2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhoa! What's going on here this morning? Another feigned outrage I see.
I swear, it's always a surprise when I log in to see the latest posts.
Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE on DU knows the meaning and context of "corporate whore".
It has absolutely nothing to do with being a woman, or providing sex for money.
Get over yourselves already and talk about issues, or is that something you just can't do?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Bernie did what he felt he needed to do. The rest of us are not obligated to act like truth is incorrect because of the way it was framed. She is what she is.
I mean, really? after all of the Bernie should apologize threads, when he does, all you have left is what his supporters on this particular site say? Whining is not attractive.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I say, go for it.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)And it still only comes out as a meek little whine.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)And you can all pat yourselves on the back.
revbones
(3,660 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)No one is buying the faux outrage.
Response to DanTex (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Yup ... his most disgruntled supporters want Bernie to use that phrase and apply it to Hillary.
I'm betting he does not do that during the debate.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)When some people want something and can't have it, they try to spoil it so no one else can enjoy it either.
But they failed.
beedle
(1,235 posts)Clinton super delegates that voted for ANTI LGBT legislation ... not just some simple words uttered by someone (with only one vote in the NY Primaries) introducing Bernie, but a bunch of super delegates (each with about 10,000 votes worth of primary candidate selection power) that actually voted for fucking ANTI LGBT legislation.
I assume you and Hillary on the same page? Against the LGBT community?
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
I find it humerous how fast and often certain users are always jumping on the posts, like there is a competition.
It seems to be 5 SBS and 12 HRC users doing it.
.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Thus both Paul and Bernie have disavowed this over the top statement.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)When I saw the full comment in context, I could only post one thing.
"Oh my god"
I was shocked that people were hiding the full context - he really is linking "Secretary Clinton" and "corporate Democratic whores".
It's indefensible and by continuing to deny that this was a really stupid thing to say, you're in essence promoting this "fake" outrage.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)and defensible. For those of you that rarely talk politics or are simply pretending to be too dumb to know the meaning of the word employed in political context, be assured it is very well known and defined especially by the politically literate.
One who has sold more than their labor to the corporation; one who has forsaken personal values and constitution for corporate $$; meaning of "whore" belittled when preceded by the word corporate; person who will sell their soul for $$.
My efforts are not driven by my passion for work, but by my own gluttony, my addition to money. I have become what I once despisedforsaken myself, I am a corporate whore.
Some of them are Republicans, some of them are Democrats, but few have so openly sacrificed their values at the corporate alter of greed. As Bill and Hilary Clinton (within our party at least)
Dem2
(8,168 posts)If it makes you feel any better, the expression is well worn and acceptable to me and I'm sure most people here.
But NOT in the CONTEXT in which is was used.
The linkage is unmistakable and indefensible.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)in my world that equals stupid. Because the person that is doing that is assuming they are getting something over on me. They aren't. But, if they do for a moment and I find out. Well, I will leave a trail of butt hurts all over the place and that person won't know why they are having trouble sitting down.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)some butts do need kicking. Feel free to defend yourself against those that would "bamboozle" you and let the bruising land where it may!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)this was posted regularly without complaint or feigned outrage:
Who is the Conservative Corporate Whore?
.
.
.
.
.
Ha,ha.
Trick Question.
They BOTH are.
For those needing an ID, the woman on the left is former Texas Republican Senator, Kay Bailey Hutchison who never met a WAR she didn't like.
The woman on the right is Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein, who also never met a WAR she didn't like. Her husband makes MILLIONS from sweetheart government deals, especially WAR.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Just because it was posted then, doesn't mean it's appropriate now.
Context matters and what is offensive in a particular example can change over time.
It's called progress and people who promote this are called progressives.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)male or female.
