2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumB Calm
(28,762 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Bye all.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)GO Neoliberal DINO under federal investigation. woo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1788167
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Over the top.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 20, 2016, 07:15 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh please.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A totally expected comment. Everyone knows that the purpose of the thread was to elicit this type of comment. You can't very well keep the thread but remove the comment. I vote leave it.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: She is under federal investigation and believing she is a not a true progressive is valid.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
I'm not juror #3 but I agree with their assessment.
Faux pas
(15,121 posts)LEAVE IT ALONE.
Gothmog
(152,718 posts)I a m amused by the Sanders supporters and republicans praying for an indictment http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/waiting-clinton-indictment-dont-hold-your-breath
The examination, which included cases spanning the past two decades, found some with parallels to Clintons use of a private server for her emails, but in nearly all instances that were prosecuted aggravating circumstances that dont appear to be present in Clintons case.
The relatively few cases that drew prosecution almost always involved a deliberate intent to violate classification rules as well as some add-on element: An FBI agent who took home highly sensitive agency records while having an affair with a Chinese agent; a Boeing engineer who brought home 2000 classified documents and whose travel to Israel raised suspicions; a National Security Agency official who removed boxes of classified documents and also lied on a job application form.
Politicos examination seems to have only been able to find one person who sincerely believes Clinton will face prosecution: former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R), who was a prosecutor and a Justice Department official before his partisan antics made him something of a clownish joke.
Among more objective observers, the idea of Clinton facing an indictment seems, at best, implausible. This is very much in line with a recent American Prospect examination, which reached the same conclusion.
TPMs Josh Marshall published a related piece in February, after speaking to a variety of law professors and former federal prosecutors about the Clinton story. To a person, Josh wrote, they agreed the idea of a Clinton indictment is very far-fetched.
aikoaiko
(34,200 posts)May 23, 2008
Categories: HRC
Hillary cites RFK assassination in explaining why she's still in race
Hillary Clinton today cited the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy during the 1968 presidential campaign to explain why she was remaining in the race despite long odds.
"We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California," Clinton told the editorial board of a South Dakota newspaper. " I don't understand it," Clinton added, alluding to the calls for her to quit.
Clinton made the statement after pointing out that her husband didn't lock up the nomination until June of 1992, trying to point out that, by past history, it's not late in the campaign. (See a clip of the interview here.)
But Barack Obama received Secret Service protection one year ago this month, the earliest ever in presidential history, after reports of threats.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It's pretty clear the decisions are his, not Sanders. He is driving people back to the "establishment."
If Skinner wants to call it that's cool too. It's really past time.
Not sure what "Heidi" is in reference to.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)How do you get that?
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Weaver Derangement Syndrome.
Now I feel silly.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"Hooray, the football game is over! Time to watch Heidi!"
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Once the FBI report is out -- she violated her signed classified information nondisclosure agreement -- HRC will no longer be the presumed Democratic candidate. No sense in calling anything other than her favorite lawyers.
Response to leveymg (Reply #10)
Post removed
leveymg
(36,418 posts)back to 1964.
Deal with facts, she's violated the law. That will have consequences. Get ready for the next steps that have to be taken, or else.
randome
(34,845 posts)You know, if you're into teamwork and all that.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
leveymg
(36,418 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)I'm not crazy about Clinton but she's obviously our nominee so let's work together on moving her further to the left. Anything less is just giving up.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
leveymg
(36,418 posts)The fact that she violated her security agreement has been apparent since March of 2015. She shouldn't have proceeded past that point, but for her hubris.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)I see they are trying to make believe low blow blow dried Biden can replace Sanders.
Muahahahahahaha!!!!!
DrDan
(20,411 posts)time for us to do likewise and bring civility back to the discussion
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)both Hillary and Trump had a different tone - they are both assuming the role of the presumptive nominee . . . appropriately
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)multiple hides be made to pay the Piper and serve the timeouts they so rightly deserve.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)I remember that night, it was crazy.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)much nonsense you allow to flow out of you.
Buh bye
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)It's time to run "Heidi."
That's sarcasm. When I was a kid a network was showing a Jets game. The game was running late and the network was anxious because they had a movie, which they presumably paid a lot for, and which had commercials earmarked for its demographic, to run. The movie was Heidi.
Thinking that the game was essentially over, the Jets were up a lot and very little time on the clock was left, they cut away from it and started showing Heidi. As you might be guessing, the game suddenly got intensely exciting and the Jets ending up losing. Fans were incensed that they missed out on this, many switched to listening on their radios, and bombarded the network with angry calls.
There's more to the story.
So the OP is, imo, comparing the sentiment to just call this race over, and adjust these forums accordingly, to the sentiment by the network to call that football game over.
So I guess the poster's Sanders supporter credentials are still intact, lol.
Cheers!
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Your OP was stupid and had nothing in it that indicated sarcasm or otherwise. You were just MESSING with people. Grow up some. Not funny.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Nobody else remembered to use the comma before Skinner's name. Now that he is
aware that he is being addressed, maybe he will finally call it!