2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAre there women in any of the top leadership roles at the Vatican?
If not, why?
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)This is the ultimate boys club. Women clean up after them, that is all. There are some women in organization associated with the Vatican, but the Vatican remains off limits to women.
LexVegas
(6,059 posts)WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)is a penis. Did you read about the Burning Times? Women (and gays) were burned at the stake by the Church and the Inquisition was a way to remove women from any position of power and wealth. The Church has become "enlightened" and no longer murders women for being witches, but they are far from giving women any role in their club.
Time for change
(13,714 posts)religious organization if they want it.
But that does not negate the tremendous contribution that our current Pope has made to the social justice movement or that he thought enough of Bernie's potential role in that movement to have him invited to the Vatican.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)is mother and whore. I know the current pope is "liberal" and loved, but the Church is still a horror.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)Religion is the opiate of the people?
haikugal
(6,476 posts)WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)zombies come back from the dead again and again.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,595 posts)Why not?
Where have you been? The Vatican is the home base of one of the most misogynistic organizations ever.
Women can't be priests, never mind being in a position of power and influence in the Vatican.
Joob
(1,065 posts)H2O Man
(73,536 posts)WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)and plays a minor role.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)is supporting by supporting them.
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)but as a great honor to be chosen as a participant in a forum on inequality. I'm sure he'll cherish his picture with the Pope though.
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)but as a great honor to be chosen as a participant in a forum on inequality. I'm sure he'll cherish his picture with the Pope though. Besides Rome should be beautiful this time of year.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You were saying?
scscholar
(2,902 posts)that doesn't mean that we should.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Unless you are trying to pin this on Bernie.
KPN
(15,642 posts)The Clinton camp has no integrity, no shame.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)So now let's settle on "Bernie is misogynistic for accepting an invite to speak at the Vatican, because the Church hierarchy is male dominated"
My goodness, the desperation & flop sweat stench from Camp Weathervane is suffocating.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Since she's actually a member of a conservative Christian cult that's much more relative, don't you think?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Why make stuff up?
suming the diagram is about supporting a given system. It would be two cells, one exclusive, one non-exclusive. Both systems are exclusive from the point of view of Spaude and Coe as they have their own non-inclusive agendas at the top. They both happen to be anti-gay, for example.
I read his book after two days of researching, and I bet that a lot of people haven't.
Here's what he says about Clinton:
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)For 15 years, Hillary Clinton has been part of a secretive religious group that seeks to bring Jesus back to Capitol Hill. Is she triangulating or living her faith?
Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet on Sat. September 1, 2007 3:00 AM PDT
Through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as the Fellowship. Her collaborations with right-wingers such as Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) grow in part from that connection. "A lot of evangelicals would see that as just cynical exploitation," says the Reverend Rob Schenck, a former leader of the militant anti-abortion group Operation Rescue who now ministers to decision makers in Washington. "I don't....there is a real good that is infected in people when they are around Jesus talk, and open Bibles, and prayer."
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2007/09/hillarys-prayer-hillary-clintons-religion-and-politics
Quibbling over semantics = deflection
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)That Clinton at times associated is not controversial.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Maybe you guys should stop bringing up religious beliefs when you want to smear Bernie?
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)The relationship was not as conspiring as you suggest.
I'm making zero comment about the OP posted just to rule people up.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)He spends like 2 whole pages talking about their "relationship" purely directed by the prayer breakfasts that women senators go to to this day. Even Elizabeth Warren goes to them. They are the sit down and talk without men just the ladies.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)your a quick one
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Time for a goal post moving session
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)but is not in the Vatican.
Like I said , move those posts
rachacha
(173 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)In the past, everytime anyone said that the Pope was a bigot, we would get shot down because he's so awesome and liberal and trying so hard and changing things.
But now that SANDERS is going there for some meeting, people are all ready to call out the RCC.
It's laughable.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I don't recall seeing him criticizing the pope or the Vatican.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)I've been told I'm a bigot and anti-theist.
Good to know it's cool now.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You would think her supporters would know better than to bring up religious beliefs.
mainer
(12,022 posts)I'm a woman and I'm sick and tired of it.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)AND I am 62..not a naive young person looking for free tuition, which, by the way I received when I was a young un...free in-state tuition for all persons who qualified!
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Why not? Is that a serious question? Look at the teachings..it's a misogynist organization, and always has been.
Your point?
Check out any Christian religious organizations and you'll find the same thing. Does this surprise you?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So the trolling shifts gears. ..
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)ADD TO THE PURGE LIST.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)VATICAN CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.
"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.
He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.
A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.
A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-vatican-idUSKCN0X5257
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)If this is the new attack on Bernie, it may backfire spectacularly if Hillary and her camp starts insulting Catholics and the church. There is a huge Catholic voting bloc in NYC -- wait, on second thought I hope Hillary through her meme trolls and surrogates attack the Catholic Church. It may give Sanders the lead in NY.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Did you envision this post as some kind of GOTCHA!?
mainer
(12,022 posts)Uh, no.
I'm a woman in my 60s. I earn more than almost any of my male colleagues. I earn more than my husband. I've never felt like a victim, and I don't plan to anytime soon.
There's nothing that gets me more riled up than to hear women say we should vote for Hillary because SHE'S A WOMAN AND THEY'RE ALL BEING MEAN TO HER.
It just demeans all women when you say that.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Nor for any corporatist warmongers.
smiley
(1,432 posts)Come on really? This is your new angle?
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)you better stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)It distills the essence of this primary in the wonderful tying together of totally unrelated subjects with Sanders, and with the obligatory claim of sexism as the denouement.
Beautiful. Congratulations.