Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:41 AM Apr 2016

Why is this, MSM and FBI?

Why is it that the FBI has to tip toe about the possibility of recommending action against a presidential candidate because no one wants politics to enter the election in this manner, but...........

the ABSENCE of action if the evidence warrants it ALSO is political.

The people have a RIGHT TO KNOW if a candidate is at risk of prosecution for criminality, corruption in office, money laundering etc. Before there is a nomination. Before there is an election.

I believe it's time to start pressuring the MSM to get this show on the road. Not doing so gives aid and comfort to Republicans.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is this, MSM and FBI? (Original Post) grasswire Apr 2016 OP
Hillary did nothing criminal and there is no tiptoe going on. nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #1
And you are certain of this because? TM99 Apr 2016 #2
Dream on... k8conant Apr 2016 #9
Dreaming? This is a Democrat's worst night nightmare. CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #57
You should go do some research before you make declarations like that. She broke several laws pdsimdars Apr 2016 #31
So are you one of the FBI agents working on case? Gwhittey Apr 2016 #49
That's what Republicans say about Bush and Cheney. Maedhros Apr 2016 #56
There's nothing there that is why. Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #3
I did not know you were a lead member of the FBI team investigating this. shush, leaks bad /nt Dragonfli Apr 2016 #12
If there's nothing there, Blue_In_AK Apr 2016 #28
You don't know what you are saying. Go do some research. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #32
“Anonymous” is threating a Clinton "Info" Dump Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #36
Anonymous has become pretty irrelevant, I'm sorry to say. FourScore Apr 2016 #46
yeah, and it ashame too. Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #52
Holy cow how many FBI agents are on DU Gwhittey Apr 2016 #51
I also want this concluded and settled, once and for all. Either do it, or abandon it, and let it highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #4
Comey said the timetable is not determined by the election. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #8
All reasonable people should factor this in when evaluating who we select as the nominee. That's highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #10
I agree it is preferable to have it done. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #15
if that happens, it truly will be a sad day. I would love for it to be done at least before the highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #17
IF this leaves one party without a candidate in the GE or jwirr Apr 2016 #47
They need to come out with a statement then, letting the electorate know that FourScore Apr 2016 #48
Theres nothing there, its not criminal, others did it in the past DJ13 Apr 2016 #5
No, others did not do it in the past. TM99 Apr 2016 #7
I know, I was just reciting ...... DJ13 Apr 2016 #11
Oh, sorry, I am so TM99 Apr 2016 #13
thank you for getting the point. grasswire Apr 2016 #14
I doubt the FBI *wants* it to be a political matter. winter is coming Apr 2016 #22
It is a serious investigation of a serious matter. TM99 Apr 2016 #6
My worry is that the FBI is accumulating info in order to gain leverage on her . . . snot Apr 2016 #16
Comey is no J Edgar Hoover. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #18
How would you know? 840high Apr 2016 #19
Comey is regarded as a straight shooter. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #21
He is a decent guy. I still think 840high Apr 2016 #29
If you say so..... sheshe2 Apr 2016 #26
Again. Chan790 Apr 2016 #20
Lynch probably has an indication. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #23
..unless the taking down of Hillary would do him worse harm grasswire Apr 2016 #25
I don't think they're buddy-buddy. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #27
He has a lot of reputation to lose if he tries to interfere karynnj Apr 2016 #38
I'll bet Obama regretted giving her SOS many times senz Apr 2016 #60
Not to mention, Kerry always is completely respectful and praises Obama for allowing him karynnj Apr 2016 #62
The thing is, snot Apr 2016 #24
the 'rumblings are right wing crap Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #41
Actually the FBI investigation is not been that long Gwhittey Apr 2016 #54
It started with the Benghazi hearings and at the end of them jwirr Apr 2016 #55
EMAILGAHZI!!!! uponit7771 Apr 2016 #30
+ 1 JoePhilly Apr 2016 #33
Hey, how about this, . . . One of the reasons Hillary gave was that she stayed in pdsimdars Apr 2016 #34
I think the reason it isn't more in the news is because the FBI hasn't released anything yet. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #35
Sounds like “Anonymous” is planning to toss a monkey wrench in to the works.... Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #37
Interesting. I wonder if they'll actually do anything. n/t winter is coming Apr 2016 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #40
That's been linked on DU several times before now. n/t winter is coming Apr 2016 #42
just realized that and deleted - Tx Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #43
I trust the FBI not to politicize this, but the DOJ? I don't trust it at all. Vattel Apr 2016 #44
By virtue of not making any statement, they are politicizing it. FourScore Apr 2016 #50
I see your point Vattel Apr 2016 #58
Funny. You aren't projecting the appearance of comfort. Nt NCTraveler Apr 2016 #45
When is the last time anyone can remember a quick federal investigation? gordianot Apr 2016 #53
didn't you get the memo? It's a "security review". nt antigop Apr 2016 #59
I guess not even though one staffer got immunity. gordianot Apr 2016 #61

