Create new account | My Profile | My Account | My Bookmarks | My Inbox | Help | Log in

Home Latest Threads Greatest Threads Forums & Groups My Subscriptions My Posts

DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Not Scientific, but...

Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:16 PM

Chasstev365 (5,191 posts)

Not Scientific, but...

I live in the Northwest Suburbs of Chicago; a fairly Republican area. I have seen several Bernie Sanders signs and NOT A SINGLE HILLARY CLINTON SIGN! I have no doubt people will vote for her on Tuesday, but it is clear there is a major enthusism gap. If she is the nominee in November, this should be very concerning.

5 replies, 1271 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

5 replies	Author	Time	Post
Not Scientific, but... (Original post)	Chasstev365	Mar 2016	OP
I wonder how many of the 600 workers who just lost their jobs at Nabisco will vote for her	PonyUp	Mar 2016	#1
A supposed enthusiasm gap, yet leading in the popular vote.	Metric System	Mar 2016	#2
Yard signs? Feh! Everyone knows that COUNTING BUMPER STICKERS ...	NurseJackie	Mar 2016	#3
Thanks Jackie!	Chasstev365	Mar 2016	#4
Ha! Congratulations! :-P	NurseJackie	Mar 2016	#5

Response to Chasstev365 (Original post)

Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:19 PM

PonyUp (1,680 posts)

1. I wonder how many of the 600 workers who just lost their jobs at Nabisco will vote for her

Thanks, ^N^A^F^T^A

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Chasstev365 (Original post)

Fri Mar 11, 2016, 11:19 PM

Metric System (6,048 posts)

2. A supposed enthusiasm gap, yet leading in the popular vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Chasstev365 (Original post)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:10 AM

NurseJackie (42,862 posts)

3. Yard signs? Feh! Everyone knows that COUNTING BUMPER STICKERS ...

... it's the only accurate way to predict a winner!

Go, Hillary!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to NurseJackie (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:27 AM

Chasstev365 (5,191 posts)

4. Thanks Jackie!

I'm starting to recognize the Hillary supporters who are blind to the fact Hillary is a majorly flawed candidate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Chasstev365 (Reply #4)

Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:36 AM

NurseJackie (42,862 posts)

5. Ha! Congratulations! :-P

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

2016 Postmortem (Forum)