Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:09 PM Apr 2016

Why Democratic Primaries are More Democratic...

Today, both parties have primary elections in Wisconsin. The Democratic Primary will determine the percentages of delegates proportionally to the election results. The delegates will be divided to correspond to the popular vote, although rounding can lead to an imprecise division by a delegate or two. That's the Democratic way.

Over in the Elephant Enclosure, though, Wisconsin is a "Winner-take-all" primary state. All of its delegates are awarded to the candidate with a plurality lead after the election. The other two candidates get bupkes. The Republican rules for primary elections are distinctly not democratic.

One more reason why I've been a Democrat all my adult life. The Democratic Party works hard to be fair and democratic.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Democratic Primaries are More Democratic... (Original Post) MineralMan Apr 2016 OP
In a way true but super delegates can easily take away voters intentions and yeoman6987 Apr 2016 #1
The Democratic Party instituted super delegates well before the Republican Party and tried to do so merrily Apr 2016 #4
I totally believe you. I just think super delegates should be used at the yeoman6987 Apr 2016 #5
And I don't think super delegates should be used at all, ever. merrily Apr 2016 #9
I don't count superdelegates at all when MineralMan Apr 2016 #10
Super Delegates are the opposite of democratic. So is using a system modeled on the electoral merrily Apr 2016 #2
Well, except for the superdelegates, who can just declare for whoever they want, djean111 Apr 2016 #3
As you will see in July, the superdelegates will ratify the MineralMan Apr 2016 #7
Then why have them at all? merrily Apr 2016 #11
Because not all conventions have to select from just two candidates. MineralMan Apr 2016 #13
Not a good reason. At a convention, the majority or plurality of pledged delegates can decide. merrily Apr 2016 #15
Get Bernie a majority of pledged delegates, MineralMan Apr 2016 #16
Look how fast the subject changed from why have super delegates at all, if YOUR post is true, to merrily Apr 2016 #17
I wish I could believe that, I really really do. n/t djean111 Apr 2016 #12
You'll believe it at the end of the convention. MineralMan Apr 2016 #14
"The Democratic Party works hard to be fair and democratic"... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #6
Some clarification here: k8conant Apr 2016 #8
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. In a way true but super delegates can easily take away voters intentions and
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:12 PM
Apr 2016

Choice of candidate. I think the entire primary process needs an overhaul for both parties.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
4. The Democratic Party instituted super delegates well before the Republican Party and tried to do so
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:16 PM
Apr 2016

well before the Democratic Party succeeded in instituting Super Delegates. Before that, it was Party bosses/leaders.

If you don't believe me, look at the candidate selection process in 1952, when Kefauver won, IIRC, every single primary that was held at the time, but Truman and party bosses, some of them with mafia contacts--the reason they were ticked at Kefauver to begin with--chose Stevenson at the convention anyway.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
5. I totally believe you. I just think super delegates should be used at the
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:19 PM
Apr 2016

Convention and not in totals during primary season.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. And I don't think super delegates should be used at all, ever.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:23 PM
Apr 2016

Thanks to my vote and my tax dollars, they got a job with power and a good salary and even better benefits. Why my vote and tax dollars should also "earn" them more voting power than I have is a mystery to me, especially as a member of something that calls itself the Democratic Party, rather than calling itself the Plutocratic Party.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
10. I don't count superdelegates at all when
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:23 PM
Apr 2016

watching delegate counts. In a two candidate election, it is the pledged delegate count that will determine the winner. The superdelegates will vote in a way to ratify that majority.

Their role is to prevent the convention from stalling if there are more than two candidates. That is not the case this year. One of the two will have a majority of pledged delegates and the superdelegates will negate that majority. They simply will not.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
2. Super Delegates are the opposite of democratic. So is using a system modeled on the electoral
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:13 PM
Apr 2016

college, which people have been trying so hard to eliminate. I understand the latter a bit more because it's used in the general. But there is no reason people cannot look at a popular vote in a primary in a given state and draw conclusions about how that state would go in the general.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. Well, except for the superdelegates, who can just declare for whoever they want,
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:15 PM
Apr 2016

no matter what the common voters want. As DWS says, they are there to protect establishment candidates from those unwashed grassroots types. Not very Democratic, no matter how many times we are told well, that's just the way it is, so STFU.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
7. As you will see in July, the superdelegates will ratify the
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:20 PM
Apr 2016

winner of the majority of pledged delegates. They will not swing the election to the loser. It will not happen.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
13. Because not all conventions have to select from just two candidates.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:30 PM
Apr 2016

If there were three candidates this year, there would be fair chance that none of them would have a majority of pledged delegates. In that situation, the superdelegates might be the deciding factor. In a two-person race, they are not needed, and will act to confirm the majority of pledged delegates. There might be a few who do not vote for the candidate with the majority, but very few.

