2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Until they release full returns, this exercise is more about politics than real transparency,”
Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:16 AM - Edit history (1)
Is this kind of statement indicative of people holding politicians accountable on transparency and disclosure, or is it just something David Brock invented so he could attack Bernie Sanders?
I'd like to see where the DU community stands on whether the demand for transparency in tax returns is legit and should be/already is expected of all candidates for President, or something that has been ginned up conveniently this past week to support the Clinton campaign.
Post title is a direct quote from an article criticizing Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz for a similar lack of full disclosure:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/marco-rubio-tax-returns-219905
64 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Real transparency is full transparency, partial transparency is not good enough | |
23 (36%) |
|
Fake issue invented by David Brock and Blue Nation Review hacks to attack Bernie | |
41 (64%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |

Lucinda
(31,170 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)this is some kind of Swiftboating
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)they are just uninformed? Dem politics are messy, but until this cycle, fairly straightforward. Lately, everything is a conspiracy.
Cha
(308,741 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Or else there's no transparency.
Perogie
(687 posts)doing all those Goldman Sachs speeches....oh wait, that wasn't him. Never mind.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)because that would reveal him as the giant hypocrite that he really is. Not only did he violate the Greenpeace pledge, but his retirement is based on fracking doing well and delivering him fat dividends!
Perogie
(687 posts)I got proof Hillary is a Hypocrite.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)his turn to put up or, at long last, shut up
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Not just Bernie.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)brought up, I'm going to call attention to the transcripts. Hillary will have to exit the national stage with broken fingernails and DNA under them if she really wants this.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)party of my youth. I'm and FDR Democrat all the way, pro-labor too.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)She knew she was the sole custodian when she said it.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Nobody actually cares what focus-grouped pablum Clinton told a bunch of bored bankers, nor how much Sanders paid in Federal income tax. It gives people something to feel indignant about, though, so it's not going away any time soon.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)for that same year and thirteen more years before that. Presidential candidates since FDR have released their full tax filings or they risk conjuring distrust among the people. Have a look at the link below.
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument
Also, some sage advice, don't demand stuff that is unprecedented from your opponent in order to make that opponent appear untrustworthy while disingenuously hiding your Federal tax filing - which does have precedence - as best you can so...so...so why, exactly? What reason could he possibly have to hide his full and complete tax filings from his employers (voters)?
What is he hiding? #ReleaseTheReturns
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)...to one's ability to perform the duties of President.
Health records, on the other hand . . .
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Demand for tax returns not even due to be filed with the IRS yet are not about "transparency," but just another crazy, manufactured line of bull.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Why not be patient for a couple of weeks, after which the whole enchilada can be available in one release? This is just another manufactured tempest in a teapot simply to make noise.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Now I know why I stay out of this forum and these silly nitpicking fights. Adios.
pugetres
(507 posts)on another thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511642278
She made almost $100,000 from an initial investment of $1,000 in a matter of months a return of 10,000% under the guidance of a lawyer who was also outside counsel to Tyson Foods Inc., Arkansas' largest employer. The returns weren't made public until 1994.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)offshoring money to Caribbean charities under other people's names? Or is wife, Jane, doing something that isn't on par with the carefully crafted image of "every day man" they've been promoting? Maybe those returns will finally show where Bernie got the $1 million he wrote a check for at the beginning of his campaign? Or are they afraid that his tax returns - his FULL and COMPLETE tax returns - might show that Bernie nor Jane are as poor as they've been trying to propagate?
#ReleaseTheReturns!
By the way? Bill Clinton isn't running for president. Hillary is. So nice try, but no dice.
And Hillary has released all her IRS full filings from 2000 through 2014 - that's fourteen years compared to Bernie's ONE, and his is only a summary of TWO PAGES.
Read for yourself: http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument
pugetres
(507 posts)and hid certain tax returns when he first ran for president. It took them two years to fully disclose their tax returns. I believe that he will release the schedules that go along with his 1040s that he has been releasing every year since he has been in office and that it won't take two years.
By the way, Jane Sanders isn't running for president. Bernie is. So nice try, but no dice.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)If you demand that your rival release transcripts for private speeches (that aren't hers to release to begin with but he knows that and he knows YOU don't), then at least release your full and complete tax filings, which are in your power to do so and what's been tradition, Otherwise, you lose credibility.
Then again, with the shoddy book keeping Bernie's campaign has shown so far, I'm highly interested in those past filings. I mean, his campaign received not one but TWO letters of notice from the FEC regarding illegal donations to his campaign. His campaign treasurer doesn't appear to know what she's doing.
How many FEC letters has Hillary Clinton received? ZERO.
President Obama had released his tax filings when he first ran, right off bat, and continues to do so. Since he was a Senator in the U.S. Congress, it was the least he could do so that we'd know how he'd be as president.
Bernie has released only his IRS 1040 form (just a summary) with a promise to release more later and then he turned around and changed that excuse to only willing to release more if Hillary accepts the dates HE want for debates to again change his mind and finally said, "my wife does our taxes". So? Didn't he sign those past filings, too?
By the way, Jane Sanders isn't running for president. Bernie is. So nice try, but no dice.
When you bring up President Bill Clinton first in order to deflect an uncomfortable truth, expect turnabout being fair play.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)radical noodle
(9,662 posts)This is always basic. Not holding Bernie to any different standard than anyone else.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)uponit7771
(92,586 posts)pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)...tax returns for her company ZFS Holdings, which funneled the money she received from her book profits and speaking fees.
DemonGoddess
(5,126 posts)what was earned from ZFS Holdings, and taxes paid.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)DemonGoddess
(5,126 posts)Okay, how the hell do I get this to show the entire link so it's clickable?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)There is not a law requiring a candidate to release speeches nor the conversations with lobbyists.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Vinca
(51,776 posts)Like ghetto-gate and a myriad of others, this one has worn out its punch.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)>Hillary supporters
>imagination
Pick one.
DemonGoddess
(5,126 posts)for anything that every other candidate except for Trump has provided. Releasing the full documents is something they all do, each cycle, with very few exceptions.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Maybe Bernie Panders thought he'd just get to run for President under a different set of rules than everyone who has run before? Talk about entitlement. Living up in his safe seat in Vermont, having hordes of white progressives blow smoke up his rear end for 20-odd years, has made Panders start buying his own hype.
Meanwhile, here in the real world, the same rules apply to all candidates, even Progressive Jesus.
pandr32
(12,753 posts)...is that DU has been over-run by Sanders supporters who will take any position that favors their candidate.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)They think it's unfair that Bernie Sanders is held to the same standard as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
pandr32
(12,753 posts)