HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Anyone remember the Clint...

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:36 PM

 

Anyone remember the Clinton supporters up in arms about Michigan?

Remember how after one of the biggest upsets in primary history, where nearly all the polls were wrong, how Clinton supporters hysterically alleged election fraud?

Yeah, I don't either.

80 replies, 4052 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 80 replies Author Time Post
Reply Anyone remember the Clinton supporters up in arms about Michigan? (Original post)
NuclearDem Mar 2016 OP
Agschmid Mar 2016 #1
radical noodle Mar 2016 #5
Agschmid Mar 2016 #6
radical noodle Mar 2016 #17
NuclearDem Mar 2016 #7
Agschmid Mar 2016 #8
virtualobserver Mar 2016 #77
Land Shark Mar 2016 #79
radical noodle Mar 2016 #2
JaneyVee Mar 2016 #3
OilemFirchen Mar 2016 #24
Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #4
Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #9
NuclearDem Mar 2016 #11
Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #13
Cha Mar 2016 #70
radical noodle Mar 2016 #18
dchill Mar 2016 #56
radical noodle Mar 2016 #62
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #10
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #16
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #19
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #26
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #32
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #35
geek tragedy Mar 2016 #36
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #39
NuclearDem Mar 2016 #25
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #31
NuclearDem Mar 2016 #15
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #22
NuclearDem Mar 2016 #27
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #33
R B Garr Mar 2016 #14
Logical Mar 2016 #20
workinclasszero Mar 2016 #21
tazkcmo Mar 2016 #23
NuclearDem Mar 2016 #29
tazkcmo Mar 2016 #34
leftofcool Mar 2016 #49
tazkcmo Mar 2016 #53
stevenleser Mar 2016 #28
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #37
stevenleser Mar 2016 #38
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #41
stevenleser Mar 2016 #42
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #44
stevenleser Mar 2016 #45
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #48
stevenleser Mar 2016 #51
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #55
stevenleser Mar 2016 #43
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #47
stevenleser Mar 2016 #50
Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #52
hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #57
stevenleser Mar 2016 #58
hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #61
noiretextatique Mar 2016 #78
LisaM Mar 2016 #30
chillfactor Mar 2016 #40
workinclasszero Mar 2016 #46
hrmjustin Mar 2016 #54
BeanMusical Mar 2016 #63
hrmjustin Mar 2016 #64
BeanMusical Mar 2016 #65
hrmjustin Mar 2016 #66
BeanMusical Mar 2016 #67
hrmjustin Mar 2016 #68
BeanMusical Mar 2016 #69
DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #75
BeanMusical Mar 2016 #80
Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #59
msanthrope Mar 2016 #60
Cha Mar 2016 #71
Ken Burch Mar 2016 #72
tk2kewl Mar 2016 #73
bigtree Mar 2016 #74
highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #76

Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:38 PM

1. They/We didn't.

However I would say disenfranchisement is a BIG issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Agschmid (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:41 PM

5. Is it disenfranchisement

Or just people who don't understand a closed primary?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to radical noodle (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:42 PM

6. Caucuses are disenfranchisement.

This seems to just be people who maybe don't get the rules.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Agschmid (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:50 PM

17. Caucuses don't fairly represent everyone

I don't understand why some states use them. I see Utah hasn't documented that all the caucus voters are properly registered, so they're still going to have to go through them and check each one for registration. Good grief.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Agschmid (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:42 PM

7. Disenfranchisement is an issue.

 

And Arizona really needs to get its act together as far as running elections is concerned.

But even so, 250k people voted early in Arizona, and they overwhelming voted for Clinton.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #7)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:43 PM

8. Yes they did :)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #7)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:12 AM

77. The problem is that only the people who win the elections go to Washington.

 

Why tamper with the system that elected them, whether it is about changing our voting laws or getting money out of politics.

The Republican strategy of reducing polling places in Democratic strongholds and reducing opportunities for early voting , and the lack of oversight in terms of touchscreen voting are all great concerns.

Once the elections are over, though.....nobody gives a shit.







Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to virtualobserver (Reply #77)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:59 PM

79. Looks like Hillary won't defend voter rights in general if they are pooh poohed in the primaries

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:38 PM

2. I sure didn't hear it. Amazing!

And it was close too...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:38 PM

3. I demand a full investigation.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaneyVee (Reply #3)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:55 PM

24. Indeed.

Who told them not to complain?

How high up does this go?

