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
74. I didn't see it that way
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:59 PM
May 2016

You'll have to be honest and admit that any post that praised Hillary Clinton has been met with some odd and vile comments. Not all, but a large number of them have been 'burned'. So, quite a few people are hesitant to start any 'I like Hillary' OP.

That's fucked up. It shouldn't be that way.

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
112. I was hidden for posting Sanders own words... and about Sanders having West stump for him
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:06 AM
May 2016

... in IA and NH in front of mostly white people and get hidden when the "Southern States" came

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
179. I was hidden for
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:12 AM
May 2016

Posting
"What prize did you win?"

After a Sanders supporters suggested another pro Hillary person was a troll .

They posted
"Troll posts for troll prizes."

 

insta8er

(960 posts)
19. No don't worry this stuff won't get reported, 13 min videos of hillsters lying
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:04 PM
May 2016

Are the ones that get reported, because what else can you do if the ugly truth is staring you in the face.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
20. It's going to be hilarious when the bus rolls over Bernie for supporting Hillary.....
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:05 PM
May 2016

So there is that to look forward to!

:cheers:

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
46. That's a silly statement
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

About 10-15 percent of people will "throw Bernie under the bus" if the time comes for him to support Clinton.

Others will listen, accept it and make up thier own minds of what to do.

And Bernie is absolutely correct. If she is the nominee it will her job to convince them that she actually does want to represent them at least as much as Goldman Sachs.


 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
54. I'd guess 15-20% will throw him under the bus. that said- it is petulant and childish to do that.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:35 PM
May 2016

and the bigger problem is that those 15-20% are the most vocal and active on Reddit, Twitter and FB and it will be mortifying for SBS and for his supporters, as well as for the Dem party to have to watch them evicerate Sanders for something the rest of us knew all along would happen- what SBS has SAID will happen, in fact.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
79. I always say that in any campaign, movement etc with large numbers...
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:10 AM
May 2016

There's as many personalities as individuals involved.



 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
80. I think a couple of "personalities" have emerged online - and it is not so pretty.
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:12 AM
May 2016

I am watching this interview with Bernie and he does not seem enthusiastic talking about contesting at the convention.... it is puzzling.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
83. I don't get your pount...
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:19 AM
May 2016

But thats okay...i'm going to bed....once again wasted too much time on DU tonight

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
89. I meant to say that I think just a few personalities feel prominent- because of the net....
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:35 AM
May 2016

but they might actually not be as common as they appear.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
159. Not so. The party rallies behind the nominee
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:09 AM
May 2016

Hillary did not say it was Obama's job to convince - she got behind him and helped.

Joob

(1,065 posts)
21. Like the passion
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:06 PM
May 2016

I'm no supporter of Hillary but guess we should all keep in mind we're fighting for a democratic party that we believe in.
We should keep it civil on both sides. With that said, I'm still Bernie or Bust.

You're wrong. No you're wrong. And that's how things get heated. Of course it will, but we can be civil about it I hope.

aikoaiko

(34,163 posts)
23. This is what it looks like when a liberal fights for an agenda instead of a job.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:07 PM
May 2016

He's not quitting because he wants to show how far and deep a more liberal agenda can go. I support that.

Remember the Howard scream speech? Remember what he said after the scream?
"We will not give up!" And then he quit in February.

And now he is a shill for the medical industry.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
48. Democrats have always been known as the "herding cats" party
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:27 PM
May 2016

It's the GOP that falls into line without questioning....Well, until this year anyway.

aikoaiko

(34,163 posts)
44. He's just campaigning until the end. How is that a trantrum?
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:24 PM
May 2016



He's talking about the same issues he has from the beginning.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
39. In Bernieworld anyone with a good job is a corporate shill if they
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:19 PM
May 2016

aren't for Bernie. Of course Bernie didn't have a job until he was 40

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
70. Was a huge fan. Have been following him for years. To be honest I actually agree with his ideas
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:56 PM
May 2016

more than I do with Hillaries. I really don't care if you choose not to believe me because I have little respect for someone who calls a person they don't know a liar.

I don't believe that someone who has called himself a Socialist can win at this point in time.

I've been rooting for and supporting Hillary for a long time now and as a woman am very much rooting for a female president. If another white male (or male for that matter) wins over one of best-qualified people to ever run for President, I would be completely dismayed.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
108. I too am rooting for a female president...
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:45 AM
May 2016

just not this female. She is not in my humble opinion she is not the best qualified by a mile. But them I am a peace freak and bleeding heart liberal for decades.