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
57. Dreaming? This is a Democrat's worst night nightmare.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:46 PM
Apr 2016

I am gob smacked that HRC hired an IT guy to build an unsecured server on which she conducted all of her State business--that included classified and Top Secret information sent via email. 2000 classified emails; 22 Top Secret.

No one thinks this is funny. It's serious and it's God awful. This could throw this election and our party into a tailspin.

Spinning this situation away, by attacking any one who DARES to bring up this very serious topic, is childish.

We're not engaging in "dreaming" as you said. But you're engaging in pure fantasy if you don't think this year-long FBI investigation of HRC's server isn't as serious as a heart attack.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
31. You should go do some research before you make declarations like that. She broke several laws
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:47 PM
Apr 2016

You don't know anything about it if you think she didn't. It will come out but you should do research and stop hiding your head in the sand.

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
49. So are you one of the FBI agents working on case?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:33 PM
Apr 2016

If not you are just as bad as someone saying she is going to jail for sure. Because you don't have a clue except your "gut' feeling cause you think a Clinton could never do anything illegal.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
56. That's what Republicans say about Bush and Cheney.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:46 PM
Apr 2016

Just wishing something is true doesn't make it so.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
28. If there's nothing there,
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:43 AM
Apr 2016

they need to say so.

Personally, I think it's fairly foolish to be running a candidate with this kind of cloud hanging over her, but if this is what the PTBs want, then Hillary's name needs to be completely cleared NOW. Can you imagine the chaos that would ensue if they decide to indict in August or if the matter is still hanging when November rolls around?

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
36. “Anonymous” is threating a Clinton "Info" Dump
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:43 PM
Apr 2016

Anonymous Hacker Video To Hillary: “We Are About To Expose Everything!”

http://www.occupyliberals.com/2016/04/24/anonymous-hacker-video-hillary-expose-everything/#comments

“Anonymous” is a loosely associated international network of activists and hackers. Their members are known as “Anons” and are sometimes seen in public wearing the Guy Fawkes masks as seen in the movie “V for Vendetta”.

The anarchist group has hacked the sites of several government agencies around the world, the Church of Scientology, child pornography sites, and several large corporations.

Now, they have apparently have a new target: Hillary Clinton.

This week, the esoteric group posted a video calling out many of Hillary Clinton’s lies. The video proclaims that she is no different than all the other politicians we have had in the past, and she will only bring negative change to the nation.

Speaking directly to Clinton, the mysterious figure in the video states, “It appears that lying has become second nature to you,”and “You are backed by the same dark suits that have supported every other past president.”


Video at link

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
46. Anonymous has become pretty irrelevant, I'm sorry to say.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:31 PM
Apr 2016

They make a lot of threats but never follow through. They were going to "mess up the election" if it looked like election fraud was happening. Unless they are working for Hillary purging voters, they haven't done a damn thing.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
52. yeah, and it ashame too.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:36 PM
Apr 2016

M$M cannot be counted on any longer to sift through the BS and tell the truth. I was kinda hoping these folks would take up the banner.

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
51. Holy cow how many FBI agents are on DU
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:35 PM
Apr 2016

Because so many people seem to either think there is nothing. Only people who know are people in FBI task force on this and a few people in charge of FBI. I don't even think Obama has the information at this point. He might but I think he would not want it to not appear he is trying to sway them.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
4. I also want this concluded and settled, once and for all. Either do it, or abandon it, and let it
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:47 AM
Apr 2016

be over with.

Letting it drag on into the actual GE is a horror story.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
8. Comey said the timetable is not determined by the election.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:57 AM
Apr 2016

The investigation is done when they've dotted the i's and crossed the t's. They're doing a thorough job, and it's done when it's done.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
10. All reasonable people should factor this in when evaluating who we select as the nominee. That's
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:58 AM
Apr 2016

just being realistic. And all the more reason to have Bernie stay in the race.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
15. I agree it is preferable to have it done.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:09 AM
Apr 2016

But the timetable happened because of 2 years of Clinton stalling, refusing to turn over emails, not disclosing the private server, and deleting emails. It could have been finished 2 years ago had she cooperated. Plus she'd have less criminal liability had she cooperated.
Yes, it would have been better to have the matter settled before people started voting in primaries...or at least before the convention. Doesn't look like that will happen. We're probably going to nominate damaged goods. Could be a bloodbath all down ticket if the hammer falls on her during the GE.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
17. if that happens, it truly will be a sad day. I would love for it to be done at least before the
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:16 AM
Apr 2016

convention.

If not, and it causes damage during the GE, that will be a tragedy. There will be a whole lot of people with culpability for that one.

I, for sure, will not be one of them.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
47. IF this leaves one party without a candidate in the GE or
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:32 PM
Apr 2016

even worse we elect her what happens to the election or her term in the WH. The consequences are really dire here.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
48. They need to come out with a statement then, letting the electorate know that
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:32 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary is either the focus of the investigation or not.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
5. Theres nothing there, its not criminal, others did it in the past
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:55 AM
Apr 2016

(None of which I agree with...)

But, by their silence, as you said, they ARE making a political decision.

The closer to the convention they allow this to fester, the more the eventual decision ends up being pure politics.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
7. No, others did not do it in the past.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:56 AM
Apr 2016

No other SoS or Cabinet member has ever run their own private off-site email server that served as a communication hub for classified and non-classified material. Period.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
11. I know, I was just reciting ......
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:00 AM
Apr 2016

.....a few of the standard fall back positions the Hillary supporters have used.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
22. I doubt the FBI *wants* it to be a political matter.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:57 AM
Apr 2016

My wild-assed guess is that if they can wrap things up in the next three months, they will. Justified or not, it would be bad PR for the FBI to be seen as messing with an election.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
6. It is a serious investigation of a serious matter.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:55 AM
Apr 2016

So many Democrats refuse to see it but it is true nonetheless.

They will do their best not to politicize it. These sorts of investigations, if done properly, take time.

The MSM has all but ignored it, and the only reason Fox hasn't is because, well the GOP abhors the Clintons.

It will end when it ends.

snot

(10,520 posts)
16. My worry is that the FBI is accumulating info in order to gain leverage on her . . .
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:14 AM
Apr 2016

so they can control her whenever – the power their info confers might actually be more useful if/when she WERE Prez.

Gawd knows they've got nothing on Bernie.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
20. Again.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:48 AM
Apr 2016

Because the FBI and DoJ are not amateurs and they don't compromise their investigations by leaking.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1846507

Not even Lynch or Obama likely knows if she's going to be indicted...and that's intentional.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
23. Lynch probably has an indication.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:59 AM
Apr 2016

Since the DoJ is being updated by the FBI, and they're reviewing evidence together. Lynch probably has a feeling one way or another if she'll bring an indictment, but is waiting for the FBI to finish. I think Obsma is keeping himself separated, but i don't know that for fact. I just don't think he'd risk his legacy at this point by interfering. Only harm could come by doing do...he has nothing to gain.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
25. ..unless the taking down of Hillary would do him worse harm
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:21 AM
Apr 2016

Depends on what their relationship is. Does she have something on him? What kind of pact did they make after last campaign? Those are matters that could influence him.

I hope someone is writing a book about this dramatic six months.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
27. I don't think they're buddy-buddy.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:42 AM
Apr 2016

And I don't think he has anything to gain by involving himself. He's had no scandals on his end, why start one with a coverup? Or why hurt the Dem party by pushing for an indictment? Either way he loses by interfering. If he stays out of it, his hands are clean, legacy intact.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
38. He has a lot of reputation to lose if he tries to interfere
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:05 PM
Apr 2016

Consider that many Nixon supporters deserted him after the Saturday night massacre. There Nixon was the target, here (if there is one) it is HRC. I agree with you he won't.

However, Obama will be somewhat harmed if his Secretary of State is even reproached by the DOJ, much less indicted or one of her people indicted. It is his administration.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
60. I'll bet Obama regretted giving her SOS many times
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:41 PM
Apr 2016

Her lawlessness, recklessness, weapons deals and warmongering did not work out well for his legacy.

Kerry as SOS has been like night and day.

I cannot imagine what she would do as president and hope we never have to find out.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
62. Not to mention, Kerry always is completely respectful and praises Obama for allowing him
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:39 PM
Apr 2016

to work on things like the Iran deal and climate change when both were more likely to fail than succeed. The praise always sounds heart felt and genuine. Kerry is both incredibly talented and a very honorable person.

snot

(10,520 posts)
24. The thing is,
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:08 AM
Apr 2016

we keep hearing rumblings of serious charges against Hillary; yet nothing concrete is brought out.

This has been going on for a pretty long while now.

If there's anything concrete behind it, either there's a prosecutorially strategic reason not to disclose the details – in which case, why all the leaks/rumblings about it? – or there's no prosecutorial reason, but rather some kind of extortionate reason, which makes more sense, because you're letting Hillary know you've got the goods on her, without giving up your power over her.

Other theories welcome.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
41. the 'rumblings are right wing crap
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:16 PM
Apr 2016

You hear about it because it is leaked in order that you hear about it. You just want it to be true.

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
54. Actually the FBI investigation is not been that long
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:41 PM
Apr 2016

Patrick Cannon was Mayor of Charlotte that got caught in a FBI sting take bribes in 2010 while he was a city council member. They did not arrest him until 2014 after he was elected mayor.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
55. It started with the Benghazi hearings and at the end of them
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:43 PM
Apr 2016

the revelation that she was using a private server out of her home. Then the State started investigating but finally handed it over to the FBI who have kept the things they have been looking at secret as they should until they have a final report.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
34. Hey, how about this, . . . One of the reasons Hillary gave was that she stayed in
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:57 PM
Apr 2016

her race with Obama was the Robert Kennedy assisination.

“My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. I don’t understand it,” she said, dismissing calls to drop out.
(you can go look it up there are lots of sources including a video of Tweety reporting on it)

Shouldn't Bernie start saying that one reason he is staying in the race is in case Hillary is indicted?

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
35. I think the reason it isn't more in the news is because the FBI hasn't released anything yet.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:59 PM
Apr 2016

But once they do. They will have to report it and start taking it as seriously as it is.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
37. Sounds like “Anonymous” is planning to toss a monkey wrench in to the works....
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:46 PM
Apr 2016



Anonymous Hacker Video To Hillary: “We Are About To Expose Everything!”


http://www.occupyliberals.com/2016/04/24/anonymous-hacker-video-hillary-expose-everything/#comments

“Anonymous” is a loosely associated international network of activists and hackers. Their members are known as “Anons” and are sometimes seen in public wearing the Guy Fawkes masks as seen in the movie “V for Vendetta”.

The anarchist group has hacked the sites of several government agencies around the world, the Church of Scientology, child pornography sites, and several large corporations.

Now, they have apparently have a new target: Hillary Clinton.

This week, the esoteric group posted a video calling out many of Hillary Clinton’s lies. The video proclaims that she is no different than all the other politicians we have had in the past, and she will only bring negative change to the nation.

Speaking directly to Clinton, the mysterious figure in the video states, “It appears that lying has become second nature to you,”and “You are backed by the same dark suits that have supported every other past president.”


Video at link

Response to winter is coming (Reply #39)

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
50. By virtue of not making any statement, they are politicizing it.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:35 PM
Apr 2016

I think the electorate and, especially, the democrats have a right to know who is a person of interest and who isn't.

We knew with Patreus.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is this, MSM and FBI?