2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBERNIE HEADLINES 1ST DAY OF VATICAN CONFERENCE!!!
Bernie scored the headline spot for the first day! The evening events include a response to Sanders, discussion, and closing final discussion.
This is incredibly HUGE!!!
Response to floppyboo (Original post)
oasis This message was self-deleted by its author.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Cuz Hillary wasn't invited
DrDan
(20,411 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So you do this...
rock
(13,218 posts)She didn't beg to be invited. See the difference?
Nanjeanne
(5,440 posts)a good thing.
See the difference?
Is nonsense supposed to be funny?
Nanjeanne
(5,440 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Yeah, he wants to eliminate global povertyy by eliminating global trade. Only in Bernieworld.
SCantiGOP
(14,288 posts)the meaning of the word "huge." It helps if you type it in ALL CAPS.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)No one begged.
Maybe you should read up on him: http://jeffsachs.org/
But, he doesn't share the corporatist world view of your candidate, so he might scare you.
Boo!
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)and you sit through a couple of opening acts, for say, 1 1/2 hours, or you skip this part altogether, and then after a refreshment and all the anticipation, you get the head liner.
Maybe you've never been out...
DrDan
(20,411 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Maybe you don't understand the significant difference between speaker and respondent and following discussion.
As a quick analogy, it's like when Obama holds a press release, then the press dude gets up to field some questions on what Obama said. Does that make sense to you?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Oh, wait....they didn't invite her...
DrDan
(20,411 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)For days you guys claimed he wouldn't be involved in any meaningful way. What changed?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)I'm really taken aback when I notice how most posts from supporters of Hillary Clinton are slams at Bernie Sanders over trivial things. I would have thought that Hillary Clinton supporters would be posting positive discussion points about the policies that Clinton is advancing or supports. What are those policies?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)but I think there were some 30 minute speakers - not going to look it up
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But, the point is still the same.
Rich people who don't want to pay taxes.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Response to DrDan (Reply #8)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Joob
(1,065 posts)morality at the vatican? To the world. You'reon the wrong side of history.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...and was schedule in the program before the Sanders speech was shoehorned in.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)FRIDAY 15 APRIL 2016
MORNING
9:00 Word of Welcome
PASS President Professor Margaret Archer and Professor Daniel Finn
9:15 New Challenges and New Concerns since Centesimus Annus H.Em. Cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga
10:00 Paper to be discussed: Changes in the World Economy Since 1981 Author: Professor Jeffrey Sachs
The fall of the Soviet Union was the major economic backdrop of Centesimus annus. Much has occurred economically since. What are the most salient changes in global economic life and how well does the economic insight of Centesimus annus illuminate those changes? What do recent economic crises and recent changes in economic thinking suggest for the near future of economic life?
10:30 Session #1: first respondent Professor Javier Iguíñiz
10:45 Discussion
11:00 Coffee Break
11:30 Session #2: second respondent Professor Stefano Zamagni
11:45 Discussion
12:00 General Discussion
13:15 Lunch
AFTERNOON
15:00 Paper to be discussed: Changes in the World Political Situation Since 1981 Author: President Rafael Correa
The fall of the Soviet Union and the democratization of Eastern Europe was the major political backdrop of Centesimus annus. What is the global political situation today and which elements require greater attention by both the international community and by Catholic social teaching?
15:30 Session #3: first respondent Professor Rocco Buttiglione
15:45 Discussion
16:00 Coffee Break
16:30 Session #4: second respondent Professor Hsin-Chi Kuan
16:45 Discussion
17:00 General Discussion
19:15 Dinner
They basically added a speech at 4 PM and pushed everything 15 minutes later. Less time to dress for dinner.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)so he must be lying about speaking at the conference.
Now you are bitching about where he is on the program and how long his speech will be.
You guys are never happy unless you can bitch about Bernie.
Now...what is going to happen if he ends up meeting the Pope?
Are you all going to find a way to bitch about that too...the somehow he rudely forced himself on the Pope, who was trying to go to the bathroom or something.
I think your behavior about this is pretty sad.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)No Sachs, no Correa. What a difference a day makes!
DanTex
(20,709 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Coffee break, which will undoubtedly be a press frenzy!
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Superbowl - last quarter - team wins!!! Then all the commentary.
