Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:22 PM Mar 2016

What A Pregnant Woman Learned from the Clinton Toxic Waste Incincerator False Promises

Terri Swearingen
acceptance speech for the Goldman Environmental Prize, April 14, 1997

I am not a scientist or a Ph.D. I am a nurse and a housewife, but my most important credential is that I am a mother. In 1982, I was pregnant with our one and only child. That's when I first learned of plans to build one of the world's largest toxic waste incinerators in my community. When they began site preparation to begin building the incinerator in 1990, my life changed forever. I'd like to share with you some of the lessons I have learned from my experiences over the past seven years.

FIRST THING

One of the main lessons I have learned from the WTI experience is that we are losing our democracy. How have I come to this sad realization? Democracy is defined by Merriam Webster as "government by the people, especially rule of the majority," and "the common people constituting the source of political authority." The definition of democracy no longer fits with the reality of what is happening in East Liverpool, Ohio. For one thing, it is on the record that the majority of people in the Ohio Valley do not want the WTI hazardous waste incinerator in their area, and they have been opposed to the project from its inception. Some of our elected officials have tried to help us, but the forces arrayed against us have been stronger than we or they had imagined. Public concerns and protests have been smothered with meaningless public hearings, voodoo risk assessment and slick legal maneuvering.

Government agencies that were set up to protect public health and the environment only do their job if it does not conflict with corporate interests.

SECOND THING

The second lesson I have learned ties directly to the first, and that is that corporations can control the highest office in the land. When Bill Clinton and Al Gore came to the Ohio Valley, they called the siting of the WTI hazardous waste incinerator next door to a 400 student elementary school, in the middle of an impoverished Appalachian neighborhood, immediately on the bank of the Ohio River in a flood plain an "UNBELIEVABLE IDEA." They said we ought to have control over where these things are located. They even went so far as to say they would stop it. But then they didn't! What has been revealed in all this is that there are forces running this country that are far more powerful than the President and the Vice President. This country trumpets to the world how democratic it is, but it's funny that I come from a community that our President dare not visit because he cannot witness first hand the injustice which he has allowed in the interest of a multinational corporation, Von Roll of Switzerland. And the Union Bank of Switzerland. And Jackson Stephens, a private investment banker from Arkansas. These forces are far more relevant to our little town than the President of the United States! And he is the one who made it that way. He has chosen that path. We didn't choose it for him.

THIRD THING

The third thing that I have learned from this situation, which ties in with the first two, is that we have to reappraise what expertise is and who qualifies as an expert. There are two kinds of experts. There are the experts who are working in the corporate interest, who often serve to obscure the obvious and challenge common sense; and there are experts and non-experts who are working in the public interest. From my experience, I am distrusting more and more the professional experts, not because they are not clever, but because they do not ask the right questions. And that's the difference between being clever and being wise. Einstein said, "A clever person solves a problem; a wise person avoids it." This lesson is extremely relevant to the nation, and to other countries as well, especially in developing economies. We have learned that the difference between being clever and being wise is the difference between working at the front end of the problem or working at the back end. Government that truly represents the best interest of its people must not be seduced by corporations that work at the back end of the problem with chemicals, pesticides, incinerators, air pollution control equipment, etc.

The corporate value system is threatening our health, our planet and our very existence. As my good friend, Dr. Paul Connett, says "WE ARE LIVING ON THIS PLANET AS IF WE HAD ANOTHER ONE TO GO TO."

RECOMMEND YOU READ MORE AT THE LINK. Follow the Money....

http://www.oilempire.us/wti.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What A Pregnant Woman Learned from the Clinton Toxic Waste Incincerator False Promises (Original Post) Skwmom Mar 2016 OP
Hey -- thanks for responding to my comments in your SECOND thread on this subject earlier today. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #1
This is an excellent thing to post. And it gives one pause. truedelphi Mar 2016 #2
This is an example of what money buys. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #4
K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #3
Umm...once again. Hillary was not President then and had no votes on this??? Jitter65 Mar 2016 #5
Only she was married to Bill at the time. truedelphi Mar 2016 #8
It is the Clinton way of doing business. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #9
Exactly. But not confined to the Clintons. truedelphi Mar 2016 #10
I'll just say this. Jitter65 Mar 2016 #6
Not comparable. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #7

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
2. This is an excellent thing to post. And it gives one pause.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 06:46 PM
Mar 2016

There is no way that having another Clinton in the WH will help us. We are gobsmacked by the way the Corporations rule over us.

Simply gobsmacked.


truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
8. Only she was married to Bill at the time.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 09:25 PM
Mar 2016

I find that it is only Democratic First Ladies who don't have their husbands sleeping on the couch if they screw up the environment, or enable big contributors to do so..

Every environmental group I have been in has had more than its share of women. And none of us would allow bedroom respite to spouses who favored Monsanto over conventional crops, allowed for big polluting and all the rest of it.

Of course, back in the 1980's Mrs Clinton was probably too busy assisting Sam Walton of WalMart in his ventures to know what was going on.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
10. Exactly. But not confined to the Clintons.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:00 PM
Mar 2016

In May of 2009, why was Michelle Obama assigned her PR mission of planting an organic garden at the WH, at the same damn time her husband was appointing the Monsanto execs to positions of authority inside the nation's FDA?


These neo cons have to go!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What A Pregnant Woman Lea...