Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weaver's Response to Clinton's new scorched earth strategy... (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 OP
The party is toast i suspect, I guess the Clinton family sees it as just an extension of themselves? JPnoodleman Apr 2016 #1
Something owed to them, just like the White House? Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #20
Clinton has been campaigning for Democrats across the country BainsBane Apr 2016 #24
campaigning is fine, schisming the base? JPnoodleman Apr 2016 #25
Schism by criticizing Bernie BainsBane Apr 2016 #35
She gets her ass handed to her among young voters... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #40
I'm sure we will hear full referenced reasons behind your stamping feet any moment now... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #41
Wait ... what? hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #46
"reluctant to criticize Sanders" cui bono Apr 2016 #61
she is acting like she is in bosnia and is running from the incoming SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #28
How precisely is she BainsBane Apr 2016 #37
Made perfect sense to me... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #55
She is not sacrificing money for herself when she raises karynnj Apr 2016 #39
So she's giving them some Wall Street cash? Red Knight Apr 2016 #45
Here is how she is getting the money! beedle Apr 2016 #62
The OLD party is toast. Hillary won't let anyone else have it, so she will burn it down instead. reformist2 Apr 2016 #42
What is he afraid of? upaloopa Apr 2016 #2
Afraid of? Nothing... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #4
Perhaps that she could tear a fatal seam in the Democratic Party if she gets nasty Armstead Apr 2016 #7
The Democrtic party is behind Hillary. Weaver knows that. My guess is the party has been urging upaloopa Apr 2016 #11
given that she hasn't won and kept hold of a state since Arizona, I don't think roguevalley Apr 2016 #13
The Wisconsin chapter of the Party sure isn't behind Hillary. Scuba Apr 2016 #38
Well... Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #56
Out of date... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #59
No... The DLC and DNC and corporately controlled media is behind Hillary. Get it straight... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #43
What fucking nerve! Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #3
Oh for fucks sake, it's Hillary who has been spouting all the lying attacks jfern Apr 2016 #5
Truth hurts I guess Nite Owl Apr 2016 #12
I was wondering when I would get to put someone else on ignore. liberal_at_heart Apr 2016 #6
bullcrap Robbins Apr 2016 #8
THAT^ MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #44
They have not been running an increasingly negative campaign..Are you that delicate? Armstead Apr 2016 #10
If you can recall, Hillary Clinton was frontrunner and sabotaged campaign 2008 when PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #14
Oh please the Vox calculator is inaccurate Avalon Sparks Apr 2016 #18
that calculator does not account for healthcare savings. its worthless Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #31
That calculator is biased, flawed, and has been debunked. tokenlib Apr 2016 #53
Well, this moment came earlier than anticipated Hydra Apr 2016 #9
Both parties might implode before the summer.. HughLefty1 Apr 2016 #15
the question becomes this... grasswire Apr 2016 #16
You obviously missed the Benghazi hearings. R B Garr Apr 2016 #26
That's precisely what worries her BainsBane Apr 2016 #34
Yes, that one's imaginary "concerns" have seemed more simplistic than usual lately. R B Garr Apr 2016 #48
Bernie isn't the Democratic Party BainsBane Apr 2016 #17
Nothing intelligent here. Move on folks. snowy owl Apr 2016 #22
Another insult BainsBane Apr 2016 #33
This isn't the Democratic Party and it's also not the truth: Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #49
Bernie is what the Democratic Party used to be when I joined in 1967. bvar22 Apr 2016 #57
Bernie is the only true Democrat in the race. libdem4life Apr 2016 #60
lol, how Rovian of Weaver. He got laughed at on CNN, R B Garr Apr 2016 #19
He's desperate to keep the millions flowing BainsBane Apr 2016 #21
Umm, are you really this dumb? $800K for his organization . . . snowy owl Apr 2016 #23
Yeah, I'm dumb BainsBane Apr 2016 #27
At least you admit it. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #30
The other poster spouted off BainsBane Apr 2016 #32
In 2008 Mark Penn's firm was paid over $14 Million by Clinton's campaign. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #50
So you find some equivalence of one person earning $225k for a one hour speech... DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #54
Yes! And your other post here is excellent. Your FEC R B Garr Apr 2016 #29
Thanks for the post--missed it but glad to hear. riversedge Apr 2016 #51
perfect response nt Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #36
What a ridiculous statement Nonhlanhla Apr 2016 #47
Wow. This thread has 50 replies and I only see 7 of them. Nyan Apr 2016 #52
Saw Jeff Weaver on the teevee today and he was deadly serious. Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #58

