Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:19 AM
FourScore (9,704 posts)
Hillary spoke 32% longer, moderators interrupted Bernie 150% more
Someone at reddit broke it down:
(I highlighted Bernie to make it easier to scan this and see who is who.) SPEAKING AND INTERRUPTION TOTALS (from 6:50 pm Pacific to end) Hillary total: 1409 sec or 23:29 | interrupted 10 times (not including clarification/follow-up) Bernie total: 1071 sec or 17:51 | interrupted 25 times (not including follow-ups) Started timing at 6:50 pm Pacific H - 1:40 uninterrupted H - 1:42 uninterrupted B - interrupted at 0:34, interrupted 0:40 (interrupted 5 times) | 1:30 total H - interrupted at 0:30 | 1:11 total B - interrupted at 0:15, and 0:30 seconds | 0:32 total H - interrupted at 0:20 | 0:30 total B - applause at 0:15, interrupted by mod at 25 seconds | 0:31 total H - (not her turn) Interrupted at 2 seconds, 5 seconds | 0:40 total B - (response to her response), interrupted at 10 seconds | 0:10 total H - interrupted at 1:40 for reiteration of question and applause | 3:08 total -- ignoring applause and mod questioning time B - (30 sec response), interrupted at 30 seconds and 35 seconds| 0:42 total COMMERCIAL B - Career politician question | 1:24 total H - Latino jobs, (but talked about Climate change?), interrupted at 1:33, 2:17 | 2:17 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:30 | 1:23 total B - ‘Free’ college (including his clarification up top), interrupted at 0:42 | 1:29 total H - Ph.D student/loans | 1:20 total B - Response (I said it before her) - whispers on mic on this question, interrupted at 0:42, 0:58 | 0:58 total H - Response (quote bailout quote got money), interrupted at 0:49 | 1:02 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:32 (by mods and Hillary) | 0:32 total H - Response | 0:49 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:42 | 0:45 total B - Climate change, interrupted at 0:52 | 1:29 total H - Climate change (bi-partisan specific), interrupted at 1:12 (by mods, Bernie told to speak) mod at 1:42 again | 2:00 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:42 | 0:42 total (not equal to Hill’s overtime like told) H - E. Warren question (also economy?), interrupted at 1:33 | 1:33 total B - name mentioned response, interrupted at 0:34, 0:41, 0:47 | 0:57 total COMMERCIAL H - Castro question | 1:39 total B - Cuba follow-up, interrupted at 0:35 | 0:35 total B - Castro video, interrupted at 1:19 (for follow-up question), 1:28, 2:08 | 2:08 total H - Puerto Rico debt (also an addition to BS’s video), | 1:33 total B - Response (overthrowing foreign gvmt/PR), int at 0:40 | 0:50 total H - (Supreme Court) | 1:19 total COMMERCIAL H - (Closing statement) | 1:06 total B - (Closing statement) | 1:14 total
|
44 replies, 173334 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
FourScore | Mar 2016 | OP |
Uncle Joe | Mar 2016 | #1 | |
SCantiGOP | Mar 2016 | #33 | |
Segami | Mar 2016 | #2 | |
litlbilly | Mar 2016 | #3 | |
JDPriestly | Mar 2016 | #20 | |
Bassomar | Mar 2016 | #21 | |
Cheese Sandwich | Mar 2016 | #4 | |
bravenak | Mar 2016 | #5 | |
lovemydog | Mar 2016 | #22 | |
bravenak | Mar 2016 | #28 | |
ljm2002 | Mar 2016 | #31 | |
kath | Mar 2016 | #38 | |
jpb33 | Mar 2016 | #6 | |
Frustratedlady | Mar 2016 | #29 | |
jpb33 | Mar 2016 | #7 | |
6chars | Mar 2016 | #8 | |
JDPriestly | Mar 2016 | #19 | |
hopemountain | Mar 2016 | #24 | |
BreakfastClub | Mar 2016 | #9 | |
Coincidence | Mar 2016 | #10 | |
kristopher | Mar 2016 | #12 | |
arikara | Mar 2016 | #32 | |
AzDar | Mar 2016 | #11 | |
6chars | Mar 2016 | #13 | |
renate | Mar 2016 | #14 | |
silvershadow | Mar 2016 | #15 | |
Geronimoe | Mar 2016 | #16 | |
dana_b | Mar 2016 | #17 | |
EmperorHasNoClothes | Mar 2016 | #27 | |
JDPriestly | Mar 2016 | #18 | |
billhicks76 | Mar 2016 | #23 | |
MrJefe | Mar 2016 | #25 | |
merrily | Mar 2016 | #26 | |
beaglelover | Mar 2016 | #30 | |
white_wolf | Mar 2016 | #39 | |
veronique25 | Mar 2016 | #34 | |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Mar 2016 | #35 | |
Karma13612 | Mar 2016 | #40 | |
donheld | Mar 2016 | #36 | |
olddots | Mar 2016 | #37 | |
www.ciafront.com | Mar 2016 | #43 | |
www.ciafront.com | Mar 2016 | #41 | |
FourScore | Mar 2016 | #42 | |
www.ciafront.com | Mar 2016 | #44 |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:21 AM
Uncle Joe (55,210 posts)
1. It was quite noticeable to me.
Thanks for the thread, FourScore.
|
Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #1)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:42 PM
SCantiGOP (13,123 posts)
33. anti-Sanders conspiracy #17,963
And all of them noted exclusively here on DU!
