Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:31 AM Apr 2016

"Until they release full returns, this exercise is more about politics than real transparency,”

Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:16 AM - Edit history (1)

Is this kind of statement indicative of people holding politicians accountable on transparency and disclosure, or is it just something David Brock invented so he could attack Bernie Sanders?

I'd like to see where the DU community stands on whether the demand for transparency in tax returns is legit and should be/already is expected of all candidates for President, or something that has been ginned up conveniently this past week to support the Clinton campaign.






Post title is a direct quote from an article criticizing Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz for a similar lack of full disclosure:

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/marco-rubio-tax-returns-219905


64 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Real transparency is full transparency, partial transparency is not good enough
23 (36%)
Fake issue invented by David Brock and Blue Nation Review hacks to attack Bernie
41 (64%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Until they release full returns, this exercise is more about politics than real transparency,” (Original Post) geek tragedy Apr 2016 OP
It's been the standard for a while now. n/t Lucinda Apr 2016 #1
that is my understanding. But apparently Sanders supporters here disagree and think geek tragedy Apr 2016 #2
Well we do have a lot of brand spankin new Dems this cycle, so maybe Lucinda Apr 2016 #3
Asdf geek tragedy Apr 2016 #15
KICK! Cha Apr 2016 #4
Same goes for speech transcripts. Let's see them. nichomachus Apr 2016 #5
I don't think he wants people to see how much he made Perogie Apr 2016 #6
If he has nothing to hide .... nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #10
Your subject line is perfect. Then you went and spoiled it with a CT. Sad. BlueCaliDem Apr 2016 #28
I don't think he wants people to see how much money he has invested in fracking CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #47
You got proof of that? Perogie Apr 2016 #49
Release the Wall Street speeches transcripts. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #7
non sequitur nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #9
yet germane. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #11
In that it shows hypocrisy on his part, yes nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #12
Not at all. I believe she set the standard for response times. We are still waiting, and waiting.. silvershadow Apr 2016 #13
She has already provided full disclosure of her taxes geek tragedy Apr 2016 #14
Oh I meant the transcripts. The tax thing is a red herring. Nice try to deflect. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #16
No, actually the tax disclosure is expected of all serious candidates geek tragedy Apr 2016 #17
I know. But your making it an issue is a red herring, meant to deflect. Every time taxes are silvershadow Apr 2016 #18
so you admit the transcripts thing is just a stunt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #19
No I don't admit anything you assert. I admit Hillary isn't much of a candidate to my party. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #21
She is to my party. I'm a Democrat nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #22
If you support her, you are Third Way, whether or not you know it. I'm talking about the Democratic silvershadow Apr 2016 #24
Spare me the sanctimony. Not everyone who supports Clinton is third way. nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #40
Her promise to release the transcripts as soon as she found the custodian WAS a stunt. silvershadow Apr 2016 #23
It's fake, just like the "transcripts" crap Recursion Apr 2016 #8
Bernie's only released his 2014 IRS summary (two pages) while Hillary's released her full IRS filing BlueCaliDem Apr 2016 #29
#Nailedit Agschmid Apr 2016 #35
Don't think either tax returns or speech transcripts are necessarily germane... Chichiri Apr 2016 #20
Filing date for 2015 isn't even here yet. silverweb Apr 2016 #25
Filing dates for 2008-2014 have already expired. nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #42
So? silverweb Apr 2016 #51
So he's delaying the release until after the NY primary? nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #54
Lame. silverweb Apr 2016 #56
Thanks to a Poster (thank you, amborin!) pugetres Apr 2016 #26
So you believe that Bernie is hiding his incredible success in...what? Is he hiding money? Is he BlueCaliDem Apr 2016 #32
I believe that the Clintons were not transparent pugetres Apr 2016 #33
And I believe Bernie Sanders isn't being transparent - which raises the trustworthy issue. BlueCaliDem Apr 2016 #55
So Bernie is hiding something like that? nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #41
Laughingly pathetic, nt artislife Apr 2016 #27
Didn't we demand Mitt Romney's full tax returns four years ago? radical noodle Apr 2016 #30
#NotUsThem SaschaHM Apr 2016 #34
But a bird landed on his podium !!! /sarcasm uponit7771 Apr 2016 #38
David Brock is a hack....Clinton never released her... pantsonfire Apr 2016 #31
the tax returns for the Clintons DO show DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #43
source? n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #48
44 pages DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #50
The candidates are required to release their tax returns, nothing new here. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #36
Taxes and transcripts should be released by all candidates (nt) bigwillq Apr 2016 #37
I would hope Hillary supporters have enough imagination to come up with a new smear du jour. Vinca Apr 2016 #39
Well... Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #45
No one is asking DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #44
Indeed, it draws more attention to withhold the returns, because it's so standard at this point. CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #46
I think all this will prove pandr32 Apr 2016 #52
Sanders supporters don't care about transparency, they just care about attacking Hillary geek tragedy Apr 2016 #53
I know! It is a head scratcher--a huge unreasonable problem. pandr32 Apr 2016 #57
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. that is my understanding. But apparently Sanders supporters here disagree and think
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:41 AM
Apr 2016

