Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 03:59 PM Mar 2016

New Study: Sanders’ Tax Wall Street Plan Would Raise $300 Billion, Create Millions of New Jobs

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rose-ann-demoro/new-study-sanders-tax-wal_b_9517700.html


Rose Ann DeMoro - Executive director, National Nurses United (AFL-CIO) and California Nurses Association

New research findings from a team of progressive economists provides documentary evidence that the financial footing for Sen. Bernie Sanders visionary social change agenda is not only plausible, but would create far more socially productive jobs, as well as moving us down the road to the more humane society that is at the heart of the Sanders campaign.

In their push to vilify Sanders, Democratic Party acolytes from the media to academia have fallen in line attacking the economic foundations of his campaign for free public college tuition, Medicare for all, job creation through infrastructure repair, and other critical needs.

But a new report from the University of Massachusetts Amherst Political Economy Research Institute documents how a key Sanders proposal — a tax on Wall Street speculation -would bring at least $300 billion a year in new revenues from those who can most afford to pay it for the critical reforms the country so desperately needs.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Study: Sanders’ Tax Wall Street Plan Would Raise $300 Billion, Create Millions of New Jobs (Original Post) Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 OP
All well and good but Clinton's plan will increase the profits for the wealthy rhett o rick Mar 2016 #1
and since when do numbers matter? lagomorph777 Mar 2016 #2
And as can see here some people charish the idea of a tough authoritarian leader rhett o rick Mar 2016 #4
Turning your back on those without healthcare? creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #15
Hillary is working for Hillary and always has been. She will not support single payer and that rhett o rick Mar 2016 #16
oh yea, I forgot Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #3
Have you been trickled on today? rhett o rick Mar 2016 #5
daily Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #6
I am alerting on you because that is clearly sexist. Why is it always a man? rhett o rick Mar 2016 #7
If I could draw I'd fix it for you Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #8
Now you are really asking for it. Doubling down on the sexism. I am sure Margaret Thatcher rhett o rick Mar 2016 #9
Wait Thatcher was in to Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #11
This has gone wayyy to far. As I said eeeeew rhett o rick Mar 2016 #12
Ok - done Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #13
. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #14
knr amborin Mar 2016 #10
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
1. All well and good but Clinton's plan will increase the profits for the wealthy
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:16 PM
Mar 2016

and they will trickle it down on us.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
2. and since when do numbers matter?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:19 PM
Mar 2016

The Dem powers that be have spoken, and annoyances such as numbers and facts will not cloud their vision:

A shining city on the hill, where the top 1% control both parties and all branches of government.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
4. And as can see here some people charish the idea of a tough authoritarian leader
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:26 PM
Mar 2016

taking good care of them. It's too much trouble to fight for your rights and liberties. And in a country trying to be democratic, I can get that, but the consequences are hardest on those among us that are struggling. I find that immoral.

Revere whomever you wish but remember the Wealthy 1% has no empathy for the 16,000,000 children living in poverty. Choose to back the Clinton Aristocracy and you will be turning your backs on those without health care and living in poverty.

creeksneakers2

(7,472 posts)
15. Turning your back on those without healthcare?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

The Sanders supporters here who are refusing to help in the general must be OK with Republicans coming in and taking away health care from 20 million people on the first day. That's turning your back. Hillary has been working for decades to get health care to more people. That's not 1%.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
16. Hillary is working for Hillary and always has been. She will not support single payer and that
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:40 PM
Mar 2016

says enough. She wants to cut Big Pharma and Big Insurance, in so she can get a cut.

Sanders supporters are refusing to be bullied into voting for Clinton and the Wealthy 1%.

And we can say the same about Clinton supporters that don't seem to recognize that Sanders has a much better chance of defeating Trump than Clinton. Stick with Clinton and get Trump. The hubris of the corrupt Democratic Party elite will be the downfall of themselves and the nation. Frack the corrupt DNC, Dino Debbie and other Party leaders in the pocket of Goldman-Sachs.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
7. I am alerting on you because that is clearly sexist. Why is it always a man?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:44 PM
Mar 2016

But since I really like you Basset Hound pissing on the Blue Dog, I will let the sexism slide. The three dog picture is so PC that I can't even begin to handle it.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
8. If I could draw I'd fix it for you
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:49 PM
Mar 2016

But it was mostly men who brought us the delusion of trickle down.


THird Way = 3 Dog Night?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
9. Now you are really asking for it. Doubling down on the sexism. I am sure Margaret Thatcher
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:58 PM
Mar 2016

(admired by Clinton) supported Reagan's trickle down. Eeeew!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New Study: Sanders’ Tax W...