HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » President Obama: Please E...

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:08 AM

 

President Obama: Please Endorse Hillary Already

Mr. President, do you want your legacy to be nominating the next George McGovern? The only reason Bernie looks good in polls against Trump is because people who don't follow politics (yet still vote) don't know who he is. Once they did, his self-declared socialism would elect The Donald, either directly, or send Bloomberg into the race if Bernie is the nominee, or drive Hillary too far to the left to get elected. He is dividing our party and sowing needless dissent.

Now is when Hillary should be pivoting for the GE and starting to fight Trump.

Now is the time to do what you should've done with OWS and some of the campus protesters, to have a Sister Souljah moment, and call out the crazies on our side, as not only does the GOP have them (mass-deporters, ammosexuals, etc.).

Unlike Bernie, Hillary embraced your legacy. Bernie and his fans think you're not liberal enough.
PLEASE Mr. President, for the good of America and the Party, endorse Hillary now.







98 replies, 10189 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 98 replies Author Time Post
Reply President Obama: Please Endorse Hillary Already (Original post)
ericson00 Mar 2016 OP
ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2016 #1
TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #29
Trenzalore Mar 2016 #33
JackRiddler Mar 2016 #50
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #64
Chan790 Mar 2016 #75
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #78
Kittycat Mar 2016 #90
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #91
Kittycat Mar 2016 #97
beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #2
ericson00 Mar 2016 #4
ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2016 #5
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #38
John Poet Mar 2016 #80
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #81
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #92
Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #94
AZ Progressive Mar 2016 #6
beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #8
The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #77
NWCorona Mar 2016 #10
AZ Progressive Mar 2016 #15
libtodeath Mar 2016 #42
Armstead Mar 2016 #44
Logical Mar 2016 #51
Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #55
Docreed2003 Mar 2016 #83
beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #85
John Poet Mar 2016 #79
Ken Burch Mar 2016 #89
hobbit709 Mar 2016 #96
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #65
beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #84
Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #87
Fairgo Mar 2016 #3
beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #14
Segami Mar 2016 #25
Mnpaul Mar 2016 #35
bvf Mar 2016 #56
femmedem Mar 2016 #71
ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2016 #7
jfern Mar 2016 #9
AZ Progressive Mar 2016 #11
strategery blunder Mar 2016 #21
Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #59
TDale313 Mar 2016 #12
JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #13
JI7 Mar 2016 #16
RepubliCON-Watch Mar 2016 #17
JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #18
Armstead Mar 2016 #45
Fumesucker Mar 2016 #19
JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #23
delrem Mar 2016 #20
JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #22
Kalidurga Mar 2016 #24
jillan Mar 2016 #26
John Poet Mar 2016 #27
Armstead Mar 2016 #46
davidpdx Mar 2016 #28
Hortensis Mar 2016 #58
davidpdx Mar 2016 #86
Hortensis Mar 2016 #93
stone space Mar 2016 #30
akbacchus_BC Mar 2016 #31
Mponti Mar 2016 #32
EdwardBernays Mar 2016 #34
morningfog Mar 2016 #36
Logical Mar 2016 #37
Vinca Mar 2016 #39
Karma13612 Mar 2016 #40
Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #41
Armstead Mar 2016 #43
Gwhittey Mar 2016 #47
ibegurpard Mar 2016 #48
cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #49
aikoaiko Mar 2016 #52
HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #53
Barack_America Mar 2016 #82
femmedem Mar 2016 #54
bvf Mar 2016 #57
nolabels Mar 2016 #62
1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #60
Recursion Mar 2016 #61
democrattotheend Mar 2016 #73
Sky Masterson Mar 2016 #63
CrispyQ Mar 2016 #66
ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #67
lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #68
bvf Mar 2016 #70
Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #69
timmymoff Mar 2016 #72
Jackilope Mar 2016 #74
Arkana Mar 2016 #76
Ken Burch Mar 2016 #88
hobbit709 Mar 2016 #95
gollygee Mar 2016 #98

Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:12 AM

1. HAHAHAHA

They're panicking!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:00 AM

29. McGovern lost because his VP pick underwent electroshock for Bipolar and still suffered from it!

.


Back then it wasn't known as bipolar, but was later revealed to be diagnosed as such.

McGovern downplayed it, and then called a heckler an ass days before the election.


Nixon and his surrogates went to town on McGovern, calling him crazy!


But, the OP writer is spinning reality the way they want it.



