Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:37 PM Apr 2016

Why did Bernie Sanders vote to confirm Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State?

Simple question. She voted for the Iraq War resolution, yet he still voted to confirm her as Secretary of State. It seems odd to confirm someone for a foreign policy position when you disagreed with them on a key foreign policy vote.

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Bernie Sanders vote to confirm Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State? (Original Post) KingFlorez Apr 2016 OP
Probably because there's checks and balances in place NWCorona Apr 2016 #1
Probably because the President nominated her... nt revbones Apr 2016 #2
That doesn't mean he had to vote in favor of confirmation KingFlorez Apr 2016 #6
So the president shouldn't get to appoint his own cabinet? revbones Apr 2016 #7
You aren't comprehending KingFlorez Apr 2016 #13
We all assumed Obama would contain her worst impulses. leveymg Apr 2016 #3
This! NWCorona Apr 2016 #5
Yeaup. hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #21
Any President deserves to have the appointees they want. earthside Apr 2016 #4
nice post - there are time to fight SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #8
Because she paid him. You know because she corupt. timlot Apr 2016 #9
Make up your mind. Do you want to attack him for not being a Democrat, or for voting with Marr Apr 2016 #10
It just makes no sense KingFlorez Apr 2016 #15
Bernie Sanders supported Obama in 2008. So why wouldn't he? senz Apr 2016 #11
She was appointed by the president which means he wanted her as SOS. Autumn Apr 2016 #12
Yes, even Sanders makes mistakes. EndElectoral Apr 2016 #14
Next up: Sanders responsible bvf Apr 2016 #25
Because Bernie knew the real reason Obama appointed her awake Apr 2016 #16
did obama tell you this personally? nt msongs Apr 2016 #17
No Hillary emailed it to me years ago awake Apr 2016 #18
Yep, there is no good answer to that one. nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #19
Yes. Hillary's performance was so inept that one must admit there is no good answer to the question. think Apr 2016 #32
What good would a negative vote do? He admires her. Supported Obama. Point please? snowy owl Apr 2016 #20
Because he's clairvoyant and knew Norrin Radd Apr 2016 #22
He also voted for Kerry as Secretary of Sate NobodyHere Apr 2016 #23
There were 2 votes against her confirmation oberliner Apr 2016 #24
Because she's .... salinsky Apr 2016 #26
Maybe he thought she had learned a lesson. Surprise! The stupidity continued. n/t Skwmom Apr 2016 #27
Because BS is just another typical establishment politician who flip flops on.. dubyadiprecession Apr 2016 #28
Good question and Why did tad devine defend John Kerry's vote on the IWR? Cha Apr 2016 #29
Because you don't have to agree with people 100% of the time. Vinca Apr 2016 #30
You could check the other 217 OPs on this topic, many of which you participated in. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #31
+1 Myrina Apr 2016 #34
Over time I forgave him for this major blunder! nt m-lekktor Apr 2016 #33

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
1. Probably because there's checks and balances in place
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:40 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary didn't have her finger on the button while at State and nobody thought Hillary would destroy Libya.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
7. So the president shouldn't get to appoint his own cabinet?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:45 PM
Apr 2016

These stupid OPs are just ridiculous. You guys can't defend Hillary on her own, so you want to hide her behind Obama or Kerry all the time. Good choice for a presidential candidate...

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
13. You aren't comprehending
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:49 PM
Apr 2016

You're going into a rage for no reason. Considering that he has made voting against the Iraq War resolution as matter of principle, it seems like he would not have voted to confirm someone who voted for said resolution. One vote against confirmation is not stopping the President from appointing his cabinet.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. We all assumed Obama would contain her worst impulses.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:41 PM
Apr 2016

Apparently, we were at least in large part wrong about both.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
4. Any President deserves to have the appointees they want.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:41 PM
Apr 2016

This is a concept that ought to apply to Republican and Democratic presidents alike.

Unless, of course, there is some kind of criminal or ethical corruption.

Pres. Obama wanted Clinton ... so Sen. Sanders gave the President the executive appointments he desired.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
10. Make up your mind. Do you want to attack him for not being a Democrat, or for voting with
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:47 PM
Apr 2016

the Democrats?

It seems to be both.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
15. It just makes no sense
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:50 PM
Apr 2016

I don't care if he votes with Tea Party caucus, I just can't comprehend how he voted for someone that he considers to be totally unqualified based on one vote.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
12. She was appointed by the president which means he wanted her as SOS.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:48 PM
Apr 2016

He is entitled to appoint whomever he chooses. Bernie like others, voted for Obama choice to be confirmed.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
25. Next up: Sanders responsible
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:45 AM
Apr 2016

for Clinton's e-mail shitstorm.

I swear, sometimes these OPs seem like they must have been drafted with crayons.

awake

(3,226 posts)
16. Because Bernie knew the real reason Obama appointed her
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:56 PM
Apr 2016

He knew if she was SOS then it would be impossible for her to run against Obama in 2012.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
32. Yes. Hillary's performance was so inept that one must admit there is no good answer to the question.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:20 AM
Apr 2016

John Kerry on the other hand has been exemplary in the office.

Thank goodness America doesn't have Hillary Clinton in that office anymore.

Her use of the office to enrich her family and foundation is utterly shameful. Her reckless propensity for military intervention in the middle east has caused untold damage on the region and our foreign policy.

Bernie, Obama, and the rest of Democrats who trusted her made an error in judgment voting in Clinton as SOS.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
20. What good would a negative vote do? He admires her. Supported Obama. Point please?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:34 AM
Apr 2016

But not for President.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
24. There were 2 votes against her confirmation
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:28 AM
Apr 2016

David Vitter and Jim DeMint.

There were 3 votes against John Kerry's confirmation.

Jim Inhofe, John Cornyn, and Ted Cruz.

dubyadiprecession

(5,706 posts)
28. Because BS is just another typical establishment politician who flip flops on..
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:19 AM
Apr 2016

everything he says. Lets face it, BS can't win.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why did Bernie Sanders vo...