Of course, you are entitled to you opinion, even when FAR wrong and WAY off base.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)There are coffees of cantankerosity to be had, and they wouldn't do without only the freshest froth of poutrage!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)Impedimentus
(898 posts)FEEL THE BERN - 2016
Nanjeanne
(4,950 posts)Corporate shills like Hillary and ilk.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)More women vote than men. Defending men who attack women in terms of their gender is a losing strategy. Song could have pursued that same line of criticism against Clinton by using any other word in a thesaurus. Now, Sanders is making headline news, not for his political platform, but for his public apologies as he tries to undo the damages and rehab his messaging to counter the continuing impression that his campaign is anti-woman.
procon
(15,805 posts)It's getting a lot harder to sweep the misogynistic remarks under the rug, and today they're overshadowing every headline what should have been a day to celebrate Sander's impressive rally that was more than 27,000-strong.
Response to procon (Reply #72)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
procon
(15,805 posts)exclusively focused on the story that someone in Bernie Sanders campaign just referred to the woman who is the Democratic frontrunner as a whore.
Can't run from the backfire in a 24/7 news cycle.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Trust me, the only people getting wound up over this are partisan Hillary people who are spinning this thinking they will gain politically from it. The general public will not give a fuck. you all are deluded. people are not getting wound up over insults towards corrupt politicians.
procon
(15,805 posts)If the complaints and criticisms were only coming from gender specific websites, commentators, journalists, you might get some traction with that line. However, that's not what's happening, and even Sanders is apologizing for the unearned error he's now tagged with thanks to his own surrogate's ill chosen words.
If there was as little public interest as you claim, the news cycle would have already moved on to more revenue generating topics, but that's not what's happening either. This remains one of today's top headlines, and it will get even more traction, and generate still more public interest, when it pops up as a hot topic in tonight's debate.
Ignoring Bernie's woman problem is what's delusional. When his followers keep it going by floating these cringe worthy evasions it's petty and embarrassing and against everything he is trying to accomplish.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)You know that comment wasn't about gender or anything else other than what it was really about - people who run for office, take money from corps, then when elected, do their bidding.
Most people aren't stupid enough to buy your line of bullshit.
procon
(15,805 posts)Sanders has officially denounced the controversial comment, calling his surrogate's words, "inappropriate and insensitive". Even the speaker has apologized. Is Sanders saying something different in private to his loyal fans, such as yourself, that leads you to believe that he welcomes your polemic reinterpretation, or encourages you to defend remarks that he's already said has no place in his political discussion?
As a means of attracting new voters to join Sanders, your methodology needs some work.
potone
(1,701 posts)Apparently you need to keep your smelling salts close at hand before you enter this site, or the news will flatten you for the day. For some reason, the Hillary supporters are unwilling to debate policies, so this expression of false "outrage" is what we get instead.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)I didn't see your post before I posted mine.
But my thought exactly.
beedle
(1,235 posts)Which I can only assume means that Hillary and her supporters support anti LGBT legislation.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Which will cost Hillary 20 delegates, but that's the message that needs to be sent that this shit is unacceptable.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)What is your level of "surprise" there?
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)You're trying to make this into a Macaca moment, and it just isn't that. It was a black joke told by white people, and that sorta thing generally flops, as this one painfully did.
The point here is, context matters. If someone had some secretly recorded Di blasio, say, commenting on a black guy being late to a meeting, and he said "well you know them black people, they're never on time", THAT would probably been widely condemned.
This ain't that, and it's time for Camp Sanders to build a bridge and get over it.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)I'll give you a hint; it is a word that begins with "c" and ends in "ontext".
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...to use the phrase "CP Time"?
Tarc
(10,476 posts)I'll give you a hint; it is a word that begins with "c" and ends in "ontext".
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...it ok for me to use it? I can use it if I do so in the correct context?
Tarc
(10,476 posts)If you have black friends and one of them shows up late to something, if you all are comfortable enough with each other then hey, knock yourself out and try saying "oh that so-and-so, always late".
In this context, Di blasio (you remember him, the guy with the multi-racial family?) made a dumb joke, not a racist joke.
Difference.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...with the multi-racial family... You do think I'm stupid.
I don't think the term "cp time" is appropriately said by anyone, no matter their skin color or their family's ethnicity. The same way I feel about the n-word. NO ONE SHOULD BE SAYING THOSE THINGS!