I will wait for a better female to be our President.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
121. so in the meanwhile
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:37 AM
May 2016

One time I baby sat one of my best friends kid, She lived right next door.
I hadn't spent much time with her let be alone with her.
The kid spent most of the night screaming at me to leave,
don't touch this, don't talk to her, a real double fuking nightmare.
I told her mother and it ruined our friendship forever.
She didn't believe me, you ask what the point is?
Read it again.
 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
171. Not the same sorry
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:32 AM
May 2016

I am not friends with anyone here so if they don't like hearing the truth about Clinton I don't fear loosing any friendships.

Sorry don't get how this applys.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
186. A peace freak
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:23 AM
May 2016

who apparently dismisses Bernie's war hawkish voting record. He's voted for far more war than Hillary. Voted to overturn Sadaam back in 98 too.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
150. Give us all a break. . . . tell us which issue, what principle did Hillary get right for you
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:58 AM
May 2016

and Bernie got wrong? What issue was the back breaker for you?
Explain it for us.

Otherwise just accept that you are not being honest about your former support of Bernie.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
52. Everybody loves a progressive when they safely tucked away in the corner
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:34 PM
May 2016

When they actually come out and push a liberal progressive agenda......Democrats become teh townspeople in "The Night of The Living Dead"

BootinUp

(47,085 posts)
82. If Bernie had been denied running as a Democrat you would have a point
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:18 AM
May 2016

Lets turn the race around. If Hillary was in Bernie's spot are saying there wouldn't be pressure for her to concede the race from Bernie supporters?

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
59. I've beenvery disappointed in Hillary Clinton going on 9 years now. So disappointed I want nothing
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:38 PM
May 2016

to do with her or what she represents nor her fake ass populism.

You can put that in your pipe and smoke it.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
51. Drama Queens For Hillary!
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:33 PM
May 2016

Here is one person who didn't get banned:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=6017420&mesg_id=6018254

Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sun May-18-08 01:08 PM

7. Yeah, her negative shit came back to bite her in the ass and

Obama soared. Thanks hilary for being such a lying, pandering fighter for yourself when you didn't fight against bush one fucking iota.

We wouldn't be in Iraq if hilary and the Dems fought against bush like hilary LIED against Obama. All these people wouldn't be DEAD.



 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
33. Alert? Why oh pray why?
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:12 PM
May 2016

perhaps though you might be projecting.

Just a thought. Some of the responses could be, but why waste my time?

Progressive dog

(6,899 posts)
34. Thank you for putting in words how I also feel
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:14 PM
May 2016

My wife has been telling me for weeks that no matter how bad Bernie and his campaign act, we will have to vote for him over Trump. Last night she saw Bernie with his "steal the super delegates, further the revolution" speech and she was finished with Bernie. I have also been moving that way and am so glad that he has lost so I will still have a Democrat to vote for in the general.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
40. How have they been acting worse than Clinton?
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:20 PM
May 2016

The Clinton campaign is just a lot more devious in their crappiness. They bought off (or scared in) the super delegates back before there was a primary.

And you begrudge her opponent the opportunity to try and fight back?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
57. How are they worse than Clinton? This garbage. Totally made up insulting attacks like you just made.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:36 PM
May 2016

Progressive dog

(6,899 posts)
138. Bernie fought in the primaries and he has lost.
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:43 AM
May 2016

He has no way to victory. He is now working to help the Republicans, it is time for him to stop.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
142. How is trying to influence the platform helping the Republicans?
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:25 AM
May 2016

Why do you begrudge Bernie for fighting hard, but with Clinton you want her to fight hard?

Progressive dog

(6,899 posts)
148. First, Bernie claims that he still has a path to the nomination
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:52 AM
May 2016

Second, Bernie claims to be a Democrat, he is running in the Democratic primaries, actual Democrats don't continue "fighting hard" against the Democrats who have beaten them.
Third, Bernie will have exactly as much say in the platform as the winner allows him to have. Helping the Republicans by "fighting hard" against Hillary and the DNC is not the way to influence Hillary or actual Democrats.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
84. steal the super delegates?
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:22 AM
May 2016

Last edited Tue May 3, 2016, 01:51 AM - Edit history (1)

OMG, I can't believe how freaked out so many people are by Bernie working within a system set up to work this way. The super delegates never chose between Bernie and Hillary. They had to go with Hillary from the very beginning because she was the presumptive winner, and even if they might have preferred Bernie, she was "supposed" to win and they could not go against the establishment...or they would pay for it.