I demand answers NOW.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:39 PM

4. Not ringing a bell.

There's something about the results that typically generate claims of election fraud here. I just wish I could put my finger on what it is . . .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:43 PM

9. People in Michigan weren't falsely told that they weren't Registered Democrats

...didn't have to wait in line for 4 hours, weren't given provisional ballots, and didn't have their votes counted by a private company.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:43 PM

11. Thank you for making my point.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #11)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:46 PM

13. What is your point? NT

NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #11)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 06:01 AM

70. Exactly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eric J in MN (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:52 PM

18. Perhaps they weren't

Since it's a closed primary, if they registered as Independents, they would not be able to vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to radical noodle (Reply #18)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:55 AM

56. And that's why their affiliation was mysteriously

changed to independent. In some cases, Republican.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #56)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:20 AM

62. They should have documentation from their registration

That should be enough to prove it and get their provisional ballots counted. At least I hope so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:43 PM

10. Did Michigan have the same problems with voter registration errors and provisional ballots?

You do understand that different states handle elections differently do you not? The election was not conducted the same way in Michigan as it was in Arizona. It seems pretty ridiculous to suggest that because there were no concerns raised about one election there should be no concerns raised about a completely different election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #10)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:46 PM

12. Improving ballot access is a noble goal.

 

But trying to delegitimize the winner isn't

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #12)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:50 PM

16. I complained loudly about problems with the caucus in my state as well, a caucus that Bernie won

It is not about who won, it is about the fact that people's votes were suppressed.

I am sick of crap like the OP that dismisses legitimate concerns about voter suppression, it is a real issue and dismissing people as conspiracy theorists if they speak out is disgusting. People need to raise hell when the vote is suppressed and it is undemocratic to dismiss their concerns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:52 PM

19. Bernie fans are accusing the DNC of stealing votes in AZ

 

Despite the fact the state government runs the election.

So that is what is going on in this forum.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #19)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:57 PM

26. I neer said anything about the DNC

The fact that a few Bernie fans were incorrect about a certain fact however does not make it OK to dismiss legitimate concerns about the fact that a lot of people ran into problems at the poling booths today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #26)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:03 AM

32. Of course not. People are dismissing the conspiracy theories

 

about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz stealing the Arizona primary.

They are not dismissing those legitimately concerned with disenfranchisement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #32)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:11 AM

35. I sure don't see anything in the OP that acknowledges people's legitimate concerns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #35)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:14 AM

36. It's not about the legit concerns, it's about the Bernie fans trying to

 

delegitimize the votes that were cast.

Which they did for Iowa. And Nevada. And Massachusetts.

Bernie fans are hijacking the issue of voting rights in order to invalidate the will of the voters--that is what this is targeting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #36)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:22 AM

39. I did not see any Bernie supporters delegitimizing any votes that were cast

The complaints I have seen raised were about the failures of the registration process that forced people to cast provisional ballots that will not be counted for a while as well long lines.

Those are not complaints about votes cast, it is a complaint about people being denied the ability to cast a vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:56 PM

25. I'm not dismissing concerns about voter suppression.

 

The caucus system, as far as I'm concerned, is one of the most undemocratic election systems to exist in this country.

My point is that claims of voter suppression tend to almost only exist in states where Sanders loses, and given other patterns of behavior, they have little to do with actual suppression, and everything to do with attempting to overturn a result they didn't like. I know you spoke out about Minnesota, but that was an anomaly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #25)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:03 AM

31. A lot of people spoke about Minnesota, I am not an anomoly

Voter suppression has been a big issue in recent years, these concerns started long before Bernie got into the race and it will continue to be an issue long after he leaves.

Your claim that this is all about Bernie supporters is absolute bullshit, many of us have cared about voter suppression for years. That is why we fought against voter ID laws and have tried to get automatic voter registration and expanded voting roghts. For you to suggest it is all about Bernie shows your ignorance as to how long this has been an issue, it did not start in 2016.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #10)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:48 PM

15. Yes, I understand that.

 

The point I'm making is that Sanders is going to continue to lose in large states, especially ones with closed primaries, so long as his supporters keep chalking up his losses to some mythical "election fraud."

Sanders wasn't going to win Arizona even if the election system worked absolutely perfectly. It was a closed primary where hundreds of thousands had made up their minds well ahead of time, and where the Clintons have had a strong network since the 90s.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #15)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:55 PM

22. You seem to care only about the primary but you don't seem to have much concern for democracy

The issues being raised in Arizona are serious issues that are effecting people's right to vote, but you seem more concerned about your candidate than you do about voting rights.

I am in Minnesota and our caucuses were a huge mess and extremely undemocratic, Bernie won by a big margin but I still called out the undemocratic nature of the caucuses. If you had any integrity you would call out voter suppression when your candidate wins as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #22)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:59 PM

27. Have I ever said the election systems in this country were perfect?

 

I live in a state with voter ID laws on the books--actual voter suppression.

