2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWaPo: Evidence Suggests Hillary's Email Monitored By Asian Govt
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/04/04/was-an-asian-government-reading-hillary-clintons-emails-in-february-2009/
Was an Asian government reading Hillary Clintons emails in February 2009?
By Stewart Baker April 4 at 6:22 AM
Two questions are raised by this timing: First, why didnt the server have encryption from the start? And second, why did it get encryption in March, at a time when Clinton should have been extraordinarily busy getting up to speed at State, not messing with computer security protocols?
The simplest answer to the first question is that the lack of a certificate was just a mistake. But what about the second? What inspired the Secretary to get an encryption certificate in March when her team hadnt bothered to get one in January or February?
The likely answer to that question is pretty troubling. There now seems to be a very real probability that Hillary Clinton rushed to install an encryption certificate in March 2009 because the U.S. intelligence community caught another country reading Clintons unencrypted messages during her February 16-21, 2009, trip to China, Indonesia, Japan, and S. Korea.
revbones
(3,660 posts)and she rushed to get the certificate while still not notifying people she was running an off-books email server then it's obvious she was knowingly and blatantly breaking the law.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)....the presumption that the same server was being used by Bill for foundation business prior to Hillary using it for State business?
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Thanks.
Response to grasswire (Reply #3)
Chasstev365 This message was self-deleted by its author.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)And reconsider your statement.
The op is berni mcoy its easy to co fuse but grasswire meant berni not bernie
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)I am puzzled at why Hillary Clinton is not awaiting a bail hearing right now.
dchill
(38,441 posts)It's what you know about them.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)I have to admit, at first I ignored this story. I was kind of like-minded with Bernie when he said, "who cares about her damned e-mails!"
But as time goes by, it just seems so bizarre - so STUPID - to have allowed the communications of the Secretary of State of the US to be conducted on a private server with questionable, and perhaps non-existent, anti-hacker security protections.
What the HELL were they thinking???? Was this really all about Hillary's obsessive need for secrecy???
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)The Clintons are known for being the least transparent.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)And Despite being warned.
Gross negligence is starting to seem a bit kind.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)in full awareness or consciousness; deliberately.
"when a journalist knowingly misleads the readers"
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and in particular 4 caught my eye... they were in the earliest release trove, and SHOULD HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED, which they later were. When I read them, hubby did as well. We both were quite incredulous that we had just downloaded what should not have been released for 20 to 25 years. That is when I started paying very close attention.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Those were snatched back real quick but it was to late.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)my history training said Warning WILL ROBINSON, Warning.
Alas, due to what hubby used to do, we had to sit on them. At this point there is enough in media I could quite possibly start to cover the issue. Right now, for real, working on a time line of this mess.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)It read like a NSA report because it actually was lol
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)by one ignorant poster.
amborin
(16,631 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 5, 2016, 01:43 PM - Edit history (1)
There was probably Chinese intercepts and some others the whole time going back to 2009. Maybe that was intentional. The only question is who was playing whom?
grasswire
(50,130 posts)....Hillary was warned that her communications had been compromised on her Asia trip.
dchill
(38,441 posts)Skink
(10,122 posts)And I was looking forward to the debate.
MattP
(3,304 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)why didn't they intervene then??? Surely if this really happened they told the President and the FBI and NSA?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)And sent the "be careful" warning out to everyone, which would have gotten the encryption stuff going on the "private" server.
Not many people pay attention to email addresses - they look at the names/aliases. It's just how our brain processes information. Or the low level people might not have mentioned it because they assumed their bosses already knew about it.
New regime, lots of work trying to get everyone up to speed, lots of chaos, everyone busy, and some Asian government hacked the system...get cracking, folks!
Plausible? Who knows?
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)She keeps saying it is.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)"won't someone please think of the children" something something something "$hypocritical_statement XOR $lie".
Modus operandi.