Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:32 PM
27 replies, 4453 views
 27 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 3 Juries about politics in 15 minutes? (Original post) |
JonathanRackham | Apr 2016 | OP |
| northernsouthern | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
| JonLeibowitz | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
| northernsouthern | Apr 2016 | #9 | |
| winter is coming | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
| JonathanRackham | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
| onehandle | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
| TM99 | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
| northernsouthern | Apr 2016 | #17 | |
| SocialLibFiscalCon | Apr 2016 | #8 | |
| ScreamingMeemie | Apr 2016 | #11 | |
| Agschmid | Apr 2016 | #13 | |
| SocialLibFiscalCon | Apr 2016 | #16 | |
| ScreamingMeemie | Apr 2016 | #18 | |
| ecstatic | Apr 2016 | #14 | |
| Bobbie Jo | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
| Chan790 | Apr 2016 | #10 | |
| ScreamingMeemie | Apr 2016 | #15 | |
| rbrnmw | Apr 2016 | #20 | |
| ScreamingMeemie | Apr 2016 | #21 | |
| rbrnmw | Apr 2016 | #22 | |
| Fuddnik | Jun 2016 | #27 | |
| cherokeeprogressive | Apr 2016 | #23 | |
| reformist2 | Apr 2016 | #12 | |
| shanti | Apr 2016 | #19 | |
| stone space | Jun 2016 | #24 | |
| JonathanRackham | Jun 2016 | #25 | |
| stone space | Jun 2016 | #26 |
Response to northernsouthern (Reply #1)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:37 PM
4. I was on a jury where simply the Merriam-Webster definitions of 2 words were hidden.
Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #4)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:44 PM
9. Oh crape
|
I linked the definition to a word currently trending...I may get served.
 |
Response to JonathanRackham (Original post)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:37 PM
5. Last gasp of the alert stalking party.
Response to SocialLibFiscalCon (Reply #8)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:47 PM
11. I am a Bernie supporter, but I beg you to remove that comment.
Response to ScreamingMeemie (Reply #11)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:49 PM
13. Yeah that's a disgusting comment.
 |
Response to SocialLibFiscalCon (Reply #8)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:49 PM
ecstatic (31,816 posts)
14. Real classy...
|
|
Response to JonathanRackham (Original post)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:43 PM
7. Just sayin'...
|
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1013&pid=5098
If we see anyone voting to leave the worst-of-the-worst posts, or voting in a nakedly partisan fashion to hide posts which are clearly legitimate, then we will remove that person's ability to serve on juries. (We are not going to provide any notification to members who lose their jury privileges, because under the messed-up values of primary season we think many of you would see it as some kind of badge of honor.)
Happy trails... 
|
Response to Bobbie Jo (Reply #7)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:47 PM
10. Hmm.
|
I haven't been called for jury duty in about a week.
^^^ My badge of honor. |
Response to Chan790 (Reply #10)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:49 PM
15. I kid you not... at 100%, we get called at least 3 times a day these days.
Response to ScreamingMeemie (Reply #15)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:54 PM
20. I have been called twice today
Response to rbrnmw (Reply #20)
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:29 AM
21. ...and it is almost always to this forum.
|
I find myself here usually when I'm called in on a jury.
 |
Response to ScreamingMeemie (Reply #15)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:58 AM
27. I haven't been called in over a month.
Response to JonathanRackham (Original post)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:54 PM
shanti (21,633 posts)
19. Wait until tomorrow n/t
Response to JonathanRackham (Original post)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:26 AM
24. Hell, I had an OP juried this morning just for expressing grief for a murdered Iowan.
|
May Andrea Farrington rest in peace.
On Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:06 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Open Carry Activist Alexander Kozak Sentenced to Life in Prison (X-posted from Iowa group) http://www.democraticunderground.com/126210829 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. ALERTER'S COMMENTS Alexander Kozak was a men's rights activist (idiot) not an open carry activist. OP information is incorrect. You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:49 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT. Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Then ask that the information be corrected, don't give someone a hide. Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: What's the point of hiding this? Why not just tell the poster that, and give him a change to self correct or delete? Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given |
Response to stone space (Reply #24)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:51 AM
25. Looks like some inaccurate information was posted.
