2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary makes fear of Trump less compelling
Yeah he puts on a good lunatic show, but it's hard to be shaking in your boots when you know we're going to get more economic hardship, wealth and income inequality, dismantling of liberties and social programs, devastation of the planet's ecosystem, and war war war, either way. Our once-in-a-lifetime shot at breaking out of the death spiral is a democratic socialist with a steadfast, lifelong commitment to justice and democratic ideals, not a self serving, shapeshifting, truth challenged, establishment 1%er. The shrewd plutocracy will let us have a black president, they'll let us have a woman president, but what they won't let us have, is a president who challenges their rule. Congrats dems.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)We know Clinton will carry water for Wall St, support domestic spying, get us in another stupid war, take kickbacks, and subject us to 4-8 more years of scandals and investigations/impeachments. Trump is no worse. I can't see any reason to vote for either.
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)This is too important. I will do whatever I can to help Bernie. Go Bernie!
onehandle
(51,122 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Nothing cool about it. Rather sad actually.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)for example, and aren't going to do dick about it (or do it incrementally *snort*), it makes no difference.
Then vote for the candidate whose got the best climate change platform for your conscience.
I've heard this at least 100 times from the millennials I know and volunteered with at the Bernie HQ.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And it will be easily measured. She got 0.36% of the vote in 2012. Everything above that in 2016 will be from Sanders supporters. The total will still be well under the 12-15% of conservative Democrats who vote for Trump, but still enough that Clinton won't be able to win any swing states. A good number of Dems simply won't vote for her, she gets only 1/3 of Independants, and nearly nothing of GOP X-over votes. I can't see her winning with the remainder.
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)If it comes down to HRC and Trump, I think the other parties are going to have a better than average year.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)And if it's between Trump the boorish asshole and HRC who ran a racist campaign against Obama and a dishonest one against one of the only genuine authentic do-gooder public servants we've got left, Jill Stein has my vote.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)WhiteTara
(30,068 posts)MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Hillary has very good liberal credentials, but the race has only highlighted her more conservative acts. It would be like highlighting Bernie's support for the stealth bomber, gun rights, and the Minutemen. The fact is that Hillary is supported by civil rights leaders, gay rights leaders, and women's rights leaders, as well as majorities in those groups is a testament to her liberal credentials.
Bernie is great, but Hillary is progress too. In terms of ratings as a Senator, she is actually to the left of Obama.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)but not her "liberalism". I'm not sore, and I'm not giving up on Bernie. Clinton and Trump are both nonstarters for me.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Wall St, war, and corruption are now 'Liberal credentials'?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)So vote your conscience on climate change. The planet can't wait any longer.
It's the message I hear most from millennials who will pivot to Jill Stein. They aren't Dems anyway and don't believe for one minute HRC is "liberal". They belong to the 43% who are independents.
vintx
(1,748 posts)+1
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maybe in 2004 or 2008, she would have been. Maybe. But in 2016, she's a big step backwards
But she's rich, she's white, she's named clinton, and she's not a Jew. S'all any of her supporters give a shit about
pengu
(462 posts)I don't like most of what she supports at all.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)that someone who voted for two wars, bailed out banks on the backs of taxpayers, was against equal rights of marriage, and pro death penalty has good liberal credentials?
Maybe I'm just stupid, but I don't understand if she was for all of those things, how that could be "liberal" in any way, so please explain how those things are liberal, so that I may understand you a bit better.
Thanks.
oasis
(51,419 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)both Trump and Clinton will chose their nominees carefully to preserve the status quo.
oasis
(51,419 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)SCOTUS picks will be irrelevant in many millennials' minds as climate change will be entering the beginning of the catastrophic phase.
HRC's climate change plan is so inneffectual it's laughable. They want real action. That means voting for either Sanders or Jill Stein.
Besides, the millennials (and plenty of other Bernie supporters of every age) I know believe HRC will pick a corporatist Justice so that doesn't work on them.
oasis
(51,419 posts)Relax, she'll do the right thing.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)and if she doesn't change her climate change position dramatically between now and election day (if she's the nominee), "fear" of Trump is irrelevant and they will vote their conscience.
agracie
(950 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,431 posts)It's like bad performance art out of a high school level.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)at not getting the candidate you want. Now, to suggest that voting for such a misogynist racist bigot is no difference, really has me questioning moral compasses around here.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)but I reject the meme that not voting for Hillary is a vote for Trump.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Capiche?
Metric System
(6,048 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)But if that's good enough for you...
Metric System
(6,048 posts)lot of support within the LGBT community even when she opposed same sex marriage.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)As I have tried to explain to Sanders supporters many, many times she actually did get involved in our issues and advocate for us. Sanders never did anything other than vote the right way a few times (as did she).
Joe Solmonese said the other day that he never even met Bernie the entire time he was president of the Human Rights Campaign. I know that is true from my time there. I can assure you the previous president of HRC never met Bernie either. Bernie did not give a shit about us.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)African American communities before he ran for President. That speaks volumes.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)My belief is that the majority of the country still wants a sane, competent, and qualified president. And that certainly is not Trump. I'm grateful he makes that obvious.
I do think it would have been very hard to go up against him with a socialist though. Hillary will certainly have a better chance of winning than Sanders.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)to keep the establishment gravy train on a greased track.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I think it's time we stopped with the innuendo that is never accompanied by any facts whatsoever. Don't you?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)That's already clearly laid out in her personal and political history.
JohnnyLib2
(11,223 posts)Chaos just doesn't appeal.....