Now some brave ones have supported Bernie, but it's still pretty much the original "set-up" that gave Hillary the upper hand without even earning it. Not because all these people think Hillary is a better choice...but because they really had no choice.

So...if it becomes a contested convention, meaning neither candidate had enough pledged delegates to win the nomination (come on...the rules are the rules), which means it's still an open contest...

OMG, now some of the super delegates might actually get to switch to supporting Bernie, whom they may have really wanted to support in the first place.

So what is so terrible? What was terrible was the rigged situation in the beginning. If Bernie does contest, he can't force any super delegate to switch. If they do, it will be because they "want" to. GET IT? Or possibly their constituents push them to do it. Bernie has no power over them...but Hillary does.

Why shouldn't they be able to support who they want to support? Why should they have to be forced to go with the establishment?

Now, I don't think Bernie is going to win this way, unless he gets a lot more pledged delegates before the convention and closes the gap. And if that happens, then where is the crime?

I think I hear a lot of people panicking...and the sound of that is getting ugly. They thought after NY he would just give in...but he didn't and now they are freaking out because he might actually still have a legitimate chance to win the contest.

And all of a sudden people who claimed they "liked" him or even "loved" him even though they supported Hillary, suddenly hate him? Oh give me a break. You either never liked him, you were just playing a game, or you don't really hate him now...you are just scared.

It's OK to be scared. You don't have to overreact.

Progressive dog

(6,899 posts)
136. OMG, Bernie can't succeed in making it a "contested contest"
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:40 AM
May 2016

because he is not a real Democrat and both Hillary and the super delegates are. Bernie may not like it but he doesn't get to overturn the decision of Democratic voters by getting super delegates to overturn Democrat's overwhelming support for Hillary. He is either delusional or he doesn't care who wins if it's not him.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
37. She pulled just as much shit in 2008...and has been pulling it this year
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:17 PM
May 2016

You are certainly entitled to your opinion, as are we all.

Bit it's disappointing to see you joining the chorus of vituperative resistance to the notion of a primary being allowed to pursue its course.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
154. Hillary used to be for "the notion of a primary being allowed to pursue its course."
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:03 AM
May 2016

Until she was the front runner. Just one more flip flop.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
47. Why would I alert it? Disagree with most of it, but would never alert it.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

I've been with DU a very long time as well. I think something very different is happening here than back in the early years.

We were united against a GW administration. However something much more insidious is happening now. A testing of the boundaries of progressives and neoliberals. This is a good thing and should be electric. Sanders is speaking of a Revolution, not a tea party (unless of the kind that helped foment the American Revolution when Bostoners threw tea into the harbor in revolt of essentially corps that were gouging Americans)

See where we part ways is when you state I am a PROUD DEMOCRAT! I support my party. I would say it a little differently I am a PROUD DEMOCRAT! I support the party exemplified by those Democrats who have upheld the best in democratic principles like FDR and JFK and LBJ's Great society programs. Those democrats who don't walk lock stock in single file like ants, but are willing to step out and fight for principles that enrich our Democratic Party, not move it further right.

I admire your passion, but I think this is a battle for what it means to be a Democrat today so that we are voting for more than a candidate with simply a "D" beside their name. It's the principles that make the Democratic Party. Not the Party that makes one a Democrat.

I'm done supporting candidates who violate core democratic principles and who pursue incrementalism, and hawkish foreign policies and who admire men that literally could be tried as war criminals or compromise their values by accepting bribes from large corporations. Sanders has indeed created a revolution of New Democrats. Those who don't accept the "lesser of two evils" proposition, and demand a new world that fights hard for change rather than appeasing rhetoric during election time.

So why would I alert you?

uponit7771

(90,302 posts)
116. One of the reasons why the banned was revoked was because of the number of times AA and HRC ...
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:13 AM
May 2016

... supporters were alerted on by stacked Sanders juries.

I was alerted on for posting Sanders own words on "ghettos" and blacks

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
61. I know you only as someone who makes snide putdowns on Bernie.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:40 PM
May 2016

That's all I've ever seen you do. You've never had a good word for Bernie OR his supporters.

This OP seems phony.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
155. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:05 AM
May 2016

You could tell it was all about whining and snivelling just by reading this one, without knowing the whole past.