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
24. Clinton has been campaigning for Democrats across the country
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:56 AM
Apr 2016

Sanders supporters among them. Although she has been out-raised and greatly outspent by the Sanders campaign, she has contributed $16 million to other Dem candidates. Bernie has contributed nothing and refused to promote Democrats candidates during his campaign. He is running against the party, made no secret of his contempt for its president, members of congress and even Democratic voters. He admitted to using the party for his election bid in order to get more media attention and financing. He currently has an FEC account open for his reelection bid to the Senare as an INDEPENDENT. He has no intention of becoming a Democrat. Pointing out facts about his lack of qualifications is not an effort to destroy the party. His entire campaign is an attack against Clinton and the party itself.

There is zero evidence to support this political operative's statement, and that people here swallow it whole is an absurd. It is tragic how Sandes supporters have decided that truth emanates from a $150 million dollar political enterprise.

It's one thing for political operatives to spout bullshit. They get paid to do just that. but to believe them, now that's just sad.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
35. Schism by criticizing Bernie
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:56 AM
Apr 2016

as he has been doing toward her for months now? Is that what you mean?

The word is she has been reluctant to criticize Sanders out of concern over alienating his supporters. But the fact is he has made attacks on her and the Democratic Party the center of his campaign. I suppose he hasn't had the same reluctance about losing support from Clinton supporters because he doesn't actually expect to be the nominee, which begs the question of why he is working so hard to attack the party and its eventual nominee?

Seems to me there is only so much shit, most of it dishonest, that she should have to take before fighting back. IMO, she should have called him on his shit a long time ago. There is a huge amount for her to work from, most of which has gotten very little attention in the press. His mountain of campaign finance violations, for example, for which he has been cited by the FEC, have gotten almost no attention. http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511645580 The press isn't doing its job of informing the public about his record or his campaign. Someone sure as hell needs to.

Another point is that a large number of Sanders supporters aren't Democrats. She wins an overwhelming majority of Democratic voters, and even leads him among Democrats in most of the states he has won. His popularity among independents is frequently cited by Sanders and his supporters alike, but the flip side of that means he isn't nearly as popular among Democrats. Therefore criticizing him can hardly bring about a "schism" in the party.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
40. She gets her ass handed to her among young voters...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 06:46 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie got over 80% in Wisconsin. You want to kill the party, cling to yesterday's politics and tell the next generation their votes don't count because we've rigged the system for the 1% and political insiders (super delegates? Seriously?)

Bernie would crush Trump or Cruz. Hillary would be in a dogfight with either one... All that money and all that name recognition doesn't alter the fact that she's viewed as dishonest, untrustworthy, in the pocket of Wall Street, and well, just plain unlikeable.

If she's struggling with progressives, imagine the lack of support she'll receive among independents. Maybe taking all that Wall Street money wasn't such a good idea after all, now was it?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
41. I'm sure we will hear full referenced reasons behind your stamping feet any moment now...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 06:52 AM
Apr 2016

I've heard his criticisms of her record that shows how many of these AWFUL trade agreements she's voted for.

Is that scorching the earth for you?

Is that dishonest?

No and No... And, frankly, you don't know how Democratic voters feel about her until you've asked one.

hereforthevoting

(241 posts)
46. Wait ... what?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:08 AM
Apr 2016

"The word is she has been reluctant to criticize Sanders out of concern over alienating his supporters."



She alienates us, or gets her surrogates to do it, herself, plenty.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
61. "reluctant to criticize Sanders"
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

omfg...

Get real. She has criticized him every chance she gets, as have her surrogates. And when I say criticized, I mean smeared him with lies.

.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
39. She is not sacrificing money for herself when she raises
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 06:43 AM
Apr 2016

That money and what she gains is not without value.

She is only allowed to raise the maximums for herself. When she has these $10,000 a plate fund raisers, the amount over that is for the party.

It also means that she personally meets many of the most powerful people in the country along with most of the party leaders, many of whom might be included even if the cost is too high.

Red Knight

(704 posts)
45. So she's giving them some Wall Street cash?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:00 AM
Apr 2016

She's BUYING them. That's all.

What Bernie supporter is she helping? Just curious.

Bernie will become a Democrat the day this party returns to its roots and acts like the Democratic party instead of a Republican-lite version. That's what this battle is about. The soul of this party. I never ever want to hear a Hillary supporter complain about money in politics. Never. They have no right to that concern when they prop up that very system. You can't be okay with it as long as it's for Hillary.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
4. Afraid of? Nothing...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:14 AM
Apr 2016

His campaign is about reinvigorating the democratic party and bringing young people in to turn the party back onto the progressive road.

New York I think will be the final showdown between Turd Ways and Progressives. I hope we can defeat them or the party will schism.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
11. The Democrtic party is behind Hillary. Weaver knows that. My guess is the party has been urging
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:19 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary to get on with the general. Weaver is afraid of the coming closed primaries.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
13. given that she hasn't won and kept hold of a state since Arizona, I don't think
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:24 AM
Apr 2016

you can count on the Democratic Party being behind her.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
43. No... The DLC and DNC and corporately controlled media is behind Hillary. Get it straight...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 06:57 AM
Apr 2016

The number of Democrats that have joined the party is a result of the vast numbers joining the Democratic party (see the rallies, or act hypnotized like they don't matter)

The disastrous chairing of the Democratic party structure has been and currently IS BEING torn apart through the disastrous "leader"ship of DWS.

You've got the kind of party the Clintons helped form, and now that it's turned into what Third Way partisan values have infused into the helpless patient's IV, you can start calling it something else, cause it doesn't help Democrats. It doesn't help anything but itself.

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
3. What fucking nerve!
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:13 AM
Apr 2016

Sander's and Weaver have been running an increasingly negative campaign against Hillary. The country needs to know how much a Sander's presidency will cost?

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/3/25/11293258/tax-plan-calculator-2016

Nite Owl

(11,303 posts)
12. Truth hurts I guess
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:20 AM
Apr 2016

They can lie but if we tell the truth it is a lie. Even videos can't count, it isn't fair to do some research.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
8. bullcrap
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:16 AM
Apr 2016

clintons have been ruing negative since january.

telling truth about clinton is not negative.and i see you have joined clinton supporters in going to right to bash bernie.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
10. They have not been running an increasingly negative campaign..Are you that delicate?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:17 AM
Apr 2016

If so, you''ll have a stroke if Clinton gets into the GE against a GOP candidate

PufPuf23

(8,767 posts)
14. If you can recall, Hillary Clinton was frontrunner and sabotaged campaign 2008 when
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:26 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary Clinton went negative on POTUS Obama and lost.

POTUS Obama was and is a better POTUS than Hillary Clinton could ever be so if she should win POTUS, (I consider this likely) we are looking at another 4 or 8 years of treading water or going backwards. Clinton will enter office as a an unpopular president that is not trusted.

I would expect Sanders to serve only one term and not be that successful but to change the direction for other Democratic leaders for a generational change away from neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism.

Clinton lost 2008 because of negative campaigning and is on the verge of screwing up 2016 for the same reason.

Who hired David Brock?

Avalon Sparks

(2,565 posts)
18. Oh please the Vox calculator is inaccurate
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:30 AM
Apr 2016

Type any low number in, and you owe more than you make.

It's nonsense

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
53. That calculator is biased, flawed, and has been debunked.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:49 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary deserves to be called out on Wall Street coddling and free trade and now the Panama Papers...

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
9. Well, this moment came earlier than anticipated
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:17 AM
Apr 2016

We were speculating the party might rupture at the convention. Now it may happen in the next few weeks.

I guess it would fit- I expected Hillary's meltdown last week to be further in the future, if at all. Now it seems it's all tied together.

Hello, New York...

HughLefty1

(231 posts)
15. Both parties might implode before the summer..
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:26 AM
Apr 2016

The entitlement of the Clintons might be the final nail in the coffin.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
16. the question becomes this...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:27 AM
Apr 2016

....is she in good enough health to weather the FBI interview AND this scorched earth attack on Bernie? I am becoming concerned about her state of mind and her health.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
26. You obviously missed the Benghazi hearings.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:58 AM
Apr 2016

She made fools of those clowns for eleven hours. In fact, you don't hear much about it anymore. Looks like she might even have destroyed a couple of their careers in the process, as they got raked by their own party for failing to incriminate her. They were on record as only having those hearings to affect her popularity numbers. Instead the hearngs only helped her, lol.

She was boss. Don't you worry.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
34. That's precisely what worries her
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:45 AM
Apr 2016

The post is pure projection, along with the requisite hail mary of an indictment out of hope it will subvert the results of popular elections and deliver what she must have determined is Sanders only remaining chance of being installed as nominee.