Tarc
(10,476 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Easy as pie.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Good one!
brush
(53,764 posts)Dr. Songs comment was inappropriate and insensitive. Theres no room for language like that in our political discourse, Sanders tweeted Thursday.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)Whoever is running the Sanders campaign needs to reassess because he's not being well-served by his advisers what with Pope-gate, NYDN-gate and now Whore-gate all in the same week leading up to the New York primary, the most important one to date.
WTF is going on?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)You know why too - a distraction to keep people from actually paying attention to what matters. I hope you're not so naive as to believe there's any legitimacy to them. If you do you've been hoodwinked.
brush
(53,764 posts)Response to brush (Reply #19)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)This is a bunch of malarkey ...
Hillary is clearly focused on the needs of the rich, corporate puppet masters who fund her campaign ...
You don't like the word ? .. Who the fuck cares?
But I do thank you for mentioning it ... Byebye
brush
(53,764 posts)No thanks to his handlers who pulled the "audience with the Pope" stunt, the whore debacle, the Daily News fail all not good.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)...and stop using that word.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)But calling a woman a whore is all well and good.
Ok, I think I got it now.
Carry on.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)ieoeja
(9,748 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)all over this forum pretending to be upset by the use of the common term "corporate whore," this is rich.
All bad behavior yesterday was on the part of those who created this phony outrage in hopes of tarnishing something beautiful that engenders their envy.
That is the problem.
choie
(4,111 posts)they got NOTHING!
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Can't wait until tonight! Let them have at it....because this is not what the campaign is working on today!
Clinton's are in a tailspin with internal movement so fast it's hard to gauge, AND the news of Clinton's using the Delaware offshore account firm. Way to go Hillary. Why doesn't she just carry on, continue making all the money the Pope says is addiction, and forget trying to convince people she should be OUR president. It's comical, and tragic at the same time.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
Avalux
(35,015 posts)This sort of thing usually is a distraction from the stuff that matters.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Corporate being in front of it makes it totally fine. Got it.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)The term has been used for years and we all know what it means. Thank you very much.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)You know it was wrong and you need to stop dodging that fact.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)But to come to DU and see Hillary supporters losing their minds over it is ridiculous. It's not important.
beedle
(1,235 posts)but will make excuses for actions
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1728442
nolabels
(13,133 posts)That is the problem, many politicians are of the lawyer trade. In earlier times it was okay because the politicians ran on their own volition.
In today's world, they are lawyers culled by principles with deep financial interests that have the number one priority to make rich people richer with as much lawyer-ease as needed. It's no accident the places where they store law books occupy many large rooms and buildings. It's insurance the that lawyers will eventually get their way no matter how corrupt things are.
Most occupations that had such a dubious record as lawyers would have regulated or even outlawed in most plural societies. Yet they proliferate around the world and have the US capitol as their base of operation. It seems obvious they will give all kinds or rational for it. But the end game is they cannot in this space and time defend the results.
Yea, it's not the words, but the real intent behind them
Marr
(20,317 posts)This kind of self-serving hypocrisy pops up again and again and again. It's like you have no principles whatsoever, beyond 'what's best for my team at this moment'. It makes it very hard to give any credence at all to the Hillary camp's complaints.
nruthie
(466 posts)Neither of these candidates inspire me anymore. They're both acting like Republicans.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)It's like they woke up and saw the sun for the first time, ever. Big ball of fire. It will kill us all. RUN!
Thanks for the laugh - needed it!
xloadiex
(628 posts)According to Websters
Whore
3
: a venal or unscrupulous person
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)She's still in the ladies room crying. She's locked the door and won't let anyone in lest they see her suffering from the Vapors.. She's so personally insulted and hurt by the comment- delicate flower that she is and all.
EmperorHasNoClothes
(4,797 posts)The only alternative would be having to talk about actual issues.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Remember when we only commented about a woman's hair, face, attire (did we make fat jokes about female candidates?).
All of those double standards came crashing down this year. Everyone is fair game.
But we're not ready for media whore. Too soon.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)That term is common, and used a lot here on DU. It wasn't even directed at Hillary so yeah whatever.
senz
(11,945 posts)with faux outrage clogging up these forums for an entire day with their disgusting messes.