.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheBlackAdder (Reply #29)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:42 AM

33. There were more reasons for the loss than just this. nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheBlackAdder (Reply #29)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:50 AM

50. No. McGovern lost because Nixon.

 

Period! No one was going to beat Nixon in 1972.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:14 AM

64. I think Obama is going to pull a Warren on Clinton: sit this one out

 

at least until the primaries are over, just like Warren did with Sanders in Massachusetts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #64)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:11 AM

75. Which is the proper course of action.

 

A President should never endorse a candidate of the same party in the primaries to replace him...it creates terrible optics for the eventual candidate in the GE and hands the opposition a free wack if the endorsed candidate doesn't win the nomination.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Chan790 (Reply #75)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:54 AM

78. Couldn't agree more with you.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #64)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:13 AM

90. Which would be the Presidential thing to do.

Especially given his 2008 platform message

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kittycat (Reply #90)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:18 AM

91. I'm fine with that.

 

It's the desperate calls for him to abandon that stance that seem clueless and out of place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #91)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:18 AM

97. I agree.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:12 AM

2. Not this shit again.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:13 AM

4. someone who praised Fidel Castro during the Cold War and hasn't apologized is morally unfit

 

to be President.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:14 AM

5. What about someone who praises Kissinger?

Get bent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ForgoTheConsequence (Reply #5)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:37 AM

38. Mic. Fucking. Drop.

 

Castro isn't nearly as much of a monster as more than a few Americans that Hillary's tight with.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #38)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:56 AM

80. INDEED!

 

Hillary loves her some war criminals...

Calls some of them 'family' even.






Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to John Poet (Reply #80)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:57 AM

81. You are known by the company you keep.

 

Some of Hillary's doesn't reflect well on her, and that's a big problem for me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #81)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:20 AM

92. Let's not forget her praise for Nancy Reagan's "silent AIDS activism"

 

(may the b*tch rot in Hell for her deliberate silence!)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #92)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:19 AM

94. Yeah...that one really ground my gears.

 

Her husband is at least good at pandering to whatever audience he finds himself in front of...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:15 AM

6. And I guess this is the rationale for rigging elections in favor of Hillary?

As well as supporting one of the most corrupt Democratic Party candidates of all time?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:16 AM

8. Didn't Hillary praise the war criminal Kissinger and make him her confidante?

I believe they still vacation together, does Bernie schmooze it up with Castro?

Seriously dude, I can't begin to tell you how much fun it is watching you guys panic and flail around.

You can't even find new material so you keep recycling old right wing smears.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #8)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:14 AM

77. She got props from Dick Cheney, too.

Not something I'd put on my resume.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:17 AM

10. Someone who votes for war because they got money

For their state is morally unfit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:20 AM

15. I dont want someone who will start WWIII and give superpowers to big corporations in the White House

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:06 AM

42. What an odd thing to say given what happened this week

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:14 AM

44. So is this who you want as your role model?

 

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB437/

Henry Kissinger urged President Richard Nixon to overthrow the democratically elected Allende government in Chile because his "'model' effect can be insidious," according to documents posted today by the National Security Archive. The coup against Allende occurred on this date 40 years ago. The posted records spotlight Kissinger's role as the principal policy architect of U.S. efforts to oust the Chilean leader, and assist in the consolidation of the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile.

The documents, which include transcripts of Kissinger's "telcons" — telephone conversations — that were never shown to the special Senate Committee chaired by Senator Frank Church in the mid 1970s, provide key details about the arguments, decisions, and operations Kissinger made and supervised during his tenure as national security adviser and secretary of state.

"These documents provide the verdict of history on Kissinger's singular contribution to the denouement of democracy and rise of dictatorship in Chile," said Peter Kornbluh who directs the Chile Documentation Project at the National Security Archive. "They are the evidence of his accountability for the events of forty years ago."

Today's posting includes a Kissinger "telcon" with Nixon that records their first conversation after the coup. During the conversation Kissinger tells Nixon that the U.S. had "helped" the coup. "[Word omitted] created the conditions as best as possible." When Nixon complained about the "liberal crap" in the media about Allende's overthrow, Kissinger advised him: "In the Eisenhower period, we would be heroes."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:52 AM

51. Wow, are you clueless IMO. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:58 AM

55. I like Fidel Castro and his beard.. Bod Dylan

 


Well, I couldn't leave
Unless the old man chased me out,
'Cause I'd already promised
That I'd milk his cows.
"I had to say something
To strike him very weird,
So I yelled out,
"I like Fidel Castro and his beard."
Rita looked offended
But she got out of the way,
As he came charging down the stairs
Sayin', "What's that I heard you say?"

I said, "I like Fidel Castro,
I think you heard me right,"
And ducked as he swung
At me with all his might.
Rita mumbled something
'Bout her mother on the hill,
As his fist hit the icebox,
He said he's going to kill me
If I don't get out the door
In two seconds flat,
"You unpatriotic,
Rotten doctor Commie rat."


Bob Dylan from Motorpsycho Nightmare

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #55)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:08 PM

83. Well played...

As a Dylan-ophile I salute you!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #55)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:25 PM

85. This thread is useless without music!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:54 AM

79. But would it be OK to go visit Fidel NOW?

 

Better let President Obama know your answer to this question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:10 AM

89. Bernie didn't "Praise Castro" and you know it.

 

He just said that some good came of the revolution.

What was he supposed to do? Act like everything the Cubans have done is evil?

It's enough that he says Cuba should democratize.

There is no good reason for anyone to be calling for the end of free education and healthcare in Cuba...they need less repression, not "shock therapy".

The Cold War is over, and Cuba is just another country now.

It's time for OUR leaders to stop trying to interfere in a country where we never had any right to interfere at all...not in 1898, not in 1961, not now.

Leave Cuba's fate to the Cubans.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:27 AM

96. Has Hillary apologized for her IWR vote or her friendship with Henry The K?

Do you get nosebleeds at that altitude on your horse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #2)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:16 AM

65. This current red scare effort is beyond beating a dead horse:

 

it's breaking the bones of a partially decomposed ungulate that may or may not have galloped once upon a time (like in the last century)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #65)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:13 PM

84. LOL!

It still stinks too, those large rotting ungulates take forever to decompose!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #84)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:55 AM

87. The sulfurous odors inform us the ungulate came from infernal climates.

 

Who knows how long such ungodly creatures take before their ashes turn to dust? - but I'd still not put it beyond David Brock to try and stir that dirt as long as there are some hooves in it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:13 AM

3. Catbox logic

scratching around, looking for buried treasure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fairgo (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:20 AM

14. LMAO!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fairgo (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:01 AM

25. lol!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fairgo (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:16 AM

35. Thread win

it perfectly describes what they found

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fairgo (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:01 AM

56. Perfect!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fairgo (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:31 AM

71. I rec'd the OP to the Greatest page so more people would find your response. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:16 AM

7. Also, bookmarking.

This may be the most unintentionally hilarious (albeit pathetic) thing I've read in a while.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:17 AM

9. Bernie would result in a McGovern margin defeat for the Republican!

Bloomberg's recent poll had Bernie 58% Trump 34%, a 24 point McGovern margin.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:17 AM

11. McGovern wen't against an incumbent president during a prosperous time

Mondale wasn't even really liberal, at least from the debates he seemed to be focused on cutting the deficit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AZ Progressive (Reply #11)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:33 AM

21. Not to mention, McGovern ran (and his VP was sabotaged) BEFORE Watergate broke.

The Democratic Party needs to confront its unresolved, 44-year-long phobia of McGovern if it is to have ANY credibility when addressing the set of problems now faced by this nation (especially on the economic front).

We now have an economy in which any any and all economic recovery accrues to the wealthy, who in turn can use such wealth to buy politicians on the open market and make "investments" in Congress to make themselves even wealthier.

One such politician, however, is NOT FOR SALE, wants to break that cycle, and has consistently advocated policies that could have prevented and/or ameliorated the problems that the nation now must address.

Alternatively, we can continue to quiver in fear of McGovern's shadow, and lose states like Michigan that have been particularly ravaged by these economic problems, where Rs have run riot on the state level the last few years, when during the general we hear "She negotiated the TPP before she was against it," "She took millions of dollars from the very same banks she says she told to 'cut it out,' " and so on, ad naseum.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to strategery blunder (Reply #21)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:07 AM

59. One can't truly discuss the McGovern race without discussing what happened to the Democratic party

in 1968 and it's aftermath. Anyone who talks about McGovern's race without mentioning 1968 is blowing smoke up your ass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:18 AM

12. Oh puhlease.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:19 AM

13. The New Republic: What Democrats Still Don’t Get About George McGovern

The party took all the wrong lessons from his landslide loss to Richard Nixon in '72.