R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
48. Yes, that one's imaginary "concerns" have seemed more simplistic than usual lately.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:50 AM
Apr 2016

Hoping for ill health and indictments is definitely a sign of projection and desperation. You are right.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
17. Bernie isn't the Democratic Party
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:30 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Wed Apr 6, 2016, 02:38 AM - Edit history (1)

If fact he has been running against the party for months now.

While I know better than to expect Bernie to care about the Democratic party's electoral prospects in December, I was disappointed to discover his campaign is targeting electoral democracy itself by working to overturn the results of already decided elections in order to install Bernie in power against the will of the electorate. http://www.ibtimes.com/bernie-sanders-fantasy-campaign-hopes-win-hillary-clintons-pledged-delegates-unlikely-2338452
Nevada is an example of just that.

Weaver's comment is pretty ironic considering how hard he has been working to undermine both the party and legitimacy in the electoral process itself. They have denounced as illegitimate very election that Bernie didn't win. In the process, they shown a determination to undermine the voting rights so American citizens. I don't think I've ever seen such a disreputable campaign in my life, an impression borne out in the record number of campaign finance violations.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511645580

Bernie is incompetent. He has proved that through the mountain of illegal campaign donations and now demonstrated a shocking level of ignorance about the particulars of the very positions he has campaigned http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/transcript-bernie-sanders-meets-news-editorial-board-article-1.2588306

Democrats are meant to be a party of policy, evidence and reason. Sanders shows contempt for all of that and instead foments rage against the party, while he and his surrogates, like Tim Robbins, repeatedly insult American citizens who dare to exercise their democratic rights independently rather than acquiescing to his dominion.

Seriously, that dude Weaver needs to look in the mirror.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
33. Another insult
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:08 AM
Apr 2016

which is a clear admission that you are unable to come up with any substantive response.
How sad it must be to know you how so little capacity to engage in political discourse that you can only produce insults.

And all this because I dared to question a wealthy political operative, getting richer by the day due to the anger toward the Democratic Party he foments.

You better save some space inside you because you're going to have a whole lot more resentment in the coming weeks as more and more voters exercise their democratic rights free of your control. One person, one vote. You don't have to like it. You don't even have to live with it, but it is the nature of the democratic electoral system.

Even on a night where Sanders did extremely well, you're filled with anger Even victory can't assuage it. Of course, you got your cues for that from the top. Note Weaver's statement on a night in which his candidate outperformed expectations. That's the problem with building a political movement entirely in opposition to everything--from the economy, to the Democratic Party, to ordinary Americans. There can be no reprieve from the rage because without it nothing remains.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
49. This isn't the Democratic Party and it's also not the truth:
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:27 AM
Apr 2016


Praises Ronald Wilson Reagan for doing the exact things he is despised for not doing at all. Claims those who took every possible action to alert the country and the world to the crisis actually did nothing at all until Dutch and Nancy led the way. Horrible, ignorant, insulting and her supporters are totally fine with it which demonstrates their underlying bigotry both homophobia and racism. Go look up the HIV stats if that statement confuses you.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
57. Bernie is what the Democratic Party used to be when I joined in 1967.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:42 PM
Apr 2016

What passes for the Democratic Party today is far to the Political Right of what it was when I joined so many years ago.
I am a mainstream-center New Deal/Great Society Democrat, now labeled a far leftist in the Clintonized version of the Party I once loved.
My values and goals haven't changed.
The Democratic party has changed, and not for the better.
That is why I support Bernie.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
60. Bernie is the only true Democrat in the race.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:37 PM
Apr 2016

Republican lite is not my party. He's done more for Democrats over the years in the Senate Because he was not hitched to the proverbial Democrat post.

Now I expect him to initiate the process to retake our moral basis.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
19. lol, how Rovian of Weaver. He got laughed at on CNN,
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:35 AM
Apr 2016

and rightfully so.

Sanders has been a Democrat for weeks, but his campaign manager is chastising a true party leader about destroying the Democratic Party because of ambition Lol, yet Bernie's ambition is the only reason Sanders is.now using the Party. Very Rovian!

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
21. He's desperate to keep the millions flowing
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:44 AM
Apr 2016

Was it he or Devine who is pulling in $800k per month, according to FEC filings? They are making a killing and are well past being the 1% they spin their Madison Avenue-crafted campaign slogans about. Now that Bernie's got an army of 1 percenters campaigning for him, they have to refocus their efforts to target Clinton and the 2.5 million plus more Americans who have voted for her.

