WP: "The idea that Bernie Sanders has been too negative to debate Hillary Clinton is ridiculous"

[Attorney in Texas]

Link to Washington Post article "The idea that Bernie Sanders has been too negative to debate Hillary Clinton is ridiculous"; excerpt:

Asked about the possibility of a New York debate between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders before the Empire State primary on April 19, Clinton pollster Joel Benenson said this on CNN Monday:

Senator Sanders doesn't get to decide when we debate, particularly when he's running a negative campaign. Let's see if he goes back to the kind of tone he said he was going to set early on. If he does that, then we'll talk about debates.

Er, okay. Negativity is, to some extent, in the eye of the beholder. But, it's very hard for me to see the campaign that Sanders has run fits the into the "negative" category. ... The closest thing I could find to a traditional negative ad from Sanders was this one that hits Wall Street for its campaign contributions and speaking fees, and, by association, Clinton.

This one, in which Sanders lays out "two visions" for dealing with the economic inequality, is also kind-of, sort-of negative. But not really.

Ads aside, Sanders has totally avoided talking about Clinton's private email server and the FBI and State Department investigations into it — insisting that "no one cares about your damn emails" even while polling suggests lots of people do.

In a genuinely negative or nasty campaign, Sanders would have spent most days this year slamming Clinton as dishonest and untrustworthy for her initial decision to set up the private email and for her subsequent insistence that the server never needed to be turned over to a third party investigator. He could be saying that Clinton represents too big a risk for Democrats to nominate because of the investigations looming over her.

Sanders has done none of that. But, he doesn't tell people not to boo Clinton at his events! THE HORROR! WHY SO NEGATIVE!!!

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

1. K & R

[pdsimdars]

2. A couple of points

(1) They make sh*t up.

(2) Usually conservatives accuse the other side of doing what they themselves are, in fact, doing.

[Jarqui]

5. "Usually conservatives accuse the other side of doing what they themselves are, in fact, doing."

Hillary did that in 2008. It's the old playbook.

[Chasstev365]

3. Classic Rovian Tactic

Accuse your opponent of what you are guilty of doing. David Brock is so transparent.

[shadowandblossom]

4. I really disliked the tone of that interview the writer is talking about.

.

[Chasstev365]

7. Good One!

[Segami]

6. Kick..

[NWCorona]

8. Thanks!

[stillwaiting]

9. It's a shitty and disgusting political calculation. HRC tends to make decisions like this often. nt

[Attorney in Texas]

10. True.