this is some kind of Swiftboating

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
3. Well we do have a lot of brand spankin new Dems this cycle, so maybe
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

they are just uninformed? Dem politics are messy, but until this cycle, fairly straightforward. Lately, everything is a conspiracy.

Perogie

(687 posts)
6. I don't think he wants people to see how much he made
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:08 AM
Apr 2016

doing all those Goldman Sachs speeches....oh wait, that wasn't him. Never mind.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
47. I don't think he wants people to see how much money he has invested in fracking
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 09:21 AM
Apr 2016

because that would reveal him as the giant hypocrite that he really is. Not only did he violate the Greenpeace pledge, but his retirement is based on fracking doing well and delivering him fat dividends!

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
13. Not at all. I believe she set the standard for response times. We are still waiting, and waiting..
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:28 AM
Apr 2016
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. She has already provided full disclosure of her taxes
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:29 AM
Apr 2016

his turn to put up or, at long last, shut up

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
18. I know. But your making it an issue is a red herring, meant to deflect. Every time taxes are
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:34 AM
Apr 2016

brought up, I'm going to call attention to the transcripts. Hillary will have to exit the national stage with broken fingernails and DNA under them if she really wants this.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
21. No I don't admit anything you assert. I admit Hillary isn't much of a candidate to my party. nt
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:38 AM
Apr 2016
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
24. If you support her, you are Third Way, whether or not you know it. I'm talking about the Democratic
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:41 AM
Apr 2016

party of my youth. I'm and FDR Democrat all the way, pro-labor too.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
23. Her promise to release the transcripts as soon as she found the custodian WAS a stunt.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:40 AM
Apr 2016

She knew she was the sole custodian when she said it.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. It's fake, just like the "transcripts" crap
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:12 AM
Apr 2016

Nobody actually cares what focus-grouped pablum Clinton told a bunch of bored bankers, nor how much Sanders paid in Federal income tax. It gives people something to feel indignant about, though, so it's not going away any time soon.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
29. Bernie's only released his 2014 IRS summary (two pages) while Hillary's released her full IRS filing
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:33 AM
Apr 2016

for that same year and thirteen more years before that. Presidential candidates since FDR have released their full tax filings or they risk conjuring distrust among the people. Have a look at the link below.

http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument

Also, some sage advice, don't demand stuff that is unprecedented from your opponent in order to make that opponent appear untrustworthy while disingenuously hiding your Federal tax filing - which does have precedence - as best you can so...so...so why, exactly? What reason could he possibly have to hide his full and complete tax filings from his employers (voters)?

What is he hiding? #ReleaseTheReturns

Chichiri

(4,667 posts)
20. Don't think either tax returns or speech transcripts are necessarily germane...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:38 AM
Apr 2016

...to one's ability to perform the duties of President.

Health records, on the other hand . . .

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
25. Filing date for 2015 isn't even here yet.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:42 AM
Apr 2016

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Demand for tax returns not even due to be filed with the IRS yet are not about "transparency," but just another crazy, manufactured line of bull.



silverweb

(16,402 posts)
51. So?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:06 AM
Apr 2016

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Why not be patient for a couple of weeks, after which the whole enchilada can be available in one release? This is just another manufactured tempest in a teapot simply to make noise.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
56. Lame.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:01 PM
Apr 2016

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Now I know why I stay out of this forum and these silly nitpicking fights. Adios.

 

pugetres

(507 posts)
26. Thanks to a Poster (thank you, amborin!)
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:06 AM
Apr 2016

on another thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511642278

In 1992, during Bill Clinton's first run for office, the Clintons declined to release all of their tax returns because, it turned out, a few of the returns showed Hillary Clinton's incredible success in commodities trading when Bill Clinton was attorney general and then governor of Arkansas.

She made almost $100,000 from an initial investment of $1,000 in a matter of months — a return of 10,000% — under the guidance of a lawyer who was also outside counsel to Tyson Foods Inc., Arkansas' largest employer. The returns weren't made public until 1994.
- http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/clintons-absymal-record-on-open-government-b99696012z1-374014501.html?platform=hootsuite

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
32. So you believe that Bernie is hiding his incredible success in...what? Is he hiding money? Is he
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:39 AM
Apr 2016

offshoring money to Caribbean charities under other people's names? Or is wife, Jane, doing something that isn't on par with the carefully crafted image of "every day man" they've been promoting? Maybe those returns will finally show where Bernie got the $1 million he wrote a check for at the beginning of his campaign? Or are they afraid that his tax returns - his FULL and COMPLETE tax returns - might show that Bernie nor Jane are as poor as they've been trying to propagate?

#ReleaseTheReturns!

By the way? Bill Clinton isn't running for president. Hillary is. So nice try, but no dice.

And Hillary has released all her IRS full filings from 2000 through 2014 - that's fourteen years compared to Bernie's ONE, and his is only a summary of TWO PAGES.

Read for yourself: http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument

 

pugetres

(507 posts)
33. I believe that the Clintons were not transparent
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:54 AM
Apr 2016

and hid certain tax returns when he first ran for president. It took them two years to fully disclose their tax returns. I believe that he will release the schedules that go along with his 1040s that he has been releasing every year since he has been in office and that it won't take two years.

By the way, Jane Sanders isn't running for president. Bernie is. So nice try, but no dice.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
55. And I believe Bernie Sanders isn't being transparent - which raises the trustworthy issue.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:37 AM
Apr 2016

If you demand that your rival release transcripts for private speeches (that aren't hers to release to begin with but he knows that and he knows YOU don't), then at least release your full and complete tax filings, which are in your power to do so and what's been tradition, Otherwise, you lose credibility.

Then again, with the shoddy book keeping Bernie's campaign has shown so far, I'm highly interested in those past filings. I mean, his campaign received not one but TWO letters of notice from the FEC regarding illegal donations to his campaign. His campaign treasurer doesn't appear to know what she's doing.

How many FEC letters has Hillary Clinton received? ZERO.

President Obama had released his tax filings when he first ran, right off bat, and continues to do so. Since he was a Senator in the U.S. Congress, it was the least he could do so that we'd know how he'd be as president.

Bernie has released only his IRS 1040 form (just a summary) with a promise to release more later and then he turned around and changed that excuse to only willing to release more if Hillary accepts the dates HE want for debates to again change his mind and finally said, "my wife does our taxes". So? Didn't he sign those past filings, too?

By the way, Jane Sanders isn't running for president. Bernie is. So nice try, but no dice.


When you bring up President Bill Clinton first in order to deflect an uncomfortable truth, expect turnabout being fair play.

radical noodle

(9,662 posts)
30. Didn't we demand Mitt Romney's full tax returns four years ago?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:35 AM
Apr 2016

This is always basic. Not holding Bernie to any different standard than anyone else.

 

pantsonfire

(1,306 posts)
31. David Brock is a hack....Clinton never released her...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:36 AM
Apr 2016

...tax returns for her company ZFS Holdings, which funneled the money she received from her book profits and speaking fees.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
36. The candidates are required to release their tax returns, nothing new here.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:09 AM
Apr 2016

There is not a law requiring a candidate to release speeches nor the conversations with lobbyists.

Vinca

(51,776 posts)
39. I would hope Hillary supporters have enough imagination to come up with a new smear du jour.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:13 AM
Apr 2016

Like ghetto-gate and a myriad of others, this one has worn out its punch.

DemonGoddess

(5,126 posts)
44. No one is asking
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:33 AM
Apr 2016

for anything that every other candidate except for Trump has provided. Releasing the full documents is something they all do, each cycle, with very few exceptions.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
46. Indeed, it draws more attention to withhold the returns, because it's so standard at this point.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 09:17 AM
Apr 2016

Maybe Bernie Panders thought he'd just get to run for President under a different set of rules than everyone who has run before? Talk about entitlement. Living up in his safe seat in Vermont, having hordes of white progressives blow smoke up his rear end for 20-odd years, has made Panders start buying his own hype.

Meanwhile, here in the real world, the same rules apply to all candidates, even Progressive Jesus.

pandr32

(12,753 posts)
52. I think all this will prove
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:11 AM
Apr 2016

...is that DU has been over-run by Sanders supporters who will take any position that favors their candidate.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
53. Sanders supporters don't care about transparency, they just care about attacking Hillary
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:15 AM
Apr 2016

They think it's unfair that Bernie Sanders is held to the same standard as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Until they release ...