Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,531 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:45 AM Apr 2016

Campaign Mystery: Why Don't Bernie Sanders' Big Rallies Lead To Big Wins?

Since last summer, when Sanders' huge rallies got him noticed by the national media, there's been a lot of discussion of an "enthusiasm gap" between Sanders and Clinton.

But in a recent Gallup poll, it was Clinton, not Sanders, who had the lead in enthusiasm among supporters. Fifty-four percent of Clinton supporters said they were "extremely" or "very enthusiastic" about their candidate, compared to 44 percent of Sanders' supporters.

It may be Clinton supporters are just less vocal, less likely to spend hours on social media praising their candidate or to show up at a concert-style rally (Clinton's campaign has also shied away from planning large events).

If big crowds meant big wins at the polls, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and former Texas Rep. Ron Paul would both be president. But election after election, crowd size has been an unreliable predictor of winning.

"The people at the rally are not a random or representative sample of the electorate," says Lynn Vavreck, a professor of political science and communication studies at University of California, Los Angeles. "These are strategic and well-planned events. This isn't just happening."


http://www.npr.org/2016/04/26/475681237/campaign-mystery-why-dont-bernie-sanders-big-rallies-lead-to-big-wins

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Campaign Mystery: Why Don't Bernie Sanders' Big Rallies Lead To Big Wins? (Original Post) RandySF Apr 2016 OP
Election fraud? snot Apr 2016 #1
Makes the most sense. Duh. N/t. Helga Scow Stern Apr 2016 #2
What was his biggest rally? ContinentalOp Apr 2016 #3
It's not a mystery. The events are "happenings" the speeches are empty and boring. Lucinda Apr 2016 #4
that's not a mystery. voting and going to rallies is not the same thing JI7 Apr 2016 #5
Dunno.. just happy they don't. And, glad they did translate into Votes for President Obama. Cha Apr 2016 #6

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
3. What was his biggest rally?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:09 AM
Apr 2016

30,000 people in Seattle? In a state where 230,000 people caucused, and there are 4 million registered voters? Not so impressive if you put it in perspective.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
4. It's not a mystery. The events are "happenings" the speeches are empty and boring.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:18 AM
Apr 2016

They don't generate votes, because you don't engage the voters just by repeating slogans and vague rhetoric that the people have already heard before.

Cha

(296,893 posts)
6. Dunno.. just happy they don't. And, glad they did translate into Votes for President Obama.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:25 AM
Apr 2016
Gabriel Debenedetti
✔ ??@gdebenedetti
The sites of Sanders' three closing mega-rallies all went to Clinton (blue).
2:12 AM - 20 Apr 2016
638 638 Retweets 693 693 likes

Mahalo, RandySF
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Campaign Mystery: Why Don...