Response to ronnykmarshall (Original post)

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
78. You know very well that you won't be banned
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:05 AM
May 2016

Therefore you just rant to get attention.

Okay.How happy will you be when the TPP has
been signed by HRC?
When she will be impeached like her husband
for lying under oath?

but calm down, nobody can hurt you over the
internet, even though you pretend that is the case.

Hey, your candidate is supposed to be so tough,
why then are you whining?

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
93. Hear, hear!!!!
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:08 AM
May 2016

People have a right to support the candidate of their choice, what it's inappropriate is to use RW talking points on a Democratic site to attack the candidate who is not of their choice. The constant bashing goes far beyond differences in policies, its' become personal.

As for Sanders, I have said repeatedly that he has a right to stay until the last vote is cast. What has infuriated me is this latest strategy of his, and his two hustlers, (Devine and Weaver). I have lost all respect for his campaign. It's one thing to fight until the bitter end and then release your votes so that the person who won can be nominated by acclamation, as Hillary did in 2008. Another thing completely different is to insist that the super delegates should switch to you, although your opponent has triple the pledged delegate advantage that Obama had in 2008. The super delegates will not go against the will of the people and switch to the losing candidate. The mere suggestion that they would do so is undemocratic. I expected better from Sanders.

Turin_C3PO

(13,911 posts)
213. I don't think he's really going to
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:09 PM
May 2016

try and get SD's to overturn the popular vote. I think his strategists might urge him to, but I think he'll endorse Hillary in June. That's my hope, at least. I'm a Sanders supporter and looking forward to voting for him in New Mexico.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
215. But that's what he, Devine and Weaver keep saying.
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:31 PM
May 2016

Sanders just gave a speech on Sunday where he reiterated that meme. One of his campaign staffers even had the nerve to suggest that the latter states' results should count more than the states that voted earlier in the election calendar. What?????

I'm done with him and his campaign. I would respect him if he merely said that he would stay in the race until all votes were cast and let the chips fall where they may, but this insistence on trying to make super delegates switch to him even if he's losing is not democratic. Obama had a small pledged delegate advantage (102) and still won the nomination. It's is what it is.

For the record, if Sanders had won the nomination I would have voted for him in the GE. Anything to stop Trump from becoming president.

Cha

(296,853 posts)
101. WOW, ronny! So glad you got to tell it like it is! And, thank you for supporting President Obama
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:25 AM
May 2016

even though you love Hillary so much.

I was for Obama and still am but now I love Hillary and want her to be #45!

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
103. The sad thing is that you have to be worried about being alerted on for posting your honest
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:31 AM
May 2016

thoughts in total accordance with TOS by intolerant people that claim that they're all about Liberty.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
104. This is the problem of painting people with a broad brush...
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:31 AM
May 2016

Truth is I supported Obama in 2008, voted in the mid-term and supported President Obama in 2012. I was proud to stand for 14 hours waiting to get into the inauguration of President Obama in below freezing temperatures. I have voted Democrat since 1974 and intent to continue voting for the foreseeable future.

So I don't support Hillary, never have...probably never will. That is MY RIGHT as a bleeding heart liberal of the Democratic party to vote as I will - for whom I will.

So glad you pulled up your "jock strap" and voted for President Obama - shows you have taste.

Who I vote for in the General is not decided as I don't know who will be the candidate at this time. I get to vote in June in the primary and that vote will be for Bernie - whether anyone on DU believes it is a good vote or a bad vote is not my concern.

So take your ugly rant and shove it in your jock strap and enjoy!!

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
105. ARE YOU KIDDING????
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:37 AM
May 2016

How can you all be so blind, she pulled some horribly racist crap against the first Black President! How do you sleep at night knowing this?










 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
188. I imagine Sanders. See, hurts me not. Clinton only a couple percentage points behind Sanders.
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:27 AM
May 2016

Tells you about the field of liberals and Sanders not too out there. Point being, yours and others caricature of Clinton is not factual or correct.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
193. Just asking
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:36 AM
May 2016

I see the reference to her senate liberality often and always note shes in the top five or the top fifteen and i wonder who number one was
The fact that you dont know leads me to believe you are just repeating what someone you agree with said since if you had seen an actual list you would have seen who was.number one before seeing who was number fifteen.
For my money i think wellstone would.be number one in this era.but the list someone you agree with misquoted most likely only included those.now living.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
195. No.
Tue May 3, 2016, 11:24 AM
May 2016

This is a false statement, b/c she has ONLY been judged against other senators, not the ENTIRE congress.