This convention will be decided on the first ballot. The pledged delegate count will be known and the holder of the majority of those pledged delegates will be elected as the nominee. Count on it.

If I'm wrong, I'll eat my crow pie, but I won't be wrong.

The superdelegates' job is to deal with a convention where there is no majority for one of the candidates. This year, that's impossible. They will act accordingly, I guarantee.

You want Bernie as the nominee? Get him a majority of pledged delegates. If he does, he'll be the nominee. If he doesn't, he won't.

It's up to the voters and his campaign to achieve that majority of pledged delegates. Can he do it? Well, it seems unlikely, but isn't impossible. His supporters need to keep working hard to help him.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
15. Not a good reason. At a convention, the majority or plurality of pledged delegates can decide.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:34 PM
Apr 2016
The superdelegates' job is to deal with a convention where there is no majority for one of the candidates.


Um, no clue where you are getting that whitewashed reason. That is not why the institution of super delegates was created and that is not what DWS recently described as their job.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
16. Get Bernie a majority of pledged delegates,
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:37 PM
Apr 2016

and you'll see that I'm correct. If Hillary ends up with a majority of pledged delegates, though, she will be the nominee.

If you want to see Bernie Sanders in the general election, get him a majority of pledged delegates. That's the only way it will happen. Nothing else will do it. Can you make that happen? If so, keep working on supporting him.

NOTHING ELSE MATTERS! If he fails to get that majority, he won't be on the GE ballot.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
17. Look how fast the subject changed from why have super delegates at all, if YOUR post is true, to
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 01:02 PM
Apr 2016

to what I should do to keep Bernie from losing to Hillary. LOL!


Thank goodness my ADD does distract me 100% of the time.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
14. You'll believe it at the end of the convention.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:33 PM
Apr 2016

I talked to my House representative, who is a strong Clinton supporter. I asked her what she'd do if Bernie ended up with a majority of pledged delegates. Her answer: "I'd vote for Sanders in that situation."

So would almost all of the other superdelegates. They're good people. Some support Hillary, but they all support the democratic process. They will do the right thing. Again, there may be a few who vote otherwise, but not enough to change the outcome.

The candidate with the majority of pledged delegates will be the nominee. Bank on it.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
6. "The Democratic Party works hard to be fair and democratic"...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:19 PM
Apr 2016

Super delegates

Debates

Open / Closed Primary vs Caucus

"idea that all people should be treated equally" or "​believes in, ​encourages, or ​supports ​freedom and ​equality between ​people and ​groups"

Is the current election cycle 'working hard to be fair and democratic'?

facts would belie your premise

k8conant

(3,030 posts)
8. Some clarification here:
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:21 PM
Apr 2016

1) Democratic Party has super delegates. How is that fair and democratic? Of course, the recent rule changes are somewhat different from the way things were when the conventions were nominating conventions and Hubert Humphrey got nominated without even winning any of the then-existing primaries. (Too bad for the guy I campaigned for--Eugene McCarthy) So I can't say the system was why I've been a Democrat all my adult life (it was the platform--which unfortunately has not kept pace)

2) For the Elephants:
http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/govt-and-politics/explaining-the-delegate-breakdown-in-wisconsin-s-presidential-primary/article_63c69d1d-37e3-5bb7-bb0c-8362fe8526a0.html

In the Republican primary there are three kinds of delegates. Wisconsin has 42 delegates. Delegate selection is a “winner-take-all” system, both by district and statewide.

The breakdown: 42 total delegates: 24 from Wisconsin's eight Congressional Districts; 10 base at-large; five bonus; three party

1. Congressional District delegates: Delegates are selected by the party in the Congressional Districts they represent and must reside there. Each of the state's eight Congressional Districts is allocated three delegates.

2. At-large delegates: Delegates that are selected statewide. Each state gets 10 delegates and the RNC awards bonus delegates in states that meet certain criteria, including whether it has a Republican governor, Republican U.S. Senator and a Republican majority in the state Legislature.

3. Republican National Committee delegates: Each state’s three RNC members, including the state chair, national committeeman and national committeewoman are automatically national convention delegates.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Democratic Primaries ...