Or are you really not understanding this at all?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)speaker after Bernie on the first day, right after the coffee break that they cut 10 minutes off of to slip Bernie a slot.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)I'm happy to correct if I am wrong. A respondent is not a speaker. They are by definition 'responding'. Get back to me when you've checked out your dictionary.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Here's a clue, since you don't seem to be familiar with conferences. If they give you the closing remarks slot, they don't schedule a respondent to speak after you, no do they limit you to 10 minutes slipped in before a coffee break. And they definitely don't schedule a whole other day of conference after you speak.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)A respondent, at such an event as this, will stick to remark 'responding' to the speaker. And as far as my experience goes, I've produced many events. So, piss off now. You will be my first hide!!!
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Bernie in between two respondents on the same topic. His 10-minute slot is the conference equivalent of a janitor's closet.
oasis
(51,730 posts)before he speaks. That's part of his 15 minute allotment.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Oh. That's right.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Gotta keep the $$$ flowing!
Boats are expensive!
DrDan
(20,411 posts)should he beat these incredible odds and get to the WH, what are the chances of any party support for his promised initiatives considering the support he has so far given them?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)This topic must really get to you
DrDan
(20,411 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)unlike certain posts
Qutzupalotl
(15,159 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)I am new to ignore. why am I still seeing this person's posts? Maybe I should un-ignore. Endless entertainment!
DrDan
(20,411 posts)coffee break is the day's headliner
priceless
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)LUNCH
3 pm - Paper by Rafael Correa - President of Ecuador (will he present it? Not clear)
3:30 - respondent
3:45 - discuss
4 pm - Speaker - Senator Sanders
4:10 - break
4:45 - respondent
5 pm - discussion
7:30 - dinner
And so, Sanders is the closing speaker. Yes, others will quote/unquote 'speak' afterwards, and you can be sure the international press will make up the majority of those voices!
Think of it - A whole 45 minutes for everyone to get their responses to Sanders together! Huuuuuge!
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)or are you still selectively reading? Anyways, you should be happy! Go for a walk, dig in the earth or something nt
DrDan
(20,411 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)would you be kinder if you knew I was a 'gal'?
Should I cry sexism? No, silly, I would never do that. It's all getting rather ridiculous around here. Going for that therapeutic walk in the woods now. see you later.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)If Hillary's our nominee, she'll have a lot of chances to visit Europe as President.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws." -- Plato (c.427 - 347 BC)
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)That tells anyone who is honest why she would never get and invite.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Hillary speaks at a 353k per plate "fundraising" dinner...
Oh the irony.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)After his exit from the US Senate, Phil Gramm found a job at Swiss bank UBS as vice chairman. He later brought in former President Bill Clinton to the Wealth Management team. What a coincidence, they are the two key figures in repealing Glass-Steagal. Since the New Deal it was the financial regulation that protected the US taxpayer from the Wall Street casino. Oh well, what are a few hundred million in speaking fees compared to a $16 trillion bailout among friends?
It's a Buy-Partisan Who's Who:
President William J. Clinton
President George W. Bush Heh heh heh.
Robert J. McCann
James Carville
John V. Miller
Paula D. Polito
Anthony Roth
Mike Ryan
John Savercool
SOURCE: http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html
One of my attorney chums doesn't like to see his name on any committees, event letterhead or political campaign literature. These folks, it seems to me, are past caring.
Some of why DUers and ALL voters should care about Phil Gramm.
Until the Panama Papers, the fact USA's Notell-6 news media corpse don't bring this up AT ALL should be of great concern to all who care about Democracy.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)sorry to introduce reality into the fantasy
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)why try and trash it? if its as unimportant or neutral as you all believe, then why not just let it play out? whats the harm?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)but why the need for some to make it more than it is? No need to inflate it.
on edit - and I have said the same thing the past few days
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)there will be a blurb afterwards, maybe a photo or two of him speaking. and then a helluva fight for new york.
personally, i would much rather be talking about hillarys relationship with wall street and why those transcripts have not been released, the loss of good union jobs due to nafta, and the corrupt campaign finance system rewarding those who do the masters bidding.
does that work for you? feel free to add your own fave issues
Zira
(1,054 posts)just like Obama has given them.
Then she can broker a few more arms deals like Algeria and Saudi Arabia - getting the US approval and a huge donation to the Clinton foundation just like she already did. Who knows we can arm all kinds of countries that the US wouldn't normally approve so Hillary can personally get richer.