However, it doesn't even remotely matter since the institution is so corrupt it just makes you the top 15% least rotten apple.

STILL a republican.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
200. LOL. Yeo, a good ol War/frackin loving liberal.
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:13 PM
May 2016

Everyone knows a good liberal takes money from the fossil fuel industry and banks, votes for bankruptcy bills and free trade agreements.

Shining example of liberalism at work.

Single payer? HELL NO! Gotta get those insurance companies involved.

Great liberal you got there.

Thank god she will never get elected to office.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
217. Hey.... Backatcha being a Sanders supporter. Getting frackin' money along with the rest of 'em.
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:05 PM
May 2016

We just do not pretend otherwise, that it comes from employees of said industry. Some like to pretend they are pure. Others get it.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
123. Most of the shit that the GOP believes about Obama started with Hillary's campaign.
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:42 AM
May 2016

She's a despicable fraud and a con artist.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
125. The pony accusation. Long time no see
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:18 AM
May 2016

And with glitter thrown in for good measure - probably because Clinton is so "gay-friendly" these days. Praise Nancy for the glitter accusation. I am sure I deserved it.

And that entitled whine: I voted for Obama in 2008 so now everybody must vote for Clinton in 2016. It's "HER TURN" by another name.

You fail to realise that Obama EARNED and DESERVED those votes. Clinton spent the last months telling us "I don't want you I don't need you I don't care about you, you racist sexist hell-bound sluts lusting for keyboard-warring Berniebros, complacent and duped millennial pony-wanters and uncorn-riders. Oh and by the way the Reagans started the national conversation they tried to deadpan, just as I tried to deadpan you marriages until 2013."

Tell me how any of that has earned my vote, deserves my vote, or better yet: telkl me how someone so callously disregarding my most fundamental rights is somehow entitled to ANY of my support. Tell me why someone like that even deserves to be nominated, when 57% of the voters thoroughly distrust her. Surely we have better candidates to field?

Response to merrily (Reply #127)

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
132. Righteous "rant"
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:51 AM
May 2016

And like you were inside my head. I was a Hillary supporter in 2008 and the second she suspended her campaign I was buying my tee shirts and buttons, voted for Pres Obama twice, voted in the midterms - I ALWAYS vote and I ALWAYS support my party which is heads and shoulders above the republicans on every single issue.

Response to ronnykmarshall (Original post)

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
137. I love you Ronny. As much of a shitshow this place can be, I'm glad it exists, I'm glad
Tue May 3, 2016, 07:42 AM
May 2016

you're here and I'm glad I met you and so many other amazing people here that I now call friends.



 

disillusioned73

(2,872 posts)
280. "I am PROUD DEMOCRAT! I support my party."
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:24 AM
May 2016

This isn't sports, I support a party that supports me... It's not about the candidates, it''s about standing for certain standards & principles.. obviously you don't understand that concept.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
146. Come on, you are so far "into a bubble" that you seem to have lost touch with reality.
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:49 AM
May 2016

Bernie doesn't do the ad hominem attacks like Hillary's campaign has on Bernie.

For the first few primaries, she was out lying about Bernie's healthcare plan. She even had her daughter go out and lie about it. (a proud moment for a mother I am sure, when you have your daughter go out and lie for you . . .awwwww).

Then, when she went to the south, to win the AA vote she swift boated Bernie on his civil rights history.

When it was the rust belt, she spread the lies about Bernie voting against the auto bailout. In all these lies she keeps it up until that set of voters had voted even when she was called on it. Forbes called her out on that and she KEPT lying until the rust belt voting was over.

Those are REAL, ACTUAL lies and smears.

If you look at what he has done, Bernie has talked about Hillary's actual record, not made up lies. Her support for every war and every trade bill. Those are TRUE, Hillary's are LIES. And Hillary supporters refuse to understand the difference. That is too bad for you AND the party.

And supporting Hillary is NOT supporting Democratic values.




Get over your fake outrage and incorporate some facts into your thinking.





Progressive dog

(6,899 posts)
169. Bernie did vote against the auto bailout
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:25 AM
May 2016

so Hillary did not lie about that. He was for it before he was against it.

Bernie voted to destroy the banks along with the economy if he had to save them to save the auto industry. Now that sane people voted to save both, he is campaigning on destroying the banks, so we don't have to bail them out again.

As of December 2013, the Treasury was wrapping up TARP and said the government’s investments had earned more than $11 billion for taxpayers.