The allegations of "voter suppression" out of places like Massachusetts and Nevada have nothing to do with any regard for democracy. They have everything to do with a certain candidate's supporters being sore losers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #27)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:09 AM

33. Voter suppression has been an issue for years, it did not start in 2016

As much as you may want to pretend this is all about those bad Bernie supporters there has been a lot of concerns expressed about the integrity of the vote for years. There have also been a lot of people like you who dismiss legitimate concerns as if they were all coming from sore losers. If people would actually listen to concerns about voter suppression rather than instantly assuming the people expressing those concerns were sore losers maybe something could be done to fix the broken system.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:47 PM

14. I heard early in the day that Michigan had a ballot shortage in a heavy

Clinton county, so I expected some big discrepancies.

But I didn't blame it on Sanders or his supporters or Wall Street or 1%'ers or a rigged economy or oligarchs or Jane Sanders or Walmart or Obama.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:53 PM

20. Remember Hillary fans whining a lot? Yes, me too, every day! Nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:54 PM

21. Mic drop

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:55 PM

23. Congratulations on your Arizona victory

No complaints about fraud or illegalities. Again, congratulations.

I do hope you all would agree that Arizona's and several other states' elections were less than professional and far from a standard that the "leader of the free world" should approve of. From reducing polling places to 60 from 200, denying poorer residents of nearby polling places, stringent ID laws to running out of ballots, our elections seem to be very poorly run. Then there's the separate but related issue of voting machines and lack of transparency.

I hope we can all agree to press the Democratic Party to adopt a plank in the platform that calls for a serious and thorough upgrade to our election process to eliminate the above mentioned issues.

I am in no way trying to insinuate that Sec Clinton's victory in Arizona was helped due to the poor running of the election there. I believe she may have lost some votes as did any other Democratic candidate as these problems effect poor minorities more severely than affluent whites. We all know some of it is done just for this reason. But some is just shitty administration of the event itself.

Again, congratulations on the big win.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tazkcmo (Reply #23)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:00 AM

29. No disagreement from me on this one.

 

The election system in this country needs a serious overhaul, as far as I'm concerned.

Thank you for the congratulations, and a preemptive congratulations from me for what looks like to be a good seven contests for Bernie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #29)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:10 AM

34. Thank you

We all get very emotional and passionate during primary season and in some ways it's even fun. Sometimes it really sucks, too. I know I'm guilty of being an ass at times. Having said that, I was confident when posting that congratulations post (Which I mean) that we could agree on this point.

Also, thank you for your preemptive congratulations. I hope it turns out that way, of course.

Anyway, congrats again and after we're done bashing each others' brains out in this election, let's all get together and clean this election mess up. The neighbors can see it and it's embarrassing!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tazkcmo (Reply #23)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:46 AM

49. AZ elections are controlled by the Republican Party not by Dems

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #49)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:51 AM

53. Not my point at all.

I want world class, above board, transparent, enabling, envy of the world elections. I hope you do, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:00 AM

28. The verdict is in about the character of an overwhelming majority of supporters on both sides.

 

One side has an over abundance of nasty, bullying, bitter, sore losing supporters, and the other just doesn't.

You're right, we Clinton supporters did not behave this way, not about New Hampshire, not about Michigan, not about any of Sanders wins. Oh I am sure there were one offs, but that's not close to a majority of us or even a significant number of us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #28)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:18 AM

37. I am sure Hillary appreciates you telling everyone how awful Bernie supporters are

I am sure attacking Bernie supporters constantly like you do is going to be very helpful to Hillary if she wins the nomination and needs Bernie supporters to come to her side.

If you think you are helping your candidate in the slightest bit you are sorely mistaken.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #37)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:20 AM

38. I don't care what the Sanders supporters here do. I'm telling the truth about how

 

They behaved and they can vote Jill Stein or stay home for all I care. All the Sanders supporters in DU won't stop Hillary from winning the General election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #38)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:26 AM

41. OK, I will make a note that you don't want your candidate to get the votes of any Sanders supporters

If you think your candidate can win the general election without the support of Bernie supporters you have the right to believe that, but it is pretty clear that your political analysis is just as shallow as that of the people you debate on Fox News.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #41)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:29 AM

42. Ok, I will make a note that you don't read what I actually write and make stuff up instead. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #42)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:34 AM

44. Oh I read what you wrote about what you called "the overwhelming majortiy of supporters"

It just so happens that what you said about "the overwhelming majority" of Bernie supporters was very insulting. You said we could all vote for Jill Stein or stay home, if you think that helps your candidate it is your choice to think that way just don't think it makes you an asset to your candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #44)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:37 AM

45. If Sanders supporters here didn't want to be called out for bad behavior, they shouldn't have

 

behaved that way.

