Bernie Sanders Takes Election by Exposing Fraud, No Support for Bogus Hillary "Win'

[Gregorian]

Minimize this at the expense of democracy. This is big stuff.

&feature=em-uploademail

[Buzz Clik]

1. Captain Insano is back.

[Godhumor]

2. Imagine an Avengers style team up of HA, Seth and the Sane Progressive

It would be a blackhole of delusional stupidity.

[Skwmom]

3. Do we live in a Banana Republic or not? If we don't have valid voting process, we live in a Banana

Republic.

[Buzz Clik]

4. A couple of the primaries really screwed up. Really badly.

Translating that into an advantage for HRC is completely and totally insane.

[Time for change]

36. It's not insane at all

There is massive evidence that this election is being stolen. There are substantial exit poll discrepancies in every state where I could find an exit poll, plus massive voter purging that is targeted at Bernie. In NY the exit poll discrepancy was 12%. That is huge, and well beyond the margin of error. In a country with a decent election system that alone would be sufficient to do a total hand recount of the entire state. Not here.

[reformist2]

5. She sounds excited, but quite reasonable.

[Buzz Clik]

6. We differ.

[CorporatistNation]

22. She IS SPOT ON! The Rigging Was SYSTEMIC! BIG DEM WHEELS IN CHARGE!

DeBlasio... et al... OWN THE FRAUD!

[DemocratSinceBirth]

10. The Sane Progressive is missing an In before Sane.

[Buzz Clik]

11. ..

[DemocratSinceBirth]

16. Official version

&list=RDRijB8wnJCN0

[CorporatistNation]

24. Debbie IS SPOT ON! DEMOCRATIC PARTY SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD IN FULL ON HILLAR MODE!

Yeah... we'll vote for Hillary in a General Election... Really...

[DemocratSinceBirth]

25. We don't need your vote.

Have a nice weekend, though.

[FlatBaroque]

14. 1st reply = 1 extra BrockBuck

[bbgrunt]

7. How is this different than Kerry's refusal to contest Ohio? In my

mind, it's not. There is no point if these issues are not addressed to the fullest extent possible.

[Joob]

9. Agreed

[nolabels]

17. When you live in Oligarchy all things are possible

The only reason rigid exceptionalism is held on so tightly to is that because true nature holds there are actually no absolute truisms, everything and anything could and sometimes does break the rule, or least to what was thought to be a rule about what is and what is not.

It's a cruel hoax many do not recognize, but has an adage as old as the hills 'with every rule there are exceptions'. That is of course if you are not writing the rules. Their rule of those writing the laws and rules, is that all gold and everything else is ours and their are no exceptions.

The question to ask is why do you trust any foisted up leader to do the right thing rather than just to do that human thing?

Kerry did not challenge because he was more comfortable knowing what he did know rather than embracing what he did not know. He was afraid and went with his comfort. The difference between an old Kerry and a young Kerry was quite a bit as we learned

[bbgrunt]

20. well I'm afraid this "human thing" that you speak of must be

challenged or else we are doomed. I guess I'm hoping for our alien overlords to supply us with the appropriate genetic mutation to over-ride that general defect. And yet I think, despite my poor acquaintance with history, there are (a few) examples of some who managed to be an exception to being slaves to the human thing. But what do I know--maybe they were the aliens.

[nolabels]

21. This is why Bernie is a person i don't hesitate listening to and following whenever possible.

The guy walks the walk and has done it all his life.

[bbgrunt]

31. me too and I expect he has some alien genes, but this election fraud shit must be pursued.

[Tarc]

8. Yep. when I want hard-hitting news, I turn to some random woman with a selfie stick

[Buzz Clik]

12. LOL!

Damn, I miss JeffR. This thread would have been lighting up the DUzies.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

13. I am listening to it now. I wish I was high.

[Dem2]

15. LOL, yeah when I see that face I just think 'wacko' now

[Time for change]

18. Very strong and excellent speech

Maybe she was too hard on Bernie for not contesting the election fraud. My respect for Bernie is so great that I don't want to accept her interpretation of his failure to contest the election fraud.

Maybe Bernie feels that if he contested it, it would take away from the main message he's trying to get out. Maybe he's unaware of the extent of the election fraud being perpetrated against him. Maybe he's in denial about it. He's not perfect, as nobody is.

I can believe that he's making the wrong decision by not contesting the election fraud -- and I do believe that is the wrong decision -- without losing respect for what he's done.

But I also tend to think she's right that we should refuse to donate any more to his campaign until he gets behind the efforts to contest the election fraud. In NY there was a 12 point discrepancy between the exit polls and the official results. That is off the map. And that is in addition to all the voter suppression, which would not even show up in the exit polls because those people didn't vote and people who don't vote are not polled in exit polls. In a fair election he would have won NY by a substantial amount. But he has no chance of winning the nomination if such election fraud is allowed to stand. He really should get behind the effort to do something about it IMO.

[MisterP]

27. perhaps he's relying on the news to filter out on its own while gunning for CA

inverting how Clinton relied on the caging being done by someobody else that'd take the fall for her (Purcell, Haslett-Rudiano)

[Time for change]

34. Could be

Or maybe he'll be able to justify an independent candidacy if polling shows that he would likely win in a three way race.

[Time for change]

35. He has to win everything except Maryland and DC in order to get even in delegates,

and in CA he has to win by a large margin. As long as fraud continues to be perpetrated as it has been, and all the existing fraud is allowed to stand, there is no chance of that happening.

[questionseverything]

28. bernie has to pick his battles/do not stop donating to him

activists in chicago have evidence the boe is falsifying the 5% required audit

we need to support them

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511809605

[Time for change]

33. What good is their evidence if the election officials are dismissing the whole thing

as noted in the title of the article you provided in your link?

I don't know the process, but clearly some sort of legal action must be taken in order to have any impact.

[questionseverything]

37. we have to go past the election officials to a judge

sue for prospective relief

if this evidence would of come in time for bernie to contest illinois i would be all for that but that deadline is over

if we get the evidence in the general populations view maybe by the next big steal we can catch them in a timely manner

[Time for change]

38. I'm hoping, but I think that there are too many powerful people in on this

This will have to be fought very aggressively in order to see any results. Bernie has to campaign, but he needs some of his legal staff to push this very aggressively, IMO.

[pdsimdars]

19. I wonder if the Sanders campaign will respond

I sent them a like to this video.

I liked it. Good work. Thanks.

[AzDar]

23. K & R

[MineralMan]

26. And Heeere's DEBBIE.

Debbier than usual she is today. Wearing her summer dress, too.

HI DEBBIE!

[questionseverything]

32. interested in your reaction to this

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511809605

even if you don't watch it all, look at the 1:17 min mark

the activist says he has evidence to back his claims that the "audit" is falsified

[brooklynite]

29. Isn't it amazing that Sanders hasn't challenged the outcome of a single State...

...except for AArizone where he joined a suit filed by the "hated" DNC and Clinton campaign?

[Beacool]

30. Every major candidate has had nut jobs who support them.

This one is one of them.