Doremus

(7,261 posts)
152. Good for you ... if it were a football game
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:01 AM
May 2016

After the rah-rahs, the reality of privatized social security, wars, climate change and no more middle class sinks in.

In the long run, your "team" doesn't care about you. They have their own backs and will eagerly stick the knife in yours if necessary.



 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
153. Logo Gate defined the intelligence of those we are up against.
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:03 AM
May 2016

I always thought it had to be extremely embarrassing to argue confusion on that one.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
161. Support whatever you want, just don't pretend to be more than a corporate tool.
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:10 AM
May 2016

Because by supporting establishment democrats, that's what you're supporting. It just is what it is.

I'm going to choke back the bile and vote for her in November only because the idea of any of those Republicans getting in there is even more repulsive. But I have no expectation of anything changing for the better if she manages to win because of what she stands for and who she truly represents.

We'll be getting Reagan's tenth term minus the religious insanity. That too is what it is.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
166. Okay.
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:22 AM
May 2016

No alert here.

I know you are an early DUer. I recognize you.

2004...ugly, yes, but '08 made '04 look like child's play, and '16 is a burning toxic cesspit.

For the record, I've never been a supporter of Hillary Clinton. Not because of her gender; I AM a woman. Because of her record. Because of who she is.

I was thrilled that Bernie threw his hat in. I didn't care who did; I just wanted a candidate to support who is not a neo-liberal, and that is not Hillary Clinton. Sanders has done so much better than I ever thought any non-neo-liberal-establishment candidate could; for the first time in my entire voting life, I've had hope. That's a positive thing, and I'm sorry that you cannot see millions of people with hope, hope that Hillary Clinton does not offer, as a good thing.

I hope for a contested convention; but then, it's not the first time I've hoped for just that. I want authentic, fundamental, positive changes that the status quo is never going to offer up without a fight. I'm eager to take that fight as far as I have to.

Er...HRC WAS SOS with President Obama. And she pulled all kinds of ugly shit in that campaign, and in this campaign. One need only to remove that speck from the eye to see it.

I am a Democrat. I am not proud of the neo-liberal turn the party has taken. I've been told ad nauseum, right here at DU for 13.5 years now, that the way to change the party is to work from within. I'm doing that. The other choice is to work from without. I think that I've been constantly encouraged to "work from within" because of this pattern:

1. Fight in the primaries.
2. "Unify," "get in line," "shut up and vote the way you're supposed to" in the GE.
3. Support the new Dem POTUS with blind loyalty if we win, because if you then fight from within for the change you want to see, you are a traitor.

You see, there really is no time, other than a primary, in which Dems can express unhappiness, discontent, or opposition to the direction the party has taken without that "traitor" label. And, if I read GD correctly, the Clinton campaign and her supporters are happy to start throwing that "traitor" shit at us before the primaries are done, when millions of people still have not voted.

I don't have a problem with your rant. I disagree in total, but that's okay. We're allowed to disagree. I'm not going to alert your post because I disagree with it.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
168. A clinton supporter banned?
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:23 AM
May 2016

That is some funny shit
They are free to do what they want
No repercussions
Link to nazi hate site? No problemo
20 hides without review? No problemo
Puh-fucking-leeez!

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
170. "didn't get their glitter pony and sat on their asses"
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:32 AM
May 2016


Yep. I'm right there with you. I supported Obama in 2008 but never felt like his campaign was negative. I liked Clinton, too, and would have happily supported her if she won. If Obama were talking the kind of smack that Sanders & Co. talks about her, I would have been very put off. Just like I was very put off by the nasty from the Sanders camp.

The contested convention idea.... I can't even..... He is LOSING the popular vote. Just like Clinton lost it in 2008. No one liked it when she floated the idea, either.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
199. You have seen only half of the singing angels, then.
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:08 PM
May 2016

The phenomenon you noted applies equally well to both camps. Perhaps it seemed slanted because more DUers were on Sanders' side.

We excuse the bullshit from our own teams, or elevate it to gospel. We disdain the bullshit coming from the other side because, well, that's just talking points.

CrispyQ

(36,424 posts)
201. Considering the political meaning of the terms left & right,
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:16 PM
May 2016

& the association of the colors red & blue, a big red right pointing arrow was a stupid choice for a "progressive" candidate. Seriously, didn't anyone in her campaign see that before it was approved or are they really that tone deaf?

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
202. Good for you.
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:17 PM
May 2016

Want to vote for her? Knock yourself out, that's your choice. Why are you acting so oppressed? Just because a lot of us won't be making that choice with you, you're some kind of martyr?

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
203. Thank you!
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:18 PM
May 2016

Thank you for being a true Democrat. Bernie-ites are acting like spoiled brats. They have no concept of reality and are the most naive people I have ever heard of. They think that because Bernie says it is so, then it must be. Fact is, Bernie has had years in Congress to do something and he hasn't done jack shit. now he talks about free college tuition and free healthcare and his naive followers think he can do all of that by himself. They have no idea that it will take at the very least a Democrat majority in the Senate. Bernie never tells his followers to vote the down ticket races and he has only helped three people running for House seats himself. That is the main reason he can't get any supers to switch. Again, thank you!

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
205. Yes!
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:23 PM
May 2016

Today I read how Sainted Bernie is attacking the Democratic Party as an institution etc etc. Screw that guy and the holier-than-thou horse he rode in on. I'm a member of the Democratic Party and I vote for Democrats and I'm proud to say - @#$% Bernie Sanders.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
212. Glad to be the 100th rec!
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:03 PM
May 2016

Great thread, ronny. I noticed a change overnight in hostility here after Sanders announced almost a year ago. You are so correct in your rant. Not sure about the other primaries here, though, but I'll say I've never seen anything this childish in other primaries. The last one this intense for me was Gore/Bradley, and I just adored Gore so I was really into that one. I never really took Dean that seriously, but saw the manic following and figured it would fade out. Nader just downright pissed me off, and that's the same for Bernie.

I didn't know a lot about Bernie and thought I could learn something here. Instead I've been called the most petty and childish names -- for no reason. I just think of these people calling my mother the same names because she's a Clinton supporter, and it puts it into perspective how much damage they have done to themselves with their unnecessary hostile stance towards other Democrats.

I knew it was a lot of phoniness after they switched from Warren and glommed onto Bernie here. Plus, virtually nothing about Clinton is taken in any context of the political realities of the time or the realities of the situation at hand, so it's all easily dismissed as grandstanding just to be contrary.

You're right all the way. If Hillary pulled any of these gimmicks that Sanders is doing, well......

kiva

(4,373 posts)
231. Saying that you are a Clinton supporter
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:14 PM
May 2016

at a site where the owner's wife works for Clinton...yeah, I'd be really worried about being banned also

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
232. Are you an actual member of the Democratic Party?
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:33 PM
May 2016

If so, how much are your monthly dues and do you attend monthly membership meetings?

If you get around to it please post a copy of Democratic Party membership requirements, duties, rights and obligations.

Thanks.

No reason to post an alert on you. I just feel a bit sorry for you.

You're out of touch with most youth and working people in this country who are rejecting the establishment, Republican and Democratic.

We don't expect the ruling rich to understand or represent us.

They are different than us.

They don't hang with us.

They don't live like us.

They are not part of us.

We want authentic people who understand. Hillary clearly doesn't.

She's all about money.

Lots of it.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
241. You know, there is a Hillary Group in DemocraticUnderground...
Tue May 3, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

where people just like you go to hide there heads in the sand regarding how right-wing Hillary is.

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
258. Of course I know of the group.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:07 PM
May 2016

So we are not allowed to vent? You do know what you just posted is the same shit why I went off in the first place.

Sorry, honey. But myself and my family are NOT right wingers and we support Hillary. I wish my step dad was alive to see her win this election as well as my brother. My brother died in 1989 of AIDS and years before he died he saw how evil the GOP is and became proud Democrat. My mom and step-dad did as well.

You and EVERY Bernie supporter in this thread throwing shade and throwing your little talking points and insults towards Hillary can just keep on. Every thing you say is crap. Bernie is a great guy. I did admire him. But he has become this media hungry monster and doing nothing but attacking Hillary.

At this stage in the game Hillary stopped HER bullshit and stopped the attacks on Barrack. Her campaign in 2008 was shitty. Which is why she lost.

She learned, she moved on and she is the best qualified candidate ever to run.

She has had everything thrown at her by the RIGHT WING ... which she is not ... and now the same bullshit is being regurgitated by the Bernie supporters here in DU and the internet which is ... thank god, not real world or reflective of voters in general. Yet, she is STILL standing.

Thanks for your charming reply.

Love you. Mean it.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
284. When you write: "best qualified candidate ever to run"...
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:34 AM
May 2016

I can now see that I would be wasting my time arguing with you.