"Winning S Carolna is like winning Guam." You know, all those second- and third-class Americans who constitute the real enemy.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
23. Umm, are you really this dumb? $800K for his organization . . .
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:51 AM
Apr 2016

you know, like when you hire an ad agency or a consulting firm. Perhaps you don't know... He's paying a lot of people with the 800K.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
32. The other poster spouted off
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 02:29 AM
Apr 2016

I simply noted the amount of money paid. He insisted it was for many people. How many people? What is their average wage? And why do they deserve so much more than others who are criticized for earning far less?

My comment was meant ironically, but you evidently missed that, despite your superior level of intelligence.

My point was a simple one. They want the money to continue. If you don't think that influences what they say to their candidate and the public, you are incredibly naive. Just because the guy is currently working for Sanders doesn't make him the Dalai Lama. Then there is the irony that Sanders has created campaign slogans out of the claim that Clinton getting paid $200k for a speech makes her supposedly beholden to big banks, while you object to the assertion that $800k a month might just influence what a political operate says.

Frankly, I find it rather sad that so many Sanders supporters find it necessary to defend anyone and everyone associated with the Sanders campaign while systematically insulting everyone who doesn't swallow their nonsense whole.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
50. In 2008 Mark Penn's firm was paid over $14 Million by Clinton's campaign.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:33 AM
Apr 2016

You seem to forget that as you plow right into the same old Medieval trope, the Jewish candidate's campaign is all about money, while the campaign of the Mega Rich Christian who has actually spent endless millions trying to get elected in the past is fully righteous in all things.
Hillary 08 says she 'gave' to other Democrats but she ended up losing the WH and deeply in debt, millions of what she 'gave' were left to others to repay via more donations to Hillary.
But it's all different for Bernie. And some of your cohort on DU have done us all the favor of making it very clear why they treat him differently.

I'll have nothing to do with your candidate's antisemitic crap nor her Reagan loving homophobia. That stuff appeals to her base, I am not her base.

 

DemocracyDirect

(708 posts)
54. So you find some equivalence of one person earning $225k for a one hour speech...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016

... to a whole campaign team being paid $800k a month for running a whole campaign?

$800k a month might just influence what a political operate says.


Of course that campaign team is being paid $800k to say things in support of Bernie Sanders political candidacy.
One must wonder what Hillary Clinton is being paid for with $225k (x3 for 3 speeches) from Goldman-Sachs.

You say I am insulting you?

You are the one who called me "naive" for something about that paying campaign staff influences what they say to the public?
That is ironic.

I applaud your interest in knowing how many people are in his campaign team. I am sure his team is more than 10 people and less than 50. And each of these people probably has an expense account.

I hope his campaign team is better than the Dalai Lama at political campaigning. I respect the Dalai Lama for things unrelated to political campaigning.

I don't consider the Progressive Platform to be nonsense.

Thank you for saying I have a superior level of intelligence.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
29. Yes! And your other post here is excellent. Your FEC
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 02:07 AM
Apr 2016

analysis is spot on. Not sure about Weavers line item, but it makes sense he is about the money. They still raise the most out of a pretend victim status for Bernie.

Sanders has really exposed himself as being a hypocrite and a shallow hypocrite at that. That New York Daily News interview revealed a shocking superficiality. I'm glad to see New York is not going to let him skate.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
47. What a ridiculous statement
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:23 AM
Apr 2016

How is going negative against Bernie "destroying the Democratic Party"? Bernie is only barely a Democrat, and he's the one who is been running negatively against Hillary for months, and who even ramped up the attacks on her in recent weeks, when he know damn well that is the likely nominee and that he is harming her GE chances. Meanwhile he has been suing the Democratic Party, and has shown no desire to help downticket races. If anyone is going negative, and if anyone is destroying the Democratic Party, is is Bernie.

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
52. Wow. This thread has 50 replies and I only see 7 of them.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 09:41 AM
Apr 2016

Thank goodness for my ignore list. I don't have to feel dirty.

Land of Enchantment

(1,217 posts)
58. Saw Jeff Weaver on the teevee today and he was deadly serious.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 07:21 PM
Apr 2016

Thank dog Bernie hired him--friends for a very long time. Good judgement, again Bernie. Jeff is smart and tenacious. He will take care of this assault and Bernie will come through this with his usual flying colors and dignity intact.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Weaver's Response to Clin...