People here laughed. I saw more.

[bkkyosemite]

https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/

[Live and Learn]

1. Wow. K&R nt

[Dem2]

2. Major typo by a human being

Stupid humans - when will they be perfect like robots!

[Kip Humphrey]

56. In this election, the numbers are direct from the central state vote tabulators.

no human intervention involved. Centralized electronic voter registration integrated into the (required) State central vote tabulation software was rolled out (and federally subsidized) for this election.

[Dem2]

59. See post #57

Clearly an error was made, these happen ALL THE TIME - I've seen so many in my years watching returns roll in that I barely blink and eye when I see an obvious mistake corrected. These corrections are often mentioned on TV broadcasts too - they are very common.

Math.

[Kip Humphrey]

60. I don't dispute the error. Read my post. When it comes to vote reporting, this election

is different from all before it due to the software change. There were no humans transcribing numbers onto a screen as in previous years.

[Dem2]

63. A non-human could not have made such an error

I would assume that the NYT feed is tied in directly (or whatever feed that misguided blogger was using), but I've heard the geeks on cable news mention transposition errors, it does seem odd that a human would be transcribing this information, but somewhere along the line an error was made. Perhaps the ballots aren't all machine tabulated in DE and the error started there where votes are counted and flowed through from there?

[Kip Humphrey]

65. The software allows for human corrections in the tabulated numbers but the algorithm producing the

error runs first, uncovering the error. The error producing set of conditions may have originated any number of ways and therefore can't be diagnosed without a forensic investigation. The flag here is a software algorithm issue generated a false result which should spur a software forensic investigation except, smack, the software is proprietary & a trade secret.

[questionseverything]

3. does bradblog know?

get the word out

[ViseGrip]

7. He does now.

[BradBlog]

36. Trying to look into it...

[ViseGrip]

4. Several called me to complain of numbers being flipped on the screen!

[questionseverything]

16. do you know final reported numbers?

[questionseverything]

20. ....

http://elections.delaware.gov/results/html/election.shtml

http://electionssc.delaware.gov/2016%20Reg%20Totals/April%202016%20House.pdf

[questionseverything]

34. ok here is by county

http://elections.delaware.gov/results/html/stwoff_kns.shtml

[Tarc]

5. And the tinfoil stuff begins

And once again, there is no comment or challenge by an actual Sanders campaign official. Just blogs and their "theories".

[MrMickeysMom]

12. This may shock you...

But, I hear that campaign officials are not the ones who analyze electronic voting, nor verify anything here. Isn't that just amazing?

You can pick me up a box of Reynolds Aluminum Foil, too, Tarc.

[Tarc]

47. Yes, it is, as it'd be Sanders' legal counsel who would advise on the feasibility of any lawsuit

Funny how they have not done so.

[peace13]

55. Tragic that Clinton has not spoken out about election fraud.

AZ was a prime example. Hurry up and vote for her because these problems will not be resolved by her administration. She doesn't see it as a problem. Same as you. Kiss your rights goodbye!

[Tarc]

61. The DoJ is investigating Arizona, that's taken care of

The rest of the "fraud!" cries are largely Camp Sanders nonsense.

[peace13]

64. You speak of what you can not know.

Election fraud has been rampant in most states this primary. Have you ever worked an election poll or witnessed a 'recount'? If you had you would not be so certain of your view. I have stood on the streets of Columbus, Ohio day after day trying to make certain that the vote count was true for all Americans. That election went down...stolen.. With one hundred people on the street. That was it. That is how apathetic our citizens are. Go ahead and dance the last nail in the coffin. You, represent the majority. Pity that!

[peace13]

53. It's a fact that election fraud is common in this country.

It is nothing to be laughed at.

[Agschmid]

6. That blog post you linked too proves itself wrong several times.

[pacalo]

11. Agschmid, Sanders went from 6,000 votes to 2,000

in one county in Deleware.

How does a candidate get votes subtracted?

[Dem2]

13. Typo

The percentages reported tell the story, he couldn't possibly have that many votes with the percent that had reported at the time.

I'm certain is was a transposed pair of numbers or a typo, it happens all the time. I've seen so many of these corrections, but I think nothing of it as I know these numbers are typed in by fallible humans. I spotted the issue in the link with this post within 30 seconds. Easy stuff for numbers people.

[pacalo]

18. Trustworthiness, or lack thereof, is a big factor here.

Considering who it is & the ambition so fierce she made sure she had a stacked deck before she had a Democratic opponent, I'm not convinced this is human "error".

... he couldn't possibly have that many votes with the percent that had reported at the time.

Elections have been projected just as quickly.

[MrMickeysMom]

46. Mathematical results generally do not take the form of a "typo"

[Dem2]

48. You understand why Bernie couldn't have had more votes than the % reporting would indicate, right?

It's so simple, even a 5th grader could handle this problem.

See post 57 for the math.

[MrMickeysMom]

70. ...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1853318

[Dem2]

71. do you have something to say or you just posting mindless links

Where people who can't comprehend what happens hundreds of times on Election night - a tabulation error - say something that's inherently obvious?

Do you actually have an opinion or ...?

[MrMickeysMom]

72. What's mindless about that question you never answered?

[Dem2]

73. I showed that it was just a tabulation error happens all the time

You haven't proven anything - you can't just keep asking the question over and over again when you know the answer -it's silly.

[MrMickeysMom]

74. Is it possible that you have NO answer to that question you never answered?

Maybe you need to concentrate on your reading comprehension.

[Dem2]

75. See post #57

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511845492#post57

I have the feeling you aren't getting the math.

[MrMickeysMom]

77. I've seen it, and since this has nothing to do with that, but more to the point of the question...

... which you don't think you can answer...

I think it's time you just played with someone else, because YOU don't even get what is being question. Well, you do, but why would you care?

[MrMickeysMom]

14. That's too much detail for the poor unfortunate poster...

[pacalo]

21. Hillary can do no wrong, Mom.

[Agschmid]

38. Really you are going to go with an attack?

Have at me.

I dealt with bullies when I came out in junior high school this poor unfortunate poster can handle whatever bullishit you want to throw at me.

Lol.

[MrMickeysMom]

39. That's what you want...

You want to be mentioned by name, to which I say, "why bother enticing something like your posts when you can pity their source?"

Sorry you, like many, many (too many) were bullied in junior high school, but this is a discussion board. You'll have to throw your own shit, because non of it sticks here.

[Agschmid]

40. I didn't "throw" anything.

You did.

[MrMickeysMom]

44. I never did...

But, if you insist... I'm sorry referring to what you said was from an "unfortunate" poster hurt your feelings.

I still think what you say here is designed to hurt others, so why don't you throw THAT out.

[KPN]

8. People will continue to laugh.

We need a voting system that has unquestionable integrity. Getting that would probably take a lot of human-power, especially if it is balanced. The first step is accepting these irregularities at face value. Then monitoring closely but in balanced fashion. I doubt that the first will occur though. The entrenched interests have too much (in their view) at stake and a lot of money. The commoner has a lot at stake too -- but far less money and must rely on movements to protect their interests. Tough rowing in the face of divide and conquer planning and operations with big money backing it.

On the other hand, real revolutions don't get put down. Are we seeing a real revolution? .... It is if we want it so. Do we?

[pacalo]

9. K&R.

[senz]

10. Voting is too crucial to be casual about.

This should be taken seriously and investigated.

Those who want it to be ignored should be ignored themselves.

Let's get to the bottom of it.

[MrMickeysMom]

15. Good idea...

I'm making myself sick responding to the distractions around here.

[vintx]

41. Those who used to laugh it off used to all be republicans.

2000, 2004...

This isn't the party it used to be.

Andy Stephenson would be so proud of so many people here.

[felix_numinous]

17. There are petitions to sign at the link nt

[CajunBlazer]

19. ....

[djean111]

23. This is one, just one, of many reasons I would never vote for or support Hillary.

Hate her policies, hate her deeds, hate her cheating and lying.

[Dem2]

49. So basically lies and name-calling?

Just admit you hate her guts and would believe the most over-the-top made up tinfoil bullshit against her.

Also, see http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511845492#post57 for the math.

[peace13]

66. The fact that she will not speak out...

...about voting irregularities is very odd. Winning at all costs. Even if she didn't rig it, there are questions that she should address! Either way it's dishonest.

[nadinbrzezinski]

24. This is why I pretend to vote anymore

in pretend elections. I know it irritates some people, but that is the reality.

[snot]

25. This is awesome BUT

Can anyone provide more info about the source?????

I find it all only too plausible; just want to make sure we're not being Ratherized.

[snot]

26. And PS, Hillaryites:

If you have any actual evidence/bases for discrediting the source, PLEASE SHARE.

[djean111]

52. I honestly think they see no problem with it, and, in fact, admire it and are proud of it.

The Democratic tent is pretty much in rags and tatters. I won't be in it.

[nolawarlock]

27. Nobody can just lose gracefully anymore. nt

[dchill]

28. I was going to say, "You've got to be kidding me!"

But then I realized, you've got to be kidding yourself.

[nolawarlock]

29. Oh?

When Hillary jumped on the Obama bandwagon, she went all in.

[dchill]

30. After she made her deal.

Which, of course, she denies.

[nolawarlock]

31. Yes ...

... and she did so behind the scenes ... gracefully ... which is what I'm talking about. I'm guessing Bernie's gonna go out like the people flouncing on message boards going on about how they'll never vote for her.

[dchill]

32. Now I know you're kidding me.

"Gracefully!"

[Juicy_Bellows]

37. Gracefully now means shady as fuck.

Try to keep up!

[Art_from_Ark]

42. It's really hard getting used to Newspeak

[rhett o rick]

33. The rich and powerful will not lose. Is that why you choose their side? They will lie, cheat and

steal elections. We are fighting for lives in the 99% that the Rich And Powerful don't care about.

[nolawarlock]

35. I choose my side ...

... and the side of my family.

You know nothing about me. According to half the people who have fired at me in the past week, I'm a paid troll and not even a real person. If I'm not a real person, then I don't even have a choice so why are you concerned about it?

[randome]

43. We're gonna need a lot more ointment 'round these parts.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]

[SidDithers]

45. People are still laughing...nt

Sid

[hrmjustin]

50. Have you ever heard of a typo?

[lmbradford]

54. K & R

[Dem2]

57. For those of you who don't wish to do the math.

There was a total of 15,973 votes total cast in Sussex County Delaware last night, see http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/delaware

At the time the screenshot was taken, it was reported that 16.4% of the vote was in:

Bernie: 6247
Hillary: 1250

So one would have to believe that 6247+1250 = 7497 votes was 16.9% of 15,973!

Actually, that works out to be 47% of the vote (7497/15973.)

This is impossible and was clearly a typographical error.

__________________________________________________

After they fixed the typo, the numbers make more sense:

39.7% reporting

Hillary: 3592
Bernie: 2383

5,975 votes combined or 37.4% of the total votes cast.

The reason the % reporting and actual percent of total don't match exactly is due to variations in the size and turnout of various precincts within a county.

So, in conclusion, the numbers of votes reported when 16.4% had reported was clearly a typo which was later corrected.

Case closed.

[DookDook]

58. “If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.” ― Mark Twain

I only vote because I like to think that I can be the mote in God's eye.

[haikugal]

62. Good post, thanks! All too true, we are a failed state....essentially true. Certainly NOT a

Democracy.

[kgnu_fan]

67. A big Elephant in the room

[Blue_Tires]

68. speculation and conjecture are not the allies you want to rely on...

[senz]

69. Have you seen this study of NY Dem primary exit polling?

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/ny-democratic-primary-more-frustration/

Only 22% of approximately 8 million registered voters turned out. Clinton won by 57.9-42.1%.

The UNADJUSTED exit poll indicated a close race. Hillary led by just 52-48%, an 11.8% discrepancy from the recorded vote. There were 1391 respondents and a 2.6% exit poll Margin of Error. Clinton led by a whopping 62-38% in the vote count with 33% of precincts reporting.

At 9:03 pm, there were 1307 exit poll respondents, Clinton led the actual count by 680-627 (52.0-48.0%). With just 84 additional respondents (1391 total), Clinton’s lead increased to 802-589 (57.7-42.3%). She had 122 additional respondents and Sanders had 38 fewer.

How can Clinton gain 122 of 84 respondents? How can Sanders’ total drop? They can’t. It is mathematically impossible. Therefore the final vote has to be impossible as well. . The exit poll was forced to match the recorded vote with impossible adjustments.

[onecaliberal]

76. And here I thought only republicans ripped off elections.