Good luck to you.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
270. Maybe you shouldn't leave the Bernie group if you are so afraid of what goes on here.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:39 PM
May 2016

This is indeed DemocraticUnderground and its fucking hilarious that you think you can censure the supporters of the Democratic Party nominee.


 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
281. So presumptuous you are!
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:49 AM
May 2016

I would love to post in the Bernie group, but I have BEEN BANNED FROM IT.
Oh, and I love your mindless profanity. NOT.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
283. Lol. You've been banned from both.
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:19 AM
May 2016

That ought to tell people something.

Fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck.




rbnyc

(17,045 posts)
242. Do you have anything substantive to say?
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:04 PM
May 2016

This is about policy. We're not voting for prom court.

Regarding a contested convention, Bernie is saying what we, his supporters, are asking him to say. He's doing this because we need him. He's serving us.

It's time for a seriously contested convention. The people do not have a party that represents our interests. Both parties use social issues to keep us locked in battle while our legislative process, empirically, does not respond in any measurable way to the concerns the electorate. The social issues that we liberals are all supposed to be united in caring about will always be in jeopardy as long as their peril delivers our obedience to entrenched party leaders. We must show courage and defiance for the sake and soul of the party and country. We must be brave enough to pull ourselves out of this trap. I really can't for the life of me figure out why people are defending the trap.

I will be demonstrating in Philly to hold Bernie's feet to the fire and make sure he fights for every last delegate vote.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
247. Good for you! This needed to be said!
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:30 AM
May 2016

The Berners are turning otherwise amiable people away from the far left. I will forevermore be against fringe liberal policies because of the damn 'revolution'.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
262. I agree. I supported Obama in 2008, but the ugliness was child's play compared to what I see now
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:20 PM
May 2016

When the primaries started, I had a very positive favorable view of Bernie. No more.

268. Have a cocktail, dear.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:29 PM
May 2016

Don't let this foolishness get a bug up your culo.

Let Sister pour you a stiff one.

and get your mind out of the gutter.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
276. Geez, you have the convenient amnesia of a conservative.
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:50 PM
May 2016

Hillary ran a nasty campaign in 2008. Far nastier than anything Bernie Sanders has done. She's also run a dirty campaign this time. She's played both sides of the race card in each campaign, which is about as low as you can go. She used Obama's religion as a target and her campaign fed the "birther" lunacy. I know, you will deny this and make excuses. That's what cultists do.

Sanders has actually been too easy on her.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
282. That's the difference RonnieK
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:08 AM
May 2016

You're a proud Democrat, not the one who signs up for Match.com with a profile that looks too good to be true, but when they show up for the date, the picture doesn't match. Wouldn't run on his own merits as an Independent. Says much about his convictions and even more about his character.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
287. Anyone who runs on the hatred of my party is a dangerous individual.
Thu May 5, 2016, 03:42 PM
May 2016

Bernie and Donald have many things in common but that is the most awful and it binds them together against the only Democrat running of the Presidency.

Now, any open primaries will be flooded with republicans voting for Bernie because everyone but Sander's followers realize he is an incredibly weak candidate. Thankfully there aren't many open primaries left. The Democratic party will have to stay strong for Hillary because the combined forces of Trump and Sander's supporters will be difficult to beat.

 

Bern2WinUSA

(44 posts)
291. You Dont Care Anymore-About the Primary The Country The Future...What exactly does that mean??
Sat May 7, 2016, 02:09 AM
May 2016

Hillary is a LIAR and a Corporatist, Ruthless, Corrupt, A Warmonger and she Doesnt inspire anyone to vote for her! She was a "Goldwater Girl" btw-Goldwater was an extreme Republican and a loser, too. She has never seen a military invasion, War or use of Military Force that she had a conscience about, because she has no conscience. She is an Egomaniac and uses African Americans to her advantage, although Clinton policies only resulted in many non-violent criminals becoming incarcerated for extremely long terms. #Which Hillary
Go Bernie Go!!

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
292. Yes I do care about future
Sat May 7, 2016, 07:57 PM
May 2016

What a don't care about is your typical Bernie bullshit.

Same shit, different screen name.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
293. Do you know what she said to the Wall Street Banksters who had stolen our money and
Sat May 7, 2016, 08:03 PM
May 2016

brought the world economy to it's knees? Or is that one of the requirements to stay uninformed to support Hillary?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»At the risk of being aler...