Then she can have a 10k dinner and you can go see her speak there.
You wouldn't want her speaking at the Vatican. That's for the NON-WAR Mongers and profiteers of war.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)politicians and their super delegate votes. Last I knew, buying votes is a fine example of corruption... as is money laundering (See DNC, 33 State Democratic Committees & the Hillary Victory Fund). How do you define corruption?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences & Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies
Centesimus Annus - 25 Years Later
So happy for Goodness!!!
MuseRider
(34,387 posts)I looked and looked on the list of "those also participating" and did not see his name! Freaked me out since yesterday I was told he was just an "also participating" so it was not a big deal. Whew! Speaker, lol. Sounds like a pretty big deal to me. 🖒
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)BTW, if anyone starts checking flights again, I will forward this information to his Secret Service detail. I find it very unhealthy - and, frankly, downright scary - that people were trying to find out what plane he'll be on. I remember Wellstone and Brown.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)events include a response to him?
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)discussion will be a response to him.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)LisaM
(28,680 posts)He's sandwiched in between a paper and the responses to that paper.
Surprised he's devoted so much time to a 25-year old initiative begun by a Pope with whom he can't possibly agreed with on many matters.
azmom
(5,208 posts)And so very, very, happy for him.
senz
(11,945 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Why, I oughtta.....
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)And I mean the LONG FORM, not some scrappy photoshop job!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)He's not the headliner, or keynoter
There's not "response to his comments", there's coffee followed by the previously scheduled second respondent to the "Change in the World Political Situation" paper
There's no discussion schedule for his speech, there's the previously scheduled discussion to the "Change in the World Political Situation" paper, followed by general discussion of the day's activities:
Senator Bernie Sanders
16:10 Coffee Break
16:45 Session #4: second respondent Professor Hsin-Chi Kuan
17:00 Discussion
17:15 General Discussion
19:30 Dinne
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Of course, then she wouldn't be Hillary "Can I give a speech for $200,000" Clinton.
DetroitSocialist83
(169 posts)I thought he wasn't invited? If only they could have afforded Hillary's speaking fee. She could have told them about how the money changers in the temple were too big to fail!
merrily
(45,251 posts)If he were a good person, he'd charge more so his gifts to charity would be larger.
There is simply no end to that man's evil, I tells ya! NONE!
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,440 posts)meeting and talking with these participants. Dinner on Friday should be really stimulating!
Response to floppyboo (Original post)
Post removed
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)She doesn't mind racist jokes, however.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)shanti
(21,718 posts)there are 113 replies in this post, but i only see 20, lol.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)MineralMan
(147,788 posts)He's not the keynote speaker. He isn't even presenting one of the papers for the conference. He is a responding speaker, who has 10 minutes for his remarks.
The headliner for a conference is the keynote speaker, not a responding participant.
Truly, I think you have misunderstood the importance of his place on the conference agenda in a serious way.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Fear tends to conflate things. I've got some kickass brownies that may help you out. oops, but then you'd end up with a criminal record and your family would be fucked. Hill should decriminalize, don't you think? Or do you want to keep paying out of your nose for fancy pharma's? You need something...
MineralMan
(147,788 posts)He's an afternoon responding speaker.
As for your loaded brownie thing, thanks, but I'll pass. I gave up using the stuff in 1974, after being a daily toker. Your implication that I need some drug is insulting, actually. I wish you wouldn't do that.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Bernie is not responding. He is giving a speech.
I am sorry I suggested you needed something. I guess we all need a little bit of something. When we devolve into semantics (guilty) its a good chance that the real point of the message is lost.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)uponit7771
(91,904 posts)Tarc
(10,575 posts)My goodness, you lot get sillier by the second.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)He's Headlining.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)drray23
(7,991 posts)He is scheduled right before the coffee break. Its not headlining by any stretch of imagination. Not sure Bernie thought this through. He will spend 2 to 3 days flying there to give a 20 minute talk and fly back in the middle of a critical primary campaign.
The move was so transparent its not even guaranteed it will draw catholic voters. It may have the opposite effect. On top of that he is giving even more ammunitions to the gop by associating with evo morales and rafael correa, both pretty close to being dictators. He already had questionable associations with south american dictators in the past its not going to help. well played Bernie...
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Spinners and liers, the lot of you.