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:23 AM
Segami (14,923 posts)
2. Thanks.....The time-overruns for Hillary drove me crazy tonight
![]() ![]() |
Response to Segami (Reply #2)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:25 AM
litlbilly (2,227 posts)
3. she might have been better off talking alot less but probably not. Bernie crushed it tonight, best
ive ever seen him.
|
Response to litlbilly (Reply #3)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:38 AM
JDPriestly (57,936 posts)
20. I think she was trying to bait him into interrupting her.
She is so obnoxiously tricky.
Really not so likable. I hate to say that, but she just does not play fair and is arrogant and condescending seeming. |
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #20)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:51 AM
Bassomar (58 posts)
21. You might be correct
You might be correct on that. I don't get why she got so much time when she talking to the undocumented mother... it was like 3-4 minutes.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:26 AM
Cheese Sandwich (9,086 posts)
4. Hillary cheats by talking past her time limits, baiting Bernie into interrupting her
Response to bravenak (Reply #5)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:57 AM
lovemydog (11,833 posts)
22. Truly.
I laugh to keep from buggin' out.
|
Response to bravenak (Reply #5)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:31 AM
ljm2002 (10,751 posts)
31. Well do you have a different analysis?
This is a very simple analysis and does not depend upon what anyone said or what side they are on. How much time did each candidate have to speak, and how often were each of them interrupted by the moderators? Either Hillary got more time than Bernie, or not. Either Bernie was interrupted more often than Hillary, or not.
If you believe the OP is factually inaccurate you are, of course, welcome to demonstrate that by showing your own analysis. Somehow I don't think you're up to it. |
Response to ljm2002 (Reply #31)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 01:06 AM
kath (10,565 posts)
38. Crickets from her.
For 14+ hours. What a surprise!
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:31 AM
jpb33 (141 posts)
6. True
The moderators were rude and disrespectful. They would raise their voice if Bernie spoke just a few seconds past his time. It was an awful performance for the moderators, just plain terrible. They came off as rude and arrogant. They behaved as if the people at home and in the audience was there to see them.
|
Response to jpb33 (Reply #6)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 09:07 AM
Frustratedlady (16,252 posts)
29. Amen! I thought it was just me who felt that way.
I left the debate after half an hour or so, as I couldn't tolerate the rudeness and arrogance of the moderators. With Bernie, it seemed to be that they were on a "gotcha" search. I thought it was one of the worst debates I'd seen on either side...and, that's goin' some.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:33 AM
jpb33 (141 posts)
7. Maybe
It would not hurt him if he did a Ted Cruz and put the moderators in their place from time to time. It usually works too.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:41 AM
6chars (3,967 posts)
8. did bernie ask her to "let me speak" this time?
Response to 6chars (Reply #8)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:36 AM
JDPriestly (57,936 posts)
19. I think she said to him, "I'm talking" or something to that effect.
She was allowed to go on and on, and the moderators cut Bernie short all the time.
I noticed the difference right away. It was quite striking if you are a person who relies on hearing more than on vision. |
Response to 6chars (Reply #8)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:07 AM
hopemountain (3,919 posts)
24. at one point he did say to the moderators
"i'd like to speak as long as she did" or something to this effect. and ramos replied "okay". lol.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:47 AM
BreakfastClub (765 posts)
9. Eh, I could easily claim the opposite and make up some numbers too. nt
Response to BreakfastClub (Reply #9)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 03:05 AM
Coincidence (98 posts)
10. Yep, you would be quickly debunked but you are correct, you could easily make any claim you want.
Apparently you didn't know this, but you can go watch the debate again at anytime, no seriously you could watch it right now if you wanted to. You could have even fact-checked the OP's numbers yourself, just think if you had bothered to do that then you wouldn't have ended up making this idiotic post and embarrassing yourself. Maybe think about it going forward.
|
Response to Coincidence (Reply #10)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 03:34 AM
kristopher (29,798 posts)
12. You are aware that embarrassment requires a sense of shame?
Not all people have that in all situations.
|
Response to BreakfastClub (Reply #9)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:32 PM
arikara (5,562 posts)
32. Not if you actually watched the debate and were honest about it
It was obvious that they gave her way more time and kept interrupting Bernie.
Not that it really matters as he won it anyhow. |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 03:07 AM
AzDar (14,023 posts)
11. It was SO obvious... and infuriating.
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 03:41 AM
6chars (3,967 posts)
13. here is the transcript
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/us/politics/transcript-democratic-presidential-debate.html
I wonder what the ratio of words spoken by each candidate is. Anyone have the skills to figure that out? |
Response to 6chars (Reply #13)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 03:45 AM
renate (13,770 posts)
14. well, I'm going to bed in a few minutes, but
I'd think cutting and pasting the transcript in a Word document, and then highlighting each person's answers, using whatever tool it is these days (I have an old version) to do a word count, and then adding it up would be pretty simple.
I'm certainly not suggesting that you or anybody here do it, because it would be time-consuming, but a journalist who was getting paid to do so would probably find it pretty trivial. If they were interested in doing so, of course. |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:15 AM
silvershadow (10,336 posts)
15. Corporate must be feeling the Bern, too...They're trying to put out a fire. nt
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:24 AM
Geronimoe (1,539 posts)
16. It likely backfired
The more Hillary talks, the more she sounds like a lawyer/politician.
Hillary is proud of her vote for Tarp II. I wish Bernie would say he voted against it because it was trickle down economics on steroids. That never helps working families A fair amount of the money was invested overseas by the bankers. |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:26 AM
dana_b (11,546 posts)
17. yep! She did and they did:
![]() |
Response to dana_b (Reply #17)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 06:32 AM
EmperorHasNoClothes (4,797 posts)
27. HAH!
That's perfect.
![]() |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 04:31 AM
JDPriestly (57,936 posts)
18. Just what I thought!
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:06 AM
billhicks76 (5,082 posts)
23. Guess What>>>CNN Burying Debate
The last 2 debates have been removed from CNN OnDemand. Every other show its up in one day and stays for the year. More BS.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:23 AM
MrJefe (7 posts)
25. She took more time and it was not to her advantage
More is not always better. There were many instances where I do not think she helped her self by speaking more. She was off tonight, I thought Bernie was much stronger, as usual. Her lies about Bernie are not going over well, IMO. She was right about not being a natural politician though, and whatever advice she is getting does not seem to be helping.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 05:28 AM
merrily (45,251 posts)
26. No end to the media bs. None!
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 10:07 AM
beaglelover (3,007 posts)
30. Hillary got much tougher questions than Bernie. And she still came out on top!
Hillary will be the D nominee in November.
|
Response to beaglelover (Reply #30)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 01:13 AM
white_wolf (6,238 posts)
39. And Trump will be president.
Face it, Hillary is a weak candidate and Trump will beat her. I'll vote for her because she'll continue our nation's march toward the right, but Trump will turn that march into a sprint.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 02:52 PM
veronique25 (74 posts)
34. french election debates have timers onscreen!
in french election debates, the viewers see a running minute-count on the screen by each candidate
"Mankind born free, yet everywhere in chains." -- Jean-Jacques Rousseau |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 03:07 PM
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (5,252 posts)
35. Some of that's stylistic. Hillary starts talking before she knows which side of an issue she wants
to fall on, forever equivocating. Bernie can actually say "Yes", "No", "I'm for it", and "I'm against it."
|
Response to WhaTHellsgoingonhere (Reply #35)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 07:32 AM
Karma13612 (4,295 posts)
40. Very true!!! It takes longer to answer when you are trying
To avoid answering, or to defend your unpopular position on something.
|
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 09:08 PM
donheld (21,287 posts)
36. But Bernie got the standing ovation!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 09:13 PM
olddots (10,237 posts)
37. whats NPR ?
oh that station from the 70s that had the Fire Sign Theater .......
|
Response to olddots (Reply #37)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 04:39 PM
www.ciafront.com (13 posts)
43. Koch Light
Response to FourScore (Original post)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 04:33 PM
www.ciafront.com (13 posts)
41. You should see how Sanders is omitted from the latest WaPo - ABC News poll...
The first link is a brief analysis I made of the blackout on Sanders on facebook. You should be able to load this link and look at the comments:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10205854923283268&set=a.1116940294727.2017711.1563580074&type=3&theater Here is the actual poll location: http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-national-poll-march-3-6-2016/1982/ Sanders data is only listed seven times. Clinton data is listed 25 times. |
Response to www.ciafront.com (Reply #41)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 04:39 PM
FourScore (9,704 posts)
42. ciafront, you should post this in an OP .
It's shocking. Really.
Welcome to DU!!! ![]() |
Response to FourScore (Reply #42)
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 09:08 PM
www.ciafront.com (13 posts)
44. Thank you I shall consider it
![]() |