2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSick and tired of the BS
"Excuse me, I was talking"????? Are you kidding me? That BS is to take the focus off the REAL issues. Where the hell is the outrage over NOT releasing the contents of THAT speech? That would be a game changer and we all know it. That arrogant look on her face when she refused says it all. Where the hell is investigative journalism? Damn media bullshit is what it is!

Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... is to start a new thread on the topic.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
dana_b
(11,546 posts)
I eventually just turn off the MSM and, frankly, some people here and work on other things.
Phone bank maybe? I find talking to actual people on a 1:1 basis is better.
Or maybe go for a walk, listen to music, etc.

saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)It was a conversation, not the usual Clinton check list or opinion poll. Come to think of it, I really don't hear that often from the Clinton campaign, not since I made my first donation to Senator Sanders on ActBlue.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Going for a workout at the gym today. Listening to music is a great way for me to get in a better mood, also.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)makes sure they don't call back
corkhead
(6,119 posts)I know first hand.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)And now I'm pissed off again.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:01 PM - Edit history (1)
is not interested in dialogue. There are responses that counter the inflammatory OP but the author has already moved on to post another inflammatory bullshit rw talking point. I wait for a response to my comment from the hit and run poster and then I put them on ignore.
I think they just post shit to get it out there. They don't care if some people put them on ignore because not everyone does so they are successfully catapulting the propaganda to everyone else. They don't seem to be interested in a discussion so they aren't worth my time.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)eom
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)It's still out there, potentially unaddressed, to be found by people who might take it as true.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)and move on to post another bullshit OP without responding to any of the replies, they aren't interested in what I or anyone else has to say anyway. I wish I had more time and patience to play whack-a-mole with the repeat offending trolls but I don't. Many of them hide behind the skirt of their protected group where I can't reply without a hide or being locked out.
I guess I am leaving it to others to do that dirty work with the obnoxious ones on my ignore list.
Buns_of_Fire
(18,229 posts)It has made all the difference. And even though my list is probably shorter than many here (around fifteen, give or take), I immediately found that fortifying myself with mass quantities was no longer necessary.
Will they be there forever? Probably not. But I'll wait until November and burn that bridge when I get to it.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)I wasn't bothered by anyone enough since to use the ignore feature until the primary season heated up again. Funny thing is, the rate of recidivism is noticeably high because I recognize many of the same obnoxious characters from 8 years ago.
They must hibernate between election seasons because I don't recall seeing them when it wasn't primary season. I find that curious. I will let them all out again once the nominee is determined and most likely I won't hear from them again until the next primary season.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Attended one of her speeches. It was 45 minutes of how to help global poverty by giving access to capital for underserved communities here in the US and places like sub-saharan Africa where they are perpetually in poverty due to no access to capital.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Goldman-Sachs remaining financially very profitable because their Father is employed by them? So we're to believe she'll do anything that could work against the financial future of her own grandchildren?
oh and nice story there
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)still any attempt to rein in Goldman works against the interests of her own family
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)people with money teaching others how that money can be used to serve the undeserved......



Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)If true, there is no reason not to release the transcripts, as they would only enhance her credibility and respectability.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)She hands over 5, they'll want 10. She gives 10, they ask for more.
No need for her to sink to the desperation of a flailing campaign looking for a life raft in order to appease them.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Embarrassingly weak excuse you're peddling there.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and all the others. You'll never be satisfied, that much is glaringly obvious. I hope she doesn't jump through meaningless hoops for those who will just demand she jumps through a dozen more. Waste of time.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)You don't know me. You don't know what it requires to satisfy me on this, so don't project a lie onto me and others to cover Hillary's ass.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)If that is what she said that speech would have been made public months ago.
flor-de-jasmim
(2,192 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)"Elect me president and I will make sure you multi millionaires pay less taxes"
or
"Elect me president and I will make it easier for you to scam the public"
It is far more likely she gives speeches about exactly what your cousin said. Which is why I dont understand why she doesn't release the transcripts.
Even if Hillary Clinton was a bought and paid for corporate or wall street person, there is no way she gives speeches admitting it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)What you highlight is actually a grain of sand with respect to the beach when it comes to discussion.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Don't expect corporations to do a thing for the people.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)which is why they should not be considered people.
Highway61
(2,578 posts)She is what a republican USED to be....many moons ago. Now we have nutcases.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Just a few words and phrased used "shrill, witch, take her out behind the woodshed, Chelsea being pimped out. whore," etc. Print media was even worse.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)...saying you're sick and tired of BS can be misconstrued as saying you'll vote for Trump these days.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511418421
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Confuse and distract from all the CRAP that she is involved in...never talk issues.
She is an absolute MESS and not Presidential material.
NO More Clintons EVER.
Response to Highway61 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NRaleighLiberal
(61,030 posts)Response to NRaleighLiberal (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)






StandingInLeftField
(972 posts)It only took two days to make my ignore list!
Congrats, and welcome to DU!
Response to StandingInLeftField (Reply #32)
Name removed Message auto-removed
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)when someone doesn't agree with them.
olddots
(10,237 posts)
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Response to Fuddnik (Reply #49)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Plenty of people heard those speeches, and a good investigative journalist (an oxymoron in this day and age) could track any number of them down and ask them to describe what she said. It isn't brain surgery. There may or may not be a good story there depending on the content of the speeches. But if she continues to stonewall, it's a safe bet she doesn't want the general public to know. I hope some journalist with a smidgen of integrity eventually steps up to the plate, digs deep, and sheds light on what she was paid millions for.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)and if so and GFB Hillary wins the nomination thats when the shit hits the fan.
But hopefully she is not the nominee..
Response to Highway61 (Original post)
Post removed
navarth
(5,927 posts)just so you know.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)
zentrum
(9,866 posts)
she gave speeches to (most of them) are on the same page and don't want the corruption underlying our political system to be exposed. They'll all at the same dinner parties and hoping to marry their kids into each other's families.
Read Jane Meyers article on the Kochs in the New Yorker, or Lee Fang on the Intercept, and others, for real that good old time investigative journalism.
Response to Highway61 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Out, blasted spot!!!!!
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Let's be calm and see the primaries play out. Until then, off to the ignore list with you. Enjoy the company of both Hillary and Bernie supporters there who also had issues with being able to handle the primary forum. See you in November.