It's pure envy. They don't have anything as good and real and promising as the Bernie Sanders campaign and the jealousy is eating them up.
So they throw mud and filth at the very thing they can't have.
That's all this is.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)It's as if they're holding onto and defending a bad relationship that's never going to get any better (and will probably get worse), when they just need to walk away and move towards the future with the rest of us.
senz
(11,945 posts)If only they knew that their envy is based in a real desire for what is good. Instead they try to ruin the good so that no one can have it. You're so right that they would be happier if they joined us.
Maybe they will, when Bernie wins the nomination.
Autumn
(45,052 posts)Silly, they have nothing else so it's time to pull out the Clinton trick of parsing words.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Bernie Sanders says you are WRONG!
senz
(11,945 posts)He doesn't have time for your nonsense.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Cut them some slack -- a "scandal" a day is hard to maintain -- especially when you're busy assembling the transcripts of your Wall St. speeches so people can finally read them. (She is, isn't she?)
longship
(40,416 posts)However, let those screeching about the "corporate whore" metaphor fall on their fainting couches over Hillary Clinton has sold her soul to the devil.
All one needs to do is to look at her fucking donor list. One then knows that she metaphorically both has sold her soul, and is a corporate whore.
Both are metaphors, a concept about which both Hillary and her supporters seem to be uneducated about.
Let them now screech about "selling ones soul".
It won't do any good.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Hillary supporters need to ponder that statement - for a good long time.
longship
(40,416 posts)I think it's apt.
senz
(11,945 posts)Maybe she will after she loses the nomination.
That might be the best thing that could ever happen to her.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)they should "shut the hell up" and stop wasting everyone's time with irrelevant obfuscations.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)from having to defend their candidates's positions.
You NEVER hear them talk about real issues, like the economy, wage gap, her healthcare plan, GLOBAL WARMING and what she would do about it . .. seeing as how she gets so much money from fossil fuel industry and promoted fracking around the world. .
EXHAUSTING, every day, the fake distractions. . . . and now we find out they are PAYING people to go online to create this cloud of distraction and outrage. TOO MUCH!
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)They somehow associate her with that word.
I know I do too. It's the right description for her.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)We all know what a "corporate whore" is, and could name quite few of them instantly. And the vast majority would be men.
Oh, the horror.
(looking for place to faint)
Response to Fuddnik (Reply #105)
ChisolmTrailDem This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)...it really isn't much of a surprise anymore. Bros gotta bro, ad all.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)For the outrage of the day by Hillary supporters.
That's some amazing spin.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Little_Wing
(417 posts)Corporate whore is so last millenium...
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)They just don't like that Third Way candidates are being called out for being them, publicly. It's okay when it's on DU, and kind of shh on the board. But over a mic, where a news camera might hear another dem call a dem a corporate whore, and OMG where's the Wahmbulance. Full on poutrage.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)I had CNN on a little while ago and some poor woman who supports Bernie was being badgered about whether Bernie saying it was unacceptable was enough. And I thought to myself . . . what exactly do they want? Should Bernie drag the guy back to Washington Square and cut his tongue out or something? WTF do they want? It's an election. People say shit without thinking. This is not an isolated event that has happened to just one campaign. It's not the end of the world as we know it.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Soooo utterly ridiculous.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)No! And if any supporters of Sanders are, then they don't speak for me or our candidate. So quick to pull the sexism card because that's all her side has!
She supports fracking, supports war, supports monied interests, and supports the establishment.
Of course she's not a whore! But, she isn't what our country needs right now! The middle class is shrinking, student and consumer debt is at an all time high, and she has proven her propensity to work through issues at the barrel of the US military arsenal, and she has too close of ties to the corporate elite.
Do Hill supporters really think that we're just going to cave in on our principles in November? I won't, and I won't!
Good luck with the Drumpf administration, because that's what we'll have if Hill is the nominee.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)At this point its a mental disorder.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)I do not believe this would be an issue against a republican, but the word is sexist.