I can not recommend highly enough this history of the modern Democratic party, including the rise of the DLC (Democrats for the Leisure Class to quote Jesse Jackson)

https://newrepublic.com/article/130737/democrats-still-dont-get-george-mcgovern

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:21 AM

16. this type of post actually hurts your candidate

begging the pres to endorse her

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:22 AM

17. Idk man...

 

This has the smell of panic all over the post. The president must remain neutral and both camps know this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:23 AM

18. Obama should have had a Sister Souljah moment with OWS?!?

The main issues raised by Occupy Wall Street were social and economic inequality, greed, corruption and the perceived undue influence of corporations on government—particularly from the financial services sector. The OWS slogan, "We are the 99%", refers to income inequality and wealth distribution in the U.S. between the wealthiest 1% and the rest of the population. To achieve their goals, protesters acted on consensus-based decisions made in general assemblies which emphasized direct action over petitioning authorities for redress.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street

This sounds exactly like what our country and party needs. Does my recognizing the undue influence that corporations have on the government vis a vis the revolving door and campaign finance make me a crazy leftist needing to be called out? Or are you a conservative or classical liberal (correct term for neoliberal, in my estimation) who has a cynical disdain for those who seek a more equitable world because you have either given up on such as an aspiration or disown it as a positive end entirely ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #18)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:18 AM

45. To some apparently any criticizing of Corporate Government is far left

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:24 AM

19. Bless your heart, K&R for sheer effort

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fumesucker (Reply #19)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:44 AM

23. i see we are the only two to have recc'ed this. A shame, it was a highlight of my evening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:27 AM

20. bwaaaaahhaaaaahaaa! Way to go ericson00!

The very first thing that Hillary Rodham Clinton promised to do is to follow up the Republican/Netanyahu disrespect for Pres. Obama by inviting Netanyahu to the White House for a rapprochement. She has already invited him, several times in articles and speeches. This is her promise to reset things in a Republican/Netanyahu-centric way, a way that for her triangulates out to be the winning strategy of being the most Republican of all Republican candidates on matters of war and economics.

Gotta give her credit, she outdoes Trump in her total disrespect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:43 AM

22. Brilliant satire of the typical screeds of Hillary supporters' pablums.

K&R. Magnificently done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:46 AM

24. You should cross post in the Hillary group if you haven't already...

someone there might give you the hug you need.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:09 AM

26. President Obama!! Ignore Democracy! Take away our right to vote!! Intervene in US Elections! HURRY!!

Bernie won 3 states. He must be stopped!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:38 AM

27. NO. The President should STAY OUT OF IT!

 

Anyway, he's busy with Fidel and Raoul.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to John Poet (Reply #27)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:19 AM

46. LOL -- busy with Fidel

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:58 AM

28. It would be inappropriate for the president to endorse a candidate in the middle of a primary

He won't do it because he's smart enough to know he'll need to endorse the nominee as soon as one of the two candidates concedes. Saying he should do it is undermining how intelligence he is.

Also it would be saying fuck you to the states who have not voted, one of which is Oregon. So you really are interested in disenfranchising voters? Maybe you might want to rethink what you are saying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #28)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:05 AM

58. Right. Inappropriate, premature.

But it's okay. He knows it. He knows his job is to support the democratic process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hortensis (Reply #58)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:34 PM

86. His job is to win the nomination

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #86)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:04 AM

93. Subject: Obama.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:11 AM

30. You do realized that the primaries are not over, don't you?

 

President Obama has plenty of time for an endorsement.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:26 AM

31. It is a long way to November, President Obama still has a lot to be accomplished. Not time for him

to endorse anyone but I hope if he endorses, it would be Mr. Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:31 AM

32. This post: Gretchen Weiner wing of the party strikes back


This post reminds me of Gretchen Weiner's meltdown in English class:

"Why should Caesar get to stomp around like a giant while the rest of us try not to get smushed under his big feet. What's so great about Caesar, Hm? Brutus is just as cute as Caesar. Brutus is just as smart as Caesar. People totally like Brutus just as much as they like Caesar. And when did it become okay for one person to be the BOSS of everybody, huh? Because that's not what Rome is about. We should totally just STAB CAESAR!"


https://m." target="_blank">[/blockquote

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:10 AM

34. Hahahah

Desperation time

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:24 AM

36. Sour grapes for breakfast!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:26 AM

37. FFS, even with the huge lead hill has you people sure the hell whine a lot. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:41 AM

39. Maybe he's waiting for the FBI to conclude their investigation.

That would be terribly embarrassing after all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:42 AM

40. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:03 AM

41. "Help me Obi Wan Kanobi you're my only hope!"

 

A light breakfast of bitter melon and sour grapes?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:08 AM

43. You sound dcesperate

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:28 AM

47. Obama is very asshamed of his 1st term Foriegn policy

 

When your advisory pushes for you to go against how you feel and it turns in a disaster do you think they are going to support that person? This shows how clueless some people are about what goes on in world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:45 AM

48. Don't expect that endorsement to garner the results you want

Obama's conservative derugulatory economic policy is a continuation of Clinton the 1st and is a big reason for the anemic performance of the Democratic Party since 2008.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:49 AM

49. Steaming puddle of diarrhea is all this post represents.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:54 AM

52. LOL.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:55 AM

53. Perhaps he doesn't want his legacy to be endorsing an indicted candidate.

 

Obama is getting regular updates on the FBI investigation, I'm sure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HooptieWagon (Reply #53)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 12:00 PM

82. That's the thing. If he endorses her...

...it will look extra bad when he blocks her indictment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:58 AM

54. Rec'd for the comedy gold in the thread. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:03 AM

57. It's a beautiful morning, isn't it? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bvf (Reply #57)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:13 AM

62. When you get up in morning and hear all the birdies singing..........

Yea it is!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:10 AM

60. I doubt an endorsement by President Obama is coming before the end of the primary ...

 

it violates tradition and would do no good. The vast majority of the Obama coalition is already on board with HRC.

Now an endorsement of HRC by Elizabeth Warren would close the door on Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:11 AM

61. A primary endorsement by a sitting President would be so unprecedented that it would do more harm

than good. He knows that. The story would become the process of that endorsement decision. That wouldn't help.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Reply #61)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:39 AM

73. Not completely unprecedented

Clinton endorsed Gore over Bill Bradley in 1999. But it was a little different because Gore was Clinton's vice president.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:14 AM

63. This thread could be the next Kudzu

I just had to get in.
Bern baby Bern.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:18 AM

66. "...call out the crazies on our side..."

~Insert flip-the-bird smilie here.

I guess the HRC supporters are pretty certain she can win without the Bernie supporters, cuz your goading & gloating is really turning a lot of us off. Asking the Prez to make an endorsement when almost half the country has yet to vote their primary is an undemocratic suggestion. But then, there is a lot I've seen in this election that seems undemocratic.

I miss unrec.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:20 AM

67. No.

Wow, the Hillarians must be seeing Deja Vu all over again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:21 AM

68. This OP is a great example of the adage: Lie down with dogs, get fleas.

 

I wonder if the DU administration ever regrets their choices.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #68)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:29 AM

70. Not that they'd admit it. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:22 AM

69. WHO WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT?..A lifeline call for Hillary?

Your OP is hysterically funny.

He already threw her unofficial endorsements, twice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:32 AM

72. We were going to be gone

 

by super Tuesday. Your candidate is so weak she can barely beat an unknown socialist lol. You Hillary supporters crack me up, she is weak and an ineffective campaigner. She is the weak link and you prove it by begging Obama to endorse your weak ass candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:48 AM

74. :-) that HRC is that weak that you have to beg Obama

is more telling about HRC and how weak she'd be running against the GOP. Kid gloves and Debbie running interference isn't going to rescue HRC against the big, bad, GOP.

She is losing the blue states in a primary. If that isn't a wake up call, don't know what is,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Sun Mar 27, 2016, 11:12 AM

76. A few things:

1) The President won't endorse shit until the convention. You are delusional if you think otherwise.

2) Do you really believe that Bernie's popularity is due to people not "knowing who he is"? Bernie Sanders' poll numbers have been climbing since he declared, not falling. Hillary hasn't made hers go up in a single state.

3) Are you actually Bill Kristol IRL? Because he's the only other person who makes this many wrong claims in one go.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:05 AM

88. Why should he have denounced OWS?

 

They stood for nothing but positive change.

The only people who opposed them are people who are right wing on everything.

There is never a good reason for a Democratic president to attack the left.

We've done nothing to deserve it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:25 AM

95. "There's desperation in the air. It stains all your clothes and no detergent gets it out"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ericson00 (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:21 AM

98. I imagine he'll want until it's absolutely clear who has the nomination and then he'll endorse

That person.

He wouldn't want to endorse one, and then have the other one end up with the nomination. That would weaken that candidate's campaign.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread