Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary wanted to bail out the banks. Bernie wanted to audit them.
The FED board of governors used their positions to make decisions that benefited their private concerns to the tune of $4 trillion. That's what we know about. And we wouldn't even know that if it wasn't for Bernie Sanders, who made the audit of the Fed part of the Wall Street bailout package. That package, so far, has found to total $16 trillion.
It's weird how they can find money to bail out the crony banks -- even when based in Switzerland, like UBS -- yet they can't find a way to create jobs or finance urban renewal, education, housing or universal healthcare -- anything that makes life better for the majority of Americans.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 971 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary wanted to bail out the banks. Bernie wanted to audit them. (Original Post)
Octafish
Apr 2016
OP
antigop
(12,778 posts)1. Thanks, Octafish. K&R nt
merrily
(45,251 posts)2. Yet another way they are so similar!
Faux pas
(14,668 posts)3. Kickin'
JEB
(4,748 posts)4. To put it bluntly,
the bankers want to squeeze the last nickel from us working people. Class warfare initiated by the 1%.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)5. Bernie has helped to distill tis essential argument in so many ways
I can breathe a sigh a relief that people have seen the light. As usual, the youngsters are able to call it out, and now the "establishment" oldsters will be dragged along to the new paradigm.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)7. So?
standard Hilteam response
Octafish
(55,745 posts)8. UBS.
Three letters that should make everyone mad as hell.
For those new to the subject of offshore banking, why:
After his exit from the US Senate, superduperderegulator Phil Gramm immediately found a job at Swiss bank UBS as its Vice Chairman. Gramm today works in the Wealth Management department, where he brought on, among others, former President Bill Clinton.
It's a Buy-Partisan Who's Who:
President William J. Clinton
President George W. Bush Heh heh heh.
Robert J. McCann
James Carville
John V. Miller
Paula D. Polito
Anthony Roth
Mike Ryan
John Savercool
SOURCE: http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html
President William J. Clinton
President George W. Bush Heh heh heh.
Robert J. McCann
James Carville
John V. Miller
Paula D. Polito
Anthony Roth
Mike Ryan
John Savercool
SOURCE: http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html
Who would have thought President Clinton and Sen. Gramm -- the two key figures in repealing Glass-Steagall -- would work together in Wealth Management at a Swiss bank?
Since the New Deal, Glass-Steagall had protected the US taxpayer from the Wall Street casino by law. After its repeal, the US taxpayer got put on the hook for, among other things, the most recent $16 trillion Wall Street bailout.
In September 2008 on DU2 I described the situation: Know your BFEE: Phil Gramm, the Meyer Lansky of the War Party, Set-Up the Biggest Bank Heist Ever.
If you don't like the way I write about it, you may enjoy what Robert Scheer thinks about Phil Gramm.
https://panamapapers.icij.org/20160403-panama-papers-global-overview.html
Until the Panama Papers, this information wasn't much interest to the USA's "news media." They don't like to disturb their owners and operators any more than they have to, which plausibly explains how it's dropped off the media radar so darn fast.