Everything else is you pretending that DU members can swing the election. Which we can't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #45)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:46 AM

48. Well thank you mother for correcting our bad behavior

I am sure glad that you are so well behaved that you would never engage in things like name calling like calling people "Bernie Bros".

You are so well behaved that you need to set the example for everyone else don't you.

P.S. Not all Bernie supporters are on DU, nor are all the attacks that have been made against Bernie supporters been on DU. You and the people making arguments like yours on other sites are turning off Bernie supporters across the nation. If you think it helps your candidate it shows how little you understand about politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #48)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:48 AM

51. You're welcome, see, that wasn't so hard. Acknowledge bad behavior among

 

Your fellow Sanders supporters, acknowledge that Bernibros is a real problem and you are on your way. Sanders himself acknowledged that Berniebros were an issue so you're only following his leadership.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #51)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:53 AM

55. Thank you for the lecture, I know it is very important that you have the opportunity to scold people

You might have a bit more credibility if you actually behaved the way you expect others to behave however.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #41)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:30 AM

43. P.s. Bernie also goes on Fox, so if you don't want to be a hypocrite, you need to endorse

 

Hillary now!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #43)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:40 AM

47. I did not say you were wrong to go on Fox, you are wrong because you can't even debate them properly

If you go on Fox you should at least try to come up with some decent arguments to debate them with. When the best argument you can come up with is name calling by using the word "Berniebros" over and over again it shows you don't have a real argument and you are just as shallow as the people you debate on Fox.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #47)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:47 AM

50. Nice attempt to move the goalposts. Completely unconvincing but I see you out some

 

effort in.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #50)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:50 AM

52. What goalposts? When did I say you were wrong to go on Fox?

I never did, what I said is that you are as shallow as the people you debate on Fox. Unless you were debating Bernie Sanders then Bernie had nothing to do with what I said about your appearances on Fox.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to hellofromreddit (Reply #57)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:58 AM

58. Nope, one offs. Not representative. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #58)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:14 AM

61. Your response is not a one-off

 

This website is quite full of people who are acutely aware of the behavior of others yet blind to their own--even when confronted with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #28)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:42 AM

78. did you feel that way about clinton supporters

When you supported Obama?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:01 AM

30. No.

The issue in Michigan was a really faulty polling model, independents criss crossing sll over the place, and Dems voting for Kasich to stop Trump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:22 AM

40. I don't either....

but when Bernie loses it is always somebody else's fault...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to chillfactor (Reply #40)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:38 AM

46. Strange

 

Isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:51 AM

54. I noticed a few trolls outed themselves tonight.. Thats always fun to watch.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #54)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:26 AM

63. Yeah, I'm having a blast watching you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeanMusical (Reply #63)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:27 AM

64. Me and my shadow.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #64)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:29 AM

65. Is shadow a code name for sockpuppet?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeanMusical (Reply #65)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:32 AM

66. Unlike others i don't use sockpuppets.

 

Sorty to disappoint.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #66)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:40 AM

67. To be disappointed by you I would need to have expectations, kid.

And now I have to go to bed so we'll continue to play another time m'kay?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeanMusical (Reply #67)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:42 AM

68. Rest well.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hrmjustin (Reply #68)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:43 AM

69. Thank you!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeanMusical (Reply #65)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:57 AM

75. Your interlocutor is not a sockpuppet. You should apologize to him.

Thank you in advance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #75)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:53 PM

80. Where did I say that he was a sockpuppet?

Thank you in advance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:59 AM

59. Wait, wait, I'm trying to recall...no, don't think so.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:03 AM

60. Feel the Bern. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 06:02 AM

71. Not our style. We were just glad Hilary came so close and went on the WIN Super Tuesday!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 06:12 AM

72. I remember the Clinton supporters who endlessly argued that Bernie's win didn't count

 

because it was an open primary. Never mind that they would have insisted the same state's results were totally valid if HRC had won, as ever poll had predicted she would.

There was plenty of bad sportsmanship on your side about Michigan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:43 AM

73. Bernie has zero access to

 

The political machines (and i don't mean the voting machines) that can be used to rig the vote.

Clinton on the other hand has the full power of the establishment behind her

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:51 AM

74. k&r

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:59 AM

76. Did you have the same